search
Back to results

Increasing Decision Quality for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Primary Purpose

Patient Engagement, Patient Preference

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Physicians trained in shared decision making
Physicians were not trained in shared decision making
Sponsored by
SingHealth Polyclinics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Patient Engagement

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • men aged 50 years old and older attending the polyclinic for routine follow up of a chronic disease (non-communicable disease)
  • have moderate-to-severe LUTS and/or poor quality of life (QOL) as assessed by the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of eight or more and/or its individual QOL score of three or more
  • men of any local Asian ethnicity and were willing to provide written consent
  • can communicate with their allocated PCP in either of the three main local languages; English, Mandarin or Malay.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have indwelling catheters
  • urinary incontinence requiring diapers
  • anuria due to any renal pathology
  • gross hematuria
  • acute urinary retention
  • symptoms consistent with an acute urinary tract infection
  • existing treatment of LUTS or other prostate pathology
  • visual or hearing impairment which render men incapable of understanding the study procedure and providing informed consent
  • men unwilling to discuss their LUTS treatment options with their PCP

Sites / Locations

  • Haidee Ngu

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms

No shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms

Arm Description

Participants used the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score so report their symptoms and were attended by Primary Care Physicians trained in shared decision making

Participants did not use the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score to report their symptoms and received usual care by Primary Care Physicians not trained in shared decision making

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the patients' perspective
The Shared Decision Making-9 (SDMQ9) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the patient. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the physicians' perspective
The Shared Decision Making-Doctor (SDMQDoc) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the physician. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
March 26, 2021
Last Updated
April 16, 2021
Sponsor
SingHealth Polyclinics
Collaborators
Singapore General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04851275
Brief Title
Increasing Decision Quality for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Official Title
Increasing Decision Quality in Older Men in Selecting Treatment Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
SingHealth Polyclinics
Collaborators
Singapore General Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators show that by upskilling of primary care physicians (PCPs) in SDM and leveraging on a novel pictorial Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score (VAUS), they can enhance older men's recognition of LUTS and stimulated discussion with their PCPs.
Detailed Description
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), often related to prostatomegaly, is common but seldom sought medical attention amongst older men. Visual-aid and shared decision-making (SDM) are potential solutions to address LUTS. The study aimed to determine the effect of a novel pictorial Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score (VAUS) and primary care physicians (PCP) SDM training on the decisional quality amongst men selecting their treatment options for LUTS. This study recruited 60 multi-ethnic Asian men aged ≥50 years with moderate-to-severe LUTS (International Prostate Symptoms Score≥8 and/or QOL≥3) in a Singapore public primary care clinic. Men used the VAUS to report their symptoms. 60 men were randomly assigned to PCPs trained in SDM in the intervention group (n=30) and the other 30 to the control group (PCPs without SDM-training). Patient-physician dyad decision quality was measured using the validated SDMQ-9 (patient) and SDMQ-Doc (physician) questionnaires.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patient Engagement, Patient Preference

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants used the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score so report their symptoms and were attended by Primary Care Physicians trained in shared decision making
Arm Title
No shared decision making for men with lower urinary tract symptoms
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants did not use the Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score to report their symptoms and received usual care by Primary Care Physicians not trained in shared decision making
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Physicians trained in shared decision making
Intervention Description
Physicians in this group were trained in shared decision making
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Physicians were not trained in shared decision making
Intervention Description
Physicians did not receive training in shared decision making
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the patients' perspective
Description
The Shared Decision Making-9 (SDMQ9) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the patient. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Title
Quality of the decision on the management of lower urinary tract symptoms from the physicians' perspective
Description
The Shared Decision Making-Doctor (SDMQDoc) Questionnaire measures decision quality from the perspective of the physician. Nine individual items in the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 5 on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). Standard scoring for the full scale is the total score, with values from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate higher quality decisions.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: men aged 50 years old and older attending the polyclinic for routine follow up of a chronic disease (non-communicable disease) have moderate-to-severe LUTS and/or poor quality of life (QOL) as assessed by the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of eight or more and/or its individual QOL score of three or more men of any local Asian ethnicity and were willing to provide written consent can communicate with their allocated PCP in either of the three main local languages; English, Mandarin or Malay. Exclusion Criteria: have indwelling catheters urinary incontinence requiring diapers anuria due to any renal pathology gross hematuria acute urinary retention symptoms consistent with an acute urinary tract infection existing treatment of LUTS or other prostate pathology visual or hearing impairment which render men incapable of understanding the study procedure and providing informed consent men unwilling to discuss their LUTS treatment options with their PCP
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tan Ngiap Chuan, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Singhealth polyclinic
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Haidee Ngu
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
150167
Country
Singapore

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31451932
Citation
Tiwari R, Ng MY, Neo SH, Mangat R, Ho H. Prospective validation of a novel visual analogue uroflowmetry score (VAUS) in 1000 men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1267-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02909-1. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Increasing Decision Quality for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs