Comparative Study Between Steroid Plus Anesthetic Block and CRF in Participants With Hip Osteoarthritis
Primary Purpose
Hip Osteoarthritis, Chronic Pain
Status
Suspended
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CRF of anterior sensitive branches to the hip
Anesthetic block with steroid injection of anterior sensitive branches to the hip
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hip Osteoarthritis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants 18 years or older
- Symptomatic unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA)
- Pain for more than 6 months in the groin, anterior, anterolateral ou lateral region
- OA radiologically classified as Kellgren and Lawrence Tipo II-IV,
- VAS ≥ 4
- Considered non-responder to conservative treatment for the participant for 6 months.
- In case of difficulty in selecting participants with symptomatic unilateral OA, symptomatic bilateral hip OA will be admitted and submitted to the same treatment on both sides, after notification and approval from the Ethic Board of each institution involved.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with radiculopathy ipsolateral
- Knee OA ipsolateral,
- Previous hip arthroplasty
- Pain exclusively in the posterior region of the hip
- Infiltration of the hip for less than 3 months
- Neurological disease compromising gait
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Psychiatric disease that compromise collaboration with the protocol
- Implanted pacemaker
- Prothrombin Activity Time (PT/INR) > 3 and
- Litigation process related to the disease.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital das Forças Armadas
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Conventional Radiofrequency Group
Anesthetic plus steroid group
Arm Description
Will be submitted to an anesthetic block of the sensory branches of femoral and obturator nerves to the hip, with 1 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1ml of steroid (Betamethasone Dipropionate 5 mg/ml + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate 2 mg/ml) for each branch, followed by denervation with CRF (22¬gauge 5¬mm active tip cannula, 10cm in length) with the tip temperature set at 90° C in a single cycle of 90 min.
The sham group will be submitted to the same anesthetic block as described in the intervention group, followed by a simulation of CRF use.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Quality of Life (WOMAC)
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) is a self-administered health status measure and consists of 24 items divided into three domains, which are pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical function (17 questions), validated to patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis, available in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 96 points.This questionnaire is translated and validated in portuguese.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale
The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, in a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme, "no pain" (score 0) and " worst pain ever" (score 100).
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS)
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint-specific measure, and it consists of two sections: questions and a physical examination, including a range of motion and deformity items. The score has a maximum of 100 points with a maximum of 44 points for pain, 47 for function, 4 points for absence of deformity, and 5 points for a range of motion. The highest score of 100 points indicates the best function and no pain.
Pain Medication Intake
To evaluate pain medication we will use a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= no medication; 0 = no medication; 1= use of dipyrone or paracetamol; 2= use of NSAIDs; 3= use of opiate derivatives; 4= routinely scheduled opiate derivatives), considering the last 48 hours.
Change in Hip muscles Isometric Peak Force
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Peak Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Change in Hip muscles Time to Reach Peak Force
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Time to Reach Peak Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Change in Hip muscles Average Force
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Average Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors. We will also determine intra and inter-rater reliability for isometric force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Evaluation of intra and inter-rater reliability of Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 in subjects with hip Osteoarthritis.
To determine intra and inter-rater reliability of the Hand lend dynamometer Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) in accessing peak force, time to reach peak force and average force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors, the first 20 participants included in this study will be evaluated by the principal investigator and outcome assessor at the baseline.
Change in Global Satisfaction
To evaluate participant satisfaction, we will use 5 points Likert Scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0= none _ no good at all, ineffective intervention; 1= poor _ some effect but unsatisfactory; 2= fair _ reasonable effect but could be better; 3= good _ satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain or stiffness; 4= excellent _ ideal response, virtually pain-free).
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04876859
Brief Title
Comparative Study Between Steroid Plus Anesthetic Block and CRF in Participants With Hip Osteoarthritis
Official Title
Conventional Radiofrequency of Anterior Sensory Branches in Chronic Hip Pain Due to Hip Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
Main researcher changed institutions, making it unfeasible to be completed by the others participants.
Study Start Date
June 8, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Brasilia
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This will be a prospective, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized study designed to compare the efficacy of Conventional Radiofrequency (CRF) and the anesthetic block of the anterior sensory branches to the hip to control pain and improve function related to hip osteoarthritis.
Detailed Description
This prospective, double-blinded (participant and outcome assessor) clinical trial was designed to investigate the results of the intervention Continuous Radiofrequency (CRF) in the treatment of participants with chronic hip pain secondary to hip osteoarthritis. Participants will be randomized in a 2-arm, parallel groups. The intervention group will be submitted to an anesthetic block of the sensory branches of femoral and obturator nerves to the hip, with 1 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1ml of steroid (Betamethasone Dipropionate 5 mg/ml + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate 2 mg/ml) for each branch, followed by denervation with CRF (22¬gauge 5¬mm active tip cannula, 10cm in length) with the tip temperature set at 90° C in a single cycle of 90 min. The sham group will be submitted to the same anesthetic block, followed by a simulation of CRF use. The surgeon performing the procedures will only be informed of the randomization after completing the anesthetic block on the participants to avoid bias at its accuracy. Participants will be evaluated at four follow-up: before intervention and after 1, 12, and 24 weeks, to access the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score (WOMAC) as the primary outcome.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Chronic Pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Conventional Radiofrequency Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Will be submitted to an anesthetic block of the sensory branches of femoral and obturator nerves to the hip, with 1 ml of 1% lidocaine with 1ml of steroid (Betamethasone Dipropionate 5 mg/ml + Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate 2 mg/ml) for each branch, followed by denervation with CRF (22¬gauge 5¬mm active tip cannula, 10cm in length) with the tip temperature set at 90° C in a single cycle of 90 min.
Arm Title
Anesthetic plus steroid group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The sham group will be submitted to the same anesthetic block as described in the intervention group, followed by a simulation of CRF use.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
CRF of anterior sensitive branches to the hip
Intervention Description
Steroid and anesthetic extra articular injection followed by denervation using CRF at 90 celsius degree during a period 90 minutes at the sensitive branches of obturator and femoral nerve, separately.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Anesthetic block with steroid injection of anterior sensitive branches to the hip
Intervention Description
Corticosteroid and anesthetic extra articular injection at the sensitive branches of obturator and femoral nerve, only
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of Life (WOMAC)
Description
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) is a self-administered health status measure and consists of 24 items divided into three domains, which are pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical function (17 questions), validated to patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis, available in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 96 points.This questionnaire is translated and validated in portuguese.
Time Frame
Baseline to 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Description
The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, in a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal line, 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme, "no pain" (score 0) and " worst pain ever" (score 100).
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Title
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Description
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint-specific measure, and it consists of two sections: questions and a physical examination, including a range of motion and deformity items. The score has a maximum of 100 points with a maximum of 44 points for pain, 47 for function, 4 points for absence of deformity, and 5 points for a range of motion. The highest score of 100 points indicates the best function and no pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Title
Pain Medication Intake
Description
To evaluate pain medication we will use a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= no medication; 0 = no medication; 1= use of dipyrone or paracetamol; 2= use of NSAIDs; 3= use of opiate derivatives; 4= routinely scheduled opiate derivatives), considering the last 48 hours.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Title
Change in Hip muscles Isometric Peak Force
Description
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Peak Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Title
Change in Hip muscles Time to Reach Peak Force
Description
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Time to Reach Peak Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Title
Change in Hip muscles Average Force
Description
To examine isometric muscle force, a Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to access Average Force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors. We will also determine intra and inter-rater reliability for isometric force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Title
Evaluation of intra and inter-rater reliability of Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 in subjects with hip Osteoarthritis.
Description
To determine intra and inter-rater reliability of the Hand lend dynamometer Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System Model-01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) in accessing peak force, time to reach peak force and average force of hip flexors, abductors, adductors and extensors, the first 20 participants included in this study will be evaluated by the principal investigator and outcome assessor at the baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Change in Global Satisfaction
Description
To evaluate participant satisfaction, we will use 5 points Likert Scale, ranging from 0 to 4 (0= none _ no good at all, ineffective intervention; 1= poor _ some effect but unsatisfactory; 2= fair _ reasonable effect but could be better; 3= good _ satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain or stiffness; 4= excellent _ ideal response, virtually pain-free).
Time Frame
1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Incidence of Adverse Effects
Description
To examine the incidence of adverse effects, a questionnaire will be apply to investigate the occurrence of: Hematoma, paresthesia, weakness, worsening of pain, worsening of function or any other adverse effect that participants attribute to the procedure performed.
Time Frame
1 week, 12 weeks ± 1 week and 24 weeks ± 1 week.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants 18 years or older
Symptomatic unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA)
Pain for more than 6 months in the groin, anterior, anterolateral ou lateral region
OA radiologically classified as Kellgren and Lawrence Tipo II-IV,
VAS ≥ 4
Considered non-responder to conservative treatment for the participant for 6 months.
In case of difficulty in selecting participants with symptomatic unilateral OA, symptomatic bilateral hip OA will be admitted and submitted to the same treatment on both sides, after notification and approval from the Ethic Board of each institution involved.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants with radiculopathy ipsolateral
Knee OA ipsolateral,
Previous hip arthroplasty
Pain exclusively in the posterior region of the hip
Infiltration of the hip for less than 3 months
Neurological disease compromising gait
Peripheral neuropathy
Psychiatric disease that compromise collaboration with the protocol
Implanted pacemaker
Prothrombin Activity Time (PT/INR) > 3 and
Litigation process related to the disease.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
João Durigan, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidade de Brasilia
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital das Forças Armadas
City
Brasília
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
70673-900
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
Comparative Study Between Steroid Plus Anesthetic Block and CRF in Participants With Hip Osteoarthritis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs