The TRAIN Study: A Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools
Primary Purpose
Concussion, Brain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TRAIN Concussion Education
Standard Concussion Education
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Concussion, Brain focused on measuring Concussion, Prevention, Management
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult with a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school
- Adult whose child has participated in organized sports in the past 2 years
Exclusion Criteria:
• Adult without a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school
Sites / Locations
- University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Standard Concussion Education
TRAIN Concussion Education
Arm Description
Participants will receive standard concussion education materials (online training) focused on concussion prevention in youth sport.
After receiving the standard concussion education materials (online training), participants will receive an additional module, the TRAIN concussion education module.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Concussion-Related Beliefs Change Score
Participants are asked 6 questions concerning beliefs related to concussion risk, symptoms, and management. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 6 to a maximum 24, where a higher score indicated more favorable beliefs. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Concussion-Related Attitudes Change Score
Participants are asked 20 survey items identifying an individual's attitudes about a certain behavior (e.g., seeking care). Each item is added together to compute an overall attitude score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 140, where higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Confidence in Concussion-Related Knowledge Change Score
Participants are asked 2 questions concerning confidence in knowing and recognizing concussion symptoms. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 2 to a maximum 8, where a higher score indicated better confidence in concussion knowledge. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Concussion-Related Intentions Change Score
Participants are asked 4 questions assessing intention to engage in or talk with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall behavioral intention score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 16, where a higher score indicates a better likelihood to engage in favorable behaviors related to concussion prevention. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Concussion-Related Self-Efficacy Change Score
Participants are asked 8 questions assessing their self-efficacy regarding engaging in or talking with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall self-efficacy score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 32, where a higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04841473
First Posted
April 7, 2021
Last Updated
November 30, 2021
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04841473
Brief Title
The TRAIN Study: A Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools
Official Title
Popular Opinion Leaders as a Sports Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools-The TRAIN Study, a Randomized Control Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 17, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 15, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-driven intervention (TRAIN concussion education) to improve parental concussion-related attitudes, beliefs, intentions, confidence in knowledge, and self-efficacy.
Participants: 180 parents of United States middle school aged children whose children have been engaged in organized sports within the past 2 years.
Procedures: The study is a single-blind (participants) randomized control trial. The investigators will randomize eligible parents into two groups: (1) control (standard concussion education); and treatment (standard concussion education AND TRAIN concussion education) to evaluate the effectiveness of the TRAIN concussion education intervention.
Detailed Description
A convenience sample of participants will be recruited from parents of United States middle school aged children whose children have been engaged in organized sports within the past 2 years. Interested parents will contact study stuff, who will ensure eligibility criteria are met.
Upon this, and completing the written informed consent process, participants will be assigned a unique identifier and randomized (simple) without replacement to one of the two study arms (control vs. treatment), using a predetermined random number generator in Excel.
Participants in the control group will receive standard concussion education materials focused on concussion prevention in youth sport. Participants in the treatment group will receive the same standard concussion education materials AND the TRAIN concussion education module. The TRAIN education module is grounded in a theoretical structure inclusive of the original intervention tenants of the Popular Opinion Leader (POL) and Diffusion of Innovations frameworks, and within the context of the socioecological model.
Participants will complete a self-administered online pre-test survey, which includes assessments of concussion-related attitudes, beliefs, intentions, confidence in knowledge, and self-efficacy. After completion of the pre-test survey, participants will complete their assigned intervention (TRAIN concussion education module + standard concussion education materials versus standard concussion education materials only).
Upon completion of their assigned intervention, participants will complete the online survey again to obtain post-test measures (post-test survey). Participants will also be scheduled to complete individual semi-structured interviews.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Concussion, Brain
Keywords
Concussion, Prevention, Management
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
103 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Standard Concussion Education
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive standard concussion education materials (online training) focused on concussion prevention in youth sport.
Arm Title
TRAIN Concussion Education
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
After receiving the standard concussion education materials (online training), participants will receive an additional module, the TRAIN concussion education module.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
TRAIN Concussion Education
Intervention Description
Participants will receive the TRAIN concussion education module.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard Concussion Education
Intervention Description
Participants will receive a standard concussion education module.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Concussion-Related Beliefs Change Score
Description
Participants are asked 6 questions concerning beliefs related to concussion risk, symptoms, and management. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 6 to a maximum 24, where a higher score indicated more favorable beliefs. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Title
Concussion-Related Attitudes Change Score
Description
Participants are asked 20 survey items identifying an individual's attitudes about a certain behavior (e.g., seeking care). Each item is added together to compute an overall attitude score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 140, where higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Confidence in Concussion-Related Knowledge Change Score
Description
Participants are asked 2 questions concerning confidence in knowing and recognizing concussion symptoms. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 2 to a maximum 8, where a higher score indicated better confidence in concussion knowledge. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Title
Concussion-Related Intentions Change Score
Description
Participants are asked 4 questions assessing intention to engage in or talk with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall behavioral intention score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 16, where a higher score indicates a better likelihood to engage in favorable behaviors related to concussion prevention. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Title
Concussion-Related Self-Efficacy Change Score
Description
Participants are asked 8 questions assessing their self-efficacy regarding engaging in or talking with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall self-efficacy score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 32, where a higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult with a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school
Adult whose child has participated in organized sports in the past 2 years
Exclusion Criteria:
• Adult without a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zachary Kerr, PhD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27514
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
9 - 36 months following publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Learn more about this trial
The TRAIN Study: A Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs