A Comparison Between Two Post-operative Dressings (DrySee)
Primary Purpose
Surgical Incision
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Surgical Incision
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years old.
- Subject has read, understood, and signed approved consent, and is willing to participate and comply with the study procedures and requirements.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject on an investigational drug or therapeutic device within 30 days of the study visit.
- Presence of a condition that PI considers will compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study.
- Known allergy to any of the dressings or their components.
- The subject has a history of excessive bleeding.
- The subject has a history of keloid formation.
Sites / Locations
- Serena Group Monroeville
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Arm Description
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
The effectiveness of liquid indication in identifying dressing compromise by visual assessment
The effectiveness of liquid indicator of the dressing turning blue
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment if there was a break in the dressing border.
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment of if there was a break in the dressing border at each treatment visit.
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04888624
First Posted
May 4, 2021
Last Updated
March 11, 2022
Sponsor
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Collaborators
DrySee, Inc
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04888624
Brief Title
A Comparison Between Two Post-operative Dressings
Acronym
DrySee
Official Title
A Comparison Between Two Post-operative Dressings in the Treatment of Surgical Incisions in Healthy Volunteers
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 13, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 25, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 1, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Collaborators
DrySee, Inc
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Surgical site infections are one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The ideal post-operative dressing is impermeable and remains intact preventing contamination of the incision with microorganisms. In addition, it is often difficult for the patient to identify breaks in dressing integrity. This trial compares a post-operative dressing (DrySee® Inc. Houston Tx) with moisture detection allowing the patient to recognize when the dressing is compromised to a standard post-operative dressing (Tegaderm® + Pad, 3M, St. Paul, MN). The ideal dressing also allows the patient to shower without removing the dressing.
Detailed Description
Healthy subjects drawn from the general population. will undergo a 1.5cm incision on the volar forearm of each arm. The incision will be closed with streriostrips. The subject's incisions will then be randomized to receive either a Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing or DrySee® dressing with moisture detection. The incisions will be photographed three times per week. Data on dressing wear time, integrity and adverse events will be collected every two days in the clinic.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical Incision
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Healthy subjects drawn from the general population. will undergo a 1.5cm incision on the volar forearm of each arm. The incision will be closed with streriostrips. The subject's incisions will then be randomized to receive either a Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing or DrySee® dressing with moisture detection. The incisions will be photographed three times per week. Data on dressing wear time, integrity and adverse events will be collected every two days in the clinic.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Arm Title
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Intervention Description
DrySee® is a waterproof bandage designed to protect surgical incisions. It contains an indicator at the perimeter of the dressing, and at the wound site that turns blue when it comes into contact with liquid (figure 1). The indicator identifies a break in the integrity of the postoperative dressing. Changing the dressing at this point prevents bacteria from reaching the incision reducing the risk of infection. In addition, the waterproof dressing allows patients to shower or bath following surgery.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Intervention Description
Tegaderm® is a transparent adhesive dressing commonly used as a postoperative dressing. The dressing has been shown to be superior to gauze in reducing SSIs. Tegaderm®, like DrySee,® is waterproof; however, it lacks technology that identifies a breach in dressing integrity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
Description
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
Time Frame
6-weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The effectiveness of liquid indication in identifying dressing compromise by visual assessment
Description
The effectiveness of liquid indicator of the dressing turning blue
Time Frame
6-weeks
Title
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
Description
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
Time Frame
6-weeks
Title
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment if there was a break in the dressing border.
Description
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment of if there was a break in the dressing border at each treatment visit.
Time Frame
6-weeks
Title
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
Description
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
Time Frame
6-weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
A comparison of bacterial burden beneath the two dressings measured by fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight, Toronto, CA).
Description
A comparison of bacterial burden beneath the two dressings measured by fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight, Toronto, CA).
Time Frame
6-weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
At least 18 years old.
Subject has read, understood, and signed approved consent, and is willing to participate and comply with the study procedures and requirements.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject on an investigational drug or therapeutic device within 30 days of the study visit.
Presence of a condition that PI considers will compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study.
Known allergy to any of the dressings or their components.
The subject has a history of excessive bleeding.
The subject has a history of keloid formation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Serena, MD,FACS
Organizational Affiliation
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Serena Group Monroeville
City
Monroeville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15146
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
A Comparison Between Two Post-operative Dressings
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs