search
Back to results

Dexametasone Versus Dexametasone Plus Dexmedetomidine in Nerve Blocks

Primary Purpose

Analgesia, Pain, Acute, Upper Extremity Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Chile
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexamethasone
Dexmedetomidine-Dexamethasone
Sponsored by
University of Chile
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Analgesia focused on measuring dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, nerve block, adjuvants

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
  • Body mass index between 20 and 35

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are unable to give their own consent
  • Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
  • Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
  • Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs)
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior surgery in the infraclavicular region
  • Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Perineural dexamethasone

Perineural dexamethasone plus dexmedetomidine

Arm Description

Addition of dexamethasone 2mg to local anesthetics in infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Addition of dexamethasone plus dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics in infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Motor block duration
The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of return of hand and fingers movement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Sensory block duration
The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of the return of hand and fingers sensation
Analgesic block duration
The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of the first sensation of pain in the surgical area
Block performance time
Sum of: 1- the acquisition time of the ultrasonographic image. and 2- the time to perform the block itself (from the skin anesthesia to the end of local anesthetic injection)
Intensity of pain during block procedure
Evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-points score represents the worst imaginable pain. Patients will be asked to rate their pain verbally with this scale. The blinded assessor will register the score reported.
Block onset time
Time required to reach a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points. The sensorimotor score is described in outcome 7.
Sensory and motor block score
The sensorimotor block will be assessed every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of local anesthetic injection using a 16-point composite score evaluating sensory and motor block of musculocutaneous, medium, radial, and ulnar nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice in each nerve territory with a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, the patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, the patient cannot feel cold or touch. The motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis. Successful blocks at 30 minutes correlate with a final score ( sum of all individual sensory and motor scores) of at least 14 points out of 16.
Incidence of complete block
Percentage of blocks with a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points at 30 minutes after the injection
Incidence of surgical anesthesia
Ability to proceed with surgery without the need for intravenous narcotics, general anesthesia, rescue blocks or local anesthesia infiltration by the surgeon
Incidence of nerve block side effects
Determined by the presence of paresthesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, Horner syndrome or hoarseness after the block.
Respiratory depression
Presence of low respiratory rates (lower than 8 breaths per minute) or persistent oxygen requirements (pulse oximetry lower than 90% without supplementary oxygen). The respiratory rate and pulse oximetry are continuously measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached
Bradycardia
Defined as a heart rate lower than 50 beats per minute. The heart rate is continuously measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached
Hypotension
Mean arterial pressure lower than 60 mmHg. The blood pressure is measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached
Postoperative persistent sedation
Persistent sedation after surgery using Ramsay sedation scale. The scale has 6 points from 1 to 6. A higher score represents a more sedated patient. 1= anxious, agitated or restless; 2= co-operative, oriented and tranquil; 3= responds to command only; 4= brisk response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 5= sluggish response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 6= no response.
Persistent neurologic deficit
Presence of persistent sensory or motor postoperative deficit. The patients will be contacted by telephone and inquired about any sensory or motor deficit in the operated extremity.

Full Information

First Posted
April 27, 2021
Last Updated
March 3, 2022
Sponsor
University of Chile
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04875039
Brief Title
Dexametasone Versus Dexametasone Plus Dexmedetomidine in Nerve Blocks
Official Title
A Randomized Comparison Between Perineural Dexamethasone and Perineural Mixture of Dexamethasone-Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 31, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Chile

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will compare perineural dexamethasone 2mg and perineural mixture of dexamethasone 2mg plus dexmedetomidine 50mcg DX plus DXD as adjuvants to local anesthetics for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (ICBs). The protocol is designed as a superiority trial and hypothesizes that the mixture of both drugs results in longer block duration. Furthermore, since analgesic and sensory duration can be influenced by the intake of pain medications and surgical trauma to small cutaneous nerves, respectively, motor block duration was selected as the main outcome to better target the action of both adjuvants on the brachial plexus.
Detailed Description
With the approval of Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, a total of 50 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery (elbow and below) will be recruited. Recruitment will be carried out by an investigator not involved in patient care in the preoperative clinic or during routine preoperative visits. All ICBs will be supervised by one of the coauthors and conducted preoperatively in an induction room. After skin disinfection and draping, the ICB will be performed with a previously described technique. In both groups, a proven 90% effective volume of 35 mL of local anesthetic solution will be injected. As LA solution, it will be used a mixture of lidocaine 1.0%-bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µ/mL. The injectate will be slowly injected through the block needle. Patients will be randomized to receive the study drug, either PN 2 mg dexamethasone or a combination of PN 2 mg dexamethasone with 50 ug dexmedetomidine, mixed with the above-mentioned LA solution. A research assistant (licensed anesthesiologist) will prepare the local anesthetic solutions and will add the study drug following the randomization order. The operator, patient and investigator assessing the block will be blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome will be the duration of the motor block (defined as the temporal interval between the end of LA injection through the block needle and the return of movement to the hand and fingers) for patients with successful ICBs. Patients will be provided with a data sheet and asked to record the time at which motor function returns. An investigator blinded to group allocation will collect this data sheet in person (inpatients) or by phone (outpatients) on postoperative day 1.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Analgesia, Pain, Acute, Upper Extremity Injury
Keywords
dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, nerve block, adjuvants

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
blinded-randomized controlled trial
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
A research assistant (licensed anesthesiologist) will prepare the local anesthetic solutions and will add the study drug following the randomization order. The operator, patient and investigator assessing the block will be blinded to group allocation.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Perineural dexamethasone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Addition of dexamethasone 2mg to local anesthetics in infraclavicular brachial plexus block
Arm Title
Perineural dexamethasone plus dexmedetomidine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Addition of dexamethasone plus dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics in infraclavicular brachial plexus block
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
dexamethasone 2 mg will be added to the local anesthetic used to block the cords of the brachial plexus with an infraclavicular approach.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexmedetomidine-Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
A mixture of dexamethasone 2mg with dexmedetomidine 50mcg will be added to the local anesthetic used to block the cords of the brachial plexus with an infraclavicular approach.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motor block duration
Description
The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of return of hand and fingers movement
Time Frame
24-48 hours after block
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensory block duration
Description
The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of the return of hand and fingers sensation
Time Frame
Time Frame: 24-48 hours after nerve block
Title
Analgesic block duration
Description
The elapsed period in minutes between the ending time of the local anesthetic injection and the time of the first sensation of pain in the surgical area
Time Frame
24-48 hours after nerve block
Title
Block performance time
Description
Sum of: 1- the acquisition time of the ultrasonographic image. and 2- the time to perform the block itself (from the skin anesthesia to the end of local anesthetic injection)
Time Frame
1 hour before surgery
Title
Intensity of pain during block procedure
Description
Evaluated with the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. This scale is graduated from 0 to 10 points. A 0-point score represents the absence of pain, and a 10-points score represents the worst imaginable pain. Patients will be asked to rate their pain verbally with this scale. The blinded assessor will register the score reported.
Time Frame
1 hour before surgery
Title
Block onset time
Description
Time required to reach a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points. The sensorimotor score is described in outcome 7.
Time Frame
1 hour before surgery
Title
Sensory and motor block score
Description
The sensorimotor block will be assessed every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after the end of local anesthetic injection using a 16-point composite score evaluating sensory and motor block of musculocutaneous, medium, radial, and ulnar nerves. Sensation will be assessed with ice in each nerve territory with a 0 to 2 point scale. 0= no block, patients can feel cold; 1= analgesic block, the patient can feel touch but not cold; 2= anesthetic block, the patient cannot feel cold or touch. The motor function will be assessed for each nerve with a 0 to 2 points scale where 0= no motor block; 1= paresis; 2= paralysis. Successful blocks at 30 minutes correlate with a final score ( sum of all individual sensory and motor scores) of at least 14 points out of 16.
Time Frame
30 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection
Title
Incidence of complete block
Description
Percentage of blocks with a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 points out of a maximum of 16 points at 30 minutes after the injection
Time Frame
30 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection
Title
Incidence of surgical anesthesia
Description
Ability to proceed with surgery without the need for intravenous narcotics, general anesthesia, rescue blocks or local anesthesia infiltration by the surgeon
Time Frame
30-60 minutes after the ending time of local anesthetic injection
Title
Incidence of nerve block side effects
Description
Determined by the presence of paresthesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, Horner syndrome or hoarseness after the block.
Time Frame
0 minutes after skin disinfection to 30 minutes after the nerve block
Title
Respiratory depression
Description
Presence of low respiratory rates (lower than 8 breaths per minute) or persistent oxygen requirements (pulse oximetry lower than 90% without supplementary oxygen). The respiratory rate and pulse oximetry are continuously measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached
Time Frame
30 minutes after the nerve block to 2 hours after surgery
Title
Bradycardia
Description
Defined as a heart rate lower than 50 beats per minute. The heart rate is continuously measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached
Time Frame
30 minutes after the nerve block to 2 hours after surgery
Title
Hypotension
Description
Mean arterial pressure lower than 60 mmHg. The blood pressure is measured intra- and post-operatively (in the post-anesthetic care unit) as a standard of care with a multiparameter monitor. Alarms are set to alert when predetermined levels are reached
Time Frame
30 minutes after the nerve block to 2 hours after surgery
Title
Postoperative persistent sedation
Description
Persistent sedation after surgery using Ramsay sedation scale. The scale has 6 points from 1 to 6. A higher score represents a more sedated patient. 1= anxious, agitated or restless; 2= co-operative, oriented and tranquil; 3= responds to command only; 4= brisk response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 5= sluggish response to light pain or loud auditory stimulus; 6= no response.
Time Frame
2 hours after surgery
Title
Persistent neurologic deficit
Description
Presence of persistent sensory or motor postoperative deficit. The patients will be contacted by telephone and inquired about any sensory or motor deficit in the operated extremity.
Time Frame
7 days after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3 Body mass index between 20 and 35 Exclusion Criteria: Adults who are unable to give their own consent Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination) Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50) Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100) Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100) Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) Pregnancy Prior surgery in the infraclavicular region Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
City
Santiago
State/Province
Metropolitan
Country
Chile

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20048654
Citation
Tran DQ, Bertini P, Zaouter C, Munoz L, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c7717c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21270721
Citation
Tran DQ, Dugani S, Dyachenko A, Correa JA, Finlayson RJ. Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):190-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4266.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27015546
Citation
Leurcharusmee P, Aliste J, Van Zundert TC, Engsusophon P, Arnuntasupakul V, Tiyaprasertkul W, Tangjitbampenbun A, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Between Intravenous and Perineural Dexamethasone for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):328-33. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000386.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28252523
Citation
Chong MA, Berbenetz NM, Lin C, Singh S. Perineural Versus Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant for Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):319-326. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000571.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28100520
Citation
Vorobeichik L, Brull R, Abdallah FW. Evidence basis for using perineural dexmedetomidine to enhance the quality of brachial plexus nerve blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;118(2):167-181. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew411.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30640652
Citation
Bravo D, Aliste J, Layera S, Fernandez D, Leurcharusmee P, Samerchua A, Tangjitbampenbun A, Watanitanon A, Arnuntasupakul V, Tunprasit C, Gordon A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A multicenter, randomized comparison between 2, 5, and 8 mg of perineural dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000032.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31300595
Citation
Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Fernandez D, Jara A, Garcia A, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jul 11:rapm-2019-100680. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100680. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35728840
Citation
Aliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Aguilera G, Erpel H, Garcia A, Lizama M, Finlayson RJ, Tran D. Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and combined perineural dexamethasone-dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jun 21:rapm-2022-103760. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103760. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Dexametasone Versus Dexametasone Plus Dexmedetomidine in Nerve Blocks

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs