Health Care Workers and Mental Health

The purpose of this proposal is to deploy digital health interventions to bring timely, easily accessible resources and care to address the mental health and well-being needs of HCWs with direct patient care that are experiencing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic, financial, and social sequelae at present and presumably for years to come. This proposal will evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced digital mental health care delivery system (Cobalt), any differential effect by race and gender and, through qualitative interviews, how those interventions are perceived.

The purpose of this proposal is to deploy digital health interventions to bring timely, easily accessible resources and care to address the mental health and well-being needs of HCWs with direct patient care that are experiencing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic, financial, and social sequelae at present and presumably for years to come. This proposal will evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced digital mental health care delivery system (Cobalt), any differential effect by race and gender and, through qualitative interviews, how those interventions are perceived. No Intervention: Usual Care, Participants will complete baseline surveys at enrollment and then complete subsequent surveys (depression, anxiety, well-being, satisfaction with access to care, work productivity, hours of direct patient care, percent of time providing care for patients with COVID-19) at enrollment; 0 months, 6 months, and 9 months. Behavioral: Cobalt +: Participants will complete baseline surveys at enrollment and then complete subsequent surveys (depression, anxiety, well-being, satisfaction with access to care, work productivity) at enrollment; 0 months and then again at 6 months. The primary endpoint is assessed at 6 months. A secondary endpoint of persistence of effect is measured 3 months later-9 months post initiation. The intervention group receives usual Cobalt plus: 1) monthly automated text messaging reminders and links to Cobalt resources 2) intermittent mental health assessments which triage individuals to an appointment based on their results.

Participants will complete baseline surveys at enrollment and then complete subsequent surveys (depression, anxiety, well-being, satisfaction with access to care, work productivity, hours of direct patient care, percent of time providing care for patients with COVID-19) at enrollment; 0 months, 6 months, and 9 months.

Participants will complete baseline surveys at enrollment and then complete subsequent surveys (depression, anxiety, well-being, satisfaction with access to care, work productivity) at enrollment; 0 months and then again at 6 months and 9 months. The intervention group receives usual Cobalt plus: 1) monthly automated text messaging reminders and links to Cobalt resources 2) intermittent mental health assessments which triage individuals to an appointment based on their results.

Participants will complete baseline surveys at enrollment and then complete subsequent surveys (depression, anxiety, well-being, satisfaction with access to care, work productivity) at enrollment; 0 months and then again at 6 months. The primary endpoint is assessed at 6 months. A secondary endpoint of persistence of effect is measured 3 months later-9 months post initiation. The intervention group receives usual Cobalt plus: 1) monthly automated text messaging reminders and links to Cobalt resources 2) intermittent mental health assessments which triage individuals to an appointment based on their results.

Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The PHQ-9 incorporates DSM-IV depression diagnostic criteria with other leading major depressive symptoms into a brief self-report tool. PHQ-9 is brief and useful in clinical practice. The PHQ-9 is completed by the patient in minutes and is rapidly scored by the clinician. The PHQ-9 is a freely available mood-rating questionnaire consisting of nine questions mirroring DSM-IV depression diagnostic criteria. The PHQ-9 has shown diagnostic validity in a study of 3,000 adult patients. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 to 3, giving a maximum score of 24. Cut-off scores are used to label depression severity as: 0 to 4, minimal depression; 5 to 9, mild depression; 10 to 14, moderate depression; 15 to 19, moderately severe depression; 20 to 24, severe depression.

GAD-7 is a 7-item anxiety scale. It has good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. Each item is rated according to the frequency of the described problem. The responses are scored as follows: 0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, 3 = nearly every day with a maximum score of 21 Scores are interpreted as 5 to 9, mild anxiety; 10 to 14, moderate anxiety; and 15 and above, severe anxiety. The GAD-7 showed good reliability and criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity in a study carried out in 15 primary care clinics. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.

The Well-being index (WBI) is a nine-question survey validated for use in Health Care Worker populations and considered important to health systems in managing the well-being of their workforce.

To evaluate work productivity, we will use Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale, or LEAPS. It is a 10-item, self-rated scale that takes only 3 to 5 minutes for the patient to complete. It is simple and easy to use. The items were chosen based on the symptoms that have the most impact on work productivity and the most common productivity problems experienced by patients with depression. The LEAPS was recently validated in a sample of 234 consecutive working patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD attending a mood disorders outpatient clinic (Lam et al, 2009).

Satisfaction Index- Mental Health (SIMH)(Nabati, Shea, McBride, Gavin, & Bauer, 1998). The SIMH is a 12-item, self-report instrument developed to measure patient satisfaction with mental health care (Nabati, et al., 1998). The SIMH has high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90), test- retest reliability (r = 0.79, p = 0.05), and sensitivity to change (Nabati, et al., 1998).

The 5-item World Health Organization Well- Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most widely used questionnaires assessing subjective psychological well-being. Scoring principle: The raw score ranging from 0 to 25 is multiplied by 4 to give the final score from 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being to 100 representing the best imaginable well-being (Topp et al. 2015)

System Usability Scale (SUS) provides a "quick and dirty", reliable tool for measuring the usability. It consists of a 10-item questionnaire with five response options for respondents; from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. Originally created by John Brooke in 1986, it allows you to evaluate a wide variety of products and services, including hardware, software, mobile devices, websites and applications.

WHODAS is a 12-item questionnaire asks about difficulties due to health conditions. Health conditions include diseases or illnesses, other health problems that may be short or long lasting, injuries, mental or emotional problems, and problems with alcohol or drugs. Think back over the past 30 days and answer these questions, thinking about how much difficulty you had doing the following activities. For each question, please circle only one response.

Inclusion Criteria: Aged 18 years or older Regular, daily access to an smartphone Able to communicate fluently in English Work at least 4 hours per week in either a hospital or outpatient based setting. This includes health care workers like physicians, nurses, certified nursing assistants, lab technicians, radiology technicians, physical therapist, occupational therapist, pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, patient registration staff, receptionists/patient intake coordinators, environmental and food service personnel approximately 4 hours/week. This averages 192 hours/ 48 weeks in a year) in the study time frame. Exclusion Criteria: Not aged 18 years or older Does not have regular, daily access to a smartphone Unable to communicate fluently in English Does not work at least 4 hours per week in either a hospital or outpatient based setting. Not willing to sign the informed consent document