search
Back to results

Pirfenidone vs. Nintedanib for Fibrotic Lung Disease After Coronavirus Disease-19 Pneumonia (PINCER)

Primary Purpose

Novel Coronavirus-induced Lung Fibrosis

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pirfenidone
Nintedanib
Sponsored by
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Novel Coronavirus-induced Lung Fibrosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age above 18 years
  2. Diagnosed to have COVID-19 by means of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test performed on a respiratory (upper or lower respiratory) sample or positive IgM antibody test or a rapid antigen test with consistent clinicoradiologic findings within the previous 4 months
  3. Persistent respiratory symptoms
  4. Having post-COVID parenchymal involvement >10% of the lung parenchyma on visual inspection of the scans with the presence of radiologic signs of fibrosis (traction bronchiectasis/traction bronchiolectasis or honeycombing or reduced lung volumes), or having persistent reticulation or persistent consolidation despite a trial of glucocorticoids (minimum prednisolone dose of 10 mg/day, or equivalent) for a minimum period of 4 weeks after discharge for the acute COVID-19 illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women
  2. Having absolute contraindication for pirfenidone or nintedanib (advanced liver cirrhosis, persistent elevation of liver transaminases, documented hypersensitivity to pirfenidone or nintedanib, receiving anticoagulants or high dose aspirin or having a vascular stent in situ)
  3. Known patient with diffuse lung disease prior to the diagnosis of COVID

Sites / Locations

  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Pirfenidone

Nintedanib

Arm Description

Pirfenidone will be started at a dose of 600 mg/day. The dose will be escalated by 600 mg/day every 3-7 days up to a targeted dose of 2400 mg/day. The subjects will be administered the maximum tolerated dose for a total period of 24 weeks from randomization.

Subjects in this group will be administered nintedanib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily. The liver function tests will be monitored as above. The dose will be reduced to 100 mg twice daily, if there is intolerance to 300 mg/day dose.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the forced vital capacity (FVC)
Forced vital capacity will be measured using spirometry. The predicted value will be calculated based on standard reference equations.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of subjects with improvement or stabilization
This will be defined by improvement or a <10% relative decline in FVC from the baseline value
Proportion of subjects with a good composite response
A good composite response will be defined as less than mMRC grade 2 breathlessness with ≥10% improvement in FVC with an oxygen saturation >92% during and after exertion.
Change in dyspnea score on modified Medical Research Council scale
The change in dyspnea score assessed using the modified Medical Research Council from the day of randomization to 6 weeks.The scale has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 4, higher values indicate worse outcomes
Severity of dyspnea on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Dyspnea-10 item scale
Severity of dyspnea assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Dyspnea-10 item scale. The scale has two item banks of 10 items each for dyspnea and functional limitations. EAch item has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 3. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Change in resting oxygen saturation
The change in resting oxygen saturation (measured by pulse oximetry) from the day of randomization to 24 weeks
Proportion of subjects with oxygen desaturation on exercise testing
Oxygen desaturation will be defined as a fall in oxygen saturation by 4% or more on exercise testing (by one-minute sit-to-stand test and six-minute walk test)
Percentage change in the six-minute walk distance
Six-minute walk test will be performed by trained technicians using a standard protocol
Proportion of participants who need rescue treatment
Rescue treatment would include the use of higher doses of glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive agents
Change in health-related quality of life using the Short Form-36 questionnaire
Health-related quality of life assessed using Short Form-36 questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 36 items covering 8 domains. Each domain score has a minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes
Change in respiratory health status using the King's Brief ILD questionnaire
Respiratory health status assessed using the King's Brief ILD questionnaire. The questionnaire has 15 items. The total score varies from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Changes in HRCT scores using the modified Salisbury system
Changes in HRCT scores for different features (reticulation, honeycombing, ground-glass opacities, mosaic attenuation/air trapping) will be calculated. The score for each feature range from 0 to 5 with higher scores representing worse outcomes
Proportion of subjects who develop adverse effects due to either study drug
The adverse effects of treatment (rash, hepatotoxicity, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain)
Predictors of response to antifibrotic agents, pirfenidone and nintedanib
These may include age, gender, the study group, baseline CT abnormalities, baseline FVC

Full Information

First Posted
April 19, 2021
Last Updated
September 30, 2022
Sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04856111
Brief Title
Pirfenidone vs. Nintedanib for Fibrotic Lung Disease After Coronavirus Disease-19 Pneumonia
Acronym
PINCER
Official Title
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone vs. Nintedanib in the Treatment of Fibrotic Lung Disease After Coronavirus Disease-19 Pneumonia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
March 17, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The antifibrotic agents, namely pirfenidone and nintedanib have been found to be effective in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Nintedanib has also been found to be effective in treating systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) and non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILDs. Pirfenidone has also been found beneficial unclassifiable ILDs. Whether these drugs would be effective in treating post-COVID lung fibrosis also is unknown. As the final pathway of lung fibrosis appears to be common among different diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), it is hoped that these antifibrotic agents might be helpful in post-COVID fibrosis. There are no randomized studies that have assessed the role of pirfenidone or nintedanib in post COVID fibrosis. In the current study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone and compare it with nintedanib in the treatment of post-COVID lung fibrosis.
Detailed Description
Since the early part of 2020, the entire world has been affected by a pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease has a short incubation period (median, 3 days) and is highly transmissible. This disease may manifest as an asymptomatic infection and through an entire range of symptoms of varying severity to severe, life-threatening disease. Although diverse systemic features might be present, the usual presentation is with lower respiratory tract involvement in the form of pneumonia often resulting in the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In some patients, multi-organ failure sets in, possibly as a result of a cytokine storm interplaying with a thrombotic microangiopathy. Early lung disease is characterized pathologically by neutrophilic and exudative capillaritis in the lungs with some evidence of microthrombosis.2 This may be followed by a picture of diffuse alveolar damage along with ongoing intravascular thrombosis in the pulmonary vessels. In late stages, an organizing pneumonia (OP) develops with extensive proliferation of fibroblasts within the airspaces. Clinically, most patients make a complete recovery after COVID pneumonia. Other patients may demonstrate some signs of recovery from the acute illness with resolution of fever and recovery of organ functions, however they continue to have some degree of breathlessness, persistent infiltrates on radiologic studies, and/or hypoxemia. The CT abnormalities in these patients are commonly characterized by patchy, multifocal consolidation and ground-glass opacities suggestive of the OP pattern. Coarse reticulation and parenchymal bands may also be present. Patients with such diffuse lung disease after COVID-19, herein referred to as post-COVID diffuse lung disease (PC-DLD) are often treated with glucocorticoids. Although most patients with a predominant OP pattern of injury would have a resolution of lung parenchymal abnormalities either spontaneously or with glucocorticoids, some of them might develop signs of lung fibrosis, in the form of traction bronchiectasis and/or honeycombing. Some subjects have ongoing respiratory symptoms despite treatment with steroids, and they may be found to have persistent reticulation or non-resolving consolidation on chest imaging that may represent early fibrosis. The antifibrotic agents, namely pirfenidone and nintedanib have been found to be effective in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Nintedanib has also been found to be effective in treating systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) and non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILDs. Pirfenidone has also been found beneficial unclassifiable ILDs. Whether these drugs would be effective in treating post-COVID lung fibrosis also is unknown. As the final pathway of lung fibrosis appears to be common among different diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), it is hoped that these antifibrotic agents might be helpful in post-COVID fibrosis. There are no randomized studies that have assessed the role of pirfenidone or nintedanib in post COVID fibrosis. In the current study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone and compare it with nintedanib in the treatment of post-COVID lung fibrosis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Novel Coronavirus-induced Lung Fibrosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pirfenidone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Pirfenidone will be started at a dose of 600 mg/day. The dose will be escalated by 600 mg/day every 3-7 days up to a targeted dose of 2400 mg/day. The subjects will be administered the maximum tolerated dose for a total period of 24 weeks from randomization.
Arm Title
Nintedanib
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects in this group will be administered nintedanib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily. The liver function tests will be monitored as above. The dose will be reduced to 100 mg twice daily, if there is intolerance to 300 mg/day dose.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pirfenidone
Intervention Description
Same as arm description
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nintedanib
Intervention Description
Same as arm description
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the forced vital capacity (FVC)
Description
Forced vital capacity will be measured using spirometry. The predicted value will be calculated based on standard reference equations.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of subjects with improvement or stabilization
Description
This will be defined by improvement or a <10% relative decline in FVC from the baseline value
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Proportion of subjects with a good composite response
Description
A good composite response will be defined as less than mMRC grade 2 breathlessness with ≥10% improvement in FVC with an oxygen saturation >92% during and after exertion.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Change in dyspnea score on modified Medical Research Council scale
Description
The change in dyspnea score assessed using the modified Medical Research Council from the day of randomization to 6 weeks.The scale has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 4, higher values indicate worse outcomes
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Severity of dyspnea on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Dyspnea-10 item scale
Description
Severity of dyspnea assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Dyspnea-10 item scale. The scale has two item banks of 10 items each for dyspnea and functional limitations. EAch item has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 3. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Change in resting oxygen saturation
Description
The change in resting oxygen saturation (measured by pulse oximetry) from the day of randomization to 24 weeks
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Proportion of subjects with oxygen desaturation on exercise testing
Description
Oxygen desaturation will be defined as a fall in oxygen saturation by 4% or more on exercise testing (by one-minute sit-to-stand test and six-minute walk test)
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Percentage change in the six-minute walk distance
Description
Six-minute walk test will be performed by trained technicians using a standard protocol
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Proportion of participants who need rescue treatment
Description
Rescue treatment would include the use of higher doses of glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive agents
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Change in health-related quality of life using the Short Form-36 questionnaire
Description
Health-related quality of life assessed using Short Form-36 questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 36 items covering 8 domains. Each domain score has a minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Change in respiratory health status using the King's Brief ILD questionnaire
Description
Respiratory health status assessed using the King's Brief ILD questionnaire. The questionnaire has 15 items. The total score varies from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Changes in HRCT scores using the modified Salisbury system
Description
Changes in HRCT scores for different features (reticulation, honeycombing, ground-glass opacities, mosaic attenuation/air trapping) will be calculated. The score for each feature range from 0 to 5 with higher scores representing worse outcomes
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Proportion of subjects who develop adverse effects due to either study drug
Description
The adverse effects of treatment (rash, hepatotoxicity, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain)
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Predictors of response to antifibrotic agents, pirfenidone and nintedanib
Description
These may include age, gender, the study group, baseline CT abnormalities, baseline FVC
Time Frame
24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age above 18 years Diagnosed to have COVID-19 by means of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test performed on a respiratory (upper or lower respiratory) sample or positive IgM antibody test or a rapid antigen test with consistent clinicoradiologic findings within the previous 4 months Persistent respiratory symptoms Having post-COVID parenchymal involvement >10% of the lung parenchyma on visual inspection of the scans with the presence of radiologic signs of fibrosis (traction bronchiectasis/traction bronchiolectasis or honeycombing or reduced lung volumes), or having persistent reticulation or persistent consolidation despite a trial of glucocorticoids (minimum prednisolone dose of 10 mg/day, or equivalent) for a minimum period of 4 weeks after discharge for the acute COVID-19 illness Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or lactating women Having absolute contraindication for pirfenidone or nintedanib (advanced liver cirrhosis, persistent elevation of liver transaminases, documented hypersensitivity to pirfenidone or nintedanib, receiving anticoagulants or high dose aspirin or having a vascular stent in situ) Known patient with diffuse lung disease prior to the diagnosis of COVID
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
City
Chandigarh
Country
India

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Pirfenidone vs. Nintedanib for Fibrotic Lung Disease After Coronavirus Disease-19 Pneumonia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs