search
Back to results

Effects of a Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonist on Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

Primary Purpose

Pancreatitis, Acute

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo treatment
Naldemedine 0.2 MG Oral Tablet
Sponsored by
Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Pancreatitis, Acute

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 74 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent before any study specific procedures
  • Able to read and understand Danish or Swedish (depending on site)
  • Male or female age between 18 and 74 years
  • At least one attack of non-biliary AP (as defined by the revised Atlanta criteria) within the last 12 months and at least two attacks within 5 years
  • Clinically stable at time of inclusion
  • The researcher believes that the participant understands what the study entails, is capable of following instructions, can attend when needed, and is expected to complete the study
  • The investigator will ensure that fertile female participants have a negative pregnancy test before treatment initiation and use contraception during the study period. The following methods of contraception, if properly used, are generally considered reliable: oral contraceptives, patch contraceptives, injection contraceptives, vaginal contraceptive ring, intrauterine device, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner, double barrier (condom and pessary), or sexual abstinence. Methods of contraception will be documented in the source documents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy towards study medication
  • Known or suspected major stenosis or perforation of the intestines
  • Known or suspected abdominal cancer (incl. intestine, pancreas and the biliary tree)
  • Pre-existing renal insufficiency (defined as habitual eGFR below 45)
  • Female participants that are lactating
  • Severe pre-existing comorbidities (assessed by investigator upon inclusion)
  • Attack of AP requiring admission within two weeks prior to inclusion
  • Gallstone etiology of RAP (MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound excluding biliary etiology of AP must be available prior to enrolment as part of the protocol)
  • Treatment with potent CYP3A4-inhibitors (ketoconazol, itraconzol, ritonavir) or P-gp inhibitors (e.g. cyclosporine).

Sites / Locations

  • Mech-Sense, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University HospitalRecruiting
  • Digestive Disease Center K, Bispebjerg University HospitalRecruiting
  • Gastrounit, Hvidovre University HospitalRecruiting
  • Odense Pancreas CenterRecruiting
  • Karolinska University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo treatment

Naldemedine treatment

Arm Description

Film-coated matched placebo-tablets consisting of: Core: Mannitol, USP/Ph. Eur./JP Croscarmellose Sodium, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Magnesium Stearate, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Coating: Opadry Yellow Purified Water, USP/EP

Film-coated matched active-tablets consisting of: Core: Naldemedine Tosylate (0,2 mg) Mannitol, USP/Ph. Eur./JP Croscarmellose Sodium, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Magnesium Stearate, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Coating: Opadry Yellow Purified Water, USP/EP

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of AP attacks verified by the Atlanta Criteria
The primary outcome is defined as difference in number of AP attacks verified by the Atlanta Criteria between the naldemedine group and the placebo group. The Atlanta Criteria is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of AP attack, and it requires a minimum of two out three of the following features: (i) Abdominal pain typical for acute pancreatitis featuring acute onset of a severe and persistent epigastric pain radiating to the back (ii) Serum amylase levels > three times greater than the normal upper limit (iii) Findings of pancreatic inflammation in contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or transabdominal ultrasonography.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain intensity
Individual difference between subgroups in number and severity of pain attacks (without fulfilling AP criteria) assessed by pain diary and modified Brief Pain Inventory short form on visual analogue scale from 0-10 (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). For each attack, participants will be asked to fill in the pain attack diary and the modified Brief Pain Inventory short form once.
Gut function (BSFS)
Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by The Bristol Stool Form Scale for assessment of stool frequency as well as stool consistency (scale from 1-7, where 1 is firmeste and 7 is softest).
Gut function (GSRS)
Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale which is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea and constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale, where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
Health resource utilization
Difference in health resource utilization (measured in frequency and type of health services used (e.g. blood sample, MRI etc.) that can be converted into danish currency for economic analyses) between subgroups based on service codes (all services have unique service codes stored digitally).
Pancreatic volume
Difference in pancreatic volume measured in cubic centimeters cm^3 between subgroups, measured by MRI.
Exocrine pancreatic function
Difference between subgroups in exocrine pancreatic function assessed by fecal-elastase (µg/g) test.
Endocrine pancreatic function
Difference between subgroups in endocrine pancreatic function assessed by hemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) (mmol/mol) test.
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Difference between subgroups in quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The questionnaire has been validated for assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic pancreatitis and is composed of single-item measures and multi-item scales with scores ranging from 0 to 100 after linear transformation of the raw score. A high score for a functional scale represents a high level of functioning, as does a high score for the global health status, while a high score for the symptom items represents a high level of symptomatology.
Impression of change
Difference between subgroups in Patient Global Impression of Change. PGIC is a seven-point rating scale for self-report of a patient's experienced efficacy of treatment on their symptoms.

Full Information

First Posted
July 8, 2021
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Sponsor
Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Collaborators
Odense University Hospital, Hvidovre University Hospital, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Karolinska University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04966559
Brief Title
Effects of a Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonist on Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
Official Title
Effects of a Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonist on Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis An Investigator-initiated, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 12, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Collaborators
Odense University Hospital, Hvidovre University Hospital, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Karolinska University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will investigate the effect of a peripheral acting opioid antagonist (PAMORA) on the disease course of patients with recurrent acute inflammation of the pancreas (acute pancreatitis). The study will be conducted by treating outpatients suffering from recurrent acute pancreatitis with a PAMORA (naldemedine) for 12 months.
Detailed Description
In this study, the effects of a peripheral acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) on disease recurrence and progression in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) will be investigated. Patients with RAP will be administered 0,2 mg naldemedine orally daily or matching placebo. This medication is defined as the investigational product. Naldemedine is approved by the European Medical Agency for treatment of opioid-induced constipation. This PAMORA have not previously been investigated in patients with pancreatitis. The dose regimes for this study will be according to label. It has previously been shown, in patients with opioid-induced obstipation and healthy subjects, that opioid antagonism incl. PAMORA treatment increases gut motility, relaxes gastrointestinal sphincters, increases the intestinal water content and improves the immune response, without affecting analgesia. The affinity of PAMORAs to the µ-opioid receptors is much stronger than opioid analgesics. Therefore, they as antagonists have the potential to counteract the harmful effects of opioids on the gut mucosa, bacterial translocation and inflammation despite the high levels of exogenous opioids present in patients with pancreatitis. PAMORAs do not cross the blood-brain barrier and consequently do not interfere with analgesia or other central effects of opioids. It is hypothesized that treatment with the PAMORA naldemedine will antagonize the harmful effects of opioids without reducing analgesia in patients with RAP and hence reduce disease severity and improve clinical outcomes. If successful, this study will for the first time document the effects of a targeted pharmacotherapy in RAP with the potential benefit of improved patient outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatitis, Acute

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo treatment
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Film-coated matched placebo-tablets consisting of: Core: Mannitol, USP/Ph. Eur./JP Croscarmellose Sodium, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Magnesium Stearate, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Coating: Opadry Yellow Purified Water, USP/EP
Arm Title
Naldemedine treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Film-coated matched active-tablets consisting of: Core: Naldemedine Tosylate (0,2 mg) Mannitol, USP/Ph. Eur./JP Croscarmellose Sodium, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Magnesium Stearate, NF/Ph. Eur./JP Coating: Opadry Yellow Purified Water, USP/EP
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo treatment
Intervention Description
Active drug/placebo is handed out equivalent of 1 tablet of 0,2 mg Naldemedine or placebo daily for 365 days.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Naldemedine 0.2 MG Oral Tablet
Intervention Description
Active drug/placebo is handed out equivalent of 1 tablet of 0,2 mg Naldemedine or placebo daily for 365 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of AP attacks verified by the Atlanta Criteria
Description
The primary outcome is defined as difference in number of AP attacks verified by the Atlanta Criteria between the naldemedine group and the placebo group. The Atlanta Criteria is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of AP attack, and it requires a minimum of two out three of the following features: (i) Abdominal pain typical for acute pancreatitis featuring acute onset of a severe and persistent epigastric pain radiating to the back (ii) Serum amylase levels > three times greater than the normal upper limit (iii) Findings of pancreatic inflammation in contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or transabdominal ultrasonography.
Time Frame
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain intensity
Description
Individual difference between subgroups in number and severity of pain attacks (without fulfilling AP criteria) assessed by pain diary and modified Brief Pain Inventory short form on visual analogue scale from 0-10 (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). For each attack, participants will be asked to fill in the pain attack diary and the modified Brief Pain Inventory short form once.
Time Frame
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months
Title
Gut function (BSFS)
Description
Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by The Bristol Stool Form Scale for assessment of stool frequency as well as stool consistency (scale from 1-7, where 1 is firmeste and 7 is softest).
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months
Title
Gut function (GSRS)
Description
Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale which is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea and constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale, where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months
Title
Health resource utilization
Description
Difference in health resource utilization (measured in frequency and type of health services used (e.g. blood sample, MRI etc.) that can be converted into danish currency for economic analyses) between subgroups based on service codes (all services have unique service codes stored digitally).
Time Frame
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months
Title
Pancreatic volume
Description
Difference in pancreatic volume measured in cubic centimeters cm^3 between subgroups, measured by MRI.
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months
Title
Exocrine pancreatic function
Description
Difference between subgroups in exocrine pancreatic function assessed by fecal-elastase (µg/g) test.
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months
Title
Endocrine pancreatic function
Description
Difference between subgroups in endocrine pancreatic function assessed by hemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) (mmol/mol) test.
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months
Title
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Description
Difference between subgroups in quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The questionnaire has been validated for assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic pancreatitis and is composed of single-item measures and multi-item scales with scores ranging from 0 to 100 after linear transformation of the raw score. A high score for a functional scale represents a high level of functioning, as does a high score for the global health status, while a high score for the symptom items represents a high level of symptomatology.
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months
Title
Impression of change
Description
Difference between subgroups in Patient Global Impression of Change. PGIC is a seven-point rating scale for self-report of a patient's experienced efficacy of treatment on their symptoms.
Time Frame
Day of randomization and at follow up visit after 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
74 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Signed informed consent before any study specific procedures Able to read and understand Danish or Swedish (depending on site) Male or female age between 18 and 74 years At least one attack of non-biliary AP (as defined by the revised Atlanta criteria) within the last 12 months and at least two attacks within 5 years Clinically stable at time of inclusion The researcher believes that the participant understands what the study entails, is capable of following instructions, can attend when needed, and is expected to complete the study The investigator will ensure that fertile female participants have a negative pregnancy test before treatment initiation and use contraception during the study period. The following methods of contraception, if properly used, are generally considered reliable: oral contraceptives, patch contraceptives, injection contraceptives, vaginal contraceptive ring, intrauterine device, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner, double barrier (condom and pessary), or sexual abstinence. Methods of contraception will be documented in the source documents Exclusion Criteria: Known allergy towards study medication Known or suspected major stenosis or perforation of the intestines Known or suspected abdominal cancer (incl. intestine, pancreas and the biliary tree) Pre-existing renal insufficiency (defined as habitual eGFR below 45) Female participants that are lactating Severe pre-existing comorbidities (assessed by investigator upon inclusion) Attack of AP requiring admission within two weeks prior to inclusion Gallstone etiology of RAP (MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound excluding biliary etiology of AP must be available prior to enrolment as part of the protocol) Treatment with potent CYP3A4-inhibitors (ketoconazol, itraconzol, ritonavir) or P-gp inhibitors (e.g. cyclosporine).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mathias E. Cook, MSc
Phone
97663520
Ext
+45
Email
m.cook@rn.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Cecilie S. Knoph, MD
Phone
97663520
Ext
+45
Email
c.siggaard@rn.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Asbjørn M. Drewes, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Aalborg University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mech-Sense, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital
City
Aalborg
State/Province
Jutland
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, MD DMSc PhD
Facility Name
Digestive Disease Center K, Bispebjerg University Hospital
City
Bispebjerg
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen, MD
Facility Name
Gastrounit, Hvidovre University Hospital
City
Hvidovre
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Srdan Novovic, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Odense Pancreas Center
City
Svendborg
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Bau Mortensen, MD DMSc PhD
Facility Name
Karolinska University Hospital
City
Stockholm
State/Province
Solna (l1:00)
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-171 76
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Miroslav Vujasinovic, MD, PhD
Phone
8-123 943 20
Ext
+460
Email
mailto:miroslav.vujasinovic@sll.se

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes

Learn more about this trial

Effects of a Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonist on Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs