search
Back to results

Navigate - Improving Survival in Vulnerable Lung Cancer Patients

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NAVIGATE
Sponsored by
Zealand University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lung Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years of age
  • Diagnosed with NSCLC at all stages regardless of treatment intension at the participating departments
  • Performance status ≤ 2
  • Vulnerable according to pre-defined criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe untreated psychiatric disorder (e.g. psychosis) or cognitive problems (e.g. dementia) preventing informed consent
  • Not able to receive treatment
  • Not able to read and understand Danish -

Sites / Locations

  • Gødstrup Hospital
  • Odense University HospitalRecruiting
  • Zealand University HospitalRecruiting
  • Sønderborg SygehusRecruiting
  • Vejle SygehusRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

NAVIGATE intervention arm

Navigate control arm

Arm Description

Nurse navigation

Standard treatment and care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall survival
Measured from death from all causes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall survival
Measured by death from all causes
Overall survival
Measured by death from all causes
Adherence to cancer treatment
Measured by date of skipped treatments or delays if any, and dose administered
Adherence to cancer treatment
Measured by date of skipped treatments or delays if any, and dose administered
Adherence to cancer treatment
Measured by date of skipped treatments or delays if any, and dose administered
Symptom burden and health related quality of life
Measured by EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss,neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Symptom burden and health related quality of life
Measured by EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Symptom burden and health related quality of life
Measured by EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss,neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention.
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention.
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention.
Health behavior
Measured by single-items questions related to physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking behavior
Health behavior
Measured by single-items questions related to physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking behavior.
Health behavior
Measured by single-items questions related to physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking behavior.
Self-efficacy and self-activation
Measured by single items from Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEIQ)
Self-efficacy and self-activation
Measured by single items from Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEIQ)
Self-efficacy and self-activation
Measured by single items from Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEIQ)
Rehabilitation services
Measured by single item question
Rehabilitation services
Measured by single item question
Rehabilitation services
Measured by single item question
Process evaluation
Evaluation by participant-observations during training and patient sessions with subsequent qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants about their experience of the intervention components; however, only among participants who provide informed consent for this. Focus group interviews with nurse navigators and physiotherapists will be conducted about their perceptions of the intervention (facilitators and barriers). Additionally, evaluation of intervention components will be measured using quantitative single-items questions
Process evaluation
Evaluation by participant-observations during training and patient sessions with subsequent qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants about their experience of the intervention components; however, only among participants who provide informed consent for this. Focus group interviews with nurse navigators and physiotherapists will be conducted about their perceptions of the intervention (facilitators and barriers). Additionally, evaluation of intervention components will be measured using quantitative single-items questions.
Cost-effectiveness
Evaluation by health care costs and QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) between the two groups.

Full Information

First Posted
September 13, 2021
Last Updated
August 18, 2022
Sponsor
Zealand University Hospital
Collaborators
Danish Cancer Society, Odense University Hospital, Vejle Hospital, Hospital of Southern Jutland
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05053997
Brief Title
Navigate - Improving Survival in Vulnerable Lung Cancer Patients
Official Title
NAVIGATE - Improving Survival in Vulnerable Lung Cancer Patients Through Nurse Navigation, Symptom Monitoring and Exercise: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Zealand University Hospital
Collaborators
Danish Cancer Society, Odense University Hospital, Vejle Hospital, Hospital of Southern Jutland

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Half of patients with lung cancer face a limited life span of one-year survival, which is characterized by severe physical and psychological symptoms. Differences in stage, comorbidity but also treatment may explain a large proportion of the social inequality in lung cancer survival. Some vulnerable patients may not receive first line treatment as planned either due to poor performance status or if they are not able to adhere to treatment appointments. Knowing how to navigate the health system may be a barrier preventing vulnerable patients in receiving optimal treatment. The primary aim of this randomised, controlled trial is to test whether a nurse-led individually tailored program including systematic screening of symptoms using PROs and a physical training program will significantly improve overall survival among vulnerable lung cancer patients compared with standard care. Secondary outcomes include adherence to cancer treatment, symptom burden and health related quality of life.
Detailed Description
During an 18-month period, consecutive newly diagnosed (< 1 week) lung cancer patients will be pre-screened for eligibility and invited to participate at departments of oncology or respiratory medicine in Denmark. Participants (N=518) will be randomized (1:1) to standard treatment plus the intervention (intervention group) or standard treatment (control group) and followed for 1 year. Patients randomized to the control group will receive standard treatment and care consisting of a nurse and a physician, who sees the patient at treatment schedules and during follow-up, i.e. every 3 months for the first 2 years and subsequently annually up to 5 years. Data will be collected from the intervention and the control group at baseline within 2 week after diagnosis, and 3, 6 months and 12 months after diagnosis. Physical tests will be performed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Baseline physical tests will be allowed after randomization if patients have difficulties in attentending the physiotherapy department within 2 weeks after their diagnosis. Considering that participating patients are vulnerable with limited resources we will proactively support patients in responding to questionnaires electronically, on paper or via telephone as per patient's preference allowing evaluation of the secondary outcomes as well as covariates and mechanisms. The primary outcome and treatment factors will be obtained from the lung cancer clinical database and individual medical journals. In order to develop costutility analyses, information on use of health services will be retrieved from the national registers.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
518 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NAVIGATE intervention arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nurse navigation
Arm Title
Navigate control arm
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard treatment and care
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
NAVIGATE
Intervention Description
Patients' symptoms are systematically monitored by use of bi-weekly patient reported outcomes and nurse navigators will initiate appropriate actions in terms of medical treatment or guidance of self-management strategies. Nurse navigators will motivate and support patients in health behavior changes and in selfmanaging their treatment and symptoms, and, if relevant, refer to existing rehabilitation services at the hospital or at the local rehabilitation center. Physiotherapists will supervise a training program aimed at improving patients' physical function and thus potentially surgery and overall treatment adherence and outcomes.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Description
Measured from death from all causes
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Description
Measured by death from all causes
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Overall survival
Description
Measured by death from all causes
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Adherence to cancer treatment
Description
Measured by date of skipped treatments or delays if any, and dose administered
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Adherence to cancer treatment
Description
Measured by date of skipped treatments or delays if any, and dose administered
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Adherence to cancer treatment
Description
Measured by date of skipped treatments or delays if any, and dose administered
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Title
Symptom burden and health related quality of life
Description
Measured by EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss,neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Symptom burden and health related quality of life
Description
Measured by EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Symptom burden and health related quality of life
Description
Measured by EORTC Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the lung module (QLQ-LC13). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire consists of 30 questions with five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. The QLQ-LC13 module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (hair loss,neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Title
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
Description
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention.
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
Description
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention.
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Quality of life (QOL) measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
Description
EQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention.
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Title
Health behavior
Description
Measured by single-items questions related to physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking behavior
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Health behavior
Description
Measured by single-items questions related to physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking behavior.
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Health behavior
Description
Measured by single-items questions related to physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking behavior.
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Title
Self-efficacy and self-activation
Description
Measured by single items from Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEIQ)
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Self-efficacy and self-activation
Description
Measured by single items from Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEIQ)
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Self-efficacy and self-activation
Description
Measured by single items from Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HEIQ)
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Title
Rehabilitation services
Description
Measured by single item question
Time Frame
3 months from randomization
Title
Rehabilitation services
Description
Measured by single item question
Time Frame
6 months from randomization
Title
Rehabilitation services
Description
Measured by single item question
Time Frame
12 months from randomization
Title
Process evaluation
Description
Evaluation by participant-observations during training and patient sessions with subsequent qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants about their experience of the intervention components; however, only among participants who provide informed consent for this. Focus group interviews with nurse navigators and physiotherapists will be conducted about their perceptions of the intervention (facilitators and barriers). Additionally, evaluation of intervention components will be measured using quantitative single-items questions
Time Frame
3 months from evaluation
Title
Process evaluation
Description
Evaluation by participant-observations during training and patient sessions with subsequent qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants about their experience of the intervention components; however, only among participants who provide informed consent for this. Focus group interviews with nurse navigators and physiotherapists will be conducted about their perceptions of the intervention (facilitators and barriers). Additionally, evaluation of intervention components will be measured using quantitative single-items questions.
Time Frame
12 months from evaluation
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Description
Evaluation by health care costs and QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) between the two groups.
Time Frame
12 months from randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years of age Diagnosed with NSCLC at all stages regardless of treatment intension at the participating departments Performance status ≤ 2 Vulnerable according to pre-defined criteria Exclusion Criteria: Severe untreated psychiatric disorder (e.g. psychosis) or cognitive problems (e.g. dementia) preventing informed consent Not able to receive treatment Not able to read and understand Danish -
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rikke Langballe, PhD
Phone
+45 35 25 79 72
Email
ril@cancer.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Randi V Karlsen, MEd
Phone
+45 35 25 76 65
Email
randi@cancer.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susanne O Dalton, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Zealand University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pernille E Bidstrup, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Danish Cancer Society
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erik Jakobsen, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The Danish Lung Cancer Research Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Gødstrup Hospital
City
Herning
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Halla Skuladottir
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Trine Heide Øllegaard
Facility Name
Odense University Hospital
City
Odense
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christian Borbjerg Laursen
Email
Christian.B.Laursen@rsyd.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Line Larsen
Email
Line.Larsen2@rsyd.dk
Facility Name
Zealand University Hospital
City
Roskilde
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mads Nordahl Svendsen
Email
mnsv@regionsjaelland.dk
Facility Name
Sønderborg Sygehus
City
Sønderborg
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Wedervang
Email
Kim.Wedervang@rsyd.dk
Facility Name
Vejle Sygehus
City
Vejle
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ole Hilberg
Email
Ole.Hilberg@rsyd.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirsten Jones
Email
Kirsten.Jones@rsyd.dk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36316074
Citation
Langballe R, Dalton SO, Jakobsen E, Karlsen RV, Iachina M, Freund KM, Leclair A, Nielsen AS, Andersen EAW, Rosthoj S, Jorgensen LB, Skou ST, Bidstrup PE. NAVIGATE: improving survival in vulnerable patients with lung cancer through nurse navigation, symptom monitoring and exercise - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e060242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060242.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Navigate - Improving Survival in Vulnerable Lung Cancer Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs