Effect of the Nutraceutical "MICODIGEST 2.0" on the Complications After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Primary Purpose
Colorectal Cancer, Surgery--Complications
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MICODIGEST 2.0 supplement
Placebo supplement
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring Colorectal Cancer, Surgery Complications, Gut microbiota, Inflammatory pattern, Dietary pattern, Nutraceutical
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- CRC patients who are candidates for surgical treatment with curative intent (risk I-III).
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status Classification (ASA) <3.
- Patients aged between 18 and 85 years.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale between 0-2.
- Patients with preserved cognitive function.
- Patient's authorization after reading the study information sheet.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Candidates for neoadjuvant therapy.
- Patients with concomitant carcinoma.
- Allergy to the supplied nutraceutical or presence of malabsorption syndrome.
- Presence of mental disorders
- Patient with active infection or antibiotic therapy in the last month.
- Previous colorectal surgery
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
MICODIGEST 2.0 supplement
Placebo
Arm Description
Treatment with MICODIGEST 2.0 will initiate with 10mL/day (before breakfast or before lunch) for 7 days, and rise to 20mL/day (10mL before breakfast and 10 mL before dinner) for 4-6 weeks.
Treatment with placebo will initiate with 10mL/day (before breakfast or before lunch) for 7 days, and rise to 20 mL/day (before breakfast and before dinner) for 4-6 weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of complications.
Anastomotic failure, infection, prolonged ileus, systemic complications and other will be measured. Clavien-Dindo classification will be used for grading the severity of these postoperative complications. These analysis will be measured to evaluate the effect of MICODEGIST 2.0 on the complications after surgery with curative intent for CRC.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Frequency of adverse effects.
Adverse effects will be considered during follow-up and after surgery using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. This analysis will be measured to evaluate the safety of MICODIGEST 2.0 in CRC patients.
Fecal microbiome composition.
High-quality DNA extraction will be performed in fecal samples. The bacterial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene will be sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq. Metagenomic species and a database with >200.000 strains will be used to define the microbiome composition. This analysis will be used to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on feal microbiome composition.
Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio.
Neutrophil/Lymphocyte will be measured dividing the absolute number of neutrophils by the absolute number of lymphocytes from peripheral blood sample. This inflammatory biomarker will be used to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern.
C reactive protein (CRP) level.
CRP levels (mg/dL) from peripheral blood samples will be measured to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern.
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels.
TNF-apha (pg/mL) and IL-6 (pg/mL) from peripheral blood samples will be measured to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern.
Dietary pattern assessment.
Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment survey (PG-SGA) will be used to assess the nutritional status. At the end of this survey, the patient will be rated nutritionally in one of three categories: "Well-nourished or anabolic" (PG-SGA - A), "Moderately or suspected of being undernourished" (PG-SGA B) and "Severely undernourished" (PG-SGA C). This analysis will be performed to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on dietary pattern.
Quality of life assessment.
The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to measure the health-related quality-of-life. The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state. This analysis will be perfomed to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on quality of life.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04821258
First Posted
March 23, 2021
Last Updated
March 26, 2021
Sponsor
Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Sur
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04821258
Brief Title
Effect of the Nutraceutical "MICODIGEST 2.0" on the Complications After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Official Title
Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of the Nutraceutical "MICODIGEST 2.0" on the Complications After Surgery With Curative Intent for Colorectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2021 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Sur
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Most of Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed are candidates for surgical resection with curative intent, although colorectal surgery is associated with some complications that could be life-threatening. Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly used prior to the admission for the prevention of postoperative complications. However, this intervention can change the composition of intestinal microbiota and promote adverse inflammatory outcomes in CRC patients after surgery.
It seems the combination of different fungal extracts could be beneficial because of their role in gut microbiota modulation and their anti-inflammatory activity. Therefore, the fungal extract nutraceutical MICODIGEST 2.0 could be used to reduced the complications after CRC surgery.
Based on this hypothesis, we have designed a double-bind randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on the complications after surgery with curative intent for CRC.
Detailed Description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in western countries. Most of the CRC diagnosed are candidates for surgical resection with curative intent. Cure rates after surgery vary between 92 % and 67 % depending on the tumor stage. However, colorectal surgery is associated with some complications that could be life-threatening.
Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly used prior to the admission for the prevention of this postoperative complications. Several studies have shown that antibiotic administration reduces the risk of infections associated with surgery. Nevertheless, this intervention does not modify the mortality and severity of other complications detected. Further, antibiotic prophylaxis could change the intestinal microbiota and promote adverse inflammatory outcomes in CRC patients after surgery.
Fungal polysaccharides have attracted attention because of their role in gut microbiota modulation. It seems that this type of polysaccharides could reduce pathogen levels and stimulate the growth of beneficial microorganism. Anti-inflammatory activity has also been described for these fungal polysaccharides. It seems the combination of different fungal extracts would send multiple stimuli to the immune system increasing intracellular reactions and interactions. Thus, the fungal extract nutraceutical MICODIGEST 2.0 could be used to reduced the complications after CRC surgery. MICODIGEST 2.0 is available since 2016 without any adverse effect reported.
For all these reasons we have designed a double-bind randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of MICODEGIST 2.0 on the complications after surgery with curative intent for CRC.
Apart from this purpose, we have also set the following secondary objectives:
To evaluate the safety of MICODIGEST 2.0 in CRC patients.
To evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on feal microbiome composition and diversity.
To evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern, dietary pattern and quality of life.
To analyze the effect of microbiome, inflammatory and dietary pattern on complications after surgery.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer, Surgery--Complications
Keywords
Colorectal Cancer, Surgery Complications, Gut microbiota, Inflammatory pattern, Dietary pattern, Nutraceutical
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
CRC candidates for surgery with curative intent will be considered to include in the study. Patients who fulfill criteria will be screened and randomly allocated to be treated with MICODIGEST 2.0 or placebo previous to the admission. Patients will be also stratified based on tumor location (distal or proximal to splenic flexure).
Patients will be followed for 4-6 weeks until surgery intervention.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
144 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
MICODIGEST 2.0 supplement
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment with MICODIGEST 2.0 will initiate with 10mL/day (before breakfast or before lunch) for 7 days, and rise to 20mL/day (10mL before breakfast and 10 mL before dinner) for 4-6 weeks.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Treatment with placebo will initiate with 10mL/day (before breakfast or before lunch) for 7 days, and rise to 20 mL/day (before breakfast and before dinner) for 4-6 weeks.
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
MICODIGEST 2.0 supplement
Intervention Description
MICODIGEST is a nutraceutical which contains 9 different fungal extracts: Ganoderma lucidum, Agaricus blazei, Grifola frondosa, Hericium erinaceus, Cordyceps sinensis, Inonotus obliquus, Pleurotus ostreatus, Polyporus umbellatus y Lentinula edodes
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo supplement
Intervention Description
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of complications.
Description
Anastomotic failure, infection, prolonged ileus, systemic complications and other will be measured. Clavien-Dindo classification will be used for grading the severity of these postoperative complications. These analysis will be measured to evaluate the effect of MICODEGIST 2.0 on the complications after surgery with curative intent for CRC.
Time Frame
week 4-6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency of adverse effects.
Description
Adverse effects will be considered during follow-up and after surgery using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. This analysis will be measured to evaluate the safety of MICODIGEST 2.0 in CRC patients.
Time Frame
week 1-6
Title
Fecal microbiome composition.
Description
High-quality DNA extraction will be performed in fecal samples. The bacterial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene will be sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq. Metagenomic species and a database with >200.000 strains will be used to define the microbiome composition. This analysis will be used to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on feal microbiome composition.
Time Frame
week 4-6
Title
Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio.
Description
Neutrophil/Lymphocyte will be measured dividing the absolute number of neutrophils by the absolute number of lymphocytes from peripheral blood sample. This inflammatory biomarker will be used to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern.
Time Frame
week 4-6
Title
C reactive protein (CRP) level.
Description
CRP levels (mg/dL) from peripheral blood samples will be measured to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern.
Time Frame
week 4-6
Title
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels.
Description
TNF-apha (pg/mL) and IL-6 (pg/mL) from peripheral blood samples will be measured to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on inflammatory pattern.
Time Frame
week 4-6
Title
Dietary pattern assessment.
Description
Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment survey (PG-SGA) will be used to assess the nutritional status. At the end of this survey, the patient will be rated nutritionally in one of three categories: "Well-nourished or anabolic" (PG-SGA - A), "Moderately or suspected of being undernourished" (PG-SGA B) and "Severely undernourished" (PG-SGA C). This analysis will be performed to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on dietary pattern.
Time Frame
week 4-6
Title
Quality of life assessment.
Description
The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to measure the health-related quality-of-life. The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state. This analysis will be perfomed to evaluate the effect of MICODIGEST 2.0 on quality of life.
Time Frame
week 4-6
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
CRC patients who are candidates for surgical treatment with curative intent (risk I-III).
American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status Classification (ASA) <3.
Patients aged between 18 and 85 years.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale between 0-2.
Patients with preserved cognitive function.
Patient's authorization after reading the study information sheet.
Exclusion Criteria:
Candidates for neoadjuvant therapy.
Patients with concomitant carcinoma.
Allergy to the supplied nutraceutical or presence of malabsorption syndrome.
Presence of mental disorders
Patient with active infection or antibiotic therapy in the last month.
Previous colorectal surgery
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Joaquín Cubiella, MD PhD
Phone
0034988385824
Email
joaquin.cubiella.fernandez@sergas.es
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32611328
Citation
Gutierrez-Stampa MA, Aguilar V, Sarasqueta C, Cubiella J, Portillo I, Bujanda L. Impact of the faecal immunochemical test on colorectal cancer survival. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07074-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32854370
Citation
Gutierrez-Stampa MA, Aguilar V, Sarasqueta C, Cubiella J, Portillo I, Bujanda L. Colorectal Cancer Survival in 50- to 69-Year-Olds after Introducing the Faecal Immunochemical Test. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 25;12(9):2412. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092412.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32899974
Citation
Cubiella J, Gonzalez A, Almazan R, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Fontenla Rodiles J, Dominguez Ferreiro C, Tejido Sandoval C, Sanchez Gomez C, de Vicente Bielza N, Lorenzo IP, Zubizarreta R. pT1 Colorectal Cancer Detected in a Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Program: Treatment and Factors Associated with Residual and Extraluminal Disease. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 6;12(9):2530. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092530.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30802304
Citation
Abis GSA, Stockmann HBAC, Bonjer HJ, van Veenendaal N, van Doorn-Schepens MLM, Budding AE, Wilschut JA, van Egmond M, Oosterling SJ; SELECT trial study group. Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial). Br J Surg. 2019 Mar;106(4):355-363. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11117. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32325012
Citation
Espin Basany E, Solis-Pena A, Pellino G, Kreisler E, Fraccalvieri D, Muinelo-Lorenzo M, Maseda-Diaz O, Garcia-Gonzalez JM, Santamaria-Olabarrieta M, Codina-Cazador A, Biondo S. Preoperative oral antibiotics and surgical-site infections in colon surgery (ORALEV): a multicentre, single-blind, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;5(8):729-738. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30075-3. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Erratum In: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr 30;:
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31469748
Citation
Chowdhury AH, Adiamah A, Kushairi A, Varadhan KK, Krznaric Z, Kulkarni AD, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Perioperative Probiotics or Synbiotics in Adults Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1036-1047. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003581.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22972297
Citation
Tremaroli V, Backhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):242-9. doi: 10.1038/nature11552.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21422915
Citation
Morowitz MJ, Babrowski T, Carlisle EM, Olivas A, Romanowski KS, Seal JB, Liu DC, Alverdy JC. The human microbiome and surgical disease. Ann Surg. 2011 Jun;253(6):1094-101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821175d7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23636012
Citation
Ralls MW, Miyasaka E, Teitelbaum DH. Intestinal microbial diversity and perioperative complications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Mar-Apr;38(3):392-9. doi: 10.1177/0148607113486482. Epub 2013 May 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29409054
Citation
Ottosson F, Brunkwall L, Ericson U, Nilsson PM, Almgren P, Fernandez C, Melander O, Orho-Melander M. Connection Between BMI-Related Plasma Metabolite Profile and Gut Microbiota. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Apr 1;103(4):1491-1501. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02114.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30655873
Citation
Liu CJ, Zhang YL, Shang Y, Wu B, Yang E, Luo YY, Li XR. Intestinal bacteria detected in cancer and adjacent tissue from patients with colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan;17(1):1115-1127. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9714. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33049854
Citation
Yin C, Noratto GD, Fan X, Chen Z, Yao F, Shi D, Gao H. The Impact of Mushroom Polysaccharides on Gut Microbiota and Its Beneficial Effects to Host: A Review. Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Dec 15;250:116942. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116942. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28513745
Citation
Ma G, Kimatu BM, Zhao L, Yang W, Pei F, Hu Q. In vivo fermentation of a Pleurotus eryngii polysaccharide and its effects on fecal microbiota composition and immune response. Food Funct. 2017 May 24;8(5):1810-1821. doi: 10.1039/c7fo00341b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26102296
Citation
Chang CJ, Lin CS, Lu CC, Martel J, Ko YF, Ojcius DM, Tseng SF, Wu TR, Chen YY, Young JD, Lai HC. Ganoderma lucidum reduces obesity in mice by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 23;6:7489. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8489. Erratum In: Nat Commun. 2017 Jul 11;8:16130.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28713364
Citation
Diling C, Chaoqun Z, Jian Y, Jian L, Jiyan S, Yizhen X, Guoxiao L. Immunomodulatory Activities of a Fungal Protein Extracted from Hericium erinaceus through Regulating the Gut Microbiota. Front Immunol. 2017 Jun 12;8:666. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00666. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28353071
Citation
Nowak R, Nowacka-Jechalke N, Juda M, Malm A. The preliminary study of prebiotic potential of Polish wild mushroom polysaccharides: the stimulation effect on Lactobacillus strains growth. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Jun;57(4):1511-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1436-9. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30279332
Citation
Hess J, Wang Q, Gould T, Slavin J. Impact of Agaricus bisporus Mushroom Consumption on Gut Health Markers in Healthy Adults. Nutrients. 2018 Oct 2;10(10):1402. doi: 10.3390/nu10101402.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28264501
Citation
Barbieri A, Quagliariello V, Del Vecchio V, Falco M, Luciano A, Amruthraj NJ, Nasti G, Ottaiano A, Berretta M, Iaffaioli RV, Arra C. Anticancer and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Ganoderma lucidum Extract Effects on Melanoma and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment. Nutrients. 2017 Feb 28;9(3):210. doi: 10.3390/nu9030210.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16428086
Citation
Chen X, Hu ZP, Yang XX, Huang M, Gao Y, Tang W, Chan SY, Dai X, Ye J, Ho PC, Duan W, Yang HY, Zhu YZ, Zhou SF. Monitoring of immune responses to a herbal immuno-modulator in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006 Mar;6(3):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.08.026. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28654020
Citation
Nie Y, Lin Q, Luo F. Effects of Non-Starch Polysaccharides on Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 27;18(7):1372. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071372.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20926736
Citation
Jiang J, Wojnowski R, Jedinak A, Sliva D. Suppression of proliferation and invasive behavior of human metastatic breast cancer cells by dietary supplement BreastDefend. Integr Cancer Ther. 2011 Jun;10(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/1534735410386953. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22135883
Citation
Jakopovich I. New dietary supplements from medicinal mushrooms: Dr Myko San--a registration report. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2011;13(3):307-13. doi: 10.1615/intjmedmushr.v13.i3.110.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33601145
Citation
Rai SN, Mishra D, Singh P, Vamanu E, Singh MP. Therapeutic applications of mushrooms and their biomolecules along with a glimpse of in silico approach in neurodegenerative diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 May;137:111377. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111377. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18296732
Citation
Borchers AT, Krishnamurthy A, Keen CL, Meyers FJ, Gershwin ME. The immunobiology of mushrooms. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2008 Mar;233(3):259-76. doi: 10.3181/0708-MR-227.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21190105
Citation
Wasser SP. Current findings, future trends, and unsolved problems in studies of medicinal mushrooms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Mar;89(5):1323-32. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-3067-4. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35576566
Citation
Regueiro C, Codesido L, Garcia-Nimo L, Zarraquinos S, Remedios D, Rodriguez-Blanco A, Sinde E, Fernandez-de-Ana C, Cubiella J. Effect of the Nutraceutical Micodigest 2.0 on the Complication Rate of Colorectal Cancer Surgery With Curative Intent: Protocol for a Placebo-Controlled Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 16;11(5):e34292. doi: 10.2196/34292.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home
Description
World Health Organization. Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2020)
Learn more about this trial
Effect of the Nutraceutical "MICODIGEST 2.0" on the Complications After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs