search
Back to results

Central Vein Stenosis Due to Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Subclavian Compared to Jugular Vein (CITES)

Primary Purpose

Subclavian Vein Stenosis, Jugular Vein Occlusion

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Temporary central dialysis catheterization
Sponsored by
Skane University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Subclavian Vein Stenosis focused on measuring Central Venous Stenosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (18 years of age or older).
  • In need of a tCDC with an expected treatment time of at least 7 days.
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intravenous pacemaker or a PICC-line via right-sided central veins in situ.
  • Known right-sided CVS.
  • AV fistula on the right upper extremity.
  • History of central venous vascular interventions including stents, dilatations and more (but not previous central venous catheterization).
  • Central venous catheter in the right internal jugular vein or in the right subclavian vein in situ.
  • Either the right jugular vein or the right subclavian vein unavailable for catheterization due to, e.g., local skin infection, thrombosis or inability to visualize the vein with ultrasound.
  • Known allergy to iodinated contrast agents.
  • BMI >35 kg/m2.
  • No study physician available for the catheterization.

Sites / Locations

  • Skånes universitetssjukhusRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Right subclavian vein catheterization

Right internal jugular vein catheterization

Arm Description

The temporary central dialysis catheter is placed in the right subclavian vein.

The temporary central dialysis catheter is placed in the right internal jugular vein.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Central vein stenosis
>50 percent central vein diameter reduction (stenosis) using CT venography

Secondary Outcome Measures

Ultrasound-guided assessment of central vein stenosis (50 percent threshold)
Ultrasound-derived parameters indicating central vein stenosis are compared to CT venography results (with a threshold of 50 percent venous diameter reduction)
Ultrasound-guided assessment of central vein stenosis (80 percent threshold)
Ultrasound-derived parameters indicating central vein stenosis are compared to CT venography results (with a threshold of 80 percent venous diameter reduction)
Patient experience
Questionnaire regarding the patient's experience of discomfort during the catheterization procedure and when carrying the catheter
Dialysis problems
Blood flow rates and interruptions during dialysis are compared between the groups

Full Information

First Posted
April 28, 2021
Last Updated
April 24, 2023
Sponsor
Skane University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04871568
Brief Title
Central Vein Stenosis Due to Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Subclavian Compared to Jugular Vein
Acronym
CITES
Official Title
Central Venous Stenosis Incidence After Right-sided Subclavian and Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization With a Silicone Temporary Hemodialysis Catheter
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 15, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Skane University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a well-known complication of central venous catheterization, especially after insertion of temporary hemodialysis catheters (tHDC). Incidence and prevalence differ between studies, and exact figures are hard to tell since proper venographies seldom are performed unless the patient is symptomatic. Most tHDC are placed in the jugular or femoral veins as catheters in the subclavian veins have been shown to result in CVS to a greater degree. However, some studies are equivocal and there are several advantages with the subclavian vein such as a lower risk for infectious and thrombotic complications, longer durability (thereby avoiding placement of a new catheter with repeated tissue trauma), increased comfort during insertion and use, less effect on blood flow if the patient moves the head, easier to mobilize. The studies on CVS incidence originate from the 1990s when ultrasound-guided insertions were unheard of and polyurethane catheters were prevalent. The investigators believe that there is less tissue trauma when using ultrasound guidance in real-time. Furthermore, CVS is less common when silicone catheters are used instead of polyurethane catheters. To avoid unnecessary vascular trauma and patient suffering, any pre-existing CVS should ideally be detected before cannulation attempts. A CT scan of the chest with IV contrast is preferred, but this exposes the patient to ionized radiation, is time-consuming and (although debated) may cause contrast-induced nephropathy. A brief ultrasound examination to verify central venous patency would be useful provided it is shown to have an adequate sensitivity for stenosis detection.
Detailed Description
This is a multicentric, prospective, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Patients will be enrolled in three hospitals (Lund, Malmö, Helsingborg) in southern Sweden. The trial is investigator-initiated and non-commercial. The radiologist interpreting CT venographies will be blinded to study group allocation, whereas the patient, the treating physicians and other care providers will not be blinded. Patients will be randomized to receive a silicone tCDC either in the right subclavian vein (intervention) or in the right internal jugular vein (control). All catheterizations will be performed in a standardized manner. A questionnaire regarding the patient's experience of the catheterization procedure is handed out as soon as possible, preferably immediately after catheterization if the clinical situation permits. Follow-up is carried out 3-6 months after the removal of the catheter to eliminate transitory thrombosis. A CT venography with a customized protocol for this study will be performed to look for CVS. An ultrasound examination of the central veins is performed and compared to the findings of the CT venography.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Subclavian Vein Stenosis, Jugular Vein Occlusion
Keywords
Central Venous Stenosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Right subclavian vein catheterization
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The temporary central dialysis catheter is placed in the right subclavian vein.
Arm Title
Right internal jugular vein catheterization
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The temporary central dialysis catheter is placed in the right internal jugular vein.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Temporary central dialysis catheterization
Intervention Description
Placement of temporary central dialysis catheter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Central vein stenosis
Description
>50 percent central vein diameter reduction (stenosis) using CT venography
Time Frame
1.5-3 months after the catheterization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ultrasound-guided assessment of central vein stenosis (50 percent threshold)
Description
Ultrasound-derived parameters indicating central vein stenosis are compared to CT venography results (with a threshold of 50 percent venous diameter reduction)
Time Frame
1.5-3 months after the catheterization
Title
Ultrasound-guided assessment of central vein stenosis (80 percent threshold)
Description
Ultrasound-derived parameters indicating central vein stenosis are compared to CT venography results (with a threshold of 80 percent venous diameter reduction)
Time Frame
1.5-3 months after the catheterization
Title
Patient experience
Description
Questionnaire regarding the patient's experience of discomfort during the catheterization procedure and when carrying the catheter
Time Frame
Immediately after catheterization and 3-6 months after the catheterization
Title
Dialysis problems
Description
Blood flow rates and interruptions during dialysis are compared between the groups
Time Frame
During dialysis sessions

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults (18 years of age or older). In need of a tCDC with an expected treatment time of at least 7 days. Informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Intravenous pacemaker or a PICC-line via right-sided central veins in situ. Known right-sided CVS. AV fistula on the right upper extremity. History of central venous vascular interventions including stents, dilatations and more (but not previous central venous catheterization). Central venous catheter in the right internal jugular vein or in the right subclavian vein in situ. Either the right jugular vein or the right subclavian vein unavailable for catheterization due to, e.g., local skin infection, thrombosis or inability to visualize the vein with ultrasound. Known allergy to iodinated contrast agents. BMI >35 kg/m2. No study physician available for the catheterization.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ola Borgquist, MD, PhD
Phone
+46704156334
Email
oborgquist@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Thomas Kander, MD, PhD
Email
thomas.kander@med.lu.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ola Borgquist, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Skånes universitetssjukhus
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Kander, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Skånes universitetssjukhus
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Skånes universitetssjukhus
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
22185
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ola Borgquist, MD, PhD
Phone
+46704156334
Email
oborgquist@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Kander, MD, PhD
Phone
+4646171156

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Central Vein Stenosis Due to Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Subclavian Compared to Jugular Vein

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs