search
Back to results

Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Before a Blood or Bone Marrow Transplant for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Failure Diseases (BMT CTN 1904)

Primary Purpose

Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome, Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia, Congenital Pure Red Cell Aplasia

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Treosulfan
Fludarabine Phosphate
Tacrolimus
Methotrexate
Lapine T-Lymphocyte Immune Globulin
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Sponsored by
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome focused on measuring Bone Marrow Failure Disorders, HSCT, Treosulfan, Unrelated donor, Matched donor, mismatched donor, transplant

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 49 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must be >= 1.0 year of age and less than 50.0 years of age at the time of enrollment (i.e. patient must have celebrated their 1st birthday when enrolled and must NOT have celebrated their 50th birthday when enrolled; 49.99 years)
  • Underlying BMFD treatable by allogenic HCT
  • Shwachman-Diamond syndrome

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      • A pathogenic mutation(s) for Shwachman-Diamond syndrome
      • For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation they must meet both **** criteria below:

        • Exocrine pancreatic dysfunction as defined by at least one of the following:

          • Pancreatic isoamylase below normal (age >= 3 years old), OR
          • Fecal elastase < 200, AND
        • Bone marrow failure as evidence by at least one of the following:

          • Intermittent or persistent neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/uL), OR
          • Hypo-productive anemia with a hemoglobin concentration below the age-related adjusted norms, OR
          • Unexplained macrocytosis, OR
          • Platelet count < 150,000/uL without alternative etiology, OR
          • Hypocellular bone marrow
    • Indications for HCT:

      • Severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500/uL), OR
      • Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR
      • Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 eligibility review committee (ERC). In addition, patients with severe or recurrent infections will be reviewed by the ERC if they do not meet the indications for transplant listed above
  • Diamond Blackfan Anemia

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      • A pathogenic mutation for Diamond Blackfan anemia
      • For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation the patient must meet the first *** criteria and at least one of the subsequent *** criteria listed below:

        • History of deficiency of erythroid precursors in an otherwise cellular bone marrow AND,
        • Reticulocytopenia, OR
        • Elevated adenosine deaminase activity, OR
        • Elevated hemoglobin F, OR
        • Macrocytosis, OR
        • Congenital anomalies
    • Indications for HCT:

      • Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent anemia despite an adequate trial of steroids; OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC
  • Congenital Sideroblastic anemia

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      • A pathogenic mutation(s) for sideroblastic anemia
      • For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation:

        • Presence of ringed sideroblasts in the bone marrow excluding acquired causes of ringed sideroblasts such as lead poisoning & zinc toxicity
    • Indications for HCT:

      • Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC
  • GATA2 mutation with associated marrow failure

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      ** A pathogenic mutation(s) for GATA2

    • Indications for HCT:

      • Severe neutropenia (ANC < 500/uL), OR
      • Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR
      • Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC. In addition, patients with severe or recurrent infections will be reviewed by the ERC if they do not meet indications for transplant listed above
  • SAMD9 or SAMD9L disorders

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      ** A pathogenic mutation(s) for SAMD9 or SAMD9L

    • Indications for HCT:

      • Severe neutropenia (ANC < 500/uL), OR
      • Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR
      • Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC
  • Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      • A pathogenic mutation(s) for congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia.
      • For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation the patient must meet criteria below:

        • Thrombocytopenia early in life, AND
        • History of bone marrow demonstrating megakaryocyte hypoplasia
    • Indications for HCT:

      • Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR
      • Neutropenia defined as an ANC < 500/uL, OR
      • Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC
  • Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

    • Criteria for Diagnosis:

      • Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clone size in granulocytes >= 10%, AND
      • Complement mediated intravascular hemolysis with an elevated LDH (above institutional upper limits of normal)
    • Indications for HCT:

      • PNH with thrombosis despite adequate medical management, OR
      • PNH with intravascular hemolysis requiring transfusion support despite adequate medical management, OR
      • Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC. In addition, patients with PNH and cytopenias may be considered for the protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC
  • An undefined BMFD: a patient with a BMFD for whom a genetic mutation responsible for their bone marrow failure phenotype has not been identified (excluding PNH) will be eligible for this clinical trial following approval by Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 1904 ERC

    * A BMFD with a known genetic mutation but not listed above will be eligible for this clinical trial following approval by BMT CTN 1904 ERC

  • Patient and/or legal guardian must sign informed consent prior to initiation of conditioning for BMT CTN 1904
  • Females and males of childbearing potential must agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception at the same time or agree to abstinence
  • Note: The following patients MUST be reviewed by the BMT CTN 1904 ERC in order to determine if they are eligible for this trial:

    • All patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, Diamond Blackfan anemia, congenital sideroblastic anemia, and congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia who have had genetic testing and lack a genetic mutation
    • All patients with an undefined BMFD: a patient with a BMFD for whom a genetic mutation responsible for their bone marrow failure phenotype has not been identified, excluding PNH
    • All patients with a BMFD and a known genetic mutation that is not listed above
    • All patients with GATA2 mutation and associated marrow failure
    • All patients with SAMD9 or SAMD9L disorders
    • There may be circumstances where a treating physician will consider a transplant for a patient with a BMFD who does not meet all the criteria listed under "indications for HCT". In these situations, treating physicians may submit their patient to the BMT CTN 1904 ERC for review in order to determine if the patient is eligible for this clinical trial based on additional clinical or laboratory information
    • Many patients with BMFD can have bone marrow evaluations that raise concern for possible myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) including but not limited to dysplastic bone marrow evaluations or cytogenetic abnormalities. However, in patients BMFD these findings are not necessarily diagnostic or consistent with MDS. Therefore, given the complexities of diagnosing MDS in patients with BMFD, all patients with bone marrow evaluations concerning for possible MDS should be submitted to the ERC for review to confirm or exclude MDS. This is particularly important as we do not want to exclude potentially eligible patients due to an incorrect diagnosis of MDS
  • HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: HLA-matched sibling: Must be a minimum HLA-6/6 matched to the recipient at HLA-A, -B (serologic typing) and DRB1 (high-resolution typing)
  • HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: HLA-matched related (phenotypic match): Fully matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and DQB1 by high-resolution typing.
  • HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: If a genetic mutation is known for the patient, the HLA-matched related donor [either HLA-matched sibling or HLA-matched related (phenotypic match)] must be screened for the same genetic mutation if clinically appropriate and should be confirmed to not have the same genetic disease (this does not include patients with PNH). Consult the protocol team with questions
  • HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: If a patient has an undefined BMFD (a patient with a BMFD for whom a genetic mutation responsible for their bone marrow failure phenotype has not been identified), the HLA-matched related donor [either HLA-matched sibling or HLA-matched related (phenotypic match)] must have an evaluation as directed by the treating physician to confirm that the donor does not have the same underlying disease. This will include a complete blood count (CBC) with differential and potentially a bone marrow evaluation or other studies as directed by the treating physician
  • UNRELATED DONOR: Fully matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and DQB1 by high-resolution typing
  • UNRELATED DONOR: Mismatched for a single HLA-class 1 allele (HLA-A, -B, or -C) by high-resolution typing; OR
  • UNRELATED DONOR: Mismatched for a single HLA DQB1 allele or antigen by high-resolution typing

    * Note: donor patient (DP) matching per institutional practice

  • DONOR SELECTION RECCOMENDATIONS: in the case where there are multiple donor options, donors should be selected based on the following priority numbered below:

    • Unaffected fully HLA-matched sibling
    • Unaffected fully phenotypically HLA-matched related donor
    • Fully HLA-matched unrelated donor
    • Unrelated donor with single allele or antigen level mismatch at DQB1
    • Unrelated donor with single allele level mismatch at class 1 (HLA-A, -B, or -C)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with idiopathic aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, and congenital neutropenia
  • Patients with MDS as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) or leukemia
  • Prior allogeneic HCT
  • Patient's weight =< 10.0 kg (actual body weight and adjusted body weight) at time of study enrollment
  • Lansky (patients < 16 years of age) or Karnofsky (patients >= 16 years of age) performance < 70%
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% by echocardiogram or multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan

    * For patients unable to obtain a left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular shortening fraction of < 26%

  • Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected/adjusted for hemoglobin) < 50%, forced expiratory volume (FEV)1 < 50% predicted, and forced vital capacity (FVC) < 50% predicted
  • For patients unable to perform pulmonary function tests (PFTs) due to age or developmental delay: oxygen (O2) saturation < 92% on room air
  • On supplemental oxygen
  • Estimated creatinine clearance < 60 mL/minute/1.73m^2 (estimated per institutional practice)
  • Dialysis dependent
  • Conjugated bilirubin > 2 x ULN for age (upper limit of normal [ULN], unless attributable to Gilbert's syndrome)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 4 x ULN for age, or
  • Fulminant liver failure or cirrhosis
  • Iron overload - This exclusion criterion only applies to patients who are considered at risk for hepatic or cardiac iron overload. Therefore, not all patients enrolled on this protocol will undergo formal hepatic or cardiac iron assessment

    • For patients >= 18 years with a history of significant transfusions defined as >= 8 packed red blood cell transfusions per year for >= 1 year or have received >= 20 packed red blood cell transfusions (lifetime cumulative) will require formal hepatic and cardiac iron measurement. In addition, patients with a prior history of hepatic or cardiac iron overload will also require formal assessment for iron overload. Patients are excluded if:

      • Hepatic iron content >= 8 mg Fe/g dry weight by liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a validated methodology (such as T2 * MRI or ferriscan) or liver biopsy per institutional practice
      • Cardiac iron content < 25 msec by cardiac T2 * MRI
    • For patients < 18 years old with a history of significant transfusions defined as >= 8 packed red blood cell transfusions per year for >= 1 year or have received >= 20 packed red blood cell transfusions (lifetime cumulative) will require formal hepatic iron measurement. In addition, patients with a prior history of liver iron overload will also require formal assessment for iron overload. Patients are excluded if:

      • Hepatic iron content >= 8 mg Fe/g dry weight by liver MRI using a validated methodology (such as T2 * MRI or ferriscan) or liver biopsy per institutional practice
  • Uncontrolled bacterial infection within 1 week of study enrollment. Uncontrolled is defined as currently taking medication with no clinical improvement or progression on adequate medical treatment
  • Uncontrolled viral or fungal infection within 30 days of study enrollment. Uncontrolled is defined as currently taking medication with no clinical improvement or progression on adequate medical treatment
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Presence of clinically significant anti-donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibodies per institutional practice
  • Prior solid organ transplant
  • Patients with prior malignancies except resected non-melanoma skin cancer or treated cervical carcinoma in situ
  • Demonstrated lack of compliance with prior medical care as determined by referring physician
  • Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Known hypersensitivity to treosulfan or fludarabine
  • Known life-threatening reaction (i.e. anaphylaxis) to Thymoglobulin that would prohibit use for the patient as this study requires use of the Thymoglobulin preparation of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital Los AngelesRecruiting
  • Rady Children's Hospital/UCSDRecruiting
  • University of California San FranciscoRecruiting
  • Children's Hospital ColoradoRecruiting
  • Children's Healthcare of AtlantaRecruiting
  • Johns Hopkins UniversityRecruiting
  • Boston Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • University of Michigan Medical CenterRecruiting
  • University of MinnesotaRecruiting
  • St. Louis Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Cohen Children's Hospital of NYRecruiting
  • Duke University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Cincinnati Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Nationwide Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Oregon Health & Science UniversityRecruiting
  • Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRecruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • MD Anderson Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Texas Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Primary Children's/University of UtahRecruiting
  • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer ConsortiumRecruiting
  • Medical College of Wisconsin/Children's Hospital of WisconsinRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Treatment (conditioning regimen; transplant; GVHD prophylaxis)

Arm Description

CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive treosulfan IV over 120 minutes on days -6 to -4, fludarabine phosphate IV over 60 minutes on days -6 to -2, and rATG IV over 4-6 hours on days -4 to -2. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously beginning on day -2 and a taper beginning on day 180. Patients may also receive tacrolimus PO. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Graft-Versus Host-Disease (GVHD)-Free Event-Free Survival (EFS)
The primary endpoint is the incidence of 1-year GVHD free, EFS (GEFS). An event is defined as death due to any cause, graft rejection/failure, or 2nd HCT whichever occurs first. Grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD (using NIH consensus criteria) requiring systemic immune suppression will be considered in this estimate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival
Overall survival at day 100 after HCT
Overall Survival
Overall survival at 6 months after HCT
Overall Survival
Overall survival at 1 year after HCT
Event-Free Survival
Event-free survival will be estimated at 12 months after HCT. Grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD requiring systemic immune suppression will be considered in this estimate. An event is defined as death due to any cause, primary or secondary graft failure/rejection, or 2nd HCT whichever occurs first
Hematologic Recovery: Neutrophil recovery
Hematologic recovery will be assessed according to neutrophil recovery after transplant. Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ to 500/mm3 for 3 consecutive measurements on 3 different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery. The competing event is death without neutrophil recovery.
Hematologic Recovery: Platelet recovery
Hematologic recovery will be assessed according to platelet counts recovery after transplant. Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a minimum of 3 days that the patient has a sustained platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding 7 days. The first day of sustained platelet count above these thresholds will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.
Donor Chimerism (CD3 and Myeloid)
Proportions of patients with full (>95%), mixed (5-95%), or rejection (<5%) myeloid
Donor Chimerism (CD3 and Myeloid)
Proportions of patients with full (>95%), mixed (5-95%), or rejection (<5%) myeloid
Donor Chimerism (CD3 and Myeloid)
Proportions of patients with full (>95%), mixed (5-95%), or rejection (<5%) myeloid
Primary graft failure/rejection
Defined as never achieving ANC ≥ 500/μL or never achieving ≥ 5% donor myeloid chimerism assessed by peripheral blood chimerism assays by day +42 post-HCT. Second infusion of hematopoietic cells is also considered indicative of primary graft failure by day +42 post-HCT
Secondary graft failure/rejection post-HCT
Defined as < 5% donor myeloid chimerism in peripheral blood beyond day +42 post-HCT in patients with prior documentation of hematopoietic recovery with ≥ 5% donor cells by day +42 post-HCT. Second infusion of hematopoietic cells is also considered indicative of secondary graft failure.
Grade II-IV and grade III-IV GVHD at day 100
The cumulative incidences of acute grade II-IV and III-IV GVHD at day 100 after HCT will be determined.
Grade II-IV and grade III-IV GVHD at day 180
The cumulative incidences of acute grade II-IV and III-IV GVHD at day 100 after HCT will be determined.
Chronic GVHD
The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (using NIH consensus criteria) requiring systemic immune suppression at 1 year after HCT will be determined. Data will be collected directly from providers and chart review as defined by the NIH Consensus Conference Criteria
Incidence of grade 3-5 toxicities
Grade 3-5 toxicities by day 30 after HCT
Incidence of grade 3-5 toxicities
Grade 3-5 toxicities by day 100 after HCT
Incidence of grade 2-3 systemic infections
All microbiologically documented infections or significant infections requiring antibiotic/antifungal therapy occurring up to 6 months after HCT
Incidence of Epstein Barr virus (EBV) reactivation requiring therapy
The incidence of EBV reactivation requiring therapy in the first 180 days after HCT, and of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder in the first 180 days after HCT will be evaluated.
Incidence of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder
Incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation requiring therapy by day 180 post-HCT

Full Information

First Posted
June 21, 2021
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Marrow Donor Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04965597
Brief Title
Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Before a Blood or Bone Marrow Transplant for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Failure Diseases (BMT CTN 1904)
Official Title
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Failure Diseases
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 19, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Marrow Donor Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This phase II trial tests whether treosulfan, fludarabine, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) work when given before a blood or bone marrow transplant (conditioning regimen) to cause fewer complications for patients with bone marrow failure diseases. Chemotherapy drugs, such as treosulfan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Fludarabine may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. rATG is used to decrease the body's immune response and may improve bone marrow function and increase blood cell counts. Adding treosulfan to a conditioning regimen with fludarabine and rATG may result in patients having less severe complications after a blood or bone marrow transplant.
Detailed Description
OUTLINE: CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive treosulfan intravenously (IV) over 120 minutes on days -6 to -4, fludarabine phosphate IV over 60 minutes on days -6 to -2, and lapine T-lymphocyte immune globulin (rATG) IV over 4-6 hours on days -4 to -2. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously beginning on day -2 and a taper beginning on day 180. Patients may also receive tacrolimus orally (PO). Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 year from transplant.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome, Congenital Amegakaryocytic Thrombocytopenia, Congenital Pure Red Cell Aplasia, Hereditary Sideroblastic Anemia, Myeloid Neoplasms With Germline GATA2 Mutation, Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome
Keywords
Bone Marrow Failure Disorders, HSCT, Treosulfan, Unrelated donor, Matched donor, mismatched donor, transplant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment (conditioning regimen; transplant; GVHD prophylaxis)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive treosulfan IV over 120 minutes on days -6 to -4, fludarabine phosphate IV over 60 minutes on days -6 to -2, and rATG IV over 4-6 hours on days -4 to -2. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously beginning on day -2 and a taper beginning on day 180. Patients may also receive tacrolimus PO. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Treosulfan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dihydroxybusulfan, Ovastat, Treosulphan, Tresulfon, Trecondi
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fludarabine Phosphate
Other Intervention Name(s)
2-fluoro-9-(5-O-phosphono-.beta.-D-arabinofuranosyl)-, 9H-purin-6-amine, 2-fluoro-9-(5-O-phosphono-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl), Beneflur, Fludara, Fludarabine-5'-Monophosphate, SH T 586
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tacrolimus
Other Intervention Name(s)
FK 506, Fujimycin, Hecoria, Prograf, Protopic
Intervention Description
Given IV and PO
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methotrexate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Abitrexate, Alpha-Methopterin, Amethopterin, Brimexate, Emthexat, Emtexate, Farmitrexat, Methotrexate LPF, Methylaminopterin, Methotrexatum, Metotrexato, Novatrex, Rheumatrex, Texate, Tremetex, Trexeron, Trixilem, WR-19039
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Lapine T-Lymphocyte Immune Globulin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Rabbit, Grafalon, Rabbit Anti-Human Thymocyte Globulin (RATG), Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin, Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin, Rabbit ATG, rATG, Thymoglobulin
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
PBPC transplantation, PBSCT, Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation, PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANT, peripheral stem cell support, Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant, peripheral stem cell transplantation
Intervention Description
Undergo PBSC
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Allo BMT, Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Allogeneic BMT
Intervention Description
Undergo bone marrow transplant
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Graft-Versus Host-Disease (GVHD)-Free Event-Free Survival (EFS)
Description
The primary endpoint is the incidence of 1-year GVHD free, EFS (GEFS). An event is defined as death due to any cause, graft rejection/failure, or 2nd HCT whichever occurs first. Grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD (using NIH consensus criteria) requiring systemic immune suppression will be considered in this estimate
Time Frame
1 year post-HCT
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival at day 100 after HCT
Time Frame
Day 100 post-HCT
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival at 6 months after HCT
Time Frame
6 months post-HCT
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival at 1 year after HCT
Time Frame
1 year post-HCT
Title
Event-Free Survival
Description
Event-free survival will be estimated at 12 months after HCT. Grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD requiring systemic immune suppression will be considered in this estimate. An event is defined as death due to any cause, primary or secondary graft failure/rejection, or 2nd HCT whichever occurs first
Time Frame
1 year post-HCT
Title
Hematologic Recovery: Neutrophil recovery
Description
Hematologic recovery will be assessed according to neutrophil recovery after transplant. Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ to 500/mm3 for 3 consecutive measurements on 3 different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery. The competing event is death without neutrophil recovery.
Time Frame
Assessed up to 1 year post-HCT
Title
Hematologic Recovery: Platelet recovery
Description
Hematologic recovery will be assessed according to platelet counts recovery after transplant. Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a minimum of 3 days that the patient has a sustained platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 with no platelet transfusions in the preceding 7 days. The first day of sustained platelet count above these thresholds will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.
Time Frame
Day 100 post-HCT
Title
Donor Chimerism (CD3 and Myeloid)
Description
Proportions of patients with full (>95%), mixed (5-95%), or rejection (<5%) myeloid
Time Frame
Day 28 post-HCT
Title
Donor Chimerism (CD3 and Myeloid)
Description
Proportions of patients with full (>95%), mixed (5-95%), or rejection (<5%) myeloid
Time Frame
Day 100 post-HCT
Title
Donor Chimerism (CD3 and Myeloid)
Description
Proportions of patients with full (>95%), mixed (5-95%), or rejection (<5%) myeloid
Time Frame
1 year post-HCT
Title
Primary graft failure/rejection
Description
Defined as never achieving ANC ≥ 500/μL or never achieving ≥ 5% donor myeloid chimerism assessed by peripheral blood chimerism assays by day +42 post-HCT. Second infusion of hematopoietic cells is also considered indicative of primary graft failure by day +42 post-HCT
Time Frame
Day 42 post-HCT
Title
Secondary graft failure/rejection post-HCT
Description
Defined as < 5% donor myeloid chimerism in peripheral blood beyond day +42 post-HCT in patients with prior documentation of hematopoietic recovery with ≥ 5% donor cells by day +42 post-HCT. Second infusion of hematopoietic cells is also considered indicative of secondary graft failure.
Time Frame
Assessed up to 1 year post-HCT
Title
Grade II-IV and grade III-IV GVHD at day 100
Description
The cumulative incidences of acute grade II-IV and III-IV GVHD at day 100 after HCT will be determined.
Time Frame
Day 100 post-HCT
Title
Grade II-IV and grade III-IV GVHD at day 180
Description
The cumulative incidences of acute grade II-IV and III-IV GVHD at day 100 after HCT will be determined.
Time Frame
Day 180 post-HCT
Title
Chronic GVHD
Description
The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (using NIH consensus criteria) requiring systemic immune suppression at 1 year after HCT will be determined. Data will be collected directly from providers and chart review as defined by the NIH Consensus Conference Criteria
Time Frame
1 year post-HCT
Title
Incidence of grade 3-5 toxicities
Description
Grade 3-5 toxicities by day 30 after HCT
Time Frame
Day 30 post-HCT
Title
Incidence of grade 3-5 toxicities
Description
Grade 3-5 toxicities by day 100 after HCT
Time Frame
Day 100 post-HCT
Title
Incidence of grade 2-3 systemic infections
Description
All microbiologically documented infections or significant infections requiring antibiotic/antifungal therapy occurring up to 6 months after HCT
Time Frame
6 months post-HCT
Title
Incidence of Epstein Barr virus (EBV) reactivation requiring therapy
Description
The incidence of EBV reactivation requiring therapy in the first 180 days after HCT, and of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder in the first 180 days after HCT will be evaluated.
Time Frame
Day 180 post-HCT
Title
Incidence of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder
Time Frame
Day 180 post-HCT
Title
Incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation requiring therapy by day 180 post-HCT
Time Frame
Up to day 180 post-HCT

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
49 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient must be >= 1.0 year of age and less than 50.0 years of age at the time of enrollment (i.e. patient must have celebrated their 1st birthday when enrolled and must NOT have celebrated their 50th birthday when enrolled; 49.99 years) Underlying BMFD treatable by allogenic HCT Shwachman-Diamond syndrome Criteria for Diagnosis: A pathogenic mutation(s) for Shwachman-Diamond syndrome For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation they must meet both **** criteria below: Exocrine pancreatic dysfunction as defined by at least one of the following: Pancreatic isoamylase below normal (age >= 3 years old), OR Fecal elastase < 200, AND Bone marrow failure as evidence by at least one of the following: Intermittent or persistent neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/uL), OR Hypo-productive anemia with a hemoglobin concentration below the age-related adjusted norms, OR Unexplained macrocytosis, OR Platelet count < 150,000/uL without alternative etiology, OR Hypocellular bone marrow Indications for HCT: Severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500/uL), OR Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 eligibility review committee (ERC). In addition, patients with severe or recurrent infections will be reviewed by the ERC if they do not meet the indications for transplant listed above Diamond Blackfan Anemia Criteria for Diagnosis: A pathogenic mutation for Diamond Blackfan anemia For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation the patient must meet the first *** criteria and at least one of the subsequent *** criteria listed below: History of deficiency of erythroid precursors in an otherwise cellular bone marrow AND, Reticulocytopenia, OR Elevated adenosine deaminase activity, OR Elevated hemoglobin F, OR Macrocytosis, OR Congenital anomalies Indications for HCT: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent anemia despite an adequate trial of steroids; OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC Congenital Sideroblastic anemia Criteria for Diagnosis: A pathogenic mutation(s) for sideroblastic anemia For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation: Presence of ringed sideroblasts in the bone marrow excluding acquired causes of ringed sideroblasts such as lead poisoning & zinc toxicity Indications for HCT: Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC GATA2 mutation with associated marrow failure Criteria for Diagnosis: ** A pathogenic mutation(s) for GATA2 Indications for HCT: Severe neutropenia (ANC < 500/uL), OR Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC. In addition, patients with severe or recurrent infections will be reviewed by the ERC if they do not meet indications for transplant listed above SAMD9 or SAMD9L disorders Criteria for Diagnosis: ** A pathogenic mutation(s) for SAMD9 or SAMD9L Indications for HCT: Severe neutropenia (ANC < 500/uL), OR Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia Criteria for Diagnosis: A pathogenic mutation(s) for congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. For those patients tested but lacking a genetic mutation the patient must meet criteria below: Thrombocytopenia early in life, AND History of bone marrow demonstrating megakaryocyte hypoplasia Indications for HCT: Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20,000/uL) or transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, OR Neutropenia defined as an ANC < 500/uL, OR Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) or transfusion-dependent anemia, OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria Criteria for Diagnosis: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clone size in granulocytes >= 10%, AND Complement mediated intravascular hemolysis with an elevated LDH (above institutional upper limits of normal) Indications for HCT: PNH with thrombosis despite adequate medical management, OR PNH with intravascular hemolysis requiring transfusion support despite adequate medical management, OR Additional clinical or laboratory data may be considered for protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC. In addition, patients with PNH and cytopenias may be considered for the protocol eligibility following review by protocol 1904 ERC An undefined BMFD: a patient with a BMFD for whom a genetic mutation responsible for their bone marrow failure phenotype has not been identified (excluding PNH) will be eligible for this clinical trial following approval by Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 1904 ERC * A BMFD with a known genetic mutation but not listed above will be eligible for this clinical trial following approval by BMT CTN 1904 ERC Patient and/or legal guardian must sign informed consent prior to initiation of conditioning for BMT CTN 1904 Females and males of childbearing potential must agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception at the same time or agree to abstinence Note: The following patients MUST be reviewed by the BMT CTN 1904 ERC in order to determine if they are eligible for this trial: All patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, Diamond Blackfan anemia, congenital sideroblastic anemia, and congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia who have had genetic testing and lack a genetic mutation All patients with an undefined BMFD: a patient with a BMFD for whom a genetic mutation responsible for their bone marrow failure phenotype has not been identified, excluding PNH All patients with a BMFD and a known genetic mutation that is not listed above All patients with GATA2 mutation and associated marrow failure All patients with SAMD9 or SAMD9L disorders There may be circumstances where a treating physician will consider a transplant for a patient with a BMFD who does not meet all the criteria listed under "indications for HCT". In these situations, treating physicians may submit their patient to the BMT CTN 1904 ERC for review in order to determine if the patient is eligible for this clinical trial based on additional clinical or laboratory information Many patients with BMFD can have bone marrow evaluations that raise concern for possible myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) including but not limited to dysplastic bone marrow evaluations or cytogenetic abnormalities. However, in patients BMFD these findings are not necessarily diagnostic or consistent with MDS. Therefore, given the complexities of diagnosing MDS in patients with BMFD, all patients with bone marrow evaluations concerning for possible MDS should be submitted to the ERC for review to confirm or exclude MDS. This is particularly important as we do not want to exclude potentially eligible patients due to an incorrect diagnosis of MDS HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: HLA-matched sibling: Must be a minimum HLA-6/6 matched to the recipient at HLA-A, -B (serologic typing) and DRB1 (high-resolution typing) HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: HLA-matched related (phenotypic match): Fully matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and DQB1 by high-resolution typing. HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: If a genetic mutation is known for the patient, the HLA-matched related donor [either HLA-matched sibling or HLA-matched related (phenotypic match)] must be screened for the same genetic mutation if clinically appropriate and should be confirmed to not have the same genetic disease (this does not include patients with PNH). Consult the protocol team with questions HLA-MATCHED RELATED DONOR: If a patient has an undefined BMFD (a patient with a BMFD for whom a genetic mutation responsible for their bone marrow failure phenotype has not been identified), the HLA-matched related donor [either HLA-matched sibling or HLA-matched related (phenotypic match)] must have an evaluation as directed by the treating physician to confirm that the donor does not have the same underlying disease. This will include a complete blood count (CBC) with differential and potentially a bone marrow evaluation or other studies as directed by the treating physician UNRELATED DONOR: Fully matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and DQB1 by high-resolution typing UNRELATED DONOR: Mismatched for a single HLA-class 1 allele (HLA-A, -B, or -C) by high-resolution typing; OR UNRELATED DONOR: Mismatched for a single HLA DQB1 allele or antigen by high-resolution typing * Note: donor patient (DP) matching per institutional practice DONOR SELECTION RECCOMENDATIONS: in the case where there are multiple donor options, donors should be selected based on the following priority numbered below: Unaffected fully HLA-matched sibling Unaffected fully phenotypically HLA-matched related donor Fully HLA-matched unrelated donor Unrelated donor with single allele or antigen level mismatch at DQB1 Unrelated donor with single allele level mismatch at class 1 (HLA-A, -B, or -C) Exclusion Criteria: Patients with idiopathic aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, and congenital neutropenia Patients with MDS as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) or leukemia Prior allogeneic HCT Patient's weight =< 10.0 kg (actual body weight and adjusted body weight) at time of study enrollment Lansky (patients < 16 years of age) or Karnofsky (patients >= 16 years of age) performance < 70% Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% by echocardiogram or multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan * For patients unable to obtain a left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular shortening fraction of < 26% Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected/adjusted for hemoglobin) < 50%, forced expiratory volume (FEV)1 < 50% predicted, and forced vital capacity (FVC) < 50% predicted For patients unable to perform pulmonary function tests (PFTs) due to age or developmental delay: oxygen (O2) saturation < 92% on room air On supplemental oxygen Estimated creatinine clearance < 60 mL/minute/1.73m^2 (estimated per institutional practice) Dialysis dependent Conjugated bilirubin > 2 x ULN for age (upper limit of normal [ULN], unless attributable to Gilbert's syndrome) Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 4 x ULN for age, or Fulminant liver failure or cirrhosis Iron overload - This exclusion criterion only applies to patients who are considered at risk for hepatic or cardiac iron overload. Therefore, not all patients enrolled on this protocol will undergo formal hepatic or cardiac iron assessment For patients >= 18 years with a history of significant transfusions defined as >= 8 packed red blood cell transfusions per year for >= 1 year or have received >= 20 packed red blood cell transfusions (lifetime cumulative) will require formal hepatic and cardiac iron measurement. In addition, patients with a prior history of hepatic or cardiac iron overload will also require formal assessment for iron overload. Patients are excluded if: Hepatic iron content >= 8 mg Fe/g dry weight by liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a validated methodology (such as T2 * MRI or ferriscan) or liver biopsy per institutional practice Cardiac iron content < 25 msec by cardiac T2 * MRI For patients < 18 years old with a history of significant transfusions defined as >= 8 packed red blood cell transfusions per year for >= 1 year or have received >= 20 packed red blood cell transfusions (lifetime cumulative) will require formal hepatic iron measurement. In addition, patients with a prior history of liver iron overload will also require formal assessment for iron overload. Patients are excluded if: Hepatic iron content >= 8 mg Fe/g dry weight by liver MRI using a validated methodology (such as T2 * MRI or ferriscan) or liver biopsy per institutional practice Uncontrolled bacterial infection within 1 week of study enrollment. Uncontrolled is defined as currently taking medication with no clinical improvement or progression on adequate medical treatment Uncontrolled viral or fungal infection within 30 days of study enrollment. Uncontrolled is defined as currently taking medication with no clinical improvement or progression on adequate medical treatment Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Presence of clinically significant anti-donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibodies per institutional practice Prior solid organ transplant Patients with prior malignancies except resected non-melanoma skin cancer or treated cervical carcinoma in situ Demonstrated lack of compliance with prior medical care as determined by referring physician Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding Known hypersensitivity to treosulfan or fludarabine Known life-threatening reaction (i.e. anaphylaxis) to Thymoglobulin that would prohibit use for the patient as this study requires use of the Thymoglobulin preparation of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Megan Scott
Phone
240-599-5648
Ext
15648
Email
bmtctn1904@emmes.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Adam Mendizabal, PhD
Email
amendizabal@emmes.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauri Burroughs, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margaret MacMillan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Minnesota
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90027
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kimberly Arieli
Email
karieli@chla.usc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paibel Aguayo-Hiraldo, MD
Facility Name
Rady Children's Hospital/UCSD
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mehrzad Milburn
Email
mmilburn@rchsd.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sheila Medina-Torne
Email
smedinatorne@rchsd.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicholas Gloude, MD
Facility Name
University of California San Francisco
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kevin Magruder
Email
kevin.magruder@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristin Shimano, MD
Facility Name
Children's Hospital Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Courtney Newbold
Email
Courtney.Newbold@childrenscolorado.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jessica Knight-Perry, MD
Facility Name
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30329
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Judson Russell
Email
judson.russell@choa.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathryn Leung, MD
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21231
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Courneya
Email
jcourne2@jhmi.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Cooke, MD
Facility Name
Boston Children's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brandi Bratrude
Email
brandi.bratrude@childrens.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leslie Lehmann, MD
Facility Name
University of Michigan Medical Center
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Connie Varner
Email
convarne@med.umich.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Vander Lugt, MD
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Merve Tekmen
Email
tekme002@umn.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Margaret MacMillan, MD
Facility Name
St. Louis Children's Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa Murray
Email
Murraylm@wustl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shalini Shenoy, MD
Facility Name
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14203
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel Carter
Email
Rachel.Carter@Roswellpark.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nataliya Buxbaum, MD
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirsten Fuller
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Cancio, MD
Facility Name
Cohen Children's Hospital of NY
City
Queens
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11040
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amelia Halac
Email
dhalac@northwell.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan Fish, MD
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erin Arbuckle
Email
erin.arbuckle@duke.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joanne Kurtzberg, MD
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samantha (Sam) McBride
Email
samantha.mcbride@cchmc.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kasiani Myers, MD
Facility Name
Nationwide Children's Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43205
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lori Jewell
Email
lori.jewell@nationwidechildrens.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rajinder Bajwa, MD
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rebecca Hulme
Email
hulmer@ohsu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Evan Shereck, MD
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patricia Hankins
Email
hankinsp@chop.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Timothy Olson, MD
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Delia Darst
Email
delia.h.darst@vumc.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jim Connelly, MD
Facility Name
MD Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marissa Rose
Email
mmrose@mdanderson.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Demetrios Petropoulous, MD
Facility Name
Texas Children's Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emily Jobe
Email
emilia.jobe@bcm.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jay Read, MD
Facility Name
Primary Children's/University of Utah
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84113
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rebecca Stoffel
Email
rebecca.stoffel@hsc.utah.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Pulsipher, MD
Facility Name
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Courtney Vandervlugt
Email
cvanderv@fredhutch.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauri Burroughs, MD
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emily Ruskiewicz
Email
eruszkiewicz@mcw.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie Talano, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen Before a Blood or Bone Marrow Transplant for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Failure Diseases (BMT CTN 1904)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs