Effectiveness of 10-minute Chair Massage Versus 10-minute Break to Reduce Stress and Improve Well-being

Effectiveness of 10-minute Chair Massage Versus 10-minute Break to Reduce Stress and Improve Well-being

The Effectiveness of a 10-minute Chair Massage Versus 10-minute Break to Reduce Psychological and Physical Stress in Healthcare Workers

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of 10-minute chair massage therapy in comparison to a scheduled 10-minute break to evaluate the impact on perceived quality of life, heart rate, blood pressure, and pain scale in healthcare workers.

The primary purpose of this study is to provide cost-effective interventions for nursing personnel aimed at reducing fatigue and stress within their work environment while improving their overall quality of life. Studies have demonstrated that stress management resources and overall engagement of staff lead to quality outcomes for both staff and patients. There is limited research that examines interventions that can reduce stress perception in nursing. This study will examine the physical and psychological impact of 10-minute massage therapy in comparison to a 10-minute scheduled break weekly over a period of 5 weeks. If the outcomes of the study indicate that either massage therapy or scheduled breaks are an effective intervention for management of stressful situations and improving quality of life, the overall goal would be to create relaxation rooms on more nursing units that allow staff to engage in massage therapy or scheduled rest sessions to reduce stressful work situations. Studies have indicated that healthcare workers experience high levels of work-related stress that include individual, social, occupational and environmental factors. Unrelieved or mismanaged stressors contribute to a variety of health-related consequences including disturbances in the digestive system, headaches, sleep disturbances, hypertension, fatigue and psychological issues, including anxiety. Massage therapy and scheduled breaks have been identified as potential interventions to mitigate or reduce stress. The use of mechanical massage has been shown to mimic the effects of traditional physical massage in terms of reducing stress and anxiety of the end-users. Mechanical massages have an advantage over physical massages since they are more cost-effective, can be used when convenient, and within a controlled environment. The literature supports that massage therapy can have an impact on reducing stress, anxiety, depression, and pain, while enhancing an individual's immune function, relaxation, and overall well-being. Studies have also indicated that nurses often lack opportunities to take breaks during their scheduled shifts. In many instances, staff sacrifice their breaks in order to fulfill patient-care duties. This study will compare both massage therapy and scheduled breaks to examine the overall impact on healthcare workers. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased workplace stressors for healthcare workers; however, there is limited evidence to support successful interventions to manage these stressors.

The change in professional quality of life scores will be compared pre trial and post at completion of 5 weeks

Participants will record heart rate pre and post intervention for each session and these measures will be examined for decrease in heartrate and compared amongst both arms

Participants will record blood pressure pre and post intervention for each session and these measures will be examined for decrease in blood pressure and compared amongst both arms

Participants will record self-reported pain level pre and post intervention for each session and these measures will be examined for decrease in level of pain and compared amongst both arms. Participants will use the Geisinger Pain Scale, 0 indicates no pain, 10 would indicate severe pain

Inclusion Criteria: Health care professional assigned work duties on designed unit Men and women able age 18-84 able to give informed consent Able to speak and understand English Exclusion Criteria: Individuals that decline to participate in the study Individuals currently on work restrictions Recent head, neck, shoulder or back surgeries