search
Back to results

Alterations in Central Control of Shoulder Muscles in Office Workers With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain

Primary Purpose

Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain, Office Workers, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
30-minute computer typing task
30-minute rest
Sponsored by
National Yang Ming University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain focused on measuring Non-specific chronic neck pain, Transcranial magnetic Stimulation, Corticospinal system, Scapular kinematics, Scapular muscles activation

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 40 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria of Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain

  1. Ages ranges from 20-40 years old
  2. Work with the computer at least 25 hours per week
  3. Neck pain of idiopathic origin ≥ 6 months during the past year
  4. Minimum of 3/10 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) in past 7 days
  5. No structural abnormalities which are confirmed by neck X-ray or negative results of all the following special tests

    • Exclude nerve root compression: Cervical distraction test and Spurling's test
    • Exclude cervical radiculopathy: Valsalva test
    • Exclude cervical instability: Alar ligament test and Sharp-Purser test
  6. Specific head movements or maintaining the fixed posture for a long time reproduced neck pain

Inclusion Criteria of Healthy Subjects in the control group

  1. Ages ranges from 20-40 years old
  2. Work with the computer at least 25 hours per week
  3. No history of neck and/or shoulder pain sustained over one week in the past one year

Inclusion Criteria of Healthy subjects in the Pilot Study

  1. Ages ranges from 20-40 years old
  2. No history of neck and/or shoulder pain sustained over one week in the past one year

Exclusion Criteria of Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain and All Healthy Subjects)

  1. Any known pathology or impairment in the shoulder joint, which is the origin of neck pain
  2. Current episode of neck pain related to a traumatic event (e.g., whiplash injury)
  3. Have a history of cervical and/or shoulder pathology (e.g., fracture, dislocation, trauma, surgery of spinal or shoulder joint, inflammatory disease, frequent headache or dizziness)
  4. Brain injury and neurological impairment (e.g., radiculopathy, myelopathy or stroke)
  5. Systematic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis), fibromyalgia, tumor
  6. Contraindications to the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), assessed with a safety screening questionnaire, including pregnancy, history of seizure, epilepsy and syncope, having cochlear implant, having medal implant and taking anti-depressant medication
  7. Any kind of previous manual and/or movement therapy on upper extremity and neck during in recent 3 months

Sites / Locations

  • National Yang-Ming University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Other

Other

Other

Arm Label

Experimental group: Non-specific chronic neck pain group

Control group: Healthy subjects group

Pilot study: Healthy subjects group

Arm Description

Subjects with non-specific chronic neck pain will be included to perform 30-minute computer typing task and assess neurophysiological measurements of scapular muscles, scapular kinematics and muscle activation.

Healthy subjects will be included to compare the differences in neurophysiological measurements of scapular muscles, scapular kinematics and muscle activation between healthy subjects and subjects with non-specific chronic neck pain. Subjects in this group will received the same assessment as the NCNP group.

Healthy subjects will be included to test reliability of single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS, including its associated neurophysiological measurements, and also to test reliability of Liberty electromagnetic tracing system and surface electromyography. Subjects in this group will received the same assessment as the NCNP group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Neurophysiological measures - Active motor threshold
Active motor threshold (AMT) will be described with the percentage (%) of maximum stimulator output (MSO).
Neurophysiological measures - Motor evoked potential
Motor evoked potential (MEP) will be described with millivolt (mV).
Neurophysiological measures - Cortical silent period
Cortical silent period (CSP) will be measured with millisecond (ms)
Neurophysiological measures - Short interval cortical inhibition
Short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is below 5 ms
Neurophysiological measures - Short interval cortical facilitation
Short interval cortical facilitation (SICF) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is above 5 ms
Neurophysiological measures - Area of cortical mapping
Area of cortical mapping will be described with square millimeter (mm2)
Neurophysiological measures - Volume of cortical mapping
Volume of cortical mapping will be calculated with multiplying summation of motor evoke potentials on the map (mV) by the area of the map (mm2) with the unit of mV*mm2
Neurophysiological measures - Center of gravity of cortical mapping
Center of gravity of cortical mapping will be described in a x-y coordinate system (mm).
Neurophysiological measures - Area of cortical mapping
Area of cortical mapping will be described with square millimeter (mm2)
Neurophysiological measures - Volume of cortical mapping
Volume of cortical mapping will be calculated with multiplying summation of motor evoke potentials on the map (mV) by the area of the map (mm2) with the unit of mV*mm2
Neurophysiological measures - Center of gravity of cortical mapping
Center of gravity of cortical mapping will be described in a x-y coordinate system (mm).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Scapular kinematics during arm elevation
Scapular kinematics, including anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation in scapula plane elevation at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, and will be described with degree (°).
Scapular kinematics during performing the computer task
The average of scapular kinematics, including anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation will be calculated with a window of 10 seconds and will be described with degree (°).
Scapular muscles activation during arm elevation
The root mean square of electromyography (EMG) data of the upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior will be normalized by the maximum voluntary contraction amplitude (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction, %) and calculated over three 30° increments of motion during arm elevation from 30° to 120°, including 30° - 60°, 60° - 90°, and 90° - 120°.
Scapular muscles activation during performing the computer task
The root mean square of electromyography (EMG) data of the upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior will be calculated with a window of 10 seconds and will be normalized by the maximum voluntary contraction amplitude (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction, %).
Craniovertebral angle
Craniovertebral angle will be measured as the included angle between the tragus, C7 spinous process and the horizontal line and will be described with degree (°)
Craniovertebral angle
Craniovertebral angle will be measured as the included angle between the tragus, C7 spinous process and the horizontal line and will be described with degree (°)
Scapular kinematics during arm elevation
Scapular kinematics, including anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation in scapula plane elevation at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, and will be described with degree (°).
Scapular muscles activation during arm elevation
The root mean square of electromyography (EMG) data of the upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior will be normalized by the maximum voluntary contraction amplitude (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction, %) and calculated over three 30° increments of motion during arm elevation from 30° to 120°, including 30° - 60°, 60° - 90°, and 90° - 120°.
Craniovertebral angle
Craniovertebral angle will be measured as the included angle between the tragus, C7 spinous process and the horizontal line and will be described with degree (°)

Full Information

First Posted
July 18, 2021
Last Updated
September 18, 2022
Sponsor
National Yang Ming University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05000177
Brief Title
Alterations in Central Control of Shoulder Muscles in Office Workers With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain
Official Title
Alterations in Corticospinal and Neuromuscular Control of Shoulder Complex in Office Workers With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 21, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 13, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 13, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National Yang Ming University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP) is commonly seen in office workers. Individuals with NCNP not only demonstrate impaired neck movement control and muscle activation, but also show abnormal scapular kinematics and muscle activation timing. Office workers with NCNP also show higher activity of upper trapezius during computer typing and have difficulty relaxing upper trapezius after typing. These changes related to scapula may increase strain over neck. In addition to the altered neuromuscular control, recent studies found neuroplasticity changes in the central nervous system on patients of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Therefore, few studies found shifts and alterations of motor cortex representation of neck muscles in individuals with NCNP, which was correlated with delayed muscle activation of deep neck flexors muscle in functional activities. However, no studies have explored that whether this corticospinal adaptation also happens over scapular muscles, especially after a computer typing task. The objectives of this proposal are to investigate the differences in corticospinal and neuromuscular control of shoulder complex between office workers with and without NCNP. Thirty-five individuals with NCNP and 35 healthy controls will be recruited. Twenty young healthy subjects will be also recruited for a pilot study to test the reliability of all the measures. Scapular kinematics and muscle activation will be tested during arm elevation. Corticospinal parameters of trapezius and serratus anterior will be tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including active motor threshold, motor evoked potential, cortical silent period, short interval intracortical facilitation, short interval intracortical inhibition and cortical mapping. Corticospinal parameters, except cortical mapping, will be measured again after a 30-minute computer typing task. Scapular muscle activation will be also recorded during the typing task.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain, Office Workers, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Neuromuscular Control
Keywords
Non-specific chronic neck pain, Transcranial magnetic Stimulation, Corticospinal system, Scapular kinematics, Scapular muscles activation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
51 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental group: Non-specific chronic neck pain group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Subjects with non-specific chronic neck pain will be included to perform 30-minute computer typing task and assess neurophysiological measurements of scapular muscles, scapular kinematics and muscle activation.
Arm Title
Control group: Healthy subjects group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Healthy subjects will be included to compare the differences in neurophysiological measurements of scapular muscles, scapular kinematics and muscle activation between healthy subjects and subjects with non-specific chronic neck pain. Subjects in this group will received the same assessment as the NCNP group.
Arm Title
Pilot study: Healthy subjects group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Healthy subjects will be included to test reliability of single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS, including its associated neurophysiological measurements, and also to test reliability of Liberty electromagnetic tracing system and surface electromyography. Subjects in this group will received the same assessment as the NCNP group.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
30-minute computer typing task
Intervention Description
The subject sits in front of a computer screen and perform computer typing tasks for 30 minutes. The same computer table and chair were used for all subjects. The height of the table and screen, and the distance of the keyboard from the subject were adjusted according to their familiar and comfortable position.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
30-minute rest
Intervention Description
Rest for 30 minutes
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Active motor threshold
Description
Active motor threshold (AMT) will be described with the percentage (%) of maximum stimulator output (MSO).
Time Frame
Change from baseline AMT after 30-minute computer typing task or 30-minute rest
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Motor evoked potential
Description
Motor evoked potential (MEP) will be described with millivolt (mV).
Time Frame
Change from baseline MEP after 30-minute computer typing task or 30-minute rest
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Cortical silent period
Description
Cortical silent period (CSP) will be measured with millisecond (ms)
Time Frame
Change from baseline CSP after 30-minute computer typing task or 30-minute rest
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Short interval cortical inhibition
Description
Short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is below 5 ms
Time Frame
Change from baseline SICI after 30-minute computer typing task or 30-minute rest
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Short interval cortical facilitation
Description
Short interval cortical facilitation (SICF) will be defined as percentage (%) of conditioning responses vs testing responses while the inter-stimulus interval is above 5 ms
Time Frame
Change from baseline SICF after 30-minute computer typing task or 30-minute rest
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Area of cortical mapping
Description
Area of cortical mapping will be described with square millimeter (mm2)
Time Frame
Before 30-minute computer typing task
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Volume of cortical mapping
Description
Volume of cortical mapping will be calculated with multiplying summation of motor evoke potentials on the map (mV) by the area of the map (mm2) with the unit of mV*mm2
Time Frame
Before 30-minute computer typing task
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Center of gravity of cortical mapping
Description
Center of gravity of cortical mapping will be described in a x-y coordinate system (mm).
Time Frame
Before 30-minute computer typing task
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Area of cortical mapping
Description
Area of cortical mapping will be described with square millimeter (mm2)
Time Frame
Change from baseline area of cortical mapping after 30-minute rest (pilot subjects)
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Volume of cortical mapping
Description
Volume of cortical mapping will be calculated with multiplying summation of motor evoke potentials on the map (mV) by the area of the map (mm2) with the unit of mV*mm2
Time Frame
Change from baseline volume of cortical mapping after 30-minute rest (pilot subjects)
Title
Neurophysiological measures - Center of gravity of cortical mapping
Description
Center of gravity of cortical mapping will be described in a x-y coordinate system (mm).
Time Frame
Change from baseline center of gravity of cortical mapping of cortical mapping after 30-minute rest (pilot subjects)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Scapular kinematics during arm elevation
Description
Scapular kinematics, including anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation in scapula plane elevation at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, and will be described with degree (°).
Time Frame
Before 30-minute computer typing task
Title
Scapular kinematics during performing the computer task
Description
The average of scapular kinematics, including anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation will be calculated with a window of 10 seconds and will be described with degree (°).
Time Frame
Change from baseline during the 30-minute computer typing task at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 minutes of the task
Title
Scapular muscles activation during arm elevation
Description
The root mean square of electromyography (EMG) data of the upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior will be normalized by the maximum voluntary contraction amplitude (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction, %) and calculated over three 30° increments of motion during arm elevation from 30° to 120°, including 30° - 60°, 60° - 90°, and 90° - 120°.
Time Frame
Before 30-minute computer typing task
Title
Scapular muscles activation during performing the computer task
Description
The root mean square of electromyography (EMG) data of the upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior will be calculated with a window of 10 seconds and will be normalized by the maximum voluntary contraction amplitude (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction, %).
Time Frame
Change from baseline during the 30-minute computer typing task at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 minutes of the task
Title
Craniovertebral angle
Description
Craniovertebral angle will be measured as the included angle between the tragus, C7 spinous process and the horizontal line and will be described with degree (°)
Time Frame
Before 30-minute computer typing task
Title
Craniovertebral angle
Description
Craniovertebral angle will be measured as the included angle between the tragus, C7 spinous process and the horizontal line and will be described with degree (°)
Time Frame
Change from baseline during the 30-minute computer typing task at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 minutes of the task
Title
Scapular kinematics during arm elevation
Description
Scapular kinematics, including anterior/posterior tilt, upward/downward rotation, and internal/external rotation in scapula plane elevation at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, and will be described with degree (°).
Time Frame
Change from baseline scapular kinematics after 30-minute rest (pilot subjects)
Title
Scapular muscles activation during arm elevation
Description
The root mean square of electromyography (EMG) data of the upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and serratus anterior will be normalized by the maximum voluntary contraction amplitude (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction, %) and calculated over three 30° increments of motion during arm elevation from 30° to 120°, including 30° - 60°, 60° - 90°, and 90° - 120°.
Time Frame
Change from baseline scapular muscles activation after 30-minute rest (pilot subjects)
Title
Craniovertebral angle
Description
Craniovertebral angle will be measured as the included angle between the tragus, C7 spinous process and the horizontal line and will be described with degree (°)
Time Frame
Change from baseline craniovertebral angle after 30-minute rest (pilot subjects)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria of Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain Ages ranges from 20-40 years old Work with the computer at least 25 hours per week Neck pain of idiopathic origin ≥ 6 months during the past year Minimum of 3/10 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) in past 7 days No structural abnormalities which are confirmed by neck X-ray or negative results of all the following special tests Exclude nerve root compression: Cervical distraction test and Spurling's test Exclude cervical radiculopathy: Valsalva test Exclude cervical instability: Alar ligament test and Sharp-Purser test Specific head movements or maintaining the fixed posture for a long time reproduced neck pain Inclusion Criteria of Healthy Subjects in the control group Ages ranges from 20-40 years old Work with the computer at least 25 hours per week No history of neck and/or shoulder pain sustained over one week in the past one year Inclusion Criteria of Healthy subjects in the Pilot Study Ages ranges from 20-40 years old No history of neck and/or shoulder pain sustained over one week in the past one year Exclusion Criteria of Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain and All Healthy Subjects) Any known pathology or impairment in the shoulder joint, which is the origin of neck pain Current episode of neck pain related to a traumatic event (e.g., whiplash injury) Have a history of cervical and/or shoulder pathology (e.g., fracture, dislocation, trauma, surgery of spinal or shoulder joint, inflammatory disease, frequent headache or dizziness) Brain injury and neurological impairment (e.g., radiculopathy, myelopathy or stroke) Systematic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis), fibromyalgia, tumor Contraindications to the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), assessed with a safety screening questionnaire, including pregnancy, history of seizure, epilepsy and syncope, having cochlear implant, having medal implant and taking anti-depressant medication Any kind of previous manual and/or movement therapy on upper extremity and neck during in recent 3 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yin-Liang Lin, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
National Yang Ming University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Yang-Ming University
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
112
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Alterations in Central Control of Shoulder Muscles in Office Workers With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs