search
Back to results

Cerebral Palsy Upper Extremity Orthotic Device

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Palsy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Upper Extremity Orthotic
Occupational Therapy
Sponsored by
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Palsy

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of cerebral palsy, age 4-17 years, moderate-severe hand disability as graded by the Manual Ability Classification System, active movement of the elbow, ability to follow commands and participate in goal-making and repetitive tasks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mild or extremely severe hand disability, Botox or orthopaedic surgery within the past 6 months, severe contractures, lack of voluntary arm motion, unable to follow commands due to severe cognitive impairment

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Orthotic + Occupational Therapy

    Occupational Therapy alone

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in Assisting Hand Assessment from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) is a test of hand function in children with difficulties using one of their hands. The AHA measures how effectively the affected hand and arm is used in bimanual performance. An assessment is performed by observing the child's spontaneous handling of toys in a relaxed and playful session. The scale is 0-100, and a higher score indicates better function. A change of +5 is clinically significant.
    Change in Melbourne Assessment-2 from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    The Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) is a valid and reliable criterion-referenced test for evaluating four elements of upper limb movement quality in children with a neurological impairment aged 2.5 to 15 years: (i) Range of movement, (ii) Accuracy of reach and placement, (iii) Dexterity of grasp, release and manipulation and (iv) Fluency of movement. The full test comprises 14 test items which require a child to reach to, grasp, release and manipulate simple objects. Each child's test performance is video recorded for subsequent scoring. Scoring is completed across the 30 score items using a three, four or five point scale and individually defined scoring criteria. Item scores relating to each element of movement measured are summed within the corresponding sub-scale. A raw score scale change of 3 for range of motion, dexterity, and fluency; and a change of 4 for accuracy is considered clinically significant.
    Change in Children's Hand Use Experience Questionnaire from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    CHEQ is a newly developed questionnaire. It has been developed for children and adolescents with decreased function in one hand, for example hemiplegic CP, obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) and upper limb reduction deficiency, and for their parents. The scale is 0-100, with the higher score indicating better abilities.
    Change in range of motion for shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in motion analysis parameters from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 3, 2021
    Last Updated
    August 26, 2021
    Sponsor
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05024409
    Brief Title
    Cerebral Palsy Upper Extremity Orthotic Device
    Official Title
    Use of Low Cost Orthotic Device to Improve Upper Extremity Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    September 2021 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 2022 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2022 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Upper extremity therapies for children with cerebral palsy (CP) have been validated for improving function in higher functioning patients. Those who function at the lowest end of the scale, on the Manual Ability Classification System scale (MACS) III-V, comprise 34-54% of the population, but as yet have no evidence-based interventions specific to their needs. Lower functioning children often retain some voluntary control of the elbow in spite of limited finger motion. A dynamic splint, or exoskeleton, could utilize the tenodesis effect from elbow motion to drive finger release while retaining flexor tone for grasp, potentially creating a portable, home-based therapeutic tool. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an upper extremity orthotic device in improving the upper extremity function of children with cerebral palsy who have limited use of their hands.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cerebral Palsy

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    36 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Orthotic + Occupational Therapy
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Occupational Therapy alone
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Upper Extremity Orthotic
    Intervention Description
    3D printed orthotic which uses elbow motion to facilitate finger extension
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Occupational Therapy
    Intervention Description
    6 weekly sessions of occupational therapy, without use of an assistive orthotic device
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Assisting Hand Assessment from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    Description
    The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) is a test of hand function in children with difficulties using one of their hands. The AHA measures how effectively the affected hand and arm is used in bimanual performance. An assessment is performed by observing the child's spontaneous handling of toys in a relaxed and playful session. The scale is 0-100, and a higher score indicates better function. A change of +5 is clinically significant.
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 6 months
    Title
    Change in Melbourne Assessment-2 from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    Description
    The Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) is a valid and reliable criterion-referenced test for evaluating four elements of upper limb movement quality in children with a neurological impairment aged 2.5 to 15 years: (i) Range of movement, (ii) Accuracy of reach and placement, (iii) Dexterity of grasp, release and manipulation and (iv) Fluency of movement. The full test comprises 14 test items which require a child to reach to, grasp, release and manipulate simple objects. Each child's test performance is video recorded for subsequent scoring. Scoring is completed across the 30 score items using a three, four or five point scale and individually defined scoring criteria. Item scores relating to each element of movement measured are summed within the corresponding sub-scale. A raw score scale change of 3 for range of motion, dexterity, and fluency; and a change of 4 for accuracy is considered clinically significant.
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 6 months
    Title
    Change in Children's Hand Use Experience Questionnaire from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    Description
    CHEQ is a newly developed questionnaire. It has been developed for children and adolescents with decreased function in one hand, for example hemiplegic CP, obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) and upper limb reduction deficiency, and for their parents. The scale is 0-100, with the higher score indicating better abilities.
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 6 months
    Title
    Change in range of motion for shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    Time Frame
    pre treatment, immediate post treatment, and 3 month followup
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in motion analysis parameters from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment
    Time Frame
    pre treatment, immediate post treatment

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    4 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    17 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: diagnosis of cerebral palsy, age 4-17 years, moderate-severe hand disability as graded by the Manual Ability Classification System, active movement of the elbow, ability to follow commands and participate in goal-making and repetitive tasks Exclusion Criteria: mild or extremely severe hand disability, Botox or orthopaedic surgery within the past 6 months, severe contractures, lack of voluntary arm motion, unable to follow commands due to severe cognitive impairment

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Cerebral Palsy Upper Extremity Orthotic Device

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs