search
Back to results

Venetoclax + Azacitidine vs. Induction Chemotherapy in AML

Primary Purpose

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cytarabine
Idarubicin
Daunorubicin
Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine
Venetoclax
Azacitidine
Sponsored by
Massachusetts General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Myeloid Leukemia focused on measuring Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Participants must have pathologically confirmed, newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The AML may be either:

    • De Novo: AML in patients with no clinical history of prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative disorder, or exposure to potentially leukemogenic therapies or agents
    • Secondary AML (sAML): refers to an acute leukemic process (1) evolving from known prior myelodysplasia, myeloproliferative disorder, or aplastic anemia with or without treatment or; (2) as a product of previous exposure to a proven leukemogenic chemotherapeutic agent
  • Eligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, according to their treating physician
  • ECOG performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction > 50% as measured by echocardiogram or MUGA scan
  • Must not have received systemic prior antineoplastic therapy for treatment for the newly diagnosed AML, including radiation therapy, except hydroxyurea for the purposes of cytoreduction. Patients may also have received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) if there is an early suspicion of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, M3-AML), although if confirmed to have APL these patients will be excluded from the study.
  • Adequate hepatic function per local laboratory reference ranges as follows:

    • Aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 3.0X ULN
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN (unless bilirubin rise is known to be due to Gilbert's syndrome or of non-hepatic origin)
  • The effects of venetoclax on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason and because other chemotherapeutic agents are known to be teratogenic, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Women should use contraceptives for at least 30 days following the last dose of venetoclax. Men treated or enrolled on this protocol must also agree to use adequate contraception prior to the study, for the duration of study participation, and 4 months after completion of therapy.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) or AML with favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21), inv(16), t(16;16)]
  • Patients < 60 years old with NPM1-mutated AML:
  • Patients with FLT3-mutated AML (TKD or ITD).
  • Patients with acute leukemia with ambiguous lineage or mixed phenotype
  • Patients that have received strong and/or moderate CYP3A inducers within 7 days prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  • Subject has consumed grapefruit, grapefruit products, Seville oranges (including marmalade containing Seville oranges) or Starfruit within 3 days prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  • Patients who have had prior systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy for AML (excluding patients with therapy-related AML), except for hydroxyurea or 6-MP as noted. Empiric intrathecal chemotherapy during a diagnostic lumbar puncture is allowed, as long as CNS disease is not suspected.
  • Patients treated with prior hypomethylating therapy (such as azacitidine or decitabine).
  • Patients who will exceed a lifetime anthracycline exposure of >550 mg/m2 daunorubicin or equivalent (or >400 mg/m2 daunorubicin or equivalent in the event of prior mediastinal radiation) if they receive the maximum potential exposure to anthracyclines per protocol (including both induction and consolidation cycles.
  • Individuals with a history of a different malignancy are ineligible except for the following circumstances. Individuals with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for at least 3 years and are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy. Individuals with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 3 years: cervical cancer in situ, breast DCIS, and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Current clinical central nervous system (CNS) symptoms deemed by the investigator to be related to leukemic CNS involvement (no lumbar puncture required, clinical assessment per investigator's judgment is sufficient).
  • Prior bone marrow transplantation for a myeloid malignancy
  • Participants who are receiving any other investigational agents within the prior 14 days.
  • Currently clinically active hepatitis C or hepatitis B infection, as suggested by serology or viral load.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected participants. Patients with no detectable viral load on a stable anti-viral regimen may be eligible, after discussion with the study overall PI.
  • Current or history of congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4, or any history of documented diastolic or systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%, as measured by MUGA scan or echocardiogram). Prior to study entry, any ECG abnormality at screening has to be documented by the investigator as not medically relevant.
  • Known hypersensitivity to the trial drugs or other contraindication to standard "7+3" induction chemotherapy.
  • WBC > 25 x 109/L. Note: hydroxyurea is permitted to meet this criterion
  • Patients who might refuse to receive blood products and/or have a hypersensitivity to blood products
  • Patients with clinically significant persistent electrolyte abnormalities such as hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypermagnesemia of Grade > 1 per NCI CTCAE, v5.0. Treatment for correction of above electrolyte imbalances is permitted during screening to meet eligibility.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, clinically ongoing or active infection requiring intravenous antibiotics (IV antibiotics are allowed if infection is deemed to be controlled), symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Known GI disease or GI procedures that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of the study drugs. Examples include, but are not limited to partial gastrectomy, history of small intestine surgery, and celiac disease.
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because venetoclax and azacitidine, along with standard induction chemotherapy, carries the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with venetoclax as well as azacitidine, cytarabine, daunorubicin and idarubicin, breastfeeding should be avoided. Confirmation that the subject is not pregnant must be established by a negative serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) pregnancy test result obtained during screening. Pregnancy testing is not required for post-menopausal or surgically sterilized women.
  • Patients with psychological, familial, social, or geographic factors that otherwise preclude them from giving informed consent, following the protocol, or potentially hamper compliance with study treatment and follow-up.
  • Patients who are otherwise felt unable to comply with the protocol, in the opinion of the investigator.

Sites / Locations

  • City of HopeRecruiting
  • University of California - DavisRecruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Atrium Health Levine Cancer InstituteRecruiting
  • Ohio State University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • University of PennsylvaniaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard of Care (Conventional Induction)

Investigational (Venetoclax and Azacitidine)

Arm Description

Randomized participants will receive cytarabine and idarubicin [or daunorubicin) per standard of care as follows: Induction: cytarabine on days 1-7 and idarubicin (or daunorubicin) on days 1-3 of induction. Second Induction (if needed): Cytarabine on days 1-5 and idarubicin (or daunorubicin) on days 1-2 of re-induction. Consolidation (if needed): If < 60 years, cytarabine days 1,3,5 of consolidation cycles, and if ≥60 years, cytarabine days 1-5 of consolidation cycles Those with secondary or therapy-related AML can receive liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) per standard of care as follows: Induction: Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) on Days 1,3, 5 of induction. Second Induction (if needed): Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) on days 1,3 of re-induction Consolidation (if needed): liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) on days 1,3 of consolidation cycles

Participants will receive azacitidine on days 1-7 and venetoclax daily for up to (3) three 28-day study cycles and evaluated for response or benefit. If benefit/response is achieved, azacitidine on days 1-7 and venetoclax on days 1-28 (or less if deemed necessary per protocol) will be given in repeating 28-day cycles until benefit/response is no longer achieved or until patient proceeds to transplantation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Event free survival
Primary endpoint is event-free-survival of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine compared to patients treated with standard induction with either 7+3 regimen or liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine Events are described in the protocol and will include Progressive Disease as defined above Any change in therapy due to leukemic persistence. Transition to hospice Relapse following CR, CRi, or CRh Any death Assessments of differences in EFS between the randomized arms will be made with the log-rank test; modeling will employ the Cox proportional hazards model. We also plan to assess the difference in estimated EFS at one year, using Kaplan-Meier estimates with standard deviation calculated by Greenwood's formula. EFS will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. EFS will be assessed with the log-rank test, and cox proportional hazards model when appropriate.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rate of response
Evaluated overall and separately for patients with primary and secondary AML, comparisons will be based on the Fisher exact test. CR and CRi will be assessed. Study also includes CRh as a possible response, CRh aims to describe marrow blast clearance and evidence of partial hematologic recovery not captured by current CR or CRi, criteria.
Treatment-related toxicity
Assessed using CTCAE 5
Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity
Assessed by flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing
30-day mortality
Analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
60-day mortality
Analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Overall survival (OS)
Survival will be summarized using the method of Kaplan Meier, and assessed using the log rank test and Cox proportional hazards when appropriate.
Rate of stem cell transplantation (SCT) following induction
The proportion of patients that receive a hematopoietic stem cell transplant following induction therapy or consolidation/continuation therapy.
Patient reported quality of life (QOL)
To compare quality of life between the two groups using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leuk). the FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life
Patient-reported depression symptoms
To compare depression symptoms between the two groups using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Depression). the HADS-depression ranges from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms
Patient-reported anxiety symptoms
To compare anxiety symptoms between the two groups using the Hospital Anxieyt and Depression Scale (HADS-Anxiety). the HADS-Anxiety ranges from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
Patient-reported symptom burden
To compare symptom burden between the two groups using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-revised). ESAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden
Patient-reported post-traumatic stress symptoms
To compare post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms between the two groups using the PTSD-Checklist-Civilian Version. The PTSD-Checklist ranges from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
Health care utilization - hospitalizations
To compare number of hospitalizations between the two groups using linear regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups
Health care utilization - days alive and out of the hospital
To compare days alive and out of the hospital between the two groups using linear regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups)
Health care utilization - Intensive care unit admissions
To compare intensive care unit admissions (yes vs. no) between the two groups using logistic regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups)
Cost of care
To compare cost of care between the two groups using parametric and non-parametric tests based on distribution of the data
Incidence of neutropenic infections
Number of patients that experience neutropenic fever during induction cycles (up to 2 cycles).
100-Day post-transplant mortality
Assessed using the Kaplan Meier method
Incidence of grade 3 or greater acute graft versus host disease (GVHD)
Assessed among patients that receive HSCT following induction.

Full Information

First Posted
March 8, 2021
Last Updated
November 16, 2022
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
AbbVie
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04801797
Brief Title
Venetoclax + Azacitidine vs. Induction Chemotherapy in AML
Official Title
A Phase 2 Randomized Study Comparing Venetoclax and Azacitidine to Induction Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 20, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
AbbVie

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This research is being done to assess the therapeutic activity of a promising combination (azacitidine and venetoclax) versus conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy in induction-eligible patients with acute myeloid leukemia. This study involves the following: Venetoclax and azacitidine (investigational combination) Cytarabine and idarubicin or daunorubicin (per standard of care) or Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (per standard of care)
Detailed Description
This is an open-label, multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial to compare the therapeutic activity of conventional induction chemotherapy (7+3 regimen or liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) to the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine among fit, traditionally induction-eligible adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the combinations of liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine as well as cytarabine and idarubicin or daunorubicin as treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) The FDA has approved the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine for people with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that are over the age of 75 or who have comorbidities that preclude intensive induction chemotherapy. Venetoclax may interact with BCL-2 (a protein that initiates tumor growth, disease progression, and drug resistance) and inhibit BLC-2 which can lead to cancer cell death. Azacitidine may cause cell death in rapidly dividing cells, which may lead to cancer cell death since cancer cells do not grow at a normal rate. Induction Chemotherapy which includes the drugs idarubicin or daunorubicin, cytarabine, and liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine is the standard of care chemotherapy treatment for someone with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and study treatment, including evaluations and follow up visits. Participants will receive study treatment for as long as they and their doctor believe they are benefitting from the study drugs. Participants will then be followed for 3 years or until they withdraw their consent to be contacted. It is expected that about 172 people will take part in this research study. AbbVie, a biopharmaceutical company, is supporting this research study by providing funding for the study, including one of the study drugs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Keywords
Acute Myeloid Leukemia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is an open-label, multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial to compare the therapeutic activity of conventional induction chemotherapy (7+3 regimen or liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine) (Standard arm) to the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine among fit, traditionally induction-eligible adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
172 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard of Care (Conventional Induction)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Randomized participants will receive cytarabine and idarubicin [or daunorubicin) per standard of care as follows: Induction: cytarabine on days 1-7 and idarubicin (or daunorubicin) on days 1-3 of induction. Second Induction (if needed): Cytarabine on days 1-5 and idarubicin (or daunorubicin) on days 1-2 of re-induction. Consolidation (if needed): If < 60 years, cytarabine days 1,3,5 of consolidation cycles, and if ≥60 years, cytarabine days 1-5 of consolidation cycles Those with secondary or therapy-related AML can receive liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) per standard of care as follows: Induction: Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) on Days 1,3, 5 of induction. Second Induction (if needed): Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) on days 1,3 of re-induction Consolidation (if needed): liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (Vyxeos) on days 1,3 of consolidation cycles
Arm Title
Investigational (Venetoclax and Azacitidine)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive azacitidine on days 1-7 and venetoclax daily for up to (3) three 28-day study cycles and evaluated for response or benefit. If benefit/response is achieved, azacitidine on days 1-7 and venetoclax on days 1-28 (or less if deemed necessary per protocol) will be given in repeating 28-day cycles until benefit/response is no longer achieved or until patient proceeds to transplantation.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cytarabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ara-C, Arabinosylcytosine
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Idarubicin
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Daunorubicin
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vyxeos
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Venetoclax
Other Intervention Name(s)
Venclexta
Intervention Description
Orally by mouth
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Azacitidine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vidaza
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Event free survival
Description
Primary endpoint is event-free-survival of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine compared to patients treated with standard induction with either 7+3 regimen or liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine Events are described in the protocol and will include Progressive Disease as defined above Any change in therapy due to leukemic persistence. Transition to hospice Relapse following CR, CRi, or CRh Any death Assessments of differences in EFS between the randomized arms will be made with the log-rank test; modeling will employ the Cox proportional hazards model. We also plan to assess the difference in estimated EFS at one year, using Kaplan-Meier estimates with standard deviation calculated by Greenwood's formula. EFS will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. EFS will be assessed with the log-rank test, and cox proportional hazards model when appropriate.
Time Frame
From the time from randomization to time for up to 3 years, per protocol.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of response
Description
Evaluated overall and separately for patients with primary and secondary AML, comparisons will be based on the Fisher exact test. CR and CRi will be assessed. Study also includes CRh as a possible response, CRh aims to describe marrow blast clearance and evidence of partial hematologic recovery not captured by current CR or CRi, criteria.
Time Frame
From the time from randomization to time for up to 6 months.
Title
Treatment-related toxicity
Description
Assessed using CTCAE 5
Time Frame
Enrollment to end of treatment duration for up to 12 months.
Title
Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity
Description
Assessed by flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing
Time Frame
From time of enrollment until up to the first 6 months.
Title
30-day mortality
Description
Analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Time Frame
From the time of start of therapy until through the first 30 days.
Title
60-day mortality
Description
Analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Time Frame
From the time of start of therapy until through the first 60 days.
Title
Overall survival (OS)
Description
Survival will be summarized using the method of Kaplan Meier, and assessed using the log rank test and Cox proportional hazards when appropriate.
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization (or registration) to death due to any cause, or censored at date last known alive, or for up to 3 years.
Title
Rate of stem cell transplantation (SCT) following induction
Description
The proportion of patients that receive a hematopoietic stem cell transplant following induction therapy or consolidation/continuation therapy.
Time Frame
From time of enrollment until up to 3 years following start of treatment.
Title
Patient reported quality of life (QOL)
Description
To compare quality of life between the two groups using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leuk). the FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life
Time Frame
up to one year
Title
Patient-reported depression symptoms
Description
To compare depression symptoms between the two groups using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Depression). the HADS-depression ranges from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms
Time Frame
up to one year
Title
Patient-reported anxiety symptoms
Description
To compare anxiety symptoms between the two groups using the Hospital Anxieyt and Depression Scale (HADS-Anxiety). the HADS-Anxiety ranges from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress) with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
Time Frame
up to one year
Title
Patient-reported symptom burden
Description
To compare symptom burden between the two groups using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-revised). ESAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden
Time Frame
up to one year
Title
Patient-reported post-traumatic stress symptoms
Description
To compare post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms between the two groups using the PTSD-Checklist-Civilian Version. The PTSD-Checklist ranges from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
Time Frame
up to one year
Title
Health care utilization - hospitalizations
Description
To compare number of hospitalizations between the two groups using linear regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups
Time Frame
up to 1 year
Title
Health care utilization - days alive and out of the hospital
Description
To compare days alive and out of the hospital between the two groups using linear regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups)
Time Frame
up to 1 year
Title
Health care utilization - Intensive care unit admissions
Description
To compare intensive care unit admissions (yes vs. no) between the two groups using logistic regression (and adjusting for any potential imbalances between the groups)
Time Frame
up to 1 year
Title
Cost of care
Description
To compare cost of care between the two groups using parametric and non-parametric tests based on distribution of the data
Time Frame
up to 1 year
Title
Incidence of neutropenic infections
Description
Number of patients that experience neutropenic fever during induction cycles (up to 2 cycles).
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks
Title
100-Day post-transplant mortality
Description
Assessed using the Kaplan Meier method
Time Frame
From date of transplantation through 100 days following transplantation.
Title
Incidence of grade 3 or greater acute graft versus host disease (GVHD)
Description
Assessed among patients that receive HSCT following induction.
Time Frame
Patients that receive a SCT will be followed post-SCT through up to 100 days.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Participants must have pathologically confirmed, newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The AML may be either: De Novo: AML in patients with no clinical history of prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative disorder, or exposure to potentially leukemogenic therapies or agents Secondary AML (sAML): refers to an acute leukemic process (1) evolving from known prior myelodysplasia, myeloproliferative disorder, or aplastic anemia with or without treatment or; (2) as a product of previous exposure to a proven leukemogenic chemotherapeutic agent Eligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, according to their treating physician ECOG performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A) Left ventricular ejection fraction > 50% as measured by echocardiogram or MUGA scan Must not have received systemic prior antineoplastic therapy for treatment for the newly diagnosed AML, including radiation therapy, except hydroxyurea for the purposes of cytoreduction. Patients may also have received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) if there is an early suspicion of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, M3-AML), although if confirmed to have APL these patients will be excluded from the study. Adequate hepatic function per local laboratory reference ranges as follows: Aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 3.0X ULN Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN (unless bilirubin rise is known to be due to Gilbert's syndrome or of non-hepatic origin) The effects of venetoclax on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason and because other chemotherapeutic agents are known to be teratogenic, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Women should use contraceptives for at least 30 days following the last dose of venetoclax. Men treated or enrolled on this protocol must also agree to use adequate contraception prior to the study, for the duration of study participation, and 4 months after completion of therapy. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) or AML with favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21), inv(16), t(16;16)] Patients < 60 years old with NPM1-mutated AML: Patients with FLT3-mutated AML (TKD or ITD). Patients with acute leukemia with ambiguous lineage or mixed phenotype Patients that have received strong and/or moderate CYP3A inducers within 7 days prior to the initiation of study treatment. Subject has consumed grapefruit, grapefruit products, Seville oranges (including marmalade containing Seville oranges) or Starfruit within 3 days prior to the initiation of study treatment. Patients who have had prior systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy for AML (excluding patients with therapy-related AML), except for hydroxyurea or 6-MP as noted. Empiric intrathecal chemotherapy during a diagnostic lumbar puncture is allowed, as long as CNS disease is not suspected. Patients treated with prior hypomethylating therapy (such as azacitidine or decitabine). Patients who will exceed a lifetime anthracycline exposure of >550 mg/m2 daunorubicin or equivalent (or >400 mg/m2 daunorubicin or equivalent in the event of prior mediastinal radiation) if they receive the maximum potential exposure to anthracyclines per protocol (including both induction and consolidation cycles. Individuals with a history of a different malignancy are ineligible except for the following circumstances. Individuals with a history of other malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for at least 3 years and are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy. Individuals with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 3 years: cervical cancer in situ, breast DCIS, and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Current clinical central nervous system (CNS) symptoms deemed by the investigator to be related to leukemic CNS involvement (no lumbar puncture required, clinical assessment per investigator's judgment is sufficient). Prior bone marrow transplantation for a myeloid malignancy Participants who are receiving any other investigational agents within the prior 14 days. Currently clinically active hepatitis C or hepatitis B infection, as suggested by serology or viral load. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected participants. Patients with no detectable viral load on a stable anti-viral regimen may be eligible, after discussion with the study overall PI. Current or history of congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4, or any history of documented diastolic or systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%, as measured by MUGA scan or echocardiogram). Prior to study entry, any ECG abnormality at screening has to be documented by the investigator as not medically relevant. Known hypersensitivity to the trial drugs or other contraindication to standard "7+3" induction chemotherapy. WBC > 25 x 109/L. Note: hydroxyurea is permitted to meet this criterion Patients who might refuse to receive blood products and/or have a hypersensitivity to blood products Patients with clinically significant persistent electrolyte abnormalities such as hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypermagnesemia of Grade > 1 per NCI CTCAE, v5.0. Treatment for correction of above electrolyte imbalances is permitted during screening to meet eligibility. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, clinically ongoing or active infection requiring intravenous antibiotics (IV antibiotics are allowed if infection is deemed to be controlled), symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. Known GI disease or GI procedures that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of the study drugs. Examples include, but are not limited to partial gastrectomy, history of small intestine surgery, and celiac disease. Pregnant women are excluded from this study because venetoclax and azacitidine, along with standard induction chemotherapy, carries the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with venetoclax as well as azacitidine, cytarabine, daunorubicin and idarubicin, breastfeeding should be avoided. Confirmation that the subject is not pregnant must be established by a negative serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) pregnancy test result obtained during screening. Pregnancy testing is not required for post-menopausal or surgically sterilized women. Patients with psychological, familial, social, or geographic factors that otherwise preclude them from giving informed consent, following the protocol, or potentially hamper compliance with study treatment and follow-up. Patients who are otherwise felt unable to comply with the protocol, in the opinion of the investigator.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Amir T Fathi, MD
Phone
(617) 724-1124
Email
afathi@mgh.harvard.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amir T Fathi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
City of Hope
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ibrahim T Aldoss, MD
Phone
626-256-4673
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ibrahim T Aldoss, MD
Facility Name
University of California - Davis
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian Jonas, MD, PhD
Email
bajonas@ucdavis.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian Jonas, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amir T Fathi, MD
Phone
617-724-1124
Email
afathi@mgh.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amir T Fathi, MD
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ajoy Dias, MD
Phone
617-667-9920
Email
adias3@bidmc.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ajoy Dias, MD
Facility Name
Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28204
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brittany K. Ragon, MD
Phone
980-442-4363
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brittany K. Ragon, MD
Facility Name
Ohio State University Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alice Mims, MD
Phone
614-293-3196
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alice Mims, MD
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexander Perl, MD
Email
alexander.perl@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexander Perl, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Contact the Partners Innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

Learn more about this trial

Venetoclax + Azacitidine vs. Induction Chemotherapy in AML

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs