search
Back to results

Age and Body Position on Handgrip Strength and Movement Coordination of Upper Limb

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
hand motor coordination in a sitting positin
Sponsored by
Anna Olczak
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, age, grip strength, coordination movement, stabilization

Eligibility Criteria

22 Years - 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:1) patients with ischemic stroke; 2) Trunk Control Test 70-100 points; 3) subjects who were in a state allowing movements of the upper extremity (FMA-UE 40-66 motor function points); 4) muscle tension (MAS 0 -1+); 5) no severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding; 6) at least 18 years of age.

-

Exclusion Criteria:1) stroke up to four weeks after the episode, 2) another neurological disease entity 3) lack of trunk stability, 4) no wrist and hand movement, 5) muscle tension (˃2 MAS), 6) high or very low blood pressure, 7) severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding; dizziness, the malaise of the respondents.

Control group inclusion criteria: 1) the control group consisted of healthy subjects, free from the upper extremity motor coordination disorders; 2) at least 18 years of age.

Control group exclusion criteria: 1) a history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, stroke, head injury, or other conditions that could affect their ability to active movement and grip hand; 2) severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding.

-

Sites / Locations

  • Anna Olczak

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

To improve the coordination of the wrist and hand after stroke in three age groups.

Arm Description

The test consisted of two motor tasks, carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and lying down (supine). During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was to be examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine position, the upper limb was stabilized at the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Maximum range of movement of the wrist [mm]
Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM).
Frequency of wrist movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec
The Hand Tutor allows measurements the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles
Frequency of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th finger movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec
The Hand Tutor allows measurements the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th finger maximum range of motion (ROM), [mm]
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM).
Assessment of the grip strength
Grip strength, kg (a manual electronic dynamometer (EH 101) was used for grip strength measurement (error of measurement, 0.5 kg/lb)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 10, 2021
Last Updated
August 10, 2021
Sponsor
Anna Olczak
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05008302
Brief Title
Age and Body Position on Handgrip Strength and Movement Coordination of Upper Limb
Official Title
Age and Body Position on Handgrip Strength and Movement Coordination of Upper Limb
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 10, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 15, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 15, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Anna Olczak

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to analyze the importance of the position of the body and the examined upper limb on the parameters of movement coordination and hand grip strength in various age groups of people after a stroke and healthy individuals.
Detailed Description
The aim of this experiment was to analyze the parameters of motor coordination and handshake strength in stroke patients and healthy volunteers in various age groups and selected torso and upper limb positions. Both patients and healthy volunteers were prospectively divided into three age groups: 18-45, 46-60 and 61 and above. Thus, the maximum range of motion (ROM), frequency of wrist and finger movements, and grip strength (dependent variables) were valued in three age groups and different starting positions (independent variables). The Hand Tutor device (MediTouch, Israel) and the electronic manual dynamometer EH 101 (Camry, China) for grip strength measurement (error of measurement, 0.5 kg/lb) were used. The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the frequency of movement (i.e., the number of cycles per second, where one cycle represents the movement from flexion to contraction) and the maximum range of movement, which is automatically measured during the frequency test, were performed over time 10 seconds (sensitivity: 0,05 [mm] of wrist and fingers Ext./Flex), the frequency of movement (motion capture speed: up to 1 [m/sec]). The test consisted of two motor tasks, carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and lying down (supine). During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was to be examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine position, the upper limb was stabilized at the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position). In each of the starting positions, after putting the glove on, the subject was asked to make moves as quickly and in as full a range as possible. Finally, the measurement of grip strength with a dynamometer was performed in both analyzed starting positions, after completing the range of motion and speed or frequency tests. The upper extremity tested in stroke patients was the paretic extremity. In healthy subjects, the dominant hand was tested.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
stroke, age, grip strength, coordination movement, stabilization

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
120 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
To improve the coordination of the wrist and hand after stroke in three age groups.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The test consisted of two motor tasks, carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and lying down (supine). During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was to be examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine position, the upper limb was stabilized at the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
hand motor coordination in a sitting positin
Other Intervention Name(s)
hand motor coordination in a supine position
Intervention Description
Before each test, the patient was instructed on how the exercise should be done. The test consisted of two motor tasks, carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and lying down (supine). During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was to be examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine position, the upper limb was stabilized at the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximum range of movement of the wrist [mm]
Description
Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM).
Time Frame
up to 1 week
Title
Frequency of wrist movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec
Description
The Hand Tutor allows measurements the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles
Time Frame
up to 1 week
Title
Frequency of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th finger movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec
Description
The Hand Tutor allows measurements the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles
Time Frame
up to 1 week
Title
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th finger maximum range of motion (ROM), [mm]
Description
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM).
Time Frame
up to 1 week
Title
Assessment of the grip strength
Description
Grip strength, kg (a manual electronic dynamometer (EH 101) was used for grip strength measurement (error of measurement, 0.5 kg/lb)
Time Frame
up to 1 week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:1) patients with ischemic stroke; 2) Trunk Control Test 70-100 points; 3) subjects who were in a state allowing movements of the upper extremity (FMA-UE 40-66 motor function points); 4) muscle tension (MAS 0 -1+); 5) no severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding; 6) at least 18 years of age. - Exclusion Criteria:1) stroke up to four weeks after the episode, 2) another neurological disease entity 3) lack of trunk stability, 4) no wrist and hand movement, 5) muscle tension (˃2 MAS), 6) high or very low blood pressure, 7) severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding; dizziness, the malaise of the respondents. Control group inclusion criteria: 1) the control group consisted of healthy subjects, free from the upper extremity motor coordination disorders; 2) at least 18 years of age. Control group exclusion criteria: 1) a history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, stroke, head injury, or other conditions that could affect their ability to active movement and grip hand; 2) severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding. -
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna Olczak, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Military Institute of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Anna Olczak
City
Warszawa
State/Province
Masovian District
ZIP/Postal Code
04-141
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Age and Body Position on Handgrip Strength and Movement Coordination of Upper Limb

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs