search
Back to results

Comparison of Continuous ESP Versus TEA After Thoracotomy

Primary Purpose

Postoperative Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Erector spinae plane block group
Thoracic epidural analgesia group
Sponsored by
Seoul National University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Postoperative Pain focused on measuring thoracotomy, lung cancer, interfascial plane block, nerve block

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracotomy for lung cancer
  • European Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification I-III
  • Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with chronic postoperative pain after thoracic surgery
  • patients undergoing thoracotomy with chest wall resection
  • allergies to anesthetic or analgesic medications
  • patients with coagulopathy or who continue to take anticoagulants
  • preoperative liver or renal dysfunction
  • patients with chronic pain, chronic opioid, analgesic or antidepressant or anticonvulsant use
  • Do not understand our study
  • Medical or psychological disease that can affect the treatment response

Sites / Locations

  • Seoul National University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Erector spinae plane block group (ESP group)

Thoracic epidural analgesia group (TEA group)

Arm Description

Patients receiving continuous unilateral ESP block. Interventions: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided unilateral ESP block via catheter placement for continuous infusion Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 21-gauge 85 mm perineural catheter, 18-gauge 100 mm stimulator needle (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France)

Patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Interventions: Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided thoracic epidural analgesia Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 17-gauge Tuohy needle (FlexTip Plus®, Teleflex Medical, USA)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Maximum postoperative pain score at rest on postoperative day 1
pain score measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Postoperative pain score at rest
Change in the pain score at rest measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3
Postoperative pain score at movement
Change in the pain score at movement measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3
Change in the total consumption (ml) of patient-controlled analgesia
total consumption (ml) of epidural or erector spinae plane patient-controlled analgesia
Change in the quality of recovery-15 scale from baseline to postoperative day 3
measured by the Korean version of the quality of recovery-15
Postoperative pulmonary function test
measured at outpatient clinic
Incidence of chronic postoperative pain
measure by the Korean version of the pain DETECT
Incidence of chronic postoperative pain
measure by the Korean version of the pain DETECT

Full Information

First Posted
August 3, 2021
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Collaborators
Seoul National University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05008614
Brief Title
Comparison of Continuous ESP Versus TEA After Thoracotomy
Official Title
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Assessor-blinded Non-inferiority Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 22, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Collaborators
Seoul National University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded study is designed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing thoracotomy. We hypothesize that US-guided ESP block is not inferior to thoracic epidural analgesia in terms of postoperative pain control in these patients.
Detailed Description
Adult patients undergoing elective unilateral thoracotomy for lung cancer resection are randomly allocated to receive US-guided ESP block (n=31) or thoracic epidural analgesia (n=31). Both procedures are performed prior to surgery. Each patient was assessed by a blinded investigator on postoperative day (POD) 1,2 and 3. The primary outcome is pain severity evaluated by a numeric rating scale (NRS) at POD1.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Postoperative Pain
Keywords
thoracotomy, lung cancer, interfascial plane block, nerve block

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A prospective randomized controlled assessor-blinded non-inferiority trial
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The outcome assessor not involved in this study will investigate the outcomes.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Erector spinae plane block group (ESP group)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receiving continuous unilateral ESP block. Interventions: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided unilateral ESP block via catheter placement for continuous infusion Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 21-gauge 85 mm perineural catheter, 18-gauge 100 mm stimulator needle (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France)
Arm Title
Thoracic epidural analgesia group (TEA group)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Interventions: Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided thoracic epidural analgesia Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 17-gauge Tuohy needle (FlexTip Plus®, Teleflex Medical, USA)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Erector spinae plane block group
Other Intervention Name(s)
ESP group
Intervention Description
Before surgery, an anesthesiologist will perform unilateral ESP block with catheterization under ultrasound guidance in the procedure room. Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution 0.2% ropivacaine is continuously infused to the erector spinae plane at T5 level via 18G 85 mm perineural catheter (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France) (basal infusion: 10ml/hr, bolus 5ml, lockout time: 20min)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Thoracic epidural analgesia group
Other Intervention Name(s)
TEA group
Intervention Description
Before surgery, an anesthesiologist will perform unilateral ESP block with catheterization under fluoroscopy guidance in the procedure room. Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution 0.2% ropivacaine is continuously infused to the erector spinae plane at T5 level via 17-gauge catheter (FlexTip Plus®, Teleflex Medical, USA) (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France) (basal infusion: 3ml/hr, bolus 1ml, lockout time: 20min)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximum postoperative pain score at rest on postoperative day 1
Description
pain score measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain)
Time Frame
Maximum pain score among the 9 am and 4 pm measurements on postoperative day 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Postoperative pain score at rest
Description
Change in the pain score at rest measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3
Time Frame
9am/4pm on postoperative day 1, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 2, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 3
Title
Postoperative pain score at movement
Description
Change in the pain score at movement measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3
Time Frame
9am/4pm on postoperative day 1, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 2, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 3
Title
Change in the total consumption (ml) of patient-controlled analgesia
Description
total consumption (ml) of epidural or erector spinae plane patient-controlled analgesia
Time Frame
9am/4pm on postoperative day 1, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 2, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 3
Title
Change in the quality of recovery-15 scale from baseline to postoperative day 3
Description
measured by the Korean version of the quality of recovery-15
Time Frame
Day before surgery and 4pm on postoperative day 3
Title
Postoperative pulmonary function test
Description
measured at outpatient clinic
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Incidence of chronic postoperative pain
Description
measure by the Korean version of the pain DETECT
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Incidence of chronic postoperative pain
Description
measure by the Korean version of the pain DETECT
Time Frame
6 months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracotomy for lung cancer European Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification I-III Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document Exclusion Criteria: patients with chronic postoperative pain after thoracic surgery patients undergoing thoracotomy with chest wall resection allergies to anesthetic or analgesic medications patients with coagulopathy or who continue to take anticoagulants preoperative liver or renal dysfunction patients with chronic pain, chronic opioid, analgesic or antidepressant or anticonvulsant use Do not understand our study Medical or psychological disease that can affect the treatment response
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hojin Lee, MD
Phone
82-2-2072-0039
Email
zenerdiode03@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Susie Yoon, MD, PhD
Phone
82-2-2072-2467
Email
susiey87@gmail.com
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
KS013
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hojin Lee, MD
Phone
82-2-2072-2467
Email
zenerdiode03@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susie Yoon, MD, PhD
Phone
82-2-2072-2467
Email
susiey87@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Continuous ESP Versus TEA After Thoracotomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs