search
Back to results

Outcome of SBO With Calcium Silicate Sealer vs WVC With Resin Based Sealer

Primary Purpose

Root Canal Obturation, Root Canal Filling, Sealer-based Obturation

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Kuwait
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TotalFill Bioceramic Sealer
AH+ Sealer
Sponsored by
Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Root Canal Obturation

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - 65 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have a classification of I or II on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system
  • Participants must not have known allergies to any materials used in the study
  • Participants must agree to participate in the study by signing a consent form
  • All types of permanent teeth are included (incisors, canines, premolars & molars)
  • The teeth must be restorable and have fully formed roots with no advanced periodontal disease
  • In the event that a patient has more than 1 tooth eligible for the study, only one tooth on the left and/or right side of the mouth will be selected at random. A maximum of 2 teeth per participant can be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classification of III or more
  • Pregnant women
  • Advanced periodontal disease or teeth with more than 5mm probing
  • Teeth with incomplete root formation or root resorption
  • Teeth with adjacent teeth that require RCT
  • Previously root canal treated teeth
  • Teeth with a history of trauma
  • Teeth that have poor restorative prognosis
  • Teeth requiring extensive prosthodontic rehabilitation
  • Cracked teeth

Sites / Locations

  • Specialized Dental Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

SBO with calcium silicate sealer

WVC with resin based sealer

Arm Description

The teeth will be obturated with the single cone technique and BC sealer

The teeth will be obturated with warm vertical compaction and AH+ sealer

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Assessment of radiographic healing with periapical (PA) radiographs using Orstavik's PAI
Proportion t-test will be carried to compare the proportion of study subjects with improved apical lesion size between the two treatment groups. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval will be reported. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for the stratification variables (gender) and other confounding factors (namely patency, extrusion of sealer or GP, short fill, voids, pre-op apical size, pre-op clinical symptoms and number of C&S visits). Orstavik's periapical index (PAI) will be used as the outcome measure
Assessment of radiographic healing with Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using Estrela's PAI based on CBCT
Proportion t-test will be carried to compare the proportion of study subjects with improved apical lesion size between the two treatment groups. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval will be reported. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for the stratification variables (gender) and other confounding factors (namely patency, extrusion of sealer or GP, short fill, voids, pre-op apical size, pre-op clinical symptoms and number of C&S visits). Estrela's (periapical index) PAI based on CBCT will be used as outcome measure
Assessment of clinical outcome by assessing the resolution/persistence/development of clinical signs and symptoms
The examiner will label the teeth as having a normal clinical outcome (absence of pain, swelling and other symptoms, no sinus tract, no loss of function) or showing signs and symptoms clinical outcome (The tooth is associated with signs and/or symptoms of infection)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison of the postoperative pain score
11 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be used. The participants will be given an NRS sheet to complete. They will be asked to choose a number between 0 'No Pain' and 10 'Worst imaginable pain' that best represents your pain intensity.
Comparison of the time required to complete obturation between the 2 groups

Full Information

First Posted
January 26, 2021
Last Updated
June 30, 2023
Sponsor
Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04753138
Brief Title
Outcome of SBO With Calcium Silicate Sealer vs WVC With Resin Based Sealer
Official Title
The Outcome of Non-surgical Root Canal Treatment Using the Sealer-based With Calcium Silicate Sealer vs. Warm Vertical Compaction With AH+ Sealer. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 24, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, Kuwait, Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A single blinded randomized controlled trial. 212 subjects (teeth), 106 in each of the 2 groups will be recruited from the patients referred to Kuwait Board of Endodontics for primary root canal treatment. The aim is to compare the outcome of sealer-based obturation (SBO) with calcium silicate sealer versus warm vertical compaction (WVC) and resin based sealer. Preoperative PA radiograph and CBCT will be taken. A 1 year follow up period will be arranged and another PA radiograph and CBCT will be taken. The preoperative, postoperative and review clinical and radiographic data will be analyzed
Detailed Description
Aims and Objectives To compare the clinical outcome of the SBO with WVC in non-surgical root canal treatment. To compare the radiographic outcome of the SBO with WVC in non-surgical root canal treatment using periapical radiographs and CBCT scans. To assess the difference in postoperative pain between the 2 groups. To assess the difference in the time required to complete the obturation between the 2 groups. Materials and Methods Patients who are referred to the Kuwait Board of Endodontics for non-surgical root canal treatment and fulfil the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study will be included Pre-operative periapical radiograph, CBCT scan and 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be taken. Upon completion of root canal instrumentation, the participants will be randomly allocated to either Group A: obturation using SCCS or Group B: obturation using WVC. The participants will be blinded to the type of treatment received and the clinician will only be informed of the obturation method once the canal/canals are ready for obturation. All teeth will then be restored definitively. The participants will be contacted via telephone 1, 3 and 7 days post-treatment to report their NRS pain score. The participants will be recalled after 1 year for clinical and radiographic assessment using periapical radiograph and CBCT scan. The participants will then be followed-up annually for up to 4 years. Statistical analysis will be performed. The design of the study will conform to the CONSORT statement. Statistical and Analytical Plans Sample size estimation for the treatment outcome was performed using PASS 2019 computer software, utilizing information from previous studies on healing outcome after initial endodontic therapy. For a two independent-samples t-test of proportions, at power of 80% and 5% significance level for two-tailed test, detecting a 10% difference of healing rate required a sample size of 148 teeth. Adjusting for a dropout rate of 30%, the required sample size was 212 teeth. The slightly high 30% dropout rate is anticipated because most of the patients we treat are non-Kuwaiti nationals and their presence in the country after 1 year is not guaranteed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Root Canal Obturation, Root Canal Filling, Sealer-based Obturation, Randomized Clinical Trial, Postoperative Pain, Resin Based Sealer, Warm Vertical Compaction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Permuted block randomization (of block size = only known to statistician) will be used to randomly select 212 subjects (106 subjects in each group). Statistical software (NCSS, LLC© ver. 2020) will be utilized to generate the randomization list and subjects will be assigned to the selected treatment group accordingly.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants will be blinded to the type of treatment they receive to reduce bias in the reporting of postoperative pain. Since it is not possible to blind the care providers, they will only be informed of the type of treatment once full chemo-mechanical debridement has been completed and the tooth is ready to be obturated. This would reduce care provider bias. Assessors will be blinded to the treatment option to reduce bias during the assessment of healing.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
212 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SBO with calcium silicate sealer
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The teeth will be obturated with the single cone technique and BC sealer
Arm Title
WVC with resin based sealer
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The teeth will be obturated with warm vertical compaction and AH+ sealer
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
TotalFill Bioceramic Sealer
Intervention Description
It will be used in conjunction with TotalFill® bioceramic impregnated gutta percha points for the obturation of root canals. It is dispensed through a fine disposable syringe into the root canals during obturation.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AH+ Sealer
Intervention Description
It consists of 2 pastes that are mixed together in equal amounts before it is used in conjunction with gutta percha points for obturation during root canal treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of radiographic healing with periapical (PA) radiographs using Orstavik's PAI
Description
Proportion t-test will be carried to compare the proportion of study subjects with improved apical lesion size between the two treatment groups. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval will be reported. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for the stratification variables (gender) and other confounding factors (namely patency, extrusion of sealer or GP, short fill, voids, pre-op apical size, pre-op clinical symptoms and number of C&S visits). Orstavik's periapical index (PAI) will be used as the outcome measure
Time Frame
Comparison of of periapical lesion size at baseline and 12 months
Title
Assessment of radiographic healing with Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using Estrela's PAI based on CBCT
Description
Proportion t-test will be carried to compare the proportion of study subjects with improved apical lesion size between the two treatment groups. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval will be reported. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for the stratification variables (gender) and other confounding factors (namely patency, extrusion of sealer or GP, short fill, voids, pre-op apical size, pre-op clinical symptoms and number of C&S visits). Estrela's (periapical index) PAI based on CBCT will be used as outcome measure
Time Frame
Comparison of of periapical lesion size at baseline and 12 months
Title
Assessment of clinical outcome by assessing the resolution/persistence/development of clinical signs and symptoms
Description
The examiner will label the teeth as having a normal clinical outcome (absence of pain, swelling and other symptoms, no sinus tract, no loss of function) or showing signs and symptoms clinical outcome (The tooth is associated with signs and/or symptoms of infection)
Time Frame
Comparison at baseline and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of the postoperative pain score
Description
11 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be used. The participants will be given an NRS sheet to complete. They will be asked to choose a number between 0 'No Pain' and 10 'Worst imaginable pain' that best represents your pain intensity.
Time Frame
1, 3 and 7 days postoperatively
Title
Comparison of the time required to complete obturation between the 2 groups
Time Frame
Intra-operatively

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants must have a classification of I or II on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system Participants must not have known allergies to any materials used in the study Participants must agree to participate in the study by signing a consent form All types of permanent teeth are included (incisors, canines, premolars & molars) The teeth must be restorable and have fully formed roots with no advanced periodontal disease In the event that a patient has more than 1 tooth eligible for the study, only one tooth on the left and/or right side of the mouth will be selected at random. A maximum of 2 teeth per participant can be included in the study Exclusion Criteria: ASA classification of III or more Pregnant women Advanced periodontal disease or teeth with more than 5mm probing Teeth with incomplete root formation or root resorption Teeth with adjacent teeth that require RCT Previously root canal treated teeth Teeth with a history of trauma Teeth that have poor restorative prognosis Teeth requiring extensive prosthodontic rehabilitation Cracked teeth
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fahad Alzoubi, M.Endo
Organizational Affiliation
Kuwait Board of Endodontics
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Specialized Dental Center
City
Kuwait
Country
Kuwait

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Outcome of SBO With Calcium Silicate Sealer vs WVC With Resin Based Sealer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs