search
Back to results

Effectiveness of Coordinated Care to Reduce the Prolonged Disability Risk Among Patients Suffering From Low Back Pain in Primary Care (COLOMB)

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Coordinated care
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Angers
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Low Back Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient consulting an investigator GP for subacute low back pain or acute recurrent low back pain
  • Patient with occupational activity (including sick leave)
  • Patient depending of occupational health service
  • Obtaining the signature of the consent to participate in this trial
  • Patient Registered with social security scheme

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  • Specific low back pain (fracture, infection, osteoporosis, inflammatory disease, tumor)
  • Low back pain with sciatic, cruralgia
  • Contraindication to active reeducation
  • Impossibility to follow up during 12 months
  • Patient planning to retire within the 12 months following the enrollment
  • Disability to write or read french
  • Adult patient protected under the law (guardianship),
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding or parturient women
  • Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Persons subject to legal protection measures
  • Persons unable to consent
  • Persons on coercion psychiatric care
  • Physiotherapy by a physiotherapist who don't participate in this trial

Sites / Locations

  • Cluster Bonchamp
  • Cluster VaunoiseRecruiting
  • Cluster BRULONRecruiting
  • Cluster Château GontierRecruiting
  • Cluster Châteauneuf sur Sarthe / MorannesRecruiting
  • Cluster ClissonRecruiting
  • Cluster ConlieRecruiting
  • Cluster Craon Renaze CosseRecruiting
  • Cluster Entrammes LavalRecruiting
  • Cluster Roche sur YonRecruiting
  • Cluster ChantenayRecruiting
  • Cluster Dinan / Quévert / Plouasne
  • Cluster Rennes BeauregardRecruiting
  • Cluster Rennes VillejeanRecruiting
  • Cluster Les Collines
  • Cluster St Florent, Mauges, PossonnièreRecruiting
  • Cluster SavenayRecruiting
  • Cluster SEGRERecruiting
  • Cluster Angers- TrélazéRecruiting
  • Cluster VenceRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

standard care

coordinated care

Arm Description

standard care for low back pain management by general practioners (GPs). the physiotherapist and occupational health services can be solicited independently by the patient or GP.

Coordinated care between general practioners, physiotherapist and occupational health services. An intervention training will be performed before the start of the study for any care professional's to elaborate coordination tools and have an active communication.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Perceived inability at 1 year
Ratio of patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The minimum value of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Perceived inability
Ratio of patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The minimum value of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Roland Morris Disability score over time
Evolution of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire over time. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Pain perceived
Ratio of patients presenting improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Numerical pain scale over time
Evolution of numerical pain scale over time. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Occupational status
Ratio of patients having an active occupation (defined by have an employment and be present at work )
Employment rate
Evolution of employment rate over time
Sick leave
number of sick leave days
Improved patients
Ratio of improved patients. Improved patients is defined by patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale and having a active occupational
Evolution of improved patients ratio
Evolution of improved patients ratio over time Improved patients is defined by patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale and having a active occupational
Mental component score of Short Form -12
Evolution of mental scores over time The mental component score is determined by 4 categories of Short Form -12. The minimum value of each category is 0 and the maximun value is 100. A higher score mean better outcome
Physical component score of Short Form -12
Evolution of physical scores over time. The physical component score is determined by 4 categories of Short Form -12. The minimum value of each category is 0 and the maximun value is 100. A higher score mean better outcome
Occupational component score of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Evolution of occupational component score over time. Occupational component is assessed using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 42. A higher score mean worse outcome
Physical activity component score of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Evolution of physical activity component score over time. Physical activity component is assessed using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Anxiety component score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Evolution of Anxiety score over time Anxiety Component is assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 21. A higher score mean worse outcome
Depression component score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Evolution of Depression score over time Depression component is assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 21. A higher score mean worse outcome
Coordination care score of Patient Centered Coordination by a Care Team questionnaire
Evolution of coordination care score over time This score is assessed by using Patient Centered Coordination by a Care Team questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 42. A higher score mean better outcome
GP satisfaction related to patient care
Evolution of GP satisfaction using an numerical scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Physiotherapist satisfaction related to patient care
Evolution of physiotherapist satisfaction using an numerical scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Professionals trained for intervention
number of professionals trained for intervention
Biomechanical component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for intervention physiotherapists
Evolution of Biomechanical component score for intervention physiotherapists. Biomechanical component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score. The minimum value is 10 and the maximun value is 60. A higher score mean worse outcome
Biopsychosocial component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for intervention physiotherapists
Evolution of Biopsychosocial component score for intervention physiotherapists. Biopsychosocial component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score.The minimum value is 9 and the maximun value is 54. A higher score mean better outcome
Biopsychosocial component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for GPs
Evolution of Biopsychosocial component score for GPs. Biopsychosocial component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score.The minimum value is 9 and the maximun value is 54. A higher score mean better outcome
Biomechanical component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for GPs
Evolution of Biomechanical component score for GPs. Biomechanical component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score. The minimum value is 10 and the maximun value is 60. A higher score mean worse outcome
Professional dialogues
Existence and types of dialogues between GP and other professionals
Number of consultations or sessions
Number of consultations or sessions

Full Information

First Posted
March 3, 2021
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04826757
Brief Title
Effectiveness of Coordinated Care to Reduce the Prolonged Disability Risk Among Patients Suffering From Low Back Pain in Primary Care
Acronym
COLOMB
Official Title
Effectiveness of Coordinated Care to Reduce the Risk of Prolonged Disability Among Patients Suffer From Subacute or Recurrent Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 21, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Common low back pain affects about 23% of general population and can be associated with psychosocial difficulties and prolonged inability to work. Its management in France mainly depends on general practioners, and sometime on physiotherapists. A coordinated care between general practioners, physiotherapists and occupational health services would help to improve the care pathway for patients and health professionals. The main objective is to assess the impact of coordinated primary care and deployed at the territories' level, in subacute or acute recurrent low back pain patients in comparison with the standard care.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomised, controlled, cluster trial. the project is multicentered.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
500 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
standard care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
standard care for low back pain management by general practioners (GPs). the physiotherapist and occupational health services can be solicited independently by the patient or GP.
Arm Title
coordinated care
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Coordinated care between general practioners, physiotherapist and occupational health services. An intervention training will be performed before the start of the study for any care professional's to elaborate coordination tools and have an active communication.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Coordinated care
Intervention Description
Coordinated care between general practioners; physiotherapists and occupational health services. Early contact with occupational health service by the general practioner and use of occupational retention tool Active physiotherapy (Individual active, intensive and regular rehabilitation program with 15 sessions of 1 hour, at a rate of 2 or 3 sessions per week)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perceived inability at 1 year
Description
Ratio of patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The minimum value of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment to 12 months follow up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perceived inability
Description
Ratio of patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The minimum value of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment to 3 months follow up, Enrollment to 6 months follow up
Title
Roland Morris Disability score over time
Description
Evolution of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire over time. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Pain perceived
Description
Ratio of patients presenting improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment - 3 months , Enrollment - 6 months and Enrollment -12 months
Title
Numerical pain scale over time
Description
Evolution of numerical pain scale over time. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Occupational status
Description
Ratio of patients having an active occupation (defined by have an employment and be present at work )
Time Frame
at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Title
Employment rate
Description
Evolution of employment rate over time
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Sick leave
Description
number of sick leave days
Time Frame
during 12 months after inclusion
Title
Improved patients
Description
Ratio of improved patients. Improved patients is defined by patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale and having a active occupational
Time Frame
at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Title
Evolution of improved patients ratio
Description
Evolution of improved patients ratio over time Improved patients is defined by patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale and having a active occupational
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Mental component score of Short Form -12
Description
Evolution of mental scores over time The mental component score is determined by 4 categories of Short Form -12. The minimum value of each category is 0 and the maximun value is 100. A higher score mean better outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Physical component score of Short Form -12
Description
Evolution of physical scores over time. The physical component score is determined by 4 categories of Short Form -12. The minimum value of each category is 0 and the maximun value is 100. A higher score mean better outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Title
Occupational component score of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Description
Evolution of occupational component score over time. Occupational component is assessed using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 42. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 12 months
Title
Physical activity component score of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Description
Evolution of physical activity component score over time. Physical activity component is assessed using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 12 months
Title
Anxiety component score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Description
Evolution of Anxiety score over time Anxiety Component is assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 21. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment 3 months, 12 months
Title
Depression component score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Description
Evolution of Depression score over time Depression component is assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 21. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 12 months
Title
Coordination care score of Patient Centered Coordination by a Care Team questionnaire
Description
Evolution of coordination care score over time This score is assessed by using Patient Centered Coordination by a Care Team questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 42. A higher score mean better outcome
Time Frame
Enrollment, 3 months, 12 months
Title
GP satisfaction related to patient care
Description
Evolution of GP satisfaction using an numerical scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
T0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)
Title
Physiotherapist satisfaction related to patient care
Description
Evolution of physiotherapist satisfaction using an numerical scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
T0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)
Title
Professionals trained for intervention
Description
number of professionals trained for intervention
Time Frame
Baseline intervention formations
Title
Biomechanical component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for intervention physiotherapists
Description
Evolution of Biomechanical component score for intervention physiotherapists. Biomechanical component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score. The minimum value is 10 and the maximun value is 60. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
T0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)
Title
Biopsychosocial component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for intervention physiotherapists
Description
Evolution of Biopsychosocial component score for intervention physiotherapists. Biopsychosocial component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score.The minimum value is 9 and the maximun value is 54. A higher score mean better outcome
Time Frame
T0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)
Title
Biopsychosocial component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for GPs
Description
Evolution of Biopsychosocial component score for GPs. Biopsychosocial component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score.The minimum value is 9 and the maximun value is 54. A higher score mean better outcome
Time Frame
T0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)
Title
Biomechanical component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for GPs
Description
Evolution of Biomechanical component score for GPs. Biomechanical component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score. The minimum value is 10 and the maximun value is 60. A higher score mean worse outcome
Time Frame
T0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)
Title
Professional dialogues
Description
Existence and types of dialogues between GP and other professionals
Time Frame
during the 12 months of follow up
Title
Number of consultations or sessions
Description
Number of consultations or sessions
Time Frame
during the 12 months of follow up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient consulting an investigator GP for subacute low back pain or acute recurrent low back pain Patient with occupational activity (including sick leave) Patient depending of occupational health service Obtaining the signature of the consent to participate in this trial Patient Registered with social security scheme Non-inclusion Criteria: Specific low back pain (fracture, infection, osteoporosis, inflammatory disease, tumor) Low back pain with sciatic, cruralgia Contraindication to active reeducation Impossibility to follow up during 12 months Patient planning to retire within the 12 months following the enrollment Disability to write or read french Adult patient protected under the law (guardianship), Pregnant, breastfeeding or parturient women Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision Persons subject to legal protection measures Persons unable to consent Persons on coercion psychiatric care Physiotherapy by a physiotherapist who don't participate in this trial
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Aline RAMOND ROQUIN, MD-PHD
Phone
0241735867
Ext
+33
Email
aline.ramond@univ-angers.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anthea LOIEZ
Phone
0241735867
Ext
+33
Email
anthea.loiez@univ-angers.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aline RAMOND ROQUIN, MD-PHD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Family Medicine - University of Angers
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cluster Bonchamp
City
Bonchamp-lès-Laval
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Cluster Vaunoise
City
Breteil
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laure FIQUET
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
François TANGUY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Béatrice NEGARET, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luc GUICHARD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Béatrice ALLARD COUALAN, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roxane MORIN, MD
Facility Name
Cluster BRULON
City
Brulon
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
ANGOULVANT Cécile, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandre DE BARBERIN-BARBERINI, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Agathe DENIS GAUBERT, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul BOULARD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claire GASNIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pauline LEFEUVRE, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Château Gontier
City
Château-Gontier
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Héloïse ROGER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thibault BARBIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre DELAHAYE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claire HAMARD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audrey LEPY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric MICHAUD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie Christine SALVATO, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Châteauneuf sur Sarthe / Morannes
City
Châteauneuf-sur-Sarthe
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine RENIER TISNE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cyril BEGUE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sylvie MARTEAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Charlotte ROCFORT, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Isabelle VIGUE-BOURREAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yoldi BRETT, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Clisson
City
Clisson
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gilles BARNABE, MG
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe ALLAIN, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Didier JUTEL, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elise KRAI-ASGARALY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sabine NAOUR-LEROY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emilie BEAGHE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Agnés PLOTEAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah NOEL, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Conlie
City
Conlie
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jessica GUELFF, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillaume FETIVEAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Noémie QUEANT, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christèle TOURNELLE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arthur VIGNAUD, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Craon Renaze Cosse
City
Craon
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aline RAMOND ROQUIN, MD-PHD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne PLESSIS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlene LESAGE BESNIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Michel MONNIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lydie GENDRY ROSSIGNOL, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maryline MERIENNE COUSSE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julien BERTRAND, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pascal GENDRY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rebecca NAUD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marine GESLOT, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Florie ALGRAIN, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Entrammes Laval
City
Entrammes
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthieu PEUROIS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thi phi Bach NGUYEN, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Josselin DELAHAYE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier PIVETEAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Romain CLISSOn, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Roche sur Yon
City
La Roche-sur-Yon
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sandrine Sandrine, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amandine PELLETIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeanne QUERE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Angèle DUCRET, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Chantenay
City
Nantes
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Pascal FOURNIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe DEZELLUS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laure GEGAUFF, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas JAN, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie LUGHERINI, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edith OMON, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Héloïse SCHMELTZ, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Servane AILLET, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom LUCAS, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Dinan / Quévert / Plouasne
City
Quévert
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Cluster Rennes Beauregard
City
Rennes
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sidonie CHHOR, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Muriel CABOTTE CARILLON, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Virginie MIMS LAROME, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre LE DOUARON, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa LOUIS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carole PONTHUS-AUFFRET, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Rennes Villejean
City
Rennes
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emmanuel ALLORY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caroline JEHANNO, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna JARNO-JOSSE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Romain NIFENECKER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hoël CHARBONNEL, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Les Collines
City
Roquefort les pins
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Cluster St Florent, Mauges, Possonnière
City
Saint-Florent-le-Vieil
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gwenaël BEAUVINEAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean BIMIER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pauline DES BOUILLONS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laure JANUS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lila TILLARD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julien VERRIERE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lucile BOURLOT, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Savenay
City
Savenay
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jérôme MICHENAUD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Armelle JEFFROY-LEOST, MG
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marine GARDY, MG
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ludovic COGNACQ, MG
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karine AH-FAT, MG
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gwenolé PERON, MG
Facility Name
Cluster SEGRE
City
Segré
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stéphane FREZE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Héloise GISLARD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gilles GUSTIN, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jérôme NUEL, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marjorie HEBERT, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Virginie HEMERY, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audrey LILLE, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Angers- Trélazé
City
Trélazé
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Catherine DE CASABIANCA, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sandra NETO-ANNE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric DE GROSSOUVRE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clément GUINEBERTEAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carène EDIN, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Héloïse PREAU, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie LA TOUR GAUVRIT, MD
Facility Name
Cluster Vence
City
Vence
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
POUILLON MAUD, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fabrice GASPERINI, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emilie SCALABRE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Asmao SALAMBERE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raphaëlle VIDAL, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte BRUN, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness of Coordinated Care to Reduce the Prolonged Disability Risk Among Patients Suffering From Low Back Pain in Primary Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs