search
Back to results

Effect of Peritoneal Fixation on Lymphocele Formation (PerFix)

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer, Lymphocele After Surgical Procedure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Czechia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peritoneal fixation (PerFix)
Standard of care
Sponsored by
University Hospital Olomouc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Prostate cancer, Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Extended pelvic lymph node dissection, Lymphocele, Peritoneal fixation, Lymphatic disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Histologically proven high risk prostate cancer or intermediate risk cancer (≥5% risk of nodal involvement on Briganti 2012 nomogram) according to European Association od Urology (EAU) risk groups
  • Suitable for minimally-invasive surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pelvic surgery or irradiation.
  • Any type of clotting disorder.
  • Patients unwilling to undergo CT scan
  • Kidney failure, Hemodialysis
  • American Society of Anesthesiology Classification> 3
  • Existing contraindications for performing a lymph node dissection

Sites / Locations

  • University hospital Olomouc

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention group (PerFix)

Control group (no PerFix)

Arm Description

Peritoneal fixation technique

Standard of care (i.e. no fixation)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants with Symptomatic lymphocele
The number of participants with symptomatic lymphocele will be determined. Clinical symptoms, time of onset, the size of the lymphocele, location, number of Lymphoceles and intervention needed will be measured

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of participants with Radiologic lymphocele on pelvic CT scan
The number of participants with radiologic lymphocele on Pelvic CT scan will be determined together with the size, location and number of detected lymphoceles.
Rate of severe (Clavien grade ≥3) complications
Incidence of adverse events in the Prefix group compared to control group (no PerFix) will be measured. Surgical complications will be evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification
Change in lymphocele size
The change in lymphocele size during follow-up CT scan will be examined
Number of participants with Occurrence of Any Venous Thromboembolism
Radiologic investigation will be done in case of by swelling or pain of the lower extremity and the number of any venous thromboembolism will be determined
Perioperative outcomes
Perioperative outcomes (time of the surgery, blood loss and hospital stay) will be measured
The effect of lymphocele on urinary incontinence
The rate of continent patients will be defined using pads needed per day. Continent equals to 0-1 pad per day.
The effect of lymphocele on potency
Potency equals to 19 and more points in the International index of erectile function (IIEF5) questionnaire (scale 0-25), the higher the score, the better.
The effect of lymphocele on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
Change in the International prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire from the baseline will be assessed (scale 0-35, higher score means worse outcome).

Full Information

First Posted
February 28, 2021
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital Olomouc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04853095
Brief Title
Effect of Peritoneal Fixation on Lymphocele Formation
Acronym
PerFix
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effect of Peritoneal Flap Fixation on Symptomatic and Radiologic Lymphocele Formation Following Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy With Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (PerFix)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital Olomouc

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The PerFix Trial aims to compare the use of peritoneal fixation technique to standard of care (no fixation) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (RARP + eLND) for the prevention of symptomatic and radiologic lymphocele formation.
Detailed Description
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is the most accurate staging tool to determine lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. As urologist perform this procedure more often now, thanks to the shift to more advanced and aggressive stages, the role of ePLND is expanding. The main complication of PLND is development of a collection of lymphatic fluid called a lymphocele. Lymphoceles can be associated with abdominal pain, lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder outlet obstruction, penile or scrotal edema, infection/sepsis, lower extremity swelling and deep vein thrombosis. They necessitate intervention in up to 10% of patients treated with RARP + ePLND which includes drainage or surgery. Radiologic incidence can be as high as around 50% of operated patients with unknown clinical relevance. Many interventions aimed at reducing the rate of lymphocele formation with limited success so far. Several retrospective studies suggested using peritoneal flap fixation technique which could direct the lymphatic fluid to the peritoneal cavity out of the pelvis and its ensure its reabsorption there. We hypothesize that peritoneal fixation can potentially lower the incidence of symptomatic and radiologic lymphocele formation. By preventing this potentially very dangerous complication, it could be very beneficial for a large group of patients suffering from aggressive localized prostate cancer who are scheduled for RARP + ePLND. Our goal is to is to test this hypothesis in a randomized trial comparing the fixation technique to standard of care, i.e. no fixation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer, Lymphocele After Surgical Procedure
Keywords
Prostate cancer, Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Extended pelvic lymph node dissection, Lymphocele, Peritoneal fixation, Lymphatic disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
260 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention group (PerFix)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Peritoneal fixation technique
Arm Title
Control group (no PerFix)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard of care (i.e. no fixation)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Peritoneal fixation (PerFix)
Intervention Description
PerFix involves suturing the free end of the peritoneal flap left after RARP + ePLND to the pelvic wall near the symphysis of the pubic bones leaving two lateral openings for directing the lymphatic fluid out of the pelvis to the abdominal cavity.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of care
Intervention Description
ePLND without peritoneal flap fixation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with Symptomatic lymphocele
Description
The number of participants with symptomatic lymphocele will be determined. Clinical symptoms, time of onset, the size of the lymphocele, location, number of Lymphoceles and intervention needed will be measured
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with Radiologic lymphocele on pelvic CT scan
Description
The number of participants with radiologic lymphocele on Pelvic CT scan will be determined together with the size, location and number of detected lymphoceles.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Rate of severe (Clavien grade ≥3) complications
Description
Incidence of adverse events in the Prefix group compared to control group (no PerFix) will be measured. Surgical complications will be evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change in lymphocele size
Description
The change in lymphocele size during follow-up CT scan will be examined
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of participants with Occurrence of Any Venous Thromboembolism
Description
Radiologic investigation will be done in case of by swelling or pain of the lower extremity and the number of any venous thromboembolism will be determined
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Perioperative outcomes
Description
Perioperative outcomes (time of the surgery, blood loss and hospital stay) will be measured
Time Frame
30 days
Title
The effect of lymphocele on urinary incontinence
Description
The rate of continent patients will be defined using pads needed per day. Continent equals to 0-1 pad per day.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The effect of lymphocele on potency
Description
Potency equals to 19 and more points in the International index of erectile function (IIEF5) questionnaire (scale 0-25), the higher the score, the better.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
The effect of lymphocele on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
Description
Change in the International prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire from the baseline will be assessed (scale 0-35, higher score means worse outcome).
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Able to give informed consent Histologically proven high risk prostate cancer or intermediate risk cancer (≥5% risk of nodal involvement on Briganti 2012 nomogram) according to European Association od Urology (EAU) risk groups Suitable for minimally-invasive surgery Exclusion Criteria: Previous pelvic surgery or irradiation. Any type of clotting disorder. Patients unwilling to undergo CT scan Kidney failure, Hemodialysis American Society of Anesthesiology Classification> 3 Existing contraindications for performing a lymph node dissection
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vladimir Student, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Dpt. of Urology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University hospital Olomouc
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
77900
Country
Czechia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Peritoneal Fixation on Lymphocele Formation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs