search
Back to results

Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.

Primary Purpose

Urologic Diseases, Urological System Complication of Procedure

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intraureteral stent
Conventional Double-J stent
Sponsored by
University of Louisville
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Urologic Diseases focused on measuring urology, ureteral stent

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 100 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Those undergoing ureteral stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Intraureteral stent group

    Conventional Double-J stent

    Arm Description

    Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of an intraureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in only in the kidney and NOT in the bladder. This group will be the experimental group.

    Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of a double-J ureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in both the kidney and the bladder. This group will serve as the control.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Stent migration
    The distance that the stent migrates into the bladder or into the kidney.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Patient comfort level
    Patient comfort level, as assessed via the Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 28, 2021
    Last Updated
    April 21, 2022
    Sponsor
    University of Louisville
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04763837
    Brief Title
    Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.
    Official Title
    Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    unable to continue
    Study Start Date
    February 2027 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 2028 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    April 2028 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Louisville

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to determine if stents placed with only one loop in the kidney move more than stents placed with a loop in both the kidney and a bladder. Participants in this study will undergo placement of a stent into the ureter that drains urine from the kidney into the bladder. The stent will be placed in 1 of 2 ways: either with only a loop of the stent is left in the kidney or in the regular manner where a loop of the stent is left in both the kidney and in the bladder. The position of the stent will be measured at the time of placement. When the stent is removed, the position of the stent will be measured prior to pulling the stent.
    Detailed Description
    The ureteral stent is one of the most extensively used tools in the field of urology. They are used for aiding post-operative healing of the ureter, visualizing the ureteral during procedures, and alleviating ureteral obstruction (eg. nephrolithiasis). Double-J stents, which are secured by loops in both the renal pelvis and the bladder, have become most urologists' go-to choice for ureteral stents since they were introduced in the 1970s. Unfortunately, it has been shown that 80-90% of patients with ureteral stents have urinary complaints following stent placement. Interestingly, a recent study suggested utility of intraureteral stents. These stents have one loop in the renal pelvis while their distal end is positioned proximal to the ureteral orifice. The above-mentioned study showed that patients with intraureteral stents had less discomfort as opposed to the those that had double-J stents. Due to the immense number of patients that require ureteral stent placement, this improvement in comfort is very promising for the urological field. However, no one has studied if stents placed intraureterally migrate from the time they are placed to the time they are removed. If stents migrate proximally toward the renal pelvis, it is possible that retrieval could be more difficult, and the ureteral patency established by the stent could be compromised. The objective of this study is to determine if intraureterally placed stents migrate as compared to ureteral stents placed via the conventional method. This study will be a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blinded trial. The subjects will include up to 140 patients (about 70 subjects per group) from ages 1-100 years old that are to undergo stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer. Prior to the procedure, each patient that has agreed to participate in this study will be randomly assigned to receive a stent placed intraureterally or a stent placed in the conventional manner. After each intraureteral stent is placed via cystoscopy, the distance of the distal end of the stent to the ureteral orifice will be measured via fluoroscopy that was calibrated prior to the procedure. After each double-J stent is placed via cystoscopy, the length of stent that is present in the bladder will also be measured using calibrated fluoroscopy . Subjects will not be informed of which group they are assigned to. When the patients return for stent removal, the previously mentioned distances will be measured again prior to pulling the stent. They will also be asked to complete the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) to assess stent-associated discomfort. The primary endpoint of the study would be stent migration distance (mm). Secondary endpoints would include patient comfort level. All medical records will be accessed on secure devices and networks. All subjects will be assigned a subject number upon enrolled in the study. When a researcher needs to record data from a patient's medical records, they will record this information with the patient's corresponding subject number. Only the researchers involved in this study will have access to the document that includes patient identifiers and their subject number. At the conclusion of this study, the document with patient identifiers and subject numbers will be destroyed. Data will be collected from electronic medical records of patients from ULP (University of Louisville Physicians) Urology.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Urologic Diseases, Urological System Complication of Procedure
    Keywords
    urology, ureteral stent

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    This study will be a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blinded trial. The subjects will include up to 140 patients (about 70 subjects per group) from ages 1-100 years old that are to undergo stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer. They will be randomized to one of two groups: intraureteral stent or conventional double-J stent. Upon removal of the stent, migration distance will be measured via fluoroscopy using a calibrated x-ray system.
    Masking
    Participant
    Masking Description
    Subjects will not be informed of which type of ureteral stent will be used.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Intraureteral stent group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of an intraureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in only in the kidney and NOT in the bladder. This group will be the experimental group.
    Arm Title
    Conventional Double-J stent
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients assigned to this group will undergo placement of a double-J ureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in both the kidney and the bladder. This group will serve as the control.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Intraureteral stent
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Polaris™ Loop Ureteral Stent - Boston Scientific
    Intervention Description
    This intervention involves the placement of an intraureteral stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube only in the kidney and NOT in the bladder. The distal end of the tube will stay in the ureter just proximal to the opening to the bladder.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Conventional Double-J stent
    Intervention Description
    This intervention involves the placement of a conventional double-J stent, a tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder and has a loop of tube in both the kidney and in the bladder.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Stent migration
    Description
    The distance that the stent migrates into the bladder or into the kidney.
    Time Frame
    12 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Patient comfort level
    Description
    Patient comfort level, as assessed via the Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ).
    Time Frame
    12 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    1 Year
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    100 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Those undergoing ureteral stent placement for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urological cancer. Exclusion Criteria: none
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Kellen B Choi, DO, FACOS
    Organizational Affiliation
    Associate Professor, University of Louisville Department of Urology
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    11905888
    Citation
    Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. 1978. J Urol. 2002 Feb;167(2 Pt 2):1135-8; discussion 1139. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(02)80361-5. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11927301
    Citation
    Joshi HB, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology. 2002 Apr;59(4):511-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01644-2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    2961892
    Citation
    Pollard SG, Macfarlane R. Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents. J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):37-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42282-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30829132
    Citation
    Yoshida T, Inoue T, Taguchi M, Matsuzaki T, Murota T, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Efficacy and Safety of Complete Intraureteral Stent Placement versus Conventional Stent Placement in Relieving Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms: A Randomized, Prospective, Single Blind, Multicenter Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):164-170. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000196. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12576846
    Citation
    Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1060-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Migration of Intraureteral Stents Compared to Conventional Double-J Stents.

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs