Rehabilitation of Arm Function Using a Biofeedback Method After Stroke
Primary Purpose
Rehabilitation, Stroke, Biofeedback
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biofeedback method
Health-resort based rehabilitation
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rehabilitation focused on measuring Health-resort based rehabilitation, Stroke, Biofeedback, Conventional (traditional) rehabilitation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient;
- a single ischemic stroke experienced;
- hemiparesis;
- a minimum of 6 months from the stroke onset;
- age 45-75 years;
- elementary (basic) handgrip ability;
- stage 4-5 arm paresis according Brunnström scale;
- stage 3 disability according to Rankin scale;
- spasticity in the paretic arm up to 1 plus on the modified Ashworth scale;
- current health status, confirmed by a medical examination, allowing the person to take part in the study and in the exercise.
Exclusion Criteria:
- lack of informed and voluntary consent of the patient;
- two or more strokes experienced, haemorrhagic stroke, brain stem and cerebellar stroke;
- impairments in higher mental functions adversely affecting the ability to understand and perform the tasks during exercise;
- visual field impairment;
- mechanical and thermal injuries potentially limiting handgrip function;
- coexisting neurological, rheumatic and orthopaedic conditions, including fixed contractures potentially affecting gripping abilities;
- unstable health condition;
- failure to complete the three-week rehabilitation program.
Sites / Locations
- University of Rzeszów
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
Biofeedback method and Health-resort based rehabilitation
Health-resort based rehabilitation
Arm Description
Health-resort based treatments supplemented with biofeedback training
Control group - health-resort based treatments, without biofeedback training.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
pinching strength of the fingers
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
pinching strength of the fingers
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
pinching strength of the fingers
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
EMG of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint
EMG assessment of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint on the Biometrics device
EMG of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint
EMG assessment of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint on the Biometrics device
EMG of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint
EMG assessment of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint on the Biometrics device
Secondary Outcome Measures
Activities of daily living, assessed with Barthel Index.
Based on the scores assigned the patient's condition is described in the following way: I. 86-100 points - "slight" dependency; II. 21- 85 points - "moderately severe" dependency; III. 0 - 20 points - "severe" dependency.
A maximum 100 points can be scored on Barthel scale.
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Handgrip function, according Franchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity is a comprehensive tool enabling measurement of motor function; it comprises 33 motor tasks, designed to assess general movements, precision movements, grip, coordination and speed. It is also possible to perform H subgroup tests - assessing superficial and deep sensibility, and J subgroup tests - for range of passive motion and pain induced by such movements.
Individual tasks are assessed on a scale 0-2 0 - impossible task
- task partially completed,
- task completed correctly The higher the score, the better.
Assessment of paretic limb function with the Brunnström scale.
Motor performance (function) of extremities is to be assessed using Brunnström scale. This is a six-point scale designed to evaluate performance (function) of paretic extremities.The higher the score, the better.
1-No moves 6-Precise movements, ball throw, button fastening and unfastening
Muscle tone (spasticity) will be examined with modified Ashworth scale.
Increased muscle tone (spasticity) is to be examined with modified Ashworth scale. This is a six-point scale modified to include grade 1.
0: No increase in muscle tone
Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM;
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moped;
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult;
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
Assessment of disability level, using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Assessment of disability using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Score Description 0 - No symptoms at all
1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2 - Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3 - Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4 - Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5 - Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6 - Dead TOTAL (0-6):
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04777253
Brief Title
Rehabilitation of Arm Function Using a Biofeedback Method After Stroke
Official Title
Effectiveness of Biofeedback Methods in Rehabilitation of Arm Function in Patients After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bogumiła Pniak
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The research will make it possible to assess effects of rehabilitation of arm function with the use of biofeedback method and conventional therapies administered to patients at a chronic stage of recovery post-stroke, as part of the treatment in a health-resort setting.
Detailed Description
: In accordance with the study design, the group will comprise 100 patients with hemiparesis after stroke, participating in a health-resort based rehabilitation program during their stay in the Health-Resort Rehabilitation Hospital in Iwonicz Zdrój, Poland. The minimum size of the sample was calculated based on the total annual number of patients after stroke receiving treatment in the Health-Resort Rehabilitation Hospital in Iwonicz Zdrój, i.e. approximately 200 patients, 100% of these being in a chronic stage of recovery. It was assumed that 50% of the patients would present stage 4-5 arm paresis according Brunnström scale. A fraction of 0.8 and a maximum error of 5% were applied and the sample size of 71 patients was obtained.
The patients meeting eligibility criteria will be randomly divided into two groups:
the study group (50 patients), participating in a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with additional biofeedback training;
the control group (50 patients), participating in the conventional rehabilitation program only.
The patients in both groups will participate in a three-week rehabilitation program (from Monday to Friday), with the treatments and therapies continued for up to two hours per day. The program will include: group and individual exercise (active and assisted exercises, manipulation exercises, PNF-based practice, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, physical treatments, such as: laser, whirlpool therapy, mud compress therapy, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and localized cryotherapy. The patients in the study group will also receive biofeedback training aimed to improve motor function of the upper limb. The exercise will be performed using equipment manufactured by Biometrics. The device makes it possible to perform movements in all the planes of the joints in the upper limb. During the exercise, a visualisation of the movements is shown to the patient on the screen; this biofeedback makes it possible for them to regulate and increase the range of movement, to use greater muscle strength and to visually assess the accuracy of their performance. The training with the biofeedback function will be carried out for 30 minutes per day.
After the program is completed, the subjects from the control group will have an opportunity to also practice with the Biometrics device with the biofeedback function.
Examinations will be carried out three times: the baseline at the start of the rehabilitation program, a check-up at the end of the three-week program, and a follow-up two months after discharge from the hospital. The tests will be performed at the same time of day, and following the same conditions.
The patients' condition and the rehabilitation effects will be assessed using the following measures:
hand grip strength and pinching strength of the fingers, to be tested with a dynamometer and pinch meter, respectively;
ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb, with R500 goniometer;
manual skills, with Box and Blocks test;
handgrip function, according Franchay scale;
motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale;
EMG test, with the Biometrics device;
activities of daily living, with Barthel Index.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rehabilitation, Stroke, Biofeedback
Keywords
Health-resort based rehabilitation, Stroke, Biofeedback, Conventional (traditional) rehabilitation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
random selection to two groups (study group and control group)
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Biofeedback method and Health-resort based rehabilitation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Health-resort based treatments supplemented with biofeedback training
Arm Title
Health-resort based rehabilitation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Control group - health-resort based treatments, without biofeedback training.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Biofeedback method
Intervention Description
Patients in the study group will participate in training with visual biofeedback, aimed to improve motor function of the arm. The exercise will be performed using a Biometrics device. The biofeedback training will be carried out for 30 minutes per day.
Health-resort based rehabilitation The patients will participate in a three-week rehabilitation program (from Monday to Friday), with the treatments and therapies continued for up to two hours per day.
The program will include: group and individual exercise (active and assisted exercises, manipulation exercise, PNF-based practice, balance and breathing exercise), manual massage, physical treatments, such as: laser, whirlpool therapy, mud compress therapy, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and localized cryotherapy.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Health-resort based rehabilitation
Intervention Description
The patients will participate in a three-week rehabilitation program (from Monday to Friday), with the treatments and therapies continued for up to two hours per day.
The program will include: group and individual exercise (active and assisted exercises, manipulation exercise, PNF-based practice, balance and breathing exercise), manual massage, physical treatments, such as: laser, whirlpool therapy, mud compress therapy, carbonic acid therapy, TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, and localized cryotherapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hand grip strength
Description
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Time Frame
: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
Title
Hand grip strength
Description
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Time Frame
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Title
Hand grip strength
Description
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
Time Frame
Third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
pinching strength of the fingers
Description
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
Time Frame
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Title
pinching strength of the fingers
Description
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
Time Frame
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Title
pinching strength of the fingers
Description
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
Time Frame
Third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
Description
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
Time Frame
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Title
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
Description
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
Time Frame
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Title
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
Description
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
Time Frame
Third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
EMG of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint
Description
EMG assessment of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint on the Biometrics device
Time Frame
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Title
EMG of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint
Description
EMG assessment of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint on the Biometrics device
Time Frame
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Title
EMG of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint
Description
EMG assessment of extensors and flexors of the radiocarpal joint on the Biometrics device
Time Frame
Third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Activities of daily living, assessed with Barthel Index.
Description
Based on the scores assigned the patient's condition is described in the following way: I. 86-100 points - "slight" dependency; II. 21- 85 points - "moderately severe" dependency; III. 0 - 20 points - "severe" dependency.
A maximum 100 points can be scored on Barthel scale.
Time Frame
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program; third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Description
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Time Frame
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program; third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
Handgrip function, according Franchay scale
Description
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Time Frame
: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program; third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Description
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity is a comprehensive tool enabling measurement of motor function; it comprises 33 motor tasks, designed to assess general movements, precision movements, grip, coordination and speed. It is also possible to perform H subgroup tests - assessing superficial and deep sensibility, and J subgroup tests - for range of passive motion and pain induced by such movements.
Individual tasks are assessed on a scale 0-2 0 - impossible task
- task partially completed,
- task completed correctly The higher the score, the better.
Time Frame
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program; third examination - two months after discharge from the hospital (follow- up)
Title
Assessment of paretic limb function with the Brunnström scale.
Description
Motor performance (function) of extremities is to be assessed using Brunnström scale. This is a six-point scale designed to evaluate performance (function) of paretic extremities.The higher the score, the better.
1-No moves 6-Precise movements, ball throw, button fastening and unfastening
Time Frame
Measurement during the patient's enrolment
Title
Muscle tone (spasticity) will be examined with modified Ashworth scale.
Description
Increased muscle tone (spasticity) is to be examined with modified Ashworth scale. This is a six-point scale modified to include grade 1.
0: No increase in muscle tone
Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM;
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moped;
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult;
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
Time Frame
Measurement during the patient's enrolment
Title
Assessment of disability level, using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Description
Assessment of disability using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Score Description 0 - No symptoms at all
1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2 - Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3 - Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4 - Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5 - Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6 - Dead TOTAL (0-6):
Time Frame
: Measurement during the patient's enrolment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
informed, voluntary consent of the patient;
a single ischemic stroke experienced;
hemiparesis;
a minimum of 6 months from the stroke onset;
age 45-75 years;
elementary (basic) handgrip ability;
stage 4-5 arm paresis according Brunnström scale;
stage 3 disability according to Rankin scale;
spasticity in the paretic arm up to 1 plus on the modified Ashworth scale;
current health status, confirmed by a medical examination, allowing the person to take part in the study and in the exercise.
Exclusion Criteria:
lack of informed and voluntary consent of the patient;
two or more strokes experienced, haemorrhagic stroke, brain stem and cerebellar stroke;
impairments in higher mental functions adversely affecting the ability to understand and perform the tasks during exercise;
visual field impairment;
mechanical and thermal injuries potentially limiting handgrip function;
coexisting neurological, rheumatic and orthopaedic conditions, including fixed contractures potentially affecting gripping abilities;
unstable health condition;
failure to complete the three-week rehabilitation program.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bogumiła Pniak, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
University of Rzeszów
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Rzeszów
City
Rzeszów
ZIP/Postal Code
35-959
Country
Poland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Rehabilitation of Arm Function Using a Biofeedback Method After Stroke
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs