search
Back to results

Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain (AuriMod)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Low-back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
AuriMod CT01_A
AuriMod CT01_B
AuriMod CT01_C
Sponsored by
Aurimod GmbH
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Low-back Pain focused on measuring Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Personalization, Therapy Management

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 to 65 years at screening
  • Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures
  • Chronic back pain with or without leg pain (CBLP) persisting for at least 3 months
  • A minimum of 70 (out of 180) points on the Computer User Self-Efficacy Scale at the screening visit
  • Patient is constant with respect to pain treatment during the screening phase
  • A daily average VAS >= 4 on at least half of the days in the screening phase
  • Compliance with the daily status reporting requirements as demonstrated by having valid required data entries for all days. It is acceptable if data of one day is missing in the screening phase

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with age under 18
  • Hemophilia
  • Infection, eczema, or psoriasis at application site
  • Numbed and desensitized skin at the application site
  • Florid malignant diseases
  • Mental and physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device
  • The presence of a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, or other active implantable device
  • Vagal hypersensitivity
  • Indication for back surgery
  • High-grade spinal stenosis
  • Patients with other active implants
  • Patients with autonomic disorders
  • Patients with diabetes type I or II
  • Patients taking Beta-Blockers
  • Patients taking drugs carrying the potential risk of arrhythmia (tricyclic medications, Alzheimer drugs, etc.)
  • Clinically significant hip or knee arthritis
  • Allergy against rescue medication used during the study
  • History of Vagus Nerve Stimulation
  • Pregnant or nursing female patients
  • Patients with arrhythmia, bradycardia, other rhythm disorders or any other clinically significant cardiac anomalies detected during ECG at screening

Sites / Locations

  • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
  • Hopital de La Tour

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group A

Group B

Group C

Arm Description

Personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude

Personalized stimulation amplitude

Non-personalized stimulation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Average VAS
Change from baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain) during the last 24 hours before the visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Max/Min VAS
Change from baseline to EoT in max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Average/Max/Min VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Change from baseline to End of Follow-Up in average/max/min VAS
Normalized average/max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Baseline-adjusted area under the max/min/average VAS from baseline to EoT
VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
VAS during follow-up
Medication use
Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase
Heart Rate
Change in heart rate over therapy and follow-up
Heart Rate Variability
Change in heart rate variability over therapy and follow-up
Blood Pressure
Change in blood pressure over therapy and follow-up
Patient motility
Change in daily step count over therapy and follow-up
painDETECT
painDETECT questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
HADS
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) over treatment and follow-up
Sleep quality
Sleep quality (5-item questionnaire) over treatment and follow-up
Wellbeing
Subjective wellbeing (on a 3-point ordinal scale: good, medium, bad)
Perception Scale
AuriMod CT01 Perception Scale evaluating the quality of stimulation perception in a 10-item questionnaire at EoT
Usability Scale
AuriMod CT01 Usability scoring using the System Usability Scale (10-item scale from 10-50, 10...worst usability, 50...best usability) at EoT
Socioeconomic data
Socioeconomic data change over treatment and follow-up

Full Information

First Posted
January 27, 2021
Last Updated
January 30, 2023
Sponsor
Aurimod GmbH
Collaborators
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, La Tour Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04753528
Brief Title
Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain
Acronym
AuriMod
Official Title
Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 13, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 25, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 25, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Aurimod GmbH
Collaborators
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, La Tour Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
One in five people in the general adult population suffer from chronic pain, a figure that is higher than heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined. A majority of these patients is suffering from chronic back pain. Conventional treatment options offer only a partial response, with many people continuing to suffer severe chronic pain, despite receiving several treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments by neuromodulation represent a promising treatment modality for these patients. For instance, spinal cord stimulation blocks pain signals travelling to the brain, but requires implantation near the spine with significant clinical risks. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is another neuromodulation modality proposed to alleviate chronic pain. Conventional VNS devices are implanted under the skin on the chest and the electrodes are wired to the left vagus nerve in the neck. However, aside from implantation risks, VNS is often associated with side effects such as swallowing difficulties, due to unwanted stimulation of motoric vagus nerve branches in the neck. Percutaneous auricular VNS (pVNS) is an emerging technology for stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve in the pinna of the ear. Specific electrical impulses are applied via three miniature needle electrodes located in the auricle near sensory vagus nerve fibers. Scientific data show that pVNS modulates brain circuits involved in autonomic control and pain processing. pVNS has shown positive effects in chronic low-back pain patients, in a sustainable way with a low side-effect profile. However, the optimal settings of stimulation with regards to personalization remain to be elucidated. The present prospective, open, randomized, controlled pilot study aims at evaluating the performance of pVNS treatment, using a small wearable stimulation device (AuriMod CT01), comparing personalized and non-personalized stimulation paradigms in patients with chronic low-back pain. Patients will be randomized in one of the following treatment groups (1) Group A: Stimulation with personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude, (2) Group B: Stimulation with personalized stimulation amplitude, (3) Group C: Stimulation without personalization (comparator group). Patients will be treated for 8 weeks. Patients will receive standardized pain medication including rescue medication in parallel. An additional follow-up period of 12 weeks allows to evaluate sustainable and late-time effects of treatment. Patients will use a therapy management system to monitor outcome.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Low-back Pain
Keywords
Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Personalization, Therapy Management

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
43 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Personalized stimulation amplitude
Arm Title
Group C
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Non-personalized stimulation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AuriMod CT01_A
Intervention Description
AuriMod CT01 is a wearable medical device for personalised pain treatment through auricular vagus nerve stimulation. AuriMod CT01 is a battery-operated electrical stimulation device, to be placed behind the ear on the neck. AuriMod CT01 connects to three needle electrodes, which are placed in vagally innervated regions of the auricle. It emits electrical signals with a personalized set of stimulation parameters and adjustable amplitude.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AuriMod CT01_B
Intervention Description
AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and adjustable stimulation amplitude.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AuriMod CT01_C
Intervention Description
AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and amplitude.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average VAS
Description
Change from baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain) during the last 24 hours before the visit
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Max/Min VAS
Description
Change from baseline to EoT in max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Average/Max/Min VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Description
Change from baseline to End of Follow-Up in average/max/min VAS
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Normalized average/max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Description
Baseline-adjusted area under the max/min/average VAS from baseline to EoT
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Description
VAS during follow-up
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Medication use
Description
Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Heart Rate
Description
Change in heart rate over therapy and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Heart Rate Variability
Description
Change in heart rate variability over therapy and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Blood Pressure
Description
Change in blood pressure over therapy and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Patient motility
Description
Change in daily step count over therapy and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
painDETECT
Description
painDETECT questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
EQ-5D-5L
Description
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
HADS
Description
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) over treatment and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Sleep quality
Description
Sleep quality (5-item questionnaire) over treatment and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Wellbeing
Description
Subjective wellbeing (on a 3-point ordinal scale: good, medium, bad)
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Perception Scale
Description
AuriMod CT01 Perception Scale evaluating the quality of stimulation perception in a 10-item questionnaire at EoT
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Usability Scale
Description
AuriMod CT01 Usability scoring using the System Usability Scale (10-item scale from 10-50, 10...worst usability, 50...best usability) at EoT
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Socioeconomic data
Description
Socioeconomic data change over treatment and follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Safety Outcome 1
Description
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Device Deficiencies (DDs) observed until EoT
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Safety Outcome 2
Description
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and related AEs observed until end of follow-up
Time Frame
20 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female aged 18 to 65 years at screening Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures Chronic back pain with or without leg pain (CBLP) persisting for at least 3 months A minimum of 70 (out of 180) points on the Computer User Self-Efficacy Scale at the screening visit Patient is constant with respect to pain treatment during the screening phase A daily average VAS >= 4 on at least half of the days in the screening phase Compliance with the daily status reporting requirements as demonstrated by having valid required data entries for all days. It is acceptable if data of one day is missing in the screening phase Exclusion Criteria: Patients with age under 18 Hemophilia Infection, eczema, or psoriasis at application site Numbed and desensitized skin at the application site Florid malignant diseases Mental and physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device The presence of a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, or other active implantable device Vagal hypersensitivity Indication for back surgery High-grade spinal stenosis Patients with other active implants Patients with autonomic disorders Patients with diabetes type I or II Patients taking Beta-Blockers Patients taking drugs carrying the potential risk of arrhythmia (tricyclic medications, Alzheimer drugs, etc.) Clinically significant hip or knee arthritis Allergy against rescue medication used during the study History of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Pregnant or nursing female patients Patients with arrhythmia, bradycardia, other rhythm disorders or any other clinically significant cardiac anomalies detected during ECG at screening
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rudolf Likar, Univ.-Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschingstrasse 11, 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe Perruchoud, PD Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Clinique de la Douleur, Hopital de La Tour, Avenue Jacob-Daniel Maillard 3, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
City
Klagenfurt
State/Province
Carinthia
ZIP/Postal Code
9020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Hopital de La Tour
City
Geneva
ZIP/Postal Code
1217
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs