search
Back to results

Comparison Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty

Primary Purpose

Myelopathy Cervical, Kyphosis Post Surgical, Neck Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
C3 laminectomy
C3 laminoplasty
Sponsored by
Seoul National University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myelopathy Cervical focused on measuring Laminoplasty, Laminectomy

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical stenosis patients with or without cervical myelopathy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic cancer patients.
  • Any combined fracture.
  • Previous surgery to cervical spine.
  • inflammatory joint disease
  • psychiatric illness

Sites / Locations

  • Seoul National University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

C3 laminectomy with C4-6 laminoplasty

C3-6 laminoplasty

Arm Description

Cervical myelopathy patients who underwent C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty.

Cervical myelopathy patients who underwent C3-6 laminoplasty.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

the Neck Disability Index (NDI)
scores from 0 to 50 with 50 being the worst performance status related to neck pain.
posterior neck with visual analog scale (VAS)
Measuring pain intensity of the posterior neck with visual analog scale (VAS), rated 1 to 10 with 10 being the most severe pain level.
C2-C7 lordosis
Measuring C2-C7 lordosis angle by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series protocol with the patients standing in a neutral position and instructed to look straight ahead with knees locked.

Secondary Outcome Measures

EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) scores
Responses on a questionnaire with five dimensions, each comprised of five levels. Scores are revised into an index with a range from -0.59-1, with 1.00 indicating full health. The 243 possible health states on the EQ-5D are evaluated against a normal population using the time trade off method (TTO).
Radiological outcomes
Measuring C2-C3 lordosis angle, C4-C7 lordosis angle, T1 slope angle, T1 slope - C2-C7 lordosis angle, by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series protocol with the patients standing in a neutral position and instructed to look straight ahead with knees locked.
C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA)
distance between C2 plumb line and C7) by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series with the patients standing in a neutral position.
C2-C3 interlaminar spontaneous fusion
Measuring the incidence of postoperative C2-C3 interlaminar spontaneous fusion by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series.
Estimated intraoperative blood loss
Measuring estimated intraoperative blood loss by using intraoperative records of anesthesiologists.
Operative time
Measuring the time between start of the surgery (incision) and the finish of surgery (closure of the skin).

Full Information

First Posted
July 30, 2021
Last Updated
August 8, 2021
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05006495
Brief Title
Comparison Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of Radiological and Axial Pain Outcome Between C3-6 Open Door Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 20, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 14, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 14, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Investigators performed a prospective randomized controlled trial for comparing postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty.
Detailed Description
Cervical laminoplasty is widely performed surgical techniques to cervical myelopathy patients. But it is well known that C3-6 Cervical laminoplasty often results in injury of the semispinalis cervicis inserted into the axis, which possibly causes postoperative cervical kyphosis and neck pain. C3 laminectomy with cervical laminoplasty is the modified technique preserving the semispinalis cervicis to reduce such complications of conventional C3-6 laminoplasty. There has been a number of retrospective studies comparing C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty, however, there's no prospective randomized controlled study yet. Investigators performed a prospective randomized controlled trial for comparing postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty. Primary end points include the Neck Disability Index(NDI), the Visual Analog Scale(VAS) of neck pain, and the C2-7 Spine Cobb angle at postoperative 1 year.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myelopathy Cervical, Kyphosis Post Surgical, Neck Pain, Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Keywords
Laminoplasty, Laminectomy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A randomized controlled trial, assigning subjects to two groups: C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Using a generator of www.randomization.com, 100 subjects randomized into blocks of 50 and 50. To reproduce this plan, use the seed 3169 along with the number of subjects per block/number of blocks and (case-sensitive) treatment labels as entered originally. and (case-sensitive) treatment labels as entered originally. After randomization of 100 subjects, additional 26 subjects randomized into blocks of 13 and13. To reproduce this plan, use the seed 5134 along with the number of subjects per block/number of blocks and (case-sensitive) treatment labels as entered originally.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
126 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
C3 laminectomy with C4-6 laminoplasty
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cervical myelopathy patients who underwent C3 laminectomy with laminoplasty.
Arm Title
C3-6 laminoplasty
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Cervical myelopathy patients who underwent C3-6 laminoplasty.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
C3 laminectomy
Intervention Description
C3 laminectomy preserving semispinalis cervicis inserted into the axis.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
C3 laminoplasty
Intervention Description
Conventional C3-6 laminoplasty, resulting in injury of semispinalis cervicis.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
the Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Description
scores from 0 to 50 with 50 being the worst performance status related to neck pain.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
posterior neck with visual analog scale (VAS)
Description
Measuring pain intensity of the posterior neck with visual analog scale (VAS), rated 1 to 10 with 10 being the most severe pain level.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
C2-C7 lordosis
Description
Measuring C2-C7 lordosis angle by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series protocol with the patients standing in a neutral position and instructed to look straight ahead with knees locked.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) scores
Description
Responses on a questionnaire with five dimensions, each comprised of five levels. Scores are revised into an index with a range from -0.59-1, with 1.00 indicating full health. The 243 possible health states on the EQ-5D are evaluated against a normal population using the time trade off method (TTO).
Time Frame
3 month, 6 month, 12 month, 2 year, 3 year
Title
Radiological outcomes
Description
Measuring C2-C3 lordosis angle, C4-C7 lordosis angle, T1 slope angle, T1 slope - C2-C7 lordosis angle, by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series protocol with the patients standing in a neutral position and instructed to look straight ahead with knees locked.
Time Frame
1year, 2 year, 3 year
Title
C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA)
Description
distance between C2 plumb line and C7) by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series with the patients standing in a neutral position.
Time Frame
1year, 2 year, 3 year
Title
C2-C3 interlaminar spontaneous fusion
Description
Measuring the incidence of postoperative C2-C3 interlaminar spontaneous fusion by using standard lateral cervical x-ray series.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Estimated intraoperative blood loss
Description
Measuring estimated intraoperative blood loss by using intraoperative records of anesthesiologists.
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Operative time
Description
Measuring the time between start of the surgery (incision) and the finish of surgery (closure of the skin).
Time Frame
Intraoperative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Cervical stenosis patients with or without cervical myelopathy. Exclusion Criteria: Metastatic cancer patients. Any combined fracture. Previous surgery to cervical spine. inflammatory joint disease psychiatric illness
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chun Kee Chung, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Seoul National University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
State/Province
Korea
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32387294
Citation
Chen C, Li J, Liao Z, Gao Y, Shao Z, Yang C. C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study. Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1403-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 May 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32941312
Citation
Kudo H, Takeuchi K, Wada K, Kumagai G, Tanaka S, Asari T, Araki R, Yokoyama T, Ishibashi Y. Ten-Year Long-term Results of Modified Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty With C3 Laminectomy Preserving the Semispinalis Cervicis Inserted Into the Axis Compared With Those of Conventional Cervical Laminoplasty. Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Apr 1;34(3):E147-E153. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001068.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33086255
Citation
Nakajima K, Nakamoto H, Kato S, Doi T, Matsubayashi Y, Taniguchi Y, Yoshida Y, Kawamura N, Nakarai H, Higashikawa A, Tozawa K, Takeshita Y, Fukushima M, Iizuka M, Ono T, Shirokoshi T, Azuma S, Tanaka S, Oshima Y. A Multicenter Observational Study on the Postoperative Outcomes of C3 Laminectomy in Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty. Clin Spine Surg. 2021 May 1;34(4):146-152. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001100.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27851661
Citation
Lee GW, Cho CW, Shin JH, Ahn MW. Which Technique Is Better Option for C3 Segment in Multilevel Open-Door Laminoplasty of the Cervical Spine?: Laminectomy Versus Laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42(14):E833-E840. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001974.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16284593
Citation
Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Aburakawa S, Saito A, Numasawa T, Iwasaki T, Itabashi T, Okada A, Ito J, Ueyama K, Toh S. Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty: a modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 15;30(22):2544-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186332.66490.ba.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs