search
Back to results

Sensor-controlled Digital Game for Heart Failure Self-management: A Clinical Trial (SCDG)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG)
Sensor Only
Sponsored by
University of Texas at Austin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 45 years or older
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure classification of I to III that permits minimal physical activity without discomfort
  • have experienced HF hospitalization in the past 6 months
  • be fluent in English
  • Pass a mini-cognitive screen
  • Score of less than 2 (able to independently walk without using a cane or walker) on the Outcome and Assessment Information Set item for ambulation/locomotion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe visual (e.g., legally blind) or tactile (e.g., severe arthritis) impairments that adversely prevent the use of a smartphone or sensor devices;
  • a history of renal failure, which adversely affects HF prognosis
  • a diagnosis of an end-stage or terminal illness (e.g., cancer)
  • undergone heart transplantation, or implantation of a durable mechanical circulatory support device (e.g., left ventricular assist device) due to unique self-management needs.

Sites / Locations

  • The University of Texas AustinRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG)

Sensors-only

Arm Description

The intervention group will receive a sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG) app and weight monitoring and physical activity sensors

The control group will receive only the weight monitoring and physical activity sensors

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Days With Weight-monitoring on Sensor Logs at 6 Weeks
This outcome will be measured by collecting number of days with weight-monitoring data. This measure will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both intervention group (IG) and control group (CG).
Number of Days With Weight-monitoring on Sensor Logs at 12 Weeks
This outcome will be measured by collecting number of days with weight-monitoring data. This measure will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both intervention group (IG) and control group (CG).
Number of Days With Weight-monitoring on Sensor Logs at 24 Weeks
This outcome will be measured by collecting number of days with weight-monitoring data. This measure will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both intervention group (IG) and control group (CG).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean of Daily Steps on Physical Activity Sensor Logs at 6 Weeks
This outcome measure will be measured by calculating the average daily steps at end of 6 weeks. These measures will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both IG and CG.
Mean of Daily Steps on Physical Activity Sensor Logs at 12 Weeks
This outcome measure will be measured by calculating the average daily steps at end of 12 weeks. These measures will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both IG and CG.
Mean of Daily Steps on Physical Activity Sensor Logs at 24 Weeks
This outcome measure will be measured by calculating the average daily steps at end of 24 weeks. These measures will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both IG and CG.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Behaviors as Measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale at 6 Weeks
The instrument used will be 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (HSBS; standardized score from 0 to 100 (every item is given an equal weight) with a higher score meaning better self-care). Items are on a Likert scale of 1 - 5. For calculating the standardized score, each item is reverse coded and then computed using the formula: (Sum of all ever-coded items - 9)*2.7777
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Behaviors as Measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale at 12 Weeks
The instrument used will be 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (HSBS; standardized score from 0 to 100 (every item is given an equal weight) with a higher score meaning better self-care). Items are on a Likert scale of 1 - 5. For calculating the standardized score, each item is reverse coded and then computed using the formula: (Sum of all ever-coded items - 9)*2.7777
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Behaviors as Measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale at 24 Weeks
The instrument used will be 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (HSBS; standardized score from 0 to 100 (every item is given an equal weight) with a higher score meaning better self-care). Items are on a Likert scale of 1 - 5. For calculating the standardized score, each item is reverse coded and then computed using the formula: (Sum of all ever-coded items - 9)*2.7777
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Quality of Life (QOL) on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 6 Weeks
The instrument used will be items 13 - 15 on the KCCQ. Values for the QoL domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Domain score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Quality of Life (QOL) on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 12 Weeks
The instrument used will be items 13 - 15 on the KCCQ. Values for the QoL domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Domain score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Quality of Life (QOL) on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 24 Weeks
The instrument used will be items 13 - 15 on the KCCQ. Values for the QoL domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Domain score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Functional Status on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 6 Weeks
The instrument used will be items 1-12 on the KCCQ. Values for the functional status summary score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Summary score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Functional Status on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 12 Weeks
The instrument used will be items 1-12 on the KCCQ. Values for the functional status summary score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Summary score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Functional Status on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 24 Weeks
The instrument used will be items 1-12 on the KCCQ. Values for the functional status summary score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Summary score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the Past Month at End of 6 Weeks
This measure will be obtained through participant self-report through periodic online surveys and will be and confirmed through hospitalization discharge summary and healthcare provider.
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the Past Month at End of 12 Weeks
This measure will be obtained through participant self-report through periodic online surveys and will be confirmed through hospitalization discharge summary and healthcare provider.
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the Past Month at End of 24 Weeks
This measure will be obtained through participant self-report through periodic online surveys and will be confirmed through hospitalization discharge summary and healthcare provider.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Knowledge on Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHKT) at 6 Weeks
The instrument used will be 30-item Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT). Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with no additional weighting of items; correct responses are then summed. Incorrect or skipped questions are awarded 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better HF knowledge
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Knowledge on Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHKT) at 12 Weeks
The instrument used will be 30-item Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT). Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with no additional weighting of items; correct responses are then summed. Incorrect or skipped questions are awarded 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better HF knowledge
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Knowledge on Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHKT) at 24 Weeks
The instrument used will be 30-item Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT). Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with no additional weighting of items; correct responses are then summed. Incorrect or skipped questions are awarded 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better HF knowledge
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-efficacy on Self-efficacy Section of Self-care of Heart Failure Index at 6 Weeks
The instrument used will be 6-item Section C Self-efficacy section of Self-care of heart failure Index (SCHFI). Scores on the self-efficacy scale will range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-efficacy. To standardize scores the formula: (sum of Section C items - 6) * 5.56 will be used.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-efficacy on Self-efficacy Section of Self-care of Heart Failure Index at 12 Weeks
The instrument used will be 6-item Section C Self-efficacy section of Self-care of heart failure Index (SCHFI). Scores on the self-efficacy scale will range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-efficacy. To standardize scores the formula: (sum of Section C items - 6) * 5.56 will be used.
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-efficacy on Self-efficacy Section of Self-care of Heart Failure Index at 24 Weeks
The instrument used will be 6-item Section C Self-efficacy section of Self-care of heart failure Index (SCHFI). Scores on the self-efficacy scale will range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-efficacy. To standardize scores the formula: (sum of Section C items - 6) * 5.56 will be used.

Full Information

First Posted
September 17, 2021
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05056129
Brief Title
Sensor-controlled Digital Game for Heart Failure Self-management: A Clinical Trial
Acronym
SCDG
Official Title
Sensor-controlled Digital Game for Heart Failure Selfmanagement Behavior Adherence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 28, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study evaluates a sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG) to motivate self-management behaviors of weight monitoring and physical activity in adults with heart failure (HF). Half of the participants will receive the SCDG app and weight monitoring and physical activity sensors and the other half will receive only the weight monitoring and physical activity sensors.
Detailed Description
The primary goal of this study is to obtain efficacy data through a randomized controlled trial of a SCDG intervention that synchronizes with a Bluetooth-enabled weight scale and activity tracker to activate game rewards and feedback based on real-time weight monitoring and exercise behaviors of adult heart failure (HF) participants who are older than 45 years. The SCDG involves a narrative, the goal of which is to help the avatar maintain good health and quality of life by using game points, earned via the participant's real-time behaviors, in game tasks that help maintain the avatar's optimal HF health status. Real-time behaviors of weight-monitoring and physical activity will be tracked by an off-the-shelf sensors and app (Withings). The data from the Withings sensors will then be routed to our SCDG app. The digital game paired with sensors will enable objective tracking of real-time behaviors such as physical activity, and weight monitoring, and provide personalized, contextually relevant feedback (e.g., reduce fluid intake or call doctor for weight gain) to motivate engagement in and generate habit formation of heart failure related self-management behaviors. The goal of this proposal is to determine efficacy of the SCDG concept for heart failure self-management in a real-world setting. In this study, the initial efficacy of the SCDG intervention for primary outcome of rate of engagement in HF self-management behavior of weight-monitoring and secondary outcomes of physical activity engagement, HF self-management-knowledge, and self-efficacy, HF-functional status, hospitalization, cognitive ability, depression and quality of life will be evaluated. For this study, 200 adults who are 45 years or older and who experienced HF hospitalization in the past 12 months will be recruited through online recruiting methods from 7 southern U.S states of Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas. Recruited, participants will be randomized to either the SCDG intervention group that will receive sensors tracking weight monitoring and activity and play the SCDG on a mobile smartphone for 24 weeks or a control group that will receive sensors and an app tracking activity and weight monitoring, and standardized written HF educational modules.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group will receive a sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG) app and weight monitoring and physical activity sensors
Arm Title
Sensors-only
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will receive only the weight monitoring and physical activity sensors
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sensor-controlled digital game (SCDG)
Intervention Description
The SCDG will involve a narrative, the goal of which is to help an avatar in the game avoid rehospitalization by using game points, earned via the participant's real-time behaviors, in game tasks that help maintain the avatar's optimal HF health status. Real-time behaviors of weight-monitoring and physical activity will be tracked by an off-the-shelf sensors and app (Withings). The data from the Withings sensors will then be routed to our SCDG app. The digital game paired with sensors will enable objective tracking of real-time behaviors such as physical activity, and weight monitoring, and provide personalized, contextually relevant feedback (e.g., reduce fluid intake or call doctor for weight gain) to motivate engagement in and generate habit formation of heart failure related self-management behaviors.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sensor Only
Intervention Description
Real-time behaviors of weight-monitoring and physical activity will be tracked by an off-the-shelf sensors and app (Withings). This group will also be provided with standardized evidence-based HF educational material.However, the data from the Withings sensors will not be routed to the SCDG.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Days With Weight-monitoring on Sensor Logs at 6 Weeks
Description
This outcome will be measured by collecting number of days with weight-monitoring data. This measure will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both intervention group (IG) and control group (CG).
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Number of Days With Weight-monitoring on Sensor Logs at 12 Weeks
Description
This outcome will be measured by collecting number of days with weight-monitoring data. This measure will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both intervention group (IG) and control group (CG).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Number of Days With Weight-monitoring on Sensor Logs at 24 Weeks
Description
This outcome will be measured by collecting number of days with weight-monitoring data. This measure will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both intervention group (IG) and control group (CG).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean of Daily Steps on Physical Activity Sensor Logs at 6 Weeks
Description
This outcome measure will be measured by calculating the average daily steps at end of 6 weeks. These measures will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both IG and CG.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Mean of Daily Steps on Physical Activity Sensor Logs at 12 Weeks
Description
This outcome measure will be measured by calculating the average daily steps at end of 12 weeks. These measures will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both IG and CG.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Mean of Daily Steps on Physical Activity Sensor Logs at 24 Weeks
Description
This outcome measure will be measured by calculating the average daily steps at end of 24 weeks. These measures will be collected from sensor logs within the apps for both IG and CG.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Behaviors as Measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale at 6 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (HSBS; standardized score from 0 to 100 (every item is given an equal weight) with a higher score meaning better self-care). Items are on a Likert scale of 1 - 5. For calculating the standardized score, each item is reverse coded and then computed using the formula: (Sum of all ever-coded items - 9)*2.7777
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Behaviors as Measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale at 12 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (HSBS; standardized score from 0 to 100 (every item is given an equal weight) with a higher score meaning better self-care). Items are on a Likert scale of 1 - 5. For calculating the standardized score, each item is reverse coded and then computed using the formula: (Sum of all ever-coded items - 9)*2.7777
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Behaviors as Measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale at 24 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (HSBS; standardized score from 0 to 100 (every item is given an equal weight) with a higher score meaning better self-care). Items are on a Likert scale of 1 - 5. For calculating the standardized score, each item is reverse coded and then computed using the formula: (Sum of all ever-coded items - 9)*2.7777
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Quality of Life (QOL) on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 6 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be items 13 - 15 on the KCCQ. Values for the QoL domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Domain score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Quality of Life (QOL) on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 12 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be items 13 - 15 on the KCCQ. Values for the QoL domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Domain score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Quality of Life (QOL) on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 24 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be items 13 - 15 on the KCCQ. Values for the QoL domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Domain score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Functional Status on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 6 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be items 1-12 on the KCCQ. Values for the functional status summary score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Summary score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Functional Status on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 12 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be items 1-12 on the KCCQ. Values for the functional status summary score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Summary score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure-related Functional Status on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 24 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be items 1-12 on the KCCQ. Values for the functional status summary score from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Summary score will be transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the Past Month at End of 6 Weeks
Description
This measure will be obtained through participant self-report through periodic online surveys and will be and confirmed through hospitalization discharge summary and healthcare provider.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks
Title
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the Past Month at End of 12 Weeks
Description
This measure will be obtained through participant self-report through periodic online surveys and will be confirmed through hospitalization discharge summary and healthcare provider.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Number of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the Past Month at End of 24 Weeks
Description
This measure will be obtained through participant self-report through periodic online surveys and will be confirmed through hospitalization discharge summary and healthcare provider.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Knowledge on Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHKT) at 6 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 30-item Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT). Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with no additional weighting of items; correct responses are then summed. Incorrect or skipped questions are awarded 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better HF knowledge
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Knowledge on Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHKT) at 12 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 30-item Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT). Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with no additional weighting of items; correct responses are then summed. Incorrect or skipped questions are awarded 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better HF knowledge
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-management Knowledge on Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHKT) at 24 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 30-item Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT). Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with no additional weighting of items; correct responses are then summed. Incorrect or skipped questions are awarded 0 points. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better HF knowledge
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-efficacy on Self-efficacy Section of Self-care of Heart Failure Index at 6 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 6-item Section C Self-efficacy section of Self-care of heart failure Index (SCHFI). Scores on the self-efficacy scale will range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-efficacy. To standardize scores the formula: (sum of Section C items - 6) * 5.56 will be used.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-efficacy on Self-efficacy Section of Self-care of Heart Failure Index at 12 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 6-item Section C Self-efficacy section of Self-care of heart failure Index (SCHFI). Scores on the self-efficacy scale will range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-efficacy. To standardize scores the formula: (sum of Section C items - 6) * 5.56 will be used.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Failure Self-efficacy on Self-efficacy Section of Self-care of Heart Failure Index at 24 Weeks
Description
The instrument used will be 6-item Section C Self-efficacy section of Self-care of heart failure Index (SCHFI). Scores on the self-efficacy scale will range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better self-efficacy. To standardize scores the formula: (sum of Section C items - 6) * 5.56 will be used.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 45 years or older New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure classification of I to III that permits minimal physical activity without discomfort have experienced HF hospitalization in the past 12 months be fluent in English Pass a mini-cognitive screen Score of less than 2 (able to independently walk without using a cane or walker) on the Outcome and Assessment Information Set item for ambulation/locomotion Exclusion Criteria: severe visual (e.g., legally blind) or tactile (e.g., severe arthritis) impairments that adversely prevent the use of a smartphone or sensor devices; a history of renal failure, which adversely affects HF prognosis a diagnosis of an end-stage or terminal illness (e.g., cancer) undergone heart transplantation, or implantation of a durable mechanical circulatory support device (e.g., left ventricular assist device) due to unique self-management needs.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Angelica Rangel, MS
Phone
512-956-8714
Email
arangel@nursing.utexas.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kavita Radhakrishnan, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Texas Austin
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The University of Texas Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78701
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kavita Radhakrishnan, PhD
Phone
512-471-7937
Email
kradhakrishnan@mail.nur.utexas.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kavita Radhakrishnan, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The investigators will make the data and associated documentation available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. After review of the purpose of the data request to make sure it is consistent with the original project goals and verification that the request meets Institution Review board (IRB) approval, de-identified data may be shared with researchers as soon as possible but no later than within one year from the completion of the funded project period for the parent award or upon acceptance of the data for publication, whichever is earlier.

Learn more about this trial

Sensor-controlled Digital Game for Heart Failure Self-management: A Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs