Minimal Invasive Volar Plating Versus Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Stable Non-displaced Distal Radial Fractures.

Minimal Invasive Volar Plating Versus Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Stable Non-displaced Distal Radial Fractures.

Minimal Invasive Volar Plating Versus Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Stable Non-displaced Distal Radial Fractures.

Nondisplaced distal radial fractures are nowadays treated by plaster cast immobilization. In this study, the investigators challenge this classical standard treatment with a surgical solution: minimal invasive volar plating with pronatus quadratus sparing approach. Potential benefits of this surgical treatment are higher cost effectiveness, economical benefit, earlier recuperation of professional and recreational activities, earlier functional recuperation by faster clinical recovery (range of motion, grip strength) and decreased risk of secondary fracture displacement. Potential drawbacks are surgical risks and complications.

Randomized controlled trial Number still to be determined by power analysis on economical outcome measurement Similar study number = 90 Randomization by computer. RZ Tienen, Dr Goorens Level 4 hand surgeon Inclusion criteria: Stable distal radial fractures (volar tilt <10° dorsal tilt, <2mm impaction, <2mm articular depression) 18 - 65 years, professional active Exclusion criteria: associated lesions, open fractures, unstable, displaced fractures neurological disorder affecting the upper limb, history of wrist lesion involving the same wrist, dementia, substance abuse, severe psychiatric disorder and previous injured contralateral wrist Treatment Cast treatment: 6 weeks with 1 plaster exchange of after 2 weeks Minimal invasive plating: no cast Followup 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year Primary PROM: Cost effectiveness: QALY SF-36 Direct costs: surgery, hospitalisation, follow-up consultations, imaging, medication, wound care, nurse cost, physiotherapy cost Indirect costs: loss of productivity (SF-HLQ) Health insurances costs Confounding factors Independent vs servant Insurance? Work type? Age, sex, dominance Work absence, professional recuperation Recreational sport resumption Secondary PROM ROM (F/E/RD/UD/P/S) Grip strength (Jamar) Pain (VAS) DASH scare, PRWE score Satisfaction (VAS), would you do it again? RX ulna variance, radial tilt complications

Blinding of results by computer of the outcome results. Blinding of the patients or the care provider is not possible due to the obvious differences.

Using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) assessment - cost effectiveness (The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability.)

Inclusion Criteria: Stable distal radial fractures (volar tilt <10° dorsal tilt, <2mm impaction, <2mm articular depression) 18 - 65 years, professional active Exclusion Criteria: associated lesions, open fractures, unstable, displaced fractures neurological disorder affecting the upper limb, history of wrist lesion involving the same wrist, dementia, substance abuse, severe psychiatric disorder and previous injured contralateral wrist