search
Back to results

Clinical Evaluation of MucoPEG™ for Xerostomia (CEMPEG)

Primary Purpose

Dry Mouth, Xerostomia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MucoPEG
Biotene
Sponsored by
SunBio, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dry Mouth focused on measuring Dry mouth, Xerostomia, Cotton mouth

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must have read, understood and signed an informed consent prior to entering the study.
  2. Must be 18 years of age or older
  3. Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or their medically qualified designee, no clinically relevant or significant abnormalities found on examination of the oral cavity or in their medical history.
  4. Participant with a Challacombe Scale score of 1 or higher
  5. Participant agrees not to eat, drink, chew tobacco, chew gum, smoke, brush or floss their teeth for 2 hours prior to study visits
  6. Participant agrees not to use any oral care products or any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2 hours prior to study visits
  7. Participant agrees not to consume any food or liquid during the study visits, except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
  8. Participant agrees to using clinical oral care supplies provided by the investigators and no other products during the entire study
  9. Understands and is willing and able to comply with all study procedures and restrictions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who are pregnant or intending to become pregnant over the course of the study, or who are found to have a positive urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit
  2. Women who are breast-feeding
  3. Participant is currently undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
  4. Any condition the investigator identifies that may impede the participant's ability to properly participate in the study. For example, Alzheimer's Disease
  5. Participant with untreated oral mucosal disease which in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the study. For example, presence of oral ulceration.
  6. Evidence of gross intra-oral neglect or need for extensive dental therapy
  7. Denture wearer (complete dentures)
  8. Participant on systemic parasympathetic medications (e.g. pilocarpine) for treating dry mouth, but the dose requirement of which is unstable
  9. Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or to any of their stated ingredients
  10. Participation in another clinical study (including studies of cosmetic products) or in receipt of an investigational drug within 14 days of the screening visit
  11. Previous participation in this study
  12. Recent history (within one year prior to screening visit) of alcohol or other substance abuse

Sites / Locations

  • ColoradoENT
  • Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

MucoPEG

Biotene

Arm Description

Arm being compared to against Biotene

Arm being compared against MucoPEG

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
To demonstrate the effectiveness of MucoPEG is better than that of Biotene Dry Mouth Gentle Oral Rinse in relieving xerostomia. Effectiveness will be addressed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (VAS), where 0 is "Not Dry at All" and 10 is "Very Dry"
Dry Mouth Relief Questionnaires (DMRQ)
To demonstrate the effectiveness of MucoPEG is better than that of Biotene Dry Mouth Gentle Oral Rinse in relieving xerostomia. Effectiveness will be addressed using the Dry Mouth Relief Questionnaires (DMRQ).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Product Use Questionnaire (PPUQ)
To demonstrate effectiveness of MucoPEG in treating symptoms of dry mouth to that of Biotene. Effectiveness will be assessed using dry mouth Product Use Questionnaire (PPUQ).
Product Performance and Attributes Questionnaire (PPAQ)
To demonstrate effectiveness of MucoPEG in treating symptoms of dry mouth to that of Biotene. Effectiveness will be assessed using dry mouth Product Performance and Attributes Questionnaire (PPAQ)
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as evaluated by the Principal Investigator
To evaluate the clinical safety of MucoPEG. Patient reported outcomes will be evaluated by the Principal Investigator.
Change in Xerostomia using the Dry Mouth Inventory (DMI) questionnaire.
To examine change in Xerostomia using the Dry Mouth Inventory (DMI). Using a scale from "Disagree (0)" to "Strongly agree (3)"
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
To assess the effectiveness of MucoPEG in relieving xerostomia. Effectiveness will be addressed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Where 0 is "Not Dry at All" and 10 is "Very Dry"

Full Information

First Posted
July 8, 2021
Last Updated
April 10, 2023
Sponsor
SunBio, Inc.
Collaborators
NAMSA, Rudacure
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04986501
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of MucoPEG™ for Xerostomia
Acronym
CEMPEG
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of MucoPEG™ for Xerostomia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 15, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 15, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
SunBio, Inc.
Collaborators
NAMSA, Rudacure

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the oral rinse comparing to MucoPEG™ and Biotene®. This is a randomized open-label crossover study with 42 patients receiving treatment. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either the MucoPEG™ or the Biotene® Dry Mouth Gentle Oral Rinse in the first period. Patients will use the assigned oral rinse two times a day for two weeks. Patients will switch to the other treatment after a wash-out period of one week.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare MucoPEG™ and it temporal change to those of the Biotene® Dry Mouth Gentle Oral Rinse in patients with Xerostomia. The study will gather data on patient reported outcomes on the safety and performance of the product, mouth-feel qualities and any changes in dry mouth.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dry Mouth, Xerostomia
Keywords
Dry mouth, Xerostomia, Cotton mouth

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
The study is a randomized, open-labelled crossover trial.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MucoPEG
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Arm being compared to against Biotene
Arm Title
Biotene
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Arm being compared against MucoPEG
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MucoPEG
Intervention Description
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Biotene
Intervention Description
Active Comparator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
To demonstrate the effectiveness of MucoPEG is better than that of Biotene Dry Mouth Gentle Oral Rinse in relieving xerostomia. Effectiveness will be addressed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (VAS), where 0 is "Not Dry at All" and 10 is "Very Dry"
Time Frame
Prior to product use, first day of treatment period, after the last dose of the product used and on the final day of treatment period.
Title
Dry Mouth Relief Questionnaires (DMRQ)
Description
To demonstrate the effectiveness of MucoPEG is better than that of Biotene Dry Mouth Gentle Oral Rinse in relieving xerostomia. Effectiveness will be addressed using the Dry Mouth Relief Questionnaires (DMRQ).
Time Frame
2 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Product Use Questionnaire (PPUQ)
Description
To demonstrate effectiveness of MucoPEG in treating symptoms of dry mouth to that of Biotene. Effectiveness will be assessed using dry mouth Product Use Questionnaire (PPUQ).
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Product Performance and Attributes Questionnaire (PPAQ)
Description
To demonstrate effectiveness of MucoPEG in treating symptoms of dry mouth to that of Biotene. Effectiveness will be assessed using dry mouth Product Performance and Attributes Questionnaire (PPAQ)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as evaluated by the Principal Investigator
Description
To evaluate the clinical safety of MucoPEG. Patient reported outcomes will be evaluated by the Principal Investigator.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Change in Xerostomia using the Dry Mouth Inventory (DMI) questionnaire.
Description
To examine change in Xerostomia using the Dry Mouth Inventory (DMI). Using a scale from "Disagree (0)" to "Strongly agree (3)"
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
To assess the effectiveness of MucoPEG in relieving xerostomia. Effectiveness will be addressed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Where 0 is "Not Dry at All" and 10 is "Very Dry"
Time Frame
2 hours and 1 week of use

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Must have read, understood and signed an informed consent prior to entering the study. Must be 18 years of age or older Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or their medically qualified designee, no clinically relevant or significant abnormalities found on examination of the oral cavity or in their medical history. Participant with a Challacombe Scale score of 1 or higher Participant agrees not to eat, drink, chew tobacco, chew gum, smoke, brush or floss their teeth for 2 hours prior to study visits Participant agrees not to use any oral care products or any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2 hours prior to study visits Participant agrees not to consume any food or liquid during the study visits, except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods) Participant agrees to using clinical oral care supplies provided by the investigators and no other products during the entire study Understands and is willing and able to comply with all study procedures and restrictions Exclusion Criteria: Women who are pregnant or intending to become pregnant over the course of the study, or who are found to have a positive urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit Women who are breast-feeding Participant is currently undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Any condition the investigator identifies that may impede the participant's ability to properly participate in the study. For example, Alzheimer's Disease Participant with untreated oral mucosal disease which in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the study. For example, presence of oral ulceration. Evidence of gross intra-oral neglect or need for extensive dental therapy Denture wearer (complete dentures) Participant on systemic parasympathetic medications (e.g. pilocarpine) for treating dry mouth, but the dose requirement of which is unstable Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or to any of their stated ingredients Participation in another clinical study (including studies of cosmetic products) or in receipt of an investigational drug within 14 days of the screening visit Previous participation in this study Recent history (within one year prior to screening visit) of alcohol or other substance abuse
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
To be determined To be determined, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
Study Site
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ColoradoENT
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80923
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Evaluation of MucoPEG™ for Xerostomia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs