search
Back to results

Neural Mechanisms of Enhancing Emotion Regulation in Bereaved Spouses

Primary Purpose

Affect, Bereavement, Emotions

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training
Sponsored by
Bryan Denny
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Affect focused on measuring emotion regulation, bereavement, affective neuroscience, social cognitive neuroscience

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recent loss of romantic partner within the past 5-7 months
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Minimum score of 25 on the Inventory for Complicated Grief
  • Must be able to speak, read, and write in English
  • Must be eligible to safely complete MRI scanning

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Death of a second close family member/friend in the past year
  • Currently receiving psychotherapy
  • Diagnosed with obstructive pulmonary and/or heart disease, diabetes, liver failure, or kidney failure
  • Significant visual, auditory, or cognitive impairment
  • Divorced within the last year
  • Prior participation in a similar emotion regulation training protocol in Dr. Denny's lab
  • Any contraindication of MRI scanning (e.g., pregnancy, presence of any non-removable metal on or in the body, implanted medical devices, tattoos, medication patches, orthodontic braces or permanent retainers, hearing aids, history of claustrophobia or breathing disorders)

Sites / Locations

  • Rice UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Distancing

Reinterpretation

Arm Description

Participants will receive structured cognitive emotion regulation training from an experimenter during an approximately 10-minute interaction in which detailed instructions for implementation of the distancing strategy is explained (i.e. appraising an emotional stimulus as an objective, impartial observer).

Participants will receive structured cognitive emotion regulation training from an experimenter during an approximately 10-minute interaction in which detailed instructions for implementation of the reinterpretation strategy is explained (i.e. imagining a better outcome than what initially seemed apparent).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in self-reported negative affect
Self-reported negative affect data collected at the completion of emotion regulation task, with 1 meaning "not negative at all" and 5 meaning "very negative".
Change in respiratory sinus arrhythmia
Heart rate variability
Change in neural activity
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data
Change in grief rumination
Grief rumination assessed via Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) and the Inventory for Complicated Grief (ICG). The URGS assesses grief by asking participants to rate how often they have experienced certain thoughts over the past month on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher numbers representing higher overall grief rumination. The ICG assesses grief via 19 first-person statements that participants rate on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Higher numbers reflect greater grief.
Change in depressive symptoms
Symptoms of depression assessed via the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, which asks participants to rate how often in the past week they have experience symptoms of depression, ranging from 0 (Rarely or none of the time) to 3 (Most of the time). Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Change in perceived stress
Perceived stress assessed via the Perceived Stress Scale, which consists of 10 self-reported items asking participants how often they felt or thought a certain way, ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very Often). Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Frequency of reappraisal usage
Overall reappraisal usage frequency assessed via the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Physical health
Physical health and quality of life assessed via the SF-36
Inflammatory biomarkers
Inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-6sR, IL-10, and TNF- α) measured via blood draw

Full Information

First Posted
March 25, 2021
Last Updated
June 12, 2023
Sponsor
Bryan Denny
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04822194
Brief Title
Neural Mechanisms of Enhancing Emotion Regulation in Bereaved Spouses
Official Title
Neural Mechanisms of Enhancing Emotion Regulation in Bereaved Spouses
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 2, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bryan Denny
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study investigates the underlying mechanisms of a novel emotion regulation intervention among recently bereaved spouses. More specifically, this study examines how thinking about an emotional stimulus in a more adaptive way can affect the relationship between psychological stress, psychophysiological biomarkers of adaptive cardiac response, and brain activity. The emotion regulation strategy targeted is reappraisal, specifically reappraisal-by-distancing (i.e., thinking about a negative situation in a more objective, impartial way) versus reappraisal-by-reinterpretation (i.e., thinking about a better outcome for a negative situation than what initially seemed apparent). The study seeks to determine if relatively brief, focused reappraisal training in bereaved spouses will result in reduction of self-reported negative affect, increases in respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA; a measure of heart rate variability reflecting adaptive cardiac vagal tone), reduction in blood-based inflammatory biomarkers, and changes in neural activity over time. Reappraisal-by-distancing is expected to lead to greater changes in these variables relative to reappraisal-by-reinterpretation. Additionally, it is expected that across time decreases in self-reported negative affect, increases in RSA, reductions in blood-based inflammatory biomarker levels, and changes in neural activity will in turn lead to reductions in depressive symptoms and grief rumination. Finally, it is expected that distancing training will lead to reductions in depressive symptoms and grief rumination that are mediated by changes in the targeted neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms.
Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to use an experimental medicine approach to evaluate the basic psychological, psychophysiological, and neural mechanisms underlying a novel cognitive emotion regulation intervention aimed at improving psychological outcomes (e.g., reducing depressive symptoms and grief rumination) in recently bereaved spouses. Cognitive reappraisal (i.e. the ability to modify the trajectory of an emotional response by thinking about and appraising emotional information in an alternative, more adaptive way) represents a highly promising target for psychological intervention in bereavement. Reappraisal can be operationalized via two primary tactics: psychological distancing (i.e. appraising an emotional stimulus as an objective, impartial observer) and reinterpretation (i.e. imagining a better outcome than what initially seemed apparent). The current study builds upon promising preliminary work to investigate the effectiveness and underlying neurobiological mechanisms of a novel, five-session cognitive reappraisal intervention in bereaved spouses. Recently bereaved participants (i.e. approximately 6 months post-spousal loss) will be randomly assigned to receive training in either distancing or reinterpretation, with five sessions occurring every 1-3 days, with longitudinal collection of affective, psychophysiological, physiological (i.e., blood draws to assess inflammatory biomarkers) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Follow-up questionnaire assessments will occur at one- and two-months post-intervention. The study aims to mechanistically relate changes in psychological, psychophysiological, physiological, and neural function during a novel emotion regulation intervention never before implemented in this stressed, high risk group. This research represents a Phase I, Stage I clinical trial. The primary endpoints are the assessments of the psychological, psychophysiological, physiological, and neural mechanisms mediating behavior change as a function of the cognitive emotion regulation intervention. The secondary endpoint is testing the efficacy of the intervention via assessment of psychological outcomes (i.e., the behavior change, as represented in changes in depressive symptoms, stress, and grief rumination).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Affect, Bereavement, Emotions, Depressive Symptoms, Grief
Keywords
emotion regulation, bereavement, affective neuroscience, social cognitive neuroscience

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomized to either the "Distancing" or "Reinterpretation" group.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
84 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Distancing
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive structured cognitive emotion regulation training from an experimenter during an approximately 10-minute interaction in which detailed instructions for implementation of the distancing strategy is explained (i.e. appraising an emotional stimulus as an objective, impartial observer).
Arm Title
Reinterpretation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive structured cognitive emotion regulation training from an experimenter during an approximately 10-minute interaction in which detailed instructions for implementation of the reinterpretation strategy is explained (i.e. imagining a better outcome than what initially seemed apparent).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training
Intervention Description
Cognitive emotion regulation training via cognitive reappraisal involves the ability to modify the trajectory of an emotional response by thinking about and appraising emotional information in an alternative, more adaptive way. Reappraisal to down-regulate negative emotion can be operationalized via two tactics: psychological distancing and reinterpretation. The current study will randomly assign participants to receive a brief course of reappraisal training using either psychological distancing or reinterpretation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in self-reported negative affect
Description
Self-reported negative affect data collected at the completion of emotion regulation task, with 1 meaning "not negative at all" and 5 meaning "very negative".
Time Frame
At each training session immediately after emotion regulation task, approximately every 2-3 days for 2 weeks.
Title
Change in respiratory sinus arrhythmia
Description
Heart rate variability
Time Frame
At baseline and at final training session, approximately 2 weeks post-baseline
Title
Change in neural activity
Description
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data
Time Frame
During emotion regulation task at baseline and at final training session, approximately 2 weeks post-baseline
Title
Change in grief rumination
Description
Grief rumination assessed via Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS) and the Inventory for Complicated Grief (ICG). The URGS assesses grief by asking participants to rate how often they have experienced certain thoughts over the past month on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher numbers representing higher overall grief rumination. The ICG assesses grief via 19 first-person statements that participants rate on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Higher numbers reflect greater grief.
Time Frame
At baseline, final training session (approximately 2 weeks post-baseline), and at 1 and 2 months post-intervention
Title
Change in depressive symptoms
Description
Symptoms of depression assessed via the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, which asks participants to rate how often in the past week they have experience symptoms of depression, ranging from 0 (Rarely or none of the time) to 3 (Most of the time). Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
At baseline, final training session (approximately 2 weeks post-baseline), and at 1 and 2 months post-intervention
Title
Change in perceived stress
Description
Perceived stress assessed via the Perceived Stress Scale, which consists of 10 self-reported items asking participants how often they felt or thought a certain way, ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very Often). Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
Time Frame
At baseline, final training session (approximately 2 weeks post-baseline), and at 1 and 2 months post-intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency of reappraisal usage
Description
Overall reappraisal usage frequency assessed via the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame
At baseline, final training session (approximately 2 weeks post-baseline), and at 1 and 2 months post-intervention
Title
Physical health
Description
Physical health and quality of life assessed via the SF-36
Time Frame
At baseline, final training session (approximately 2 weeks post-baseline), and at 1 and 2 months post-intervention
Title
Inflammatory biomarkers
Description
Inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-6sR, IL-10, and TNF- α) measured via blood draw
Time Frame
Prior to baseline and following the final training session (approximately 2 weeks post-baseline)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Recent loss of romantic partner within the past 5-7 months At least 18 years of age Minimum score of 25 on the Inventory for Complicated Grief Must be able to speak, read, and write in English Must be eligible to safely complete MRI scanning Exclusion Criteria: Death of a second close family member/friend in the past year Currently receiving psychotherapy Diagnosed with obstructive pulmonary and/or heart disease, diabetes, liver failure, or kidney failure Significant visual, auditory, or cognitive impairment Divorced within the last year Prior participation in a similar emotion regulation training protocol in Dr. Denny's lab Any contraindication of MRI scanning (e.g., pregnancy, presence of any non-removable metal on or in the body, implanted medical devices, tattoos, medication patches, orthodontic braces or permanent retainers, hearing aids, history of claustrophobia or breathing disorders)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Bryan Denny, Ph.D.
Phone
713-348-8257
Email
btd3@rice.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bryan Denny, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
William Marsh Rice University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rice University
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mallory L Jungles, BA
Phone
713-348-8246
Email
mlj5@rice.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bryan T Denny, PhD
Phone
713-348-8257
Email
btd3@rice.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bryan T Denny, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pursuant to the NIH Data Sharing Policy, we have created a Data Sharing Plan for the proposed research. Under this plan, and pursuant to IRB regulations, fully de-identified raw data (defined below) will be made publicly available. Available data will include a compendium of de-identified training condition assignments; raw (i.e. individual subject-by-condition level) negative affect self-reports; questionnaire data; raw heart rate variability data; and raw subject-level brain data (i.e. unpreprocessed functional and structural MRI data, converted to the widely-sharable Brain Imaging Data Structure [BIDS] standard).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
De-identified data will be made available after the analysis process is complete and research manuscripts are finalized. There is no fixed end date for data access.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data will be publicly available on OpenNeuro (https://openneuro.org), a free, open- science neuroinformatics data repository.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24364856
Citation
Denny BT, Ochsner KN. Behavioral effects of longitudinal training in cognitive reappraisal. Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):425-33. doi: 10.1037/a0035276. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31961188
Citation
Denny BT. Getting better over time: A framework for examining the impact of emotion regulation training. Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):110-114. doi: 10.1037/emo0000641.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30368120
Citation
Fagundes CP, Brown RL, Chen MA, Murdock KW, Saucedo L, LeRoy A, Wu EL, Garcini LM, Shahane AD, Baameur F, Heijnen C. Grief, depressive symptoms, and inflammation in the spousally bereaved. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Feb;100:190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10589301
Citation
Bonanno GA, Kaltman S. Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement. Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):760-76. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.760.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26231911
Citation
Denny BT, Inhoff MC, Zerubavel N, Davachi L, Ochsner KN. Getting Over It: Long-Lasting Effects of Emotion Regulation on Amygdala Response. Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;26(9):1377-88. doi: 10.1177/0956797615578863. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23025352
Citation
Ochsner KN, Silvers JA, Buhle JT. Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Mar;1251:E1-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29702444
Citation
Fagundes CP, Murdock KW, LeRoy A, Baameur F, Thayer JF, Heijnen C. Spousal bereavement is associated with more pronounced ex vivo cytokine production and lower heart rate variability: Mechanisms underlying cardiovascular risk? Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Jul;93:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Neural Mechanisms of Enhancing Emotion Regulation in Bereaved Spouses

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs