search
Back to results

NanaBis™ an Oro-buccal Administered delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (d9-THC) & Cannabidiol (CBD) Medicine for the Management of Bone Pain From Metastatic Cancers

Primary Purpose

Cancer Related Pain

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NanaBis™
Oxycodone CR
Placebo Spray
Placebo Tablet
Oxycodone IR
Sponsored by
Medlab Clinical
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cancer Related Pain focused on measuring Cannabis based medicine, d9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabidiol, Cancer Pain, Cancer Bone Pain, Treatment, Monotherapy, Nanoparticle, Tetrahydrocannabinol

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

At Screening Phase

Participants must fulfil all of the following criteria:

  • Prospective male and female participants that are:

    1. in the age range 18-65 years or
    2. 65 to 75 years without significant co-morbidities (heart, lung, liver or renal failure, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, connective tissue disease or diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage)
  • Metastatic bone pain from a cancer diagnosis is the only major cause of pain.
  • Documented proof (imaging) confirming the Metastatic Bone Disease at the current site of pain and that there has no been treatment since diagnosis
  • Meet International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pain management criteria (i.e., bone cancer pain)
  • During the screening period, the participant is on stable opioid pain management and pain severity (NPRS) ≤ 8 with a maximum variation of ± 1
  • Pain Detect score > 18
  • Participant willing and able to provide informed consent and follow study procedures

    1. including agreeing to not drive or operate heavy machinery; and
    2. females of child-bearing potential agree to use reliable contraception during the duration of the clinical trial
  • Patient deemed tolerable to Oxycodone and NanaBis™ determined by medical history of allergies to cannabinoids or opioids
  • Patient must not be a participant in a clinical trial or study.

Exclusion Criteria:

At Screening Phase

Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria that include:

  • History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
  • Moderate to severe medical conditions such as

    1. Severe hepatic, cardiovascular, pulmonary or renal impairment or
    2. Psychiatric disorders (i.e., unstable schizophrenia, recent drug-induced psychosis, severe mood disorders), that would be assessed at the medical screen
  • If participants have been diagnosed with a current substance abuse disorder
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant
  • Identified concerns by the nursing / medical team relevant to the safe storage of medications (i.e., NanaBis™ or standard medical therapy)
  • Participants who may not be available for follow up (i.e., planned or expected travel or other)
  • Participants plan to undergo any treatment that will substantially reduce the burden of disease (and therefore bone pain) during the screening, titration or maintenance phase of the clinical trial such as radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • Participants who are unable to withhold all analgesia (apart from which is part of this trial) during the titration and maintenance phase of the study, including bisphosphonates, or are currently exceeding equivalence of 70mg BD Oxycodone CR. Medications such as bisphosphonates may be coordinated so they are given either side of the excluded period that covers the titration and maintenance phases
  • Participants will NOT be excluded if they are being treated with maintenance pharmacotherapy to prevent progression of disease such as steroids and hormone therapy, which may be continued during the trial at a stable dose
  • Participant will be excluded if they are participating in any other clinical trial or study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Placebo Comparator

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Double Placebo Arm

    Treatment NanaBis™ Arm

    Comparator (Oxycodone) Arm

    Arm Description

    Spray Placebo + Tablet Placebo Spray Placebo is a nanoparticle water soluble solution without cannabinoids containing a small amount of hemp seed oil (for fragrance purposes only) as defined by Australian Office of Drug Control (ODC) (https://www.odc.gov.au/hemp-products). One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume. Tablet Placebo will be identical to the Oxycontin tablets.

    NanaBis™ + Tablet Placebo NanaBis™ is a nanoparticle water soluble equimolar solution of d9-THC and CBD. One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume containing 2.5 mg d9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD. The dose administered will be 1 - 3.5 doses (2 sprays to 7 sprays) per 4 hours unless asleep.

    Spray Placebo + Oxycodone CR Spray Placebo is a nanoparticle water soluble solution without cannabinoids containing a small amount of hemp seed oil (for fragrance purposes only) as defined by Australian ODC (https://www.odc.gov.au/hemp-products). One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume. Oxycodone controlled release (CR) used as a comparator will be Oxycontin tablets 10 mg - 70 mg po bd.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Significant changes in responders with NanaBis™ spray over placebo (p<0.05)
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ group shows significant change than the proportion of responders in the placebo group. A responder is defined as a participant who completes the maintenance phase with an acceptable level of pain (NPRS is equal to 5) and without requiring excessive amounts of rescue (breakthrough analgesia) medication. NPRS Assessment [Time Frame: Baseline and then twice daily for the duration of the study]. The NPRS questionnaire is completed by the participant to determine their pain intensity. The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from '0-10'. A score of '0' being no pain and a score of '10' being the most intense pain imaginable. Participants select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain they have experienced in the last 24 hours.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Comparable efficacy in proportion of responders from NanaBis™ spray to the proportion of responders to Oxycodone CR
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ group is similar to the proportion of responders in the Oxycodone group determined by pain levels recorded using NPRS. A responder is defined as a participant who completes the maintenance phase with an acceptable level of pain (NPRS is equal to 5) and without requiring excessive amounts of rescue (breakthrough analgesia) medication. NPRS Assessment [Time Frame: Baseline and then twice daily for the duration of the study]. The NPRS questionnaire is completed by the participant to determine their pain intensity. The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from '0-10'. A score of '0' being no pain and a score of '10' being the most intense pain imaginable. Participants select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
    Significant change in the Health-Related Quality of Life Scores with NanaBis™ spray over placebo (p<0.05) and comparable to Oxycodone CR
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period the Health-Related Quality of Life scores in the NanaBis™ treated group are significantly changed than in the Placebo group and is similar to the Oxycodone CR treated group. Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 validated questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline and then weekly during the maintenance phase of the study and at then weeks 7 and 18 of the Open Label Extension]. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is validated questionnaire answered by participants to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. It assesses important functioning domains (e.g. physical, emotional, role) and common cancer symptoms (e.g. fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss).
    Significant change in the NPRS score with NanaBis™ spray over placebo (p<0.05) and comparable to Oxycodone CR
    NPRS Assessment [Time Frame: Baseline and then twice daily for the duration of the study]. The NPRS questionnaire is completed by the participant to determine their pain intensity. The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from '0-10'. A score of '0' being no pain and a score of '10' being the most intense pain imaginable. Participants select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
    NanaBis™ Adverse Events
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period that NanaBis™ is safe and tolerable. Safety and tolerability will be assessed via standardised adverse events, Serious adverse events, Deaths, UKU - Side Effects Rating Scale (UKU), Local Adverse Events Charts and patient medical records. Adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths will be summarised by treatment arm. Does the daily use of NanaBis™ oro-buccal spray reduce the severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (safety and tolerability). [Time Frame: Baseline and then weekly for the duration of the study]. Changes in validated UKU scale range is 0 to 3 for rating the degree of severity (mild, moderate or severe) and a second scale for the investigator that assigns a casual relationship of improbable, possible or probable.
    Fifty percent or greater of the NanaBis™ treated group request compassionate extension with NanaBis™ spray
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period that after unblinding, half or more of the NanaBis™ treated group prefer further treatment with NanaBis™ in the open label extension phase (note that all participants will be all offered open label extension if appropriate).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 11, 2021
    Last Updated
    April 4, 2022
    Sponsor
    Medlab Clinical
    Collaborators
    George Clinical Pty Ltd, WriteSource Medical Pty Ltd
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04808531
    Brief Title
    NanaBis™ an Oro-buccal Administered delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (d9-THC) & Cannabidiol (CBD) Medicine for the Management of Bone Pain From Metastatic Cancers
    Official Title
    NanaBis™ an Oro-buccal Administered Equimolar d9-THC & CBD Formulation as Monotherapy for Management of Opioid Requiring Bone Pain Due to Metastatic Cancer: Phase 3 Multi Centre Blinded Randomized Withdrawal Active & Placebo Controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    November 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    February 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    June 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Medlab Clinical
    Collaborators
    George Clinical Pty Ltd, WriteSource Medical Pty Ltd

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This is a multi-centre, long term, double blind, clinical protocol for NanaBis™ as a monotherapy treatment in participants 18-75 years of age with cancer related pain.
    Detailed Description
    This trial uses an alternative method to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of NanaBis™ as a monotherapy in cancer participants. Proving analgesic efficacy requires demonstrating that (i) the analgesic is significantly better than placebo and (ii) that the magnitude of the improvement is clinically important. The latter is standardly done by measuring the change in pain levels from a baseline (no analgesia) to the end of a treatment period. A 30% decrease in the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) has been correlated with participants reporting a moderate improvement in their pain and this was adopted as the standard method of demonstrating a clinically important magnitude of improvement. In this strategy, the measure of analgesic efficacy is the proportion of participants in the treatment group whose pain is adequately treated (responders). A responder is defined as a patient who completes the treatment phase with an acceptable level of pain (NPRS ≤ 5) and without requiring excessive amounts of rescue (breakthrough analgesia) medication. Unlimited breakthrough analgesia (Oxycodone) is allowed throughout the study; however, excessive use will result in discontinuation. Comparison of the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ arm and placebo arms will determine if NanaBis™ is significantly better than placebo. Demonstrating that the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ arm is non-inferior to the Oxycodone controlled release (CR) comparator arm will determine if the magnitude of improvement (provided by NanaBis™) is clinically important because Oxycodone CR has been established as the benchmark analgesic that provides a clinically important effect.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cancer Related Pain
    Keywords
    Cannabis based medicine, d9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabidiol, Cancer Pain, Cancer Bone Pain, Treatment, Monotherapy, Nanoparticle, Tetrahydrocannabinol

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Quadruple blinding
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    360 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Double Placebo Arm
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Spray Placebo + Tablet Placebo Spray Placebo is a nanoparticle water soluble solution without cannabinoids containing a small amount of hemp seed oil (for fragrance purposes only) as defined by Australian Office of Drug Control (ODC) (https://www.odc.gov.au/hemp-products). One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume. Tablet Placebo will be identical to the Oxycontin tablets.
    Arm Title
    Treatment NanaBis™ Arm
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    NanaBis™ + Tablet Placebo NanaBis™ is a nanoparticle water soluble equimolar solution of d9-THC and CBD. One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume containing 2.5 mg d9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD. The dose administered will be 1 - 3.5 doses (2 sprays to 7 sprays) per 4 hours unless asleep.
    Arm Title
    Comparator (Oxycodone) Arm
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Spray Placebo + Oxycodone CR Spray Placebo is a nanoparticle water soluble solution without cannabinoids containing a small amount of hemp seed oil (for fragrance purposes only) as defined by Australian ODC (https://www.odc.gov.au/hemp-products). One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume. Oxycodone controlled release (CR) used as a comparator will be Oxycontin tablets 10 mg - 70 mg po bd.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    NanaBis™
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    MDCNB-01, NanoCelle® d9-THC & CBD
    Intervention Description
    NanaBis™ is a nanoparticle water soluble equimolar solution of d9-THC & CBD. One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume containing 2.5 mg d9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Oxycodone CR
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    OxyNorm®, OxyContin®, Endone®, Proladone®, Targin®, Xtampza ER®
    Intervention Description
    Oxycodone CR tablet is an opioid agonist supplied in 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg,40 mg, 60 mg and 80 mg tablets for oral administration. The tablet strengths describe the amount of oxycodone per tablet as the hydrochloride salt.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Placebo Spray
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    NanoCelle® Placebo Spray
    Intervention Description
    Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Placebo Tablet
    Intervention Description
    Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Oxycodone IR
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Oxyfast®, Oxy IR®, Oxaydo®, Roxicodone®
    Intervention Description
    Oxycodone immediate release (IR) tablet or capsule or oral solution used as breakthrough analgesia.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Significant changes in responders with NanaBis™ spray over placebo (p<0.05)
    Description
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ group shows significant change than the proportion of responders in the placebo group. A responder is defined as a participant who completes the maintenance phase with an acceptable level of pain (NPRS is equal to 5) and without requiring excessive amounts of rescue (breakthrough analgesia) medication. NPRS Assessment [Time Frame: Baseline and then twice daily for the duration of the study]. The NPRS questionnaire is completed by the participant to determine their pain intensity. The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from '0-10'. A score of '0' being no pain and a score of '10' being the most intense pain imaginable. Participants select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Comparable efficacy in proportion of responders from NanaBis™ spray to the proportion of responders to Oxycodone CR
    Description
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ group is similar to the proportion of responders in the Oxycodone group determined by pain levels recorded using NPRS. A responder is defined as a participant who completes the maintenance phase with an acceptable level of pain (NPRS is equal to 5) and without requiring excessive amounts of rescue (breakthrough analgesia) medication. NPRS Assessment [Time Frame: Baseline and then twice daily for the duration of the study]. The NPRS questionnaire is completed by the participant to determine their pain intensity. The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from '0-10'. A score of '0' being no pain and a score of '10' being the most intense pain imaginable. Participants select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Title
    Significant change in the Health-Related Quality of Life Scores with NanaBis™ spray over placebo (p<0.05) and comparable to Oxycodone CR
    Description
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period the Health-Related Quality of Life scores in the NanaBis™ treated group are significantly changed than in the Placebo group and is similar to the Oxycodone CR treated group. Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 validated questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline and then weekly during the maintenance phase of the study and at then weeks 7 and 18 of the Open Label Extension]. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is validated questionnaire answered by participants to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. It assesses important functioning domains (e.g. physical, emotional, role) and common cancer symptoms (e.g. fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss).
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Title
    Significant change in the NPRS score with NanaBis™ spray over placebo (p<0.05) and comparable to Oxycodone CR
    Description
    NPRS Assessment [Time Frame: Baseline and then twice daily for the duration of the study]. The NPRS questionnaire is completed by the participant to determine their pain intensity. The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from '0-10'. A score of '0' being no pain and a score of '10' being the most intense pain imaginable. Participants select the value that is most in line with the intensity of pain they have experienced in the last 24 hours.
    Time Frame
    18 weeks
    Title
    NanaBis™ Adverse Events
    Description
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period that NanaBis™ is safe and tolerable. Safety and tolerability will be assessed via standardised adverse events, Serious adverse events, Deaths, UKU - Side Effects Rating Scale (UKU), Local Adverse Events Charts and patient medical records. Adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths will be summarised by treatment arm. Does the daily use of NanaBis™ oro-buccal spray reduce the severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (safety and tolerability). [Time Frame: Baseline and then weekly for the duration of the study]. Changes in validated UKU scale range is 0 to 3 for rating the degree of severity (mild, moderate or severe) and a second scale for the investigator that assigns a casual relationship of improbable, possible or probable.
    Time Frame
    18 weeks
    Title
    Fifty percent or greater of the NanaBis™ treated group request compassionate extension with NanaBis™ spray
    Description
    To demonstrate that at the end of the 6-week study period that after unblinding, half or more of the NanaBis™ treated group prefer further treatment with NanaBis™ in the open label extension phase (note that all participants will be all offered open label extension if appropriate).
    Time Frame
    12 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    75 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: At Screening Phase Participants must fulfil all of the following criteria: Prospective male and female participants that are: in the age range 18-65 years or 65 to 75 years without significant co-morbidities (heart, lung, liver or renal failure, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, connective tissue disease or diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage) Metastatic bone pain from a cancer diagnosis is the only major cause of pain. Documented proof (imaging) confirming the Metastatic Bone Disease at the current site of pain and that there has no been treatment since diagnosis Meet International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pain management criteria (i.e., bone cancer pain) During the screening period, the participant is on stable opioid pain management and pain severity (NPRS) ≤ 8 with a maximum variation of ± 1 Pain Detect score > 18 Participant willing and able to provide informed consent and follow study procedures including agreeing to not drive or operate heavy machinery; and females of child-bearing potential agree to use reliable contraception during the duration of the clinical trial Patient deemed tolerable to Oxycodone and NanaBis™ determined by medical history of allergies to cannabinoids or opioids Patient must not be a participant in a clinical trial or study. Exclusion Criteria: At Screening Phase Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria that include: History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures Moderate to severe medical conditions such as Severe hepatic, cardiovascular, pulmonary or renal impairment or Psychiatric disorders (i.e., unstable schizophrenia, recent drug-induced psychosis, severe mood disorders), that would be assessed at the medical screen If participants have been diagnosed with a current substance abuse disorder Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant Identified concerns by the nursing / medical team relevant to the safe storage of medications (i.e., NanaBis™ or standard medical therapy) Participants who may not be available for follow up (i.e., planned or expected travel or other) Participants plan to undergo any treatment that will substantially reduce the burden of disease (and therefore bone pain) during the screening, titration or maintenance phase of the clinical trial such as radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy Participants who are unable to withhold all analgesia (apart from which is part of this trial) during the titration and maintenance phase of the study, including bisphosphonates, or are currently exceeding equivalence of 70mg BD Oxycodone CR. Medications such as bisphosphonates may be coordinated so they are given either side of the excluded period that covers the titration and maintenance phases Participants will NOT be excluded if they are being treated with maintenance pharmacotherapy to prevent progression of disease such as steroids and hormone therapy, which may be continued during the trial at a stable dose Participant will be excluded if they are participating in any other clinical trial or study.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Prof. Luis Vitetta
    Phone
    +61 8188 0311
    Ext
    106
    Email
    luis_vitetta@medlab.co
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Dr. Michael Lyon
    Phone
    +1 604 777 5500
    Email
    doctorlyon@me.com

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    11690728
    Citation
    Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25054392
    Citation
    Kress HG, Koch ED, Kosturski H, Steup A, Karcher K, Lange B, Dogan C, Etropolski MS, Eerdekens M. Tapentadol prolonged release for managing moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain. Pain Physician. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):329-43.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21762341
    Citation
    Anderson W. 2007 National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Intern Med J. 2011 Jul;41(7):581-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02528.x. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21704873
    Citation
    Portenoy RK. Treatment of cancer pain. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2236-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60236-5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18632721
    Citation
    Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G. Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature. Ann Oncol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1985-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn419. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17943804
    Citation
    Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ. Oral morphine for cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003868.pub2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25633978
    Citation
    Kane CM, Hoskin P, Bennett MI. Cancer induced bone pain. BMJ. 2015 Jan 29;350:h315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h315. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20452835
    Citation
    Gregorian RS Jr, Gasik A, Kwong WJ, Voeller S, Kavanagh S. Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: a trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1095-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 May 10.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28584570
    Citation
    Macedo F, Ladeira K, Pinho F, Saraiva N, Bonito N, Pinto L, Goncalves F. Bone Metastases: An Overview. Oncol Rev. 2017 May 9;11(1):321. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2017.321. eCollection 2017 Mar 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    14600589
    Citation
    Choong PF. The molecular basis of skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Oct;(415 Suppl):S19-31. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093839.72468.da.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24295792
    Citation
    Pezaro C, Omlin A, Lorente D, Rodrigues DN, Ferraldeschi R, Bianchini D, Mukherji D, Riisnaes R, Altavilla A, Crespo M, Tunariu N, de Bono J, Attard G. Visceral disease in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.055. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10836297
    Citation
    Bubendorf L, Schopfer A, Wagner U, Sauter G, Moch H, Willi N, Gasser TC, Mihatsch MJ. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000 May;31(5):578-83. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.6698.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28884071
    Citation
    Yanae M, Fujimoto S, Tane K, Tanioka M, Fujiwara K, Tsubaki M, Yamazoe Y, Morishima Y, Chiba Y, Takao S, Komoike Y, Tsurutani J, Nakagawa K, Nishida S. Increased risk of SSEs in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients treated with zoledronic acid. J Bone Oncol. 2017 Aug 31;8:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2017.08.004. eCollection 2017 Sep.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28602171
    Citation
    Body JJ, Quinn G, Talbot S, Booth E, Demonty G, Taylor A, Amelio J. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the proportion of patients with breast cancer who develop bone metastases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Jul;115:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17062708
    Citation
    Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28205574
    Citation
    Colloca L, Ludman T, Bouhassira D, Baron R, Dickenson AH, Yarnitsky D, Freeman R, Truini A, Attal N, Finnerup NB, Eccleston C, Kalso E, Bennett DL, Dworkin RH, Raja SN. Neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Feb 16;3:17002. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29921999
    Citation
    Murnion BP. Neuropathic pain: current definition and review of drug treatment. Aust Prescr. 2018 Jun;41(3):60-63. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2018.022. Epub 2018 Jun 1. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24792411
    Citation
    Mantyh PW. Bone cancer pain: from mechanism to therapy. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014 Jun;8(2):83-90. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000048.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30443456
    Citation
    Ahmad I, Ahmed MM, Ahsraf MF, Naeem A, Tasleem A, Ahmed M, Farooqi MS. Pain Management in Metastatic Bone Disease: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2018 Sep 11;10(9):e3286. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3286.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28537982
    Citation
    Meng H, Johnston B, Englesakis M, Moulin DE, Bhatia A. Selective Cannabinoids for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1638-1652. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002110.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30900486
    Citation
    Cavalli E, Mammana S, Nicoletti F, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. The neuropathic pain: An overview of the current treatment and future therapeutic approaches. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2019 Jan-Dec;33:2058738419838383. doi: 10.1177/2058738419838383.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25410243
    Citation
    Lee-Kubli CA, Calcutt NA. Painful neuropathy: Mechanisms. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;126:533-57. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53480-4.00034-5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26505059
    Citation
    Deshpande A, Mailis-Gagnon A, Zoheiry N, Lakha SF. Efficacy and adverse effects of medical marijuana for chronic noncancer pain: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Aug;61(8):e372-81.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28866904
    Citation
    Blake A, Wan BA, Malek L, DeAngelis C, Diaz P, Lao N, Chow E, O'Hearn S. A selective review of medical cannabis in cancer pain management. Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;6(Suppl 2):S215-S222. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.08.05. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27630175
    Citation
    Ligresti A, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V. From Phytocannabinoids to Cannabinoid Receptors and Endocannabinoids: Pleiotropic Physiological and Pathological Roles Through Complex Pharmacology. Physiol Rev. 2016 Oct;96(4):1593-659. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00002.2016.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31627091
    Citation
    Sun J, Zhou YQ, Chen SP, Wang XM, Xu BY, Li DY, Tian YK, Ye DW. The endocannabinoid system: Novel targets for treating cancer induced bone pain. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Dec;120:109504. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109504. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31661120
    Citation
    Mao Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wu H, Tian X, Liu Y, Hou B, Liang Y, Rong H, Gu X, Ma Z. Cannabinoid receptor 2-selective agonist JWH015 attenuates bone cancer pain through the amelioration of impaired autophagy flux induced by inflammatory mediators in the spinal cord. Mol Med Rep. 2019 Dec;20(6):5100-5110. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10772. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31959586
    Citation
    Boland EG, Bennett MI, Allgar V, Boland JW. Cannabinoids for adult cancer-related pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Mar;10(1):14-24. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002032. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24906437
    Citation
    Imanaka K, Tominaga Y, Etropolski M, Ohashi H, Hirose K, Matsumura T. Ready conversion of patients with well-controlled, moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain on other opioids to tapentadol extended release. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Jul;34(7):501-11. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0204-3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17022849
    Citation
    Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tolle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Oct;22(10):1911-20. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132488.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16574036
    Citation
    Freynhagen R, Baron R, Tolle T, Stemmler E, Gockel U, Stevens M, Maier C. Screening of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic back pain associated with nerve root compression: a prospective observational pilot study (MIPORT). Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Mar;22(3):529-37. doi: 10.1185/030079906X89874.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23346175
    Citation
    Lee SH, Min YS, Park HY, Jung TD. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients with lymphedema who survived more than one year after surgery. J Breast Cancer. 2012 Dec;15(4):449-53. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.449. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27922844
    Citation
    Rehberg B, Mathivon S, Combescure C, Mercier Y, Savoldelli GL. Prediction of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: A Cohort Study. Clin J Pain. 2017 Jan;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000380.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    3687892
    Citation
    Handelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, Ness R, Rubinstein KJ, Kanof PD. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13(3):293-308. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001515.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22019563
    Citation
    Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23295957
    Citation
    Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27527475
    Citation
    Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Margo McCaffery Alexander Beebe Mosby Yearbook UK pound17.25 0 7234 1992 2. Nurs Stand. 1994 Dec 7;9(11):55. doi: 10.7748/ns.9.11.55.s69.
    Results Reference
    background
    Links:
    URL
    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/ich13595an.pdf
    Description
    Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95) - annotated with TGA comments. DSEB. 2000.
    URL
    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/ich37795.pdf
    Description
    Note for Guidance on Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting (CPMP/ICH/377/95). Annotated with TGA comments,. 2001.
    URL
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK476449/
    Description
    VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports. In Benefits and Harms of Cannabis in Chronic Pain or Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review, Department of Veterans Affairs (US): Washington (DC), 2017.

    Learn more about this trial

    NanaBis™ an Oro-buccal Administered delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (d9-THC) & Cannabidiol (CBD) Medicine for the Management of Bone Pain From Metastatic Cancers

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs