Efficacy of a Hemostatic Agent (PuraStat®) in Reducing Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Primary Purpose
Colo-rectal Cancer
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with Purastat
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Colo-rectal Cancer focused on measuring Resection, Colorectal lesions, bleeding, ESD
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of both sexes aged 18 years or older
- Patient with a validated indication for colonoscopy for colorectal lesions
- Patients with a single colorectal lesion to be resected by ESD according to European recommendations.
- Patients with a colorectal neoplastic lesion (≥3 cm)
- Patients taking anticoagulants (acetylsalicylic acid >300 mg/day) or antiplatelet agents (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel) and managed according to European recommendations for ESD (including patients who may require heparin replacement)
- Written consent signed after clear, fair, and understood information.
- Patients with social security coverage.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who may have an allergic reaction to the substances of PuraStat®.
- Patients with severe fibrosis
- Patients with a history of familial colorectal polyposis (familial adenomatous, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome)
- Patients with a score ASA greater than or equal to 4 or 5
- Patients with a platelet count of 50,000/mm3
- Patients with acquired (non-medicated) or inherited bleeding disorders
- Patients who are being treated with acetylsalicylic acid but whose treatment is discontinued at the time of the procedure (therapeutic window)
- Patients with advanced cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis (with colonic involvement)
- Contraindication to general anesthesia
- Patients with a mental disorder, drug addiction, alcoholism, etc.
- Pregnant women or women wishing to become pregnant during the study
- Patients already participating or scheduled to participate in other clinical trials
- Lesion that has been previously resected by mucosectomy
- Patient with an initial metastatic lesion prior to colonoscopy.
- Patient unable to give personal consent
- Lack of signed informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Hopital Edouard HerriotRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with Purastat
Comparative arm without Purastat
Arm Description
To compare of the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection, after ESD, application of Purastat gel (not a drug but a device with CE mark) with a catheter of a gel on the resected area to cover the whole surface of mucosal resection.
After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hemostasis, if the patient is randomized in the comparative group, no gel will be applied on the resected area that will remain like this without intervention (common practice)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of delayed bleeding after surgery (ESD)
Percentage of delayed bleeding is expressed primarily by the number of patients with at least one unplanned colorectal endoscopy occurring within 30 days of surgery (ESD)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Rate of emergency endoscopy use by risk factors for secondary bleeding
Number of patients with at least one unplanned colorectal endoscopy by factors for secondary bleeding occurring within 30 days of ESD.
Rate of emergency endoscopic hemostasis use by risk factors for secondary bleeding
Number of patients requiring hemostasis, unplanned occurring within 30 days of ESD.
Rate of cases requiring transfusion related to post-ESD bleeding
Number of patients for whom at least one transfusion was ordered after the ESD
Rate of adverse events related to procedures (delayed perforation and stenosis) in each of the 2 arms
Number of patients with at least one delayed perforation or one symptomatic stenosis.
Rate and duration of hospitalizations
Number of hospitalizations and number of days of hospitalization per stay within 30 days after ESD
Tolerance of PuraStat
Number of patients with at least one irritation or thromboembolic accidents.
Evaluation of the gel application time on the resection area
Time between introduction and removal of the PuraStat® catheter.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05031325
Brief Title
Efficacy of a Hemostatic Agent (PuraStat®) in Reducing Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Official Title
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Hemostatic Agent (PuraStat®) in Reducing Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Colorectal Submucosal Dissection
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 28, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 28, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 26, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mathieu Pioche
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The problem of delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection is becoming important due to the growing number of indications for anti-aggregation or anticoagulant treatment for cardiovascular reasons in the aging populations. Previous studies have shown that in patients at high risk of bleeding, the use of (PuraStat®), a simple and easily applicable solution, decreases the rate of delayed bleeding by promoting wound healing. Various preventive treatments, such as the prophylactic use of clips, have been tried to prevent the occurrence of delayed bleeding, but to date, no treatment has clearly shown its effectiveness. In addition, preventive hemostasis with clips is difficult and costly. The main objective is to compare the efficacy of PuraStat® to the standard treatment in reducing delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD in patients at high risk of delayed bleeding. The secondary objectives are to compare the same two strategies in terms of effectiveness and side effects. The primary outcome measure is the percentage of delayed bleeding at 30 days after surgery (ESD).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colo-rectal Cancer
Keywords
Resection, Colorectal lesions, bleeding, ESD
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
288 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with Purastat
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
To compare of the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection, after ESD, application of Purastat gel (not a drug but a device with CE mark) with a catheter of a gel on the resected area to cover the whole surface of mucosal resection.
Arm Title
Comparative arm without Purastat
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hemostasis, if the patient is randomized in the comparative group, no gel will be applied on the resected area that will remain like this without intervention (common practice)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with Purastat
Intervention Description
Purastat (peptidic gel) application
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of delayed bleeding after surgery (ESD)
Description
Percentage of delayed bleeding is expressed primarily by the number of patients with at least one unplanned colorectal endoscopy occurring within 30 days of surgery (ESD)
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of emergency endoscopy use by risk factors for secondary bleeding
Description
Number of patients with at least one unplanned colorectal endoscopy by factors for secondary bleeding occurring within 30 days of ESD.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Rate of emergency endoscopic hemostasis use by risk factors for secondary bleeding
Description
Number of patients requiring hemostasis, unplanned occurring within 30 days of ESD.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Rate of cases requiring transfusion related to post-ESD bleeding
Description
Number of patients for whom at least one transfusion was ordered after the ESD
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Rate of adverse events related to procedures (delayed perforation and stenosis) in each of the 2 arms
Description
Number of patients with at least one delayed perforation or one symptomatic stenosis.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Rate and duration of hospitalizations
Description
Number of hospitalizations and number of days of hospitalization per stay within 30 days after ESD
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Tolerance of PuraStat
Description
Number of patients with at least one irritation or thromboembolic accidents.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Title
Evaluation of the gel application time on the resection area
Description
Time between introduction and removal of the PuraStat® catheter.
Time Frame
During the intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients of both sexes aged 18 years or older
Patient with a validated indication for colonoscopy for colorectal lesions
Patients with a single colorectal lesion to be resected by ESD according to European recommendations.
Patients with a colorectal neoplastic lesion (≥3 cm)
Patients taking anticoagulants (acetylsalicylic acid >300 mg/day) or antiplatelet agents (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel) and managed according to European recommendations for ESD (including patients who may require heparin replacement)
Written consent signed after clear, fair, and understood information.
Patients with social security coverage.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who may have an allergic reaction to the substances of PuraStat®.
Patients with severe fibrosis
Patients with a history of familial colorectal polyposis (familial adenomatous, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome)
Patients with a score ASA greater than or equal to 4 or 5
Patients with a platelet count of 50,000/mm3
Patients with acquired (non-medicated) or inherited bleeding disorders
Patients who are being treated with acetylsalicylic acid but whose treatment is discontinued at the time of the procedure (therapeutic window)
Patients with advanced cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis (with colonic involvement)
Contraindication to general anesthesia
Patients with a mental disorder, drug addiction, alcoholism, etc.
Pregnant women or women wishing to become pregnant during the study
Patients already participating or scheduled to participate in other clinical trials
Lesion that has been previously resected by mucosectomy
Patient with an initial metastatic lesion prior to colonoscopy.
Patient unable to give personal consent
Lack of signed informed consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mathieu PIOCHE, Pr
Phone
+ 33 4 72 11 03 43
Email
mathieu.pioche@chu-lyon.fr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hopital Edouard Herriot
City
Lyon
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mathieu PIOCHE, PI
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of a Hemostatic Agent (PuraStat®) in Reducing Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs