search
Back to results

Does Fall Arrest Strategy Training Improve Capacity to Prevent Fall-Related Injury in Older Women? (FAST)

Primary Purpose

Fall Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exercise
Exercise
Sponsored by
University of Saskatchewan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Fall Injury focused on measuring fall risk, older adult, injury prevention

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

- Women aged 60 years or older living in the community.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any recent upper body (hand, wrist, shoulder, trunk, neck) injury or painful joint problem that limited day to day activities or resulted in pain on a daily basis,
  • A prior distal radius fracture in the past 2 years,
  • Any fracture in the past year, or multiple fractures of the wrist or forearm,
  • Any history of UE neurological problems (i.e. Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Reflex Neuropathy),
  • Any cardio-vascular problems that would contradict UE strength testing or training,
  • Any signs of severe cognitive impairment or
  • Unable to safely ambulate independently (with or without a walking aid) in the community.

A medical and demographic screening questionnaire as well as the Mini-Cog (Borson et al, 2000) were used to determine eligibility.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    FAST

    Standard

    Arm Description

    Twice per week exercise program, 45 minutes duration for 12 weeks conducted in the community. Participants attended a 30-minute fall prevention education session once per week. FAST followed the same principles as Standard, with the addition of the following goals: 1) Increase UE strength (shoulder girdle/arm) utilizing both concentric and eccentric contractions, 2) Improve trunk and neck postural control during slow and fast body motions, 3) Optimize forward descent strategies via practice of quick response reaching, landing and controlled descent with hands on the wall or on the floor as able. Training progression for strength and body control included increasing the distance standing from the wall, progressing to one arm descents, increasing reps and speed and moving to greater gravity and body weight resistance such as hands and knees position on the floor as able. Quick movement practice targeted unexpected reaching activities, balloon and ball toss

    Twice per week exercise program, 45 minutes duration for 12 weeks conducted in a community site (assisted living residence). Participants also attended a 3o minute fall prevention education session once per week. The Standard intervention consisted of a fall prevention exercise program designed for community-dwelling older adults. Exercises focussed on balance, leg strength, walking and mobility exercises designed to decrease fall risk.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    UE Strength - Isometric
    Measured with a hand-held dynamometer; mean of three trials for shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion and elbow extension
    UE Strength - Grip
    Measured with a dynamometer; participant in sitting, standardized elbow flexion position and handle position, gripping maximum exertion; mean of three trials for shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion and elbow extension
    UE Strength - Isometric Push-off Test
    Measured with a hand-held dynamometer for grip strength with the handle inverted and stabilized on a table top. Participant pushes downward in a standing position; mean of 3 trials used
    UE Strength - Isokinetic Concentric and Eccentric
    Using a protocol developed in the investigators' lab, with the Humac Norm isokinetic dynamometer. An upper extremity pushing motion of primarily elbow extension measuring maximal force for concentric and eccentric motion. Mean of three trials used
    UE Mobility
    Shoulder Extension and Wrist Extension Active Range of Motion with passive overpressure measure with a manual goniometer in a sitting position
    UE Response Time
    Time from the start of an auditory cue to lift hands from a position standing with arms at side of body to the first touch on a force from auditory cue to touching a forceplate at shoulder level. Mean of three trials for right, left and both hands together used.
    Balance - One Leg Standing
    Timed ability to stand on one leg with no support, up to 60 seconds. Two trials on each leg
    Balance - Tandem Standing
    This is a standard test first described by Hile et al (2012) where the participant tries standing in a tandem position, one foot in front of the other first with and then without support for up to 30 seconds without support. Scored on a scale of 5, with maximum score of 5 meaning standing without support for full 30 seconds
    Self Report Fall Risk - FROP-Com
    Fall Risk for Older People living in the Community (National Aging Research Institute, 2012 http://www.mednwh.unimelb.edu.au/nari_tools/nari_tools_falls.html) measures fall risk in 13 categories, for a total possible score of 60 (higher risk)
    Self Report Balance Confidence
    Activities Balance Confidence Scale (ABC; Powell & Myers 1995) rating of confidence for 16 day to day functional tasks on a scale 0 - 100; mean of 16 items used as total score
    Sit to Stand Test
    Number of full sit to stand movements completed within 30 seconds with arms crossed. One practice followed by actual test
    Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
    Timed test to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn to chair and sit down. One practice trial, followed by one timed test (Podsiadlo & Richardson 1991)
    Ground Reaction Force
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). Bilateral force platforms recorded ground reaction forces as participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Elbow ROM during simulated forward descent
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). An eight camera motion capture system collected 3D upper extremity kinematics. Maximal elbow ROM was measured as participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Peak elbow moment and elbow stiffness during simulated forward descent
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). An eight camera motion capture system collected 3D upper extremity kinematics. Elbow moments and stiffness values were calculated, normalized to height and body weight. Participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Energy Absorption during simulated forward descent
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). An eight camera motion capture system collected 3D upper extremity kinematics. Energy absorption was calculated calculated using the total ground reaction force and the movement of the shoulders as a measure of the vertical displacement of the body, normalized to height and body weight. Participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Falls
    number of reported falls
    Muscle Activity
    EMG analysis of muscle activity during controlled and quick descents

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 8, 2021
    Last Updated
    April 12, 2021
    Sponsor
    University of Saskatchewan
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04844047
    Brief Title
    Does Fall Arrest Strategy Training Improve Capacity to Prevent Fall-Related Injury in Older Women?
    Acronym
    FAST
    Official Title
    Does Fall Arrest Strategy Training (FAST) Added to a Fall Prevention Program Improve Physical Capacity to Prevent Serious Fall-related Injury in Older Women?
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    August 24, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 18, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    April 18, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Saskatchewan

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Falls are the leading cause of injury hospitalization for seniors across Saskatchewan and addressing the underlying causes is a provincial health priority. Older women are more vulnerable to the most common fall-related injuries (upper body) during forward falling while walking. Exercise programs designed to improve balance and strength can reduce fall risk but it is not known if specific exercises targeted to upper body strength and agility can improve chances for safe landing when a fall is inevitable. The investigators have developed such a program, Fall Arrest Strategy Training (FAST) and successfully piloted the feasibility of the exercises to be included in a standard fall prevention program. FAST is meant to increase arm strength, reaction time, trunk control, and teach better landing techniques. The potential efficacy of such an intervention to improve landing capacity has not been studied in older women. Thirty-two women age 60 years or older will be randomly assigned to either FAST or a Standard Exercise group. Half will do standard exercises targeting balance, mobility and lower extremity strength; the other half will do the same exercises with the addition of FAST. Both groups will exercise twice per week for 12 weeks. Participants will be tested before and after for arm strength, reaction time, balance, mobility and the ability to control body descent (absorb energy) using a technique we developed in our lab. While in a safety harness, participants will simulate a forward fall onto a platform that measures energy during impact. While completely preventing falls is not possible, this study will help the investigators learn if simple exercises like FAST combined with balance training can decrease fall risk AND reduce the risk of serious injury when a fall is unavoidable. It will help address the growing personal and societal cost of fall-related injury. This study will also inform future research targeted to include a large-scale trial evaluating the impact and implementation of FAST training in older adults across the spectrum of care and development of a computer simulation model to determine which factors are most important for reducing the risk of fall-related injury.
    Detailed Description
    Falls are the current leading cause of fracture and head injury in older adults in Saskatchewan and will continue to be a growing health concern given the aging population. Determining effective and feasible interventions to prevent the downward spiral of failing health, admission to long term care and even death following a serious fall-related injury is important to Saskatchewan seniors, the health care team, policy makers and the public at large. Exercise is known to decrease fall risk in community-dwelling older adults and should theoretically also reduce risk for injury during a fall; however, there are no clinical trials evaluating exercises designed specifically to enhance safe landing when a fall is imminent. Ideally, the health care team would like to support older adults in preventing all falls but in reality, this is not possible. Developing an intervention targeting both fall AND injury prevention (in the event a fall is inevitable) should enhance the effectiveness of exercise for reducing fall-related injury. This study will investigate the efficacy of novel Fall-Arrest Strategy Training (FAST) to improve the physical capacity to arrest a fall and reduce injury risk in older community-dwelling women. The risk of injury from falls depends on both the severity of impact and neuromuscular capacity such as bone and muscle strength of the affected body part. Sixty percent of all falls in older adults occur in a forward direction, more often in women than men. Forward falls are typically combined with hand contact as a protective response to prevent head, hip or torso injury. The effectiveness of these important protective strategies unfortunately decreases with aging. Evidence suggests forward fall arrest strategies can be modified to improve safe landing and reduce impact forces. The critically important question is whether older adults, in particular older women at high risk for fracture, can enhance their ability to efficiently utilize fall arrest strategies intended to diminish both the risk of head impact and the risk of wrist fracture. Fall Arrest Strategy Training (FAST) is a new, innovative exercise intervention the investigators have developed uniquely focusing on enhancing upper extremity (UE) strength, response time, trunk control and specific strategies to safely lower the body. The severity of impact with a forward fall is determined primarily by pre-impact neuromuscular factors - muscle strength, movement time, and kinematic placement of the upper extremity (UE) which may also depend on available joint range of motion (ROM). FAST uses functional exercises specifically targeted to address these factors and are easily incorporated into general fall prevention programs. Staying on Your Feet is an established and effective fall prevention program offered to community-dwelling older adults in the Saskatoon Health Region. The feasibility of implementing FAST into Staying on Your Feet was verified in a previous pilot study. The important extension of this work is to determine if functional improvements result in improved fall-specific neuromuscular capacity and ability to absorb energy. The focus of this project is to further advance our understanding of the effect of FAST on functional fall risk outcomes and fall-arrest capacity in older women. The goal of FAST is to increase fall-arrest capacity, defined as neuromuscular ability that could be utilized to prevent and minimize injury during a fall. While fall-related injury risk is difficult to measure directly, increases in fall-arrest capacity will likely lead to a reduction in that risk. Therefore, the effectiveness of injury risk reduction interventions such as FAST can be measured by their ability to increase fall-arrest capacity. One important factor recently emerging in the falls literature is energy absorption; older women absorb less energy in their UE during a controlled forward descent compared to younger women. The investigators have developed an experimental apparatus which can measure UE energy absorption in both controlled and unexpected forward body descents. Muscle strength, particularly surrounding the shoulder girdle and elbow, is another important forward fall-arrest capacity factor. The purpose of this study is to advance knowledge of this innovative and simple training program, FAST, integrated into fall prevention programming, to determine if it has potential to improve the physical capacity to arrest a fall and reduce injury risk in older community-dwelling women. This proposed study will use novel lab-based energy absorption and strength measures, combined with functional measures of mobility and fall risk. Fall-arrest capacity changes after an intervention such as FAST have never been examined in older women. Research Goals and Objectives: The principal research questions of this study are: 1) Does the addition of FAST training lead to improvements in UE energy absorption during controlled and unexpected forward descents as compared to a Standard fall prevention exercise program (Standard Exercise) focusing on walking, balance and lower extremity strength? 2) Does FAST produce greater gains in functional arm muscle strength, response time, mobility and balance control compared to Standard Exercise? The hypotheses are that FAST will result in greater improvements in energy absorption, UE strength, response time and mobility compared to Standard Exercise at the end of 12 weeks of training with similar gains in fall risk and balance control. Trial Design and Methodology: The proposed study is a pilot randomized trial where women, age 60 years or older living in the community will be randomly assigned to either FAST or Standard Exercise. Education on fall prevention will be provided to both groups. The exercise groups will be offered in the community, coordinated with an existing fall prevention program (Staying on Your Feet; Saskatoon Health Region). Participants will be recruited via announcements and posters in the community. Interested participants are invited to attend an information session prior to the start of the program and a screening questionnaire will be administered in person or by telephone. Eligibility criteria is explained in detail elsewhere. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either group using a random allocation conducted by someone not directly involved in the study. Measures will be collected at the College of Kinesiology Biomechanics of Balance and Movement Lab, University of Saskatchewan at the start of the training (baseline), and immediately post intervention. An experienced physical therapist or exercise therapist will supervise FAST and Standard Exercise. Both exercise programs will occur twice per week, 45 minutes duration, for 12 weeks at a community site. FAST will include the same exercises to improve balance, walking and general mobility as Standard Exercise, but will also incorporate FAST training. Outcome Measures: Outcome measures are designed to inform five primary fall-arrest capacity variables: 1) energy absorption in controlled descent, 2) energy absorption in unexpected descent, 3) eccentric muscle strength, 4) concentric muscle strength, 5) UE response time and secondary measures of fall risk, joint range of motion and balance and are described in detail elsewhere. Analysis: Effect sizes for this study were estimated using variability data from our previous fall-arrest capacity work with young and older women and other published UE energy data. Our pilot data with older adults has shown a 20% higher energy absorption in adults who perform more UE training. A clinically meaningful increase in energy absorption is unknown. Based on our data, a 25% increase in the energy absorption will require 16 participants per group to detect differences at 80% power. Intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted using all participants assigned to intervention or control sites. A completer only analysis (based on attendance rates) will also be conducted. Repeated measures MANOVA tests will test for time and time*group differences across the 12 week time period for the five primary variables: energy absorption in controlled an unexpected descent, concentric and eccentric arm muscle strength and UE reaction time as well as the secondary measures of joint mobility, balance and fall risk. Given the exploratory nature of this study, significance will be set at p<0.05 for omnibus tests.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Fall Injury
    Keywords
    fall risk, older adult, injury prevention

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Assessors were blinded to intervention
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    40 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    FAST
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Twice per week exercise program, 45 minutes duration for 12 weeks conducted in the community. Participants attended a 30-minute fall prevention education session once per week. FAST followed the same principles as Standard, with the addition of the following goals: 1) Increase UE strength (shoulder girdle/arm) utilizing both concentric and eccentric contractions, 2) Improve trunk and neck postural control during slow and fast body motions, 3) Optimize forward descent strategies via practice of quick response reaching, landing and controlled descent with hands on the wall or on the floor as able. Training progression for strength and body control included increasing the distance standing from the wall, progressing to one arm descents, increasing reps and speed and moving to greater gravity and body weight resistance such as hands and knees position on the floor as able. Quick movement practice targeted unexpected reaching activities, balloon and ball toss
    Arm Title
    Standard
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Twice per week exercise program, 45 minutes duration for 12 weeks conducted in a community site (assisted living residence). Participants also attended a 3o minute fall prevention education session once per week. The Standard intervention consisted of a fall prevention exercise program designed for community-dwelling older adults. Exercises focussed on balance, leg strength, walking and mobility exercises designed to decrease fall risk.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Exercise
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    FAST
    Intervention Description
    refer to arm descriptors
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Exercise
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Standard
    Intervention Description
    refer to arm descriptors
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    UE Strength - Isometric
    Description
    Measured with a hand-held dynamometer; mean of three trials for shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion and elbow extension
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    UE Strength - Grip
    Description
    Measured with a dynamometer; participant in sitting, standardized elbow flexion position and handle position, gripping maximum exertion; mean of three trials for shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion and elbow extension
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    UE Strength - Isometric Push-off Test
    Description
    Measured with a hand-held dynamometer for grip strength with the handle inverted and stabilized on a table top. Participant pushes downward in a standing position; mean of 3 trials used
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    UE Strength - Isokinetic Concentric and Eccentric
    Description
    Using a protocol developed in the investigators' lab, with the Humac Norm isokinetic dynamometer. An upper extremity pushing motion of primarily elbow extension measuring maximal force for concentric and eccentric motion. Mean of three trials used
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    UE Mobility
    Description
    Shoulder Extension and Wrist Extension Active Range of Motion with passive overpressure measure with a manual goniometer in a sitting position
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    UE Response Time
    Description
    Time from the start of an auditory cue to lift hands from a position standing with arms at side of body to the first touch on a force from auditory cue to touching a forceplate at shoulder level. Mean of three trials for right, left and both hands together used.
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Balance - One Leg Standing
    Description
    Timed ability to stand on one leg with no support, up to 60 seconds. Two trials on each leg
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Balance - Tandem Standing
    Description
    This is a standard test first described by Hile et al (2012) where the participant tries standing in a tandem position, one foot in front of the other first with and then without support for up to 30 seconds without support. Scored on a scale of 5, with maximum score of 5 meaning standing without support for full 30 seconds
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Self Report Fall Risk - FROP-Com
    Description
    Fall Risk for Older People living in the Community (National Aging Research Institute, 2012 http://www.mednwh.unimelb.edu.au/nari_tools/nari_tools_falls.html) measures fall risk in 13 categories, for a total possible score of 60 (higher risk)
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Self Report Balance Confidence
    Description
    Activities Balance Confidence Scale (ABC; Powell & Myers 1995) rating of confidence for 16 day to day functional tasks on a scale 0 - 100; mean of 16 items used as total score
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Sit to Stand Test
    Description
    Number of full sit to stand movements completed within 30 seconds with arms crossed. One practice followed by actual test
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
    Description
    Timed test to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn to chair and sit down. One practice trial, followed by one timed test (Podsiadlo & Richardson 1991)
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Ground Reaction Force
    Description
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). Bilateral force platforms recorded ground reaction forces as participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Elbow ROM during simulated forward descent
    Description
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). An eight camera motion capture system collected 3D upper extremity kinematics. Maximal elbow ROM was measured as participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Peak elbow moment and elbow stiffness during simulated forward descent
    Description
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). An eight camera motion capture system collected 3D upper extremity kinematics. Elbow moments and stiffness values were calculated, normalized to height and body weight. Participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Title
    Energy Absorption during simulated forward descent
    Description
    Forward Descent and Landing Apparatus used to measure a controlled and unexpected release onto outstretched hands (simulated forward fall). An eight camera motion capture system collected 3D upper extremity kinematics. Energy absorption was calculated calculated using the total ground reaction force and the movement of the shoulders as a measure of the vertical displacement of the body, normalized to height and body weight. Participants performed a controlled descent with body at an angle 30 degrees from vertical, and then in an unexpected release while tethered to the ceiling, shoulders in 90 degrees of flexion and hands just hovering above force plate. Mean of 3 trials.
    Time Frame
    12 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Falls
    Description
    number of reported falls
    Time Frame
    64 weeks
    Title
    Muscle Activity
    Description
    EMG analysis of muscle activity during controlled and quick descents
    Time Frame
    12 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Gender Based
    Yes
    Gender Eligibility Description
    Self identification as female is inclusion criteria
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    60 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: - Women aged 60 years or older living in the community. Exclusion Criteria: Any recent upper body (hand, wrist, shoulder, trunk, neck) injury or painful joint problem that limited day to day activities or resulted in pain on a daily basis, A prior distal radius fracture in the past 2 years, Any fracture in the past year, or multiple fractures of the wrist or forearm, Any history of UE neurological problems (i.e. Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Reflex Neuropathy), Any cardio-vascular problems that would contradict UE strength testing or training, Any signs of severe cognitive impairment or Unable to safely ambulate independently (with or without a walking aid) in the community. A medical and demographic screening questionnaire as well as the Mini-Cog (Borson et al, 2000) were used to determine eligibility.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Cathy Arnold, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    School Of Rehabilitation Science, University Of Saskatchewan
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    Aggregate data will be disseminated. Participants will receive aggregate summary of findings and confidential individual information as requested
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    12021005
    Citation
    DeGoede KM, Ashton-Miller JA. Fall arrest strategy affects peak hand impact force in a forward fall. J Biomech. 2002 Jun;35(6):843-8. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00011-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12594989
    Citation
    DeGoede KM, Ashton-Miller JA. Biomechanical simulations of forward fall arrests: effects of upper extremity arrest strategy, gender and aging-related declines in muscle strength. J Biomech. 2003 Mar;36(3):413-20. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00396-2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11113982
    Citation
    Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The mini-cog: a cognitive 'vital signs' measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;15(11):1021-7. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:113.0.co;2-6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19861641
    Citation
    Sran MM, Stotz PJ, Normandin SC, Robinovitch SN. Age differences in energy absorption in the upper extremity during a descent movement: implications for arresting a fall. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Mar;65(3):312-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp153. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21484509
    Citation
    Lee Y, Ashton-Miller JA. The effects of gender, level of co-contraction, and initial angle on elbow extensor muscle stiffness and damping under a step increase in elbow flexion moment. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Oct;39(10):2542-9. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0308-3. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12957559
    Citation
    Lo J, McCabe GN, DeGoede KM, Okuizumi H, Ashton-Miller JA. On reducing hand impact force in forward falls: results of a brief intervention in young males. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Oct;18(8):730-6. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00124-4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16926197
    Citation
    Maki BE, McIlroy WE. Control of rapid limb movements for balance recovery: age-related changes and implications for fall prevention. Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35 Suppl 2:ii12-ii18. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl078.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Public Health Agency of Canada. Seniors' Falls in Canada. 2nd Report. 2014; www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines [On-line].
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24101612
    Citation
    Schonnop R, Yang Y, Feldman F, Robinson E, Loughin M, Robinovitch SN. Prevalence of and factors associated with head impact during falls in older adults in long-term care. CMAJ. 2013 Nov 19;185(17):E803-10. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130498. Epub 2013 Oct 7. Erratum In: CMAJ. 2014 Mar 18;186(5):372.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19093923
    Citation
    Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JC. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9882050
    Citation
    Chiu J, Robinovitch SN. Prediction of upper extremity impact forces during falls on the outstretched hand. J Biomech. 1998 Dec;31(12):1169-76. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00137-7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30369700
    Citation
    Arnold CM, Walker-Johnston J, Lanovaz JL, Lattimer LJ. Does Fall Arrest Strategy Training Added to a Fall Prevention Programme Improve Balance, Strength, and Agility in Older Women? A Pilot Study. Physiother Can. 2017;69(4):323-332. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-27EP.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28095094
    Citation
    Lattimer LJ, Lanovaz JL, Farthing JP, Madill S, Kim S, Robinovitch S, Arnold C. Female Age-Related Differences in Biomechanics and Muscle Activity During Descents on the Outstretched Arms. J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jul;25(3):474-481. doi: 10.1123/japa.2016-0102. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29407858
    Citation
    Lattimer LJ, Lanovaz JL, Farthing JP, Madill S, Kim SY, Robinovitch S, Arnold CM. Biomechanical and physiological age differences in a simulated forward fall on outstretched hands in women. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Feb;52:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Does Fall Arrest Strategy Training Improve Capacity to Prevent Fall-Related Injury in Older Women?

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs