search
Back to results

Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) Combined With Allograft in Treatment of Calcaneus Fractures (BMAC)

Primary Purpose

Fractures, Bone

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Autograft
Allograft only
Allograft combined with BMAC
Sponsored by
University of Alabama at Birmingham
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fractures, Bone focused on measuring calcaneus fracture, bone graft, bone marrow aspirate, stem cells

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Closed displaced intra-articular fracture without any evidence of nerve or blood vessel injury, the fractures belonged to Sanders type III according to Sanders classification and amenable to open reduction internal fixation
  • Life expectancy of at least 1 year
  • Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and able to comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen
  • Adequate soft tissue coverage at the fracture site through primary closure.
  • Unilateral or bilateral calcaneal fractures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or planning on becoming pregnant during the investigational period
  • Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c levels > 10%)
  • A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
  • Currently has untreated malignant neoplasm(s), or is currently undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy.
  • Inadequate neurovascular status in the involved limb that may jeopardize healing.
  • Patients who have a preexisting calcaneus deformity that cannot accommodate a reduction or a previous history of osteomyelitis in the index limb.
  • Other ipsilateral lower extremity fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    Autograft

    Allograft only

    Allograft combined with BMAC

    Arm Description

    Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group an autograft will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of autologous grafting, cancellous strips of bone will be harvested from the posterior superior iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). This will be the control arm.

    Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) will be used to fill the void. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s).

    Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) combined with BMAC will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of BMAC preparation, bone marrow will be collected from iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s).

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 17, 2021
    Last Updated
    July 27, 2023
    Sponsor
    University of Alabama at Birmingham
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05017961
    Brief Title
    Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) Combined With Allograft in Treatment of Calcaneus Fractures
    Acronym
    BMAC
    Official Title
    Randomized Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Combined With Cryopreserve Allograft Bone in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    July 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    Unfortunately this study didn't receive funding.
    Study Start Date
    July 10, 2019 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 10, 2019 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    July 10, 2019 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BMAC when used in conjunction with viable allograft bone for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, in terms of rate of allograft incorporation into the host tissue, bone healing, and functional outcome.
    Detailed Description
    The study group will consist of patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures admitted to our academic level I trauma center that underwent open reduction internal fixation. Inclusion criteria will be patients with a closed displaced intra-articular fracture Sanders type III without any evidence of neurovascular injury. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups according to the plan of management: autograft alone, viable allograft combined with BMAC, or viable allograft alone. Radiographic imaging and three-dimensional standing computed tomography will be used to assess the articular surface, Bohler's angle, the crucial angle of Gissane, and the height, width and length of the calcaneus. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind-foot scoring system and visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to post-operative evaluation of the patients.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Fractures, Bone
    Keywords
    calcaneus fracture, bone graft, bone marrow aspirate, stem cells

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Autograft
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group an autograft will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of autologous grafting, cancellous strips of bone will be harvested from the posterior superior iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). This will be the control arm.
    Arm Title
    Allograft only
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) will be used to fill the void. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s).
    Arm Title
    Allograft combined with BMAC
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) combined with BMAC will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of BMAC preparation, bone marrow will be collected from iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s).
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Autograft
    Intervention Description
    An autograft bone will be harvested from proximal tibia or posterior superior iliac crest. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest or proximal tibia are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. After 1 cm skin incision and gentle dissection of subcutaneous soft tissue, the bone harvesting device inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tissues until it reaches the cortical bone. Then, manual pressure is used to position the bone harvesting device against the dense cortical bone. A battery-powered power instrument is then will be used to drill the harvesting device into the medullary cavity. After the harvesting device insertion the cancellous strips of bone will be harvested and applied to the fracture site gap.At the conclusion of autograft bone harvesting procedure, the wound will be closed with 3-0 Nylon and a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Allograft only
    Intervention Description
    The jar containing allograft tissue and cryopreservation solution will be placed in a sterile basin containing a warm (35°C to 39°C; 95°F to 102.2°F) sterile irrigant (Normal saline or 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution). The jar containing the allograft will remain in this solution until the contents of the jar flows freely upon inversion. The jar will be removed from the warm solution once free-flowing. Sterile gauze or the optional strainer will be used to decant the cryopreservation solution into a waste container. 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution will be added to the indicated fill line to immerse the allograft tissue. The cap will be replaced and inverted twice to suspend tissue until ready for use. 5% Dextrose will be decanted in Lactated Ringer's Solution prior to use. Implant will be used within 2 hours of thawing.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Allograft combined with BMAC
    Intervention Description
    A bone marrow aspiration kit will be used for bone marrow aspiration. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest and sacroiliac joint are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. Then, the bone marrow aspiration trochar and needle are percutaneously inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tis- sues until it reaches the posterior iliac crest. The trajectory of the needle will be parallel to the iliac crest, or perpendicular to the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) or Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS), depending on the harvest site used. After the trochar is inserted into the posterior iliac crest but prior to aspiration, 1 mL of heparin (1,000 U/mL) will be preloaded into the syringe. Approximately 60 mL of bone marrow will be aspirated, which requires the use of two 30-mL syringes. At the conclusion of BMAC harvesting, a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    Description
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 6 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    Description
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 12 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    Description
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 24 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
    Description
    The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 52 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Description
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 6 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Description
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 12 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Description
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 24 weeks
    Title
    Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
    Description
    The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
    Time Frame
    baseline to 52 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    75 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Closed displaced intra-articular fracture without any evidence of nerve or blood vessel injury, the fractures belonged to Sanders type III according to Sanders classification and amenable to open reduction internal fixation Life expectancy of at least 1 year Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and able to comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen Adequate soft tissue coverage at the fracture site through primary closure. Unilateral or bilateral calcaneal fractures. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or breastfeeding women or planning on becoming pregnant during the investigational period Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c levels > 10%) A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis Currently has untreated malignant neoplasm(s), or is currently undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Inadequate neurovascular status in the involved limb that may jeopardize healing. Patients who have a preexisting calcaneus deformity that cannot accommodate a reduction or a previous history of osteomyelitis in the index limb. Other ipsilateral lower extremity fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Michael Johnson, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) Combined With Allograft in Treatment of Calcaneus Fractures

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs