search
Back to results

The Prognosis of Lipid Reprogramming With Rosuvastatin, in Castrated Egyptian Prostate Cancer Patients

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer Metastatic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rosuvastatin 20mg
surgical castration
Sponsored by
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer Metastatic focused on measuring Prostate cancer, Rosuvastatin, Castration/Androgen deprivation, HMG-CoA Reductase, Lipid metabolism/, Survival, Aldoketoreductase 1C4, Prostate specific antigen, Alkaline phosphatase, Caveolin-1, ABCA-1, SLDL-RP1, Lipid profile, epidermal growth factor receptor

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Naïve newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer
  • Age ≥ 50 years.
  • No psychological or geographical barriers for regular follow up of the patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 50 years.
  • psychological or geographical barriers for regular follow up of the patients.

Sites / Locations

  • National Cancer Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Control/statin non-users

Interventional/statin users

Arm Description

newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients who underwent surgical castration in the form of bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy.

newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients who underwent surgical castration in the form of bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy and administered rosuvastatin 20 mg/day for 6 months

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Lipid profile
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the lipid profile (LDL, triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL) in mg/dl
Aggressiveness parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the PSA in ng/ml
Aggressiveness parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the ALP in IU/L
Aggressiveness parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the EGFR in ng/ml
Aggressiveness parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the Caveolin-1 in pg/ml
Lipid metabolism parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on HMG-CoA reductase in ng/ml
Lipid metabolism parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on SLDLRP1 in pg/ml
Lipid metabolism parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on AKR1C4 ng/L
Lipid metabolism parameters
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on ABCA-1 in pg/ml

Secondary Outcome Measures

short-term clinical outcome
disease progression/regression
short-term clinical outcome
overall survival

Full Information

First Posted
February 23, 2021
Last Updated
February 25, 2021
Sponsor
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04776889
Brief Title
The Prognosis of Lipid Reprogramming With Rosuvastatin, in Castrated Egyptian Prostate Cancer Patients
Official Title
The Prognosis of Lipid Reprogramming With the HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor, Rosuvastatin, in Castrated Egyptian Prostate Cancer Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National Cancer Institute, Egypt

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aim: The role of surgical castration and rosuvastatin treatment on lipid profile and lipid metabolism related markers was evaluated for their prognostic significance in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) patients. Methods: A total of 70 newly diagnosed castrated mPC patients treated with castration were recruited and divided into two groups: Group I included 30 patients and served as control (statin non-users) while group II included 40 patients treated with Rosuvastatin (20 mg/day) for 6 months and served as statin users. Prostate specific antigen (PSA), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Caveolin-1, lipid profile (LDL, HDL, triglycerides and cholesterol) and lipid metabolism related markers (aldoketoreductase (AKR1C4), HMGCoA reductase, ABCA1, and SLDL RP1) were measured at baseline, after 3 and 6 months. Overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and COX regression for prognostic significance.
Detailed Description
This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University. The study ID BB1901-30303 was approved by the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee of NCI, Egypt, Number 00004025, with IRB review Number 201819019.3 and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki with informed consent was taken from all participants. The study included 70 Egyptian metastatic prostate cancer (m PC) patients who were treated and followed up in the NCI hospital in the period from January 2019 till December 2020. Patients were recruited from January to June 2019, then followed-up to December 2020. Blood samples were withdrawn from all patients at baseline to monitor parameters under investigation. Then, all patients were subjected to surgical castration and divided in to two groups. Group I included 30 patients and served as control (statin non-users). Group II included 40 patients treated with Rosuvastatin (20 mg/day) for 6 months and served as statin users. Then, blood samples were withdrawn from the two groups after 3 and 6 months. Full demographic information and clinicopatholologic characteristics were obtained for each patient including; age, comorbid diseases, initial complain symptoms, family history of malignancy, smoking status and performance status. Also, serum level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Gleason score and metastasis sites were recorded. The treatment modality and decision making were according to NCI guidelines. Collected whole blood samples into k.EDTA tubes were incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes and then centrifuged for 20 minutes at 1500 rpm. The plasma supernatant was carefully collected and freezed until analysis. Plasma protein concentrations of some lipid reprogramming and prostate cancer aggressiveness markers were measured. Kits were probed against human soluble low density lipoprotein receptor related protein -1 (SLDLRP-1; catalogue number: SL2705Hu), human ATP binding cassette transporter A-1 (ABCA-1; catalogue number: SL0314Hu), Human Aldoketo-reductase family 1 member C4 (AKR-1C4; catalogue number: SL3032Hu), human 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Co-enzyme A reductase (HMGCR; catalogue number: SL3030Hu), human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; catalogue number: SL0665Hu) and human Caveolin-1 (Cav-1; catalogue number: SL0427Hu). Procedures were carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of the markers in plasma samples was calculated by comparing the OD of the samples to the corresponding plotted standard curves. Data management and statistical analysis were performed using The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24. Normal distribution and variance homogeneity of data were assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene's tests, respectively. Numerical data were summarized using median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical data were summarized as count and percentage. Patients were stratified according to their clinicopathological factors and for more than two subgroups of patients, the change in measured parameters were tested for significance using Kruskal-Wallis test and the pairwise comparison were done using Mann-Whitney. The change in proteins concentration over time was tested using Friedman test of significance. Spearman correlation analysis was used to test all possible correlations. Kaplan- Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the cumulative survival rate as well as median levels of OS after two years of follow up. OS was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of death by any cause. Living patients or patients lost to follow-up were censored on the last known alive date. The hazardous effect of death or progression Cox proportion hazard Model was used to evaluate the hazardous effect of different clinicopathological and proteins levels on death and progression. All P-values are two-sided. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
Keywords
Prostate cancer, Rosuvastatin, Castration/Androgen deprivation, HMG-CoA Reductase, Lipid metabolism/, Survival, Aldoketoreductase 1C4, Prostate specific antigen, Alkaline phosphatase, Caveolin-1, ABCA-1, SLDL-RP1, Lipid profile, epidermal growth factor receptor

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A cohort of 70 newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients were recruited. Blood samples were withdrawn from all patients at baseline to monitor parameters under investigation. Then, all patients were subjected to surgical castration and divided in to two groups. Group I included 30 patients and served as control (statin non-users). Group II included 40 patients treated with Rosuvastatin (20 mg/day) for 6 months and served as statin users.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control/statin non-users
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients who underwent surgical castration in the form of bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy.
Arm Title
Interventional/statin users
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients who underwent surgical castration in the form of bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy and administered rosuvastatin 20 mg/day for 6 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rosuvastatin 20mg
Intervention Description
Rosuvastatin 20mg/day for 6 months added to bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
surgical castration
Intervention Description
bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lipid profile
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the lipid profile (LDL, triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL) in mg/dl
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Aggressiveness parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the PSA in ng/ml
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Aggressiveness parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the ALP in IU/L
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Aggressiveness parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the EGFR in ng/ml
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Aggressiveness parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on the Caveolin-1 in pg/ml
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Lipid metabolism parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on HMG-CoA reductase in ng/ml
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Lipid metabolism parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on SLDLRP1 in pg/ml
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Lipid metabolism parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on AKR1C4 ng/L
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Lipid metabolism parameters
Description
effect of adding rosuvastatin to surgical castration on ABCA-1 in pg/ml
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
short-term clinical outcome
Description
disease progression/regression
Time Frame
18 months
Title
short-term clinical outcome
Description
overall survival
Time Frame
18 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Naïve newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer Age ≥ 50 years. No psychological or geographical barriers for regular follow up of the patients. Exclusion Criteria: Age < 50 years. psychological or geographical barriers for regular follow up of the patients.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Cancer Institute
City
Cairo
ZIP/Postal Code
112796
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
requests for individual participant data should be directed to riham.karkeet@nci.cu.edu.eg, and shall not be limited to specific institutes/researchers
IPD Sharing Time Frame
for 2 years after publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
requests for participant data should be directed to riham.karkeet@nci.cu.edu.eg, and shall not be limited to specific institutes/researchers

Learn more about this trial

The Prognosis of Lipid Reprogramming With Rosuvastatin, in Castrated Egyptian Prostate Cancer Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs