Comparison of Continuous ESP Versus TEA After Thoracotomy
Postoperative Pain
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Postoperative Pain focused on measuring thoracotomy, lung cancer, interfascial plane block, nerve block
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracotomy for lung cancer
- European Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification I-III
- Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with chronic postoperative pain after thoracic surgery
- patients undergoing thoracotomy with chest wall resection
- allergies to anesthetic or analgesic medications
- patients with coagulopathy or who continue to take anticoagulants
- preoperative liver or renal dysfunction
- patients with chronic pain, chronic opioid, analgesic or antidepressant or anticonvulsant use
- Do not understand our study
- Medical or psychological disease that can affect the treatment response
Sites / Locations
- Seoul National University HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Experimental
Active Comparator
Erector spinae plane block group (ESP group)
Thoracic epidural analgesia group (TEA group)
Patients receiving continuous unilateral ESP block. Interventions: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided unilateral ESP block via catheter placement for continuous infusion Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 21-gauge 85 mm perineural catheter, 18-gauge 100 mm stimulator needle (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France)
Patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Interventions: Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided thoracic epidural analgesia Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 17-gauge Tuohy needle (FlexTip Plus®, Teleflex Medical, USA)