Diagnostic Errors in Anaphylactic Shock (ANASim)
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic Error
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Diagnostic context
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Diagnostic Error
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Physicians taking part in voluntary simulator workshops
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate or to being videorecorded
Sites / Locations
- University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Expected
Unexpected, no distractor
Unexpected, with distractor
Arm Description
Anaphylactic shock occurs after the injection of a drug known to cause allergic reactions
Anaphylactic shock occurs unexpectedly, but their is no medical distractor
Anaphylactic shock occurs unexpectedly. Scenario is set up such, that a tension pneumothorax may be a likely explanation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Correct diagnosis of anaphylactic shock
Diagnosis of anaphylactic shock is explicitly stated by at least one team member within a time frame of 15 minutes after onset
Secondary Outcome Measures
Treatment of anaphylactic shock with epinephrine ≥ 0.3mg intravenously
Anaphylactic shock is correctly treated with epinephrine in an appropriate dose (≥ 0.3mg intravenously) within a time frame of 5 minutes after diagnosis
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04825106
First Posted
March 22, 2021
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04825106
Brief Title
Diagnostic Errors in Anaphylactic Shock
Acronym
ANASim
Official Title
Context-dependent Diagnostic Accuracy in Anaphylactic Shock
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Diagnostic accuracy and quality of management in anaphylactic shock is assessed in three conditions: expected, unexpected with no distractor, unexpected with distractor
Detailed Description
participants: physicians taking part in voluntary workshops. Participants are allocated to teams of three design: prospective, randomized, single-blind setting: simulated anaphylactic shock intervention: participants are allocated to 3 versions of the scenario: 1) expected, 2) unexpected but no distractor, 3) unexpected with distractor
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diagnostic Error
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
270 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Expected
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Anaphylactic shock occurs after the injection of a drug known to cause allergic reactions
Arm Title
Unexpected, no distractor
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Anaphylactic shock occurs unexpectedly, but their is no medical distractor
Arm Title
Unexpected, with distractor
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Anaphylactic shock occurs unexpectedly. Scenario is set up such, that a tension pneumothorax may be a likely explanation
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Diagnostic context
Intervention Description
A life-threatening situation occurs in 3 different contexts
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Correct diagnosis of anaphylactic shock
Description
Diagnosis of anaphylactic shock is explicitly stated by at least one team member within a time frame of 15 minutes after onset
Time Frame
15 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment of anaphylactic shock with epinephrine ≥ 0.3mg intravenously
Description
Anaphylactic shock is correctly treated with epinephrine in an appropriate dose (≥ 0.3mg intravenously) within a time frame of 5 minutes after diagnosis
Time Frame
5 minutes
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
24 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Physicians taking part in voluntary simulator workshops
Exclusion Criteria:
Refusal to participate or to being videorecorded
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephan Marsch
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Basel
State/Province
BS
ZIP/Postal Code
4031
Country
Switzerland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Secondary data can be shared Videorecordings are strictly confidential and cannot be shared
Learn more about this trial
Diagnostic Errors in Anaphylactic Shock
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs