Fecal Microbiota Transplant and Dietary Fiber Supplementation for the Treatment of Gut Graft Versus Host Disease
Primary Purpose
Intestinal Graft Versus Host Disease
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Colonoscopy
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Nutritional Supplementation
Survey Administration
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Intestinal Graft Versus Host Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- History of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant in the past 100 days
- Post-engraftment, defined by three consecutive days of sustained neutrophil engraftment with an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 cells/mm^3
- Moderate to severe acute GI GvHD stage 2 or higher as measured by the modified Glucksberg criteria and averaged over 3 consecutive days. In patients who have already had GI biopsy, biopsy histology must be compatible with GVHD, although biopsy is not required
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of previous serious adverse events associated with FMT
- History of bowel perforation
- History of bowel resection
- History of intestinal obstruction
- History of gastric bypass
- History of diverticulitis
- History of inflammatory bowel disease (i.e. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis)
- History of celiac disease confirmed by serologic testing or small bowel biopsy
- History of severe dietary allergy as designated by World Allergy Organization Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Systemic Reaction Grading System grade 2 or more
- Current evidence of mechanical obstruction of the bowel
- Known allergies to sodium chloride, glycerol, theobroma oil, hide bovine gelatin, sodium lauryl sulfate, colorants FD&C, or titanium dioxide
- Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period. Women of childbearing potential (those who are not post-menopausal or post-hysterectomy) must be negative for pregnancy per urine pregnancy test at enrollment
- Individuals with the ability to conceive children who are not willing to abstain from sexual activity or use an effective form of birth control during the duration of the study
- Unwilling or unable to participate in study procedures including oral intake of FMT, colonoscopy, fiber supplementation, collection of stool samples and completion study surveys
- Cannot reasonably and safely participate in the study in the opinion of the investigators
Sites / Locations
- Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Arm I (upper FMT)
Arm II (Lower FMT)
Arm III (upper FMT, fiber supplementation)
Arm IV (Lower FMT, fiber supplementation)
Arm Description
Patients receive upper FMT capsules PO over 2 days.
Patients undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy on day 0.
Patients receive upper FMT capsules PO over 2 days. Patients receive fiber supplementation PO while on study.
Patients undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy on day 0. Patients receive fiber supplementation PO while on study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Bacterial composition of stool
Analyses will consist of summary statistics of the bacterial diversity in the microbiome (e.g., the alpha diversity, the abundance of bacterial species associated with protection from graft versus host disease [GvHD]).
Bacterial genes in stool
Specifically abundance of genes related to fiber fermentation and short chain fatty acids (SCFA) production metabolites in stool, specifically short chain fatty acids will be assessed.
Incidence of adverse events
Will by assessed by computing the total number of adverse events (AE)s and serious adverse events (SAE)s, the number per patient, and the number of patients with at least one event. The type of AE/SAE and whether the AE/SAE is related to the fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) or not will be tabulated. These summaries will be computed overall as well as by randomization arm and stratification factor (steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status). The odds will be compared of at least one SAE per patient by randomization arm and stratification factor using logistic regression with independent variables for route of FMT administration, fiber supplementation, and steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status. Interaction terms will be considered between these factors and may use exact or firth logistic regression in the event that some categories have zero patients with a SAE.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Complete response (CR) after the initial FMT
Will be defined by stage 0 on the Modified Glucksberg GvHD scale, without abdominal pain or hematochezia. To account for variability in this measure, patient stool volume (inpatients only) and survey data (both inpatients and outpatients) from days 25-27 will be used to determine whether patients meet these criteria or not. Inpatients will be a compare measured stool volumes to those reported via survey, to assess how well the survey data may serve as a surrogate for stool volume. Subjects who die before day 28 will be counted as no CR. The number and proportion of patients with CR by steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status, and each randomization arm (route of FMT administration and receipt of fiber supplementation) as well as within combinations of these factors will be computed. To test for differences in CR by these factors, logistic regression models similar to those described above for SAE comparisons.
CR or partial response (PR) after the initial FMT
Will be assessed by CR or PR at day 28 will use similar analysis methods as to the CR at day 28 outcome analysis.
Gut and overall GvHD grade
Will be assessed using the Modified Glucksberg scale measurements at baseline and throughout follow-up to summarize decrease in stool volume. For both of these ordinal outcomes (GvHD grade and Modified Glucksberg scale stage), descriptive statistics and graphical summaries to show changes over time by stratification factor and randomization arm. Generalized linear mixed effects models to test for differences in these outcomes by stratification factor and randomization arm.
Six-month survival
Will be evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression with independent variables for the steroid- responsive, versus steroid-dependent or - refractory disease and randomization arm as specified in previous models.
Quality of Life (QoL)
Will be summarized at baseline and during study using descriptive statistics.
Decrease in stool volume
Levels of MAIT cells in the periphery
Will be assessed using plot cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for MAIT cells over time to compare longitudinal patterns by study arm and stratification factor. Mann-Whitney tests will be used to evaluate differences in cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for MAIT cells in recipients of upper versus lower FMT, and individuals who receive fiber supplementation versus those who do not at specific time points post-FMT. Linear mixed effects models may be used to test for differences in longitudinal patterns of these outcomes by randomization arm and stratification factor.
Levels of Treg cells in the periphery
Will be assessed using plot cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for Treg cells over time to compare longitudinal patterns by study arm and stratification factor. Mann-Whitney tests will be used to evaluate differences in cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for Tregs in recipients of upper versus lower FMT, and individuals who receive fiber supplementation versus those who do not at specific time points post-FMT. Linear mixed effects models may be used to test for differences in longitudinal patterns of these outcomes by randomization arm and stratification factor.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05067595
First Posted
December 10, 2019
Last Updated
September 19, 2023
Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05067595
Brief Title
Fecal Microbiota Transplant and Dietary Fiber Supplementation for the Treatment of Gut Graft Versus Host Disease
Official Title
A Randomized, Controlled, Phase I Study of Fecal Microbiota Transplant and Dietary Fiber Supplementation in Graft Versus Host Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This phase I trial studies how well fecal microbiota transplant and dietary fiber supplementation work in treating patients with gut graft versus host disease. Fecal microbiota transplant entails inoculating donor stool into a recipient's gastrointestinal tract. Changing the gut microbiome by fecal microbiota transplant and fiber supplementation may help treat gut graft versus host disease.
Detailed Description
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive upper FMT capsules orally (PO) over 2 days.
ARM II: Patients undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy on day 0.
ARM III: Patients receive upper FMT capsules PO over 2 days. Patients receive fiber supplementation PO while on study.
ARM IV: Patients undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy on day 0. Patients receive fiber supplementation PO while on study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 180 days.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intestinal Graft Versus Host Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Arm I (upper FMT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive upper FMT capsules PO over 2 days.
Arm Title
Arm II (Lower FMT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy on day 0.
Arm Title
Arm III (upper FMT, fiber supplementation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive upper FMT capsules PO over 2 days. Patients receive fiber supplementation PO while on study.
Arm Title
Arm IV (Lower FMT, fiber supplementation)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy on day 0. Patients receive fiber supplementation PO while on study.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Colonoscopy
Intervention Description
Undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fecal Material Transplantation, Fecal Transplantation, FMT, Poo Transplant, Poop Transplant, Stool Transplant
Intervention Description
Given upper FMT PO
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fecal Material Transplantation, Fecal Transplantation, FMT, Poo Transplant, Poop Transplant, Stool Transplant
Intervention Description
Undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Nutritional Supplementation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Supplementation
Intervention Description
Given dietary fiber supplementation PO
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Survey Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bacterial composition of stool
Description
Analyses will consist of summary statistics of the bacterial diversity in the microbiome (e.g., the alpha diversity, the abundance of bacterial species associated with protection from graft versus host disease [GvHD]).
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Bacterial genes in stool
Description
Specifically abundance of genes related to fiber fermentation and short chain fatty acids (SCFA) production metabolites in stool, specifically short chain fatty acids will be assessed.
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Incidence of adverse events
Description
Will by assessed by computing the total number of adverse events (AE)s and serious adverse events (SAE)s, the number per patient, and the number of patients with at least one event. The type of AE/SAE and whether the AE/SAE is related to the fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) or not will be tabulated. These summaries will be computed overall as well as by randomization arm and stratification factor (steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status). The odds will be compared of at least one SAE per patient by randomization arm and stratification factor using logistic regression with independent variables for route of FMT administration, fiber supplementation, and steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status. Interaction terms will be considered between these factors and may use exact or firth logistic regression in the event that some categories have zero patients with a SAE.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete response (CR) after the initial FMT
Description
Will be defined by stage 0 on the Modified Glucksberg GvHD scale, without abdominal pain or hematochezia. To account for variability in this measure, patient stool volume (inpatients only) and survey data (both inpatients and outpatients) from days 25-27 will be used to determine whether patients meet these criteria or not. Inpatients will be a compare measured stool volumes to those reported via survey, to assess how well the survey data may serve as a surrogate for stool volume. Subjects who die before day 28 will be counted as no CR. The number and proportion of patients with CR by steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status, and each randomization arm (route of FMT administration and receipt of fiber supplementation) as well as within combinations of these factors will be computed. To test for differences in CR by these factors, logistic regression models similar to those described above for SAE comparisons.
Time Frame
At day 28
Title
CR or partial response (PR) after the initial FMT
Description
Will be assessed by CR or PR at day 28 will use similar analysis methods as to the CR at day 28 outcome analysis.
Time Frame
At day 28
Title
Gut and overall GvHD grade
Description
Will be assessed using the Modified Glucksberg scale measurements at baseline and throughout follow-up to summarize decrease in stool volume. For both of these ordinal outcomes (GvHD grade and Modified Glucksberg scale stage), descriptive statistics and graphical summaries to show changes over time by stratification factor and randomization arm. Generalized linear mixed effects models to test for differences in these outcomes by stratification factor and randomization arm.
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
Title
Six-month survival
Description
Will be evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression with independent variables for the steroid- responsive, versus steroid-dependent or - refractory disease and randomization arm as specified in previous models.
Time Frame
At 6 months
Title
Quality of Life (QoL)
Description
Will be summarized at baseline and during study using descriptive statistics.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Decrease in stool volume
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
Title
Levels of MAIT cells in the periphery
Description
Will be assessed using plot cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for MAIT cells over time to compare longitudinal patterns by study arm and stratification factor. Mann-Whitney tests will be used to evaluate differences in cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for MAIT cells in recipients of upper versus lower FMT, and individuals who receive fiber supplementation versus those who do not at specific time points post-FMT. Linear mixed effects models may be used to test for differences in longitudinal patterns of these outcomes by randomization arm and stratification factor.
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
Title
Levels of Treg cells in the periphery
Description
Will be assessed using plot cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for Treg cells over time to compare longitudinal patterns by study arm and stratification factor. Mann-Whitney tests will be used to evaluate differences in cell counts and percentage of lymphocytes for Tregs in recipients of upper versus lower FMT, and individuals who receive fiber supplementation versus those who do not at specific time points post-FMT. Linear mixed effects models may be used to test for differences in longitudinal patterns of these outcomes by randomization arm and stratification factor.
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years of age or older
History of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the past 100 days
Post-engraftment, defined by time period following three consecutive days of sustained neutrophil engraftment with an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 cells/mm^1
Mild to severe acute GI GvHD stage 1 as measured by the modified Glucksberg criteria and averaged over 3 consecutive days in the last week. In patients who have already had GI biopsy, biopsy histology must be compatible with GVHD, although biopsy is not required
Exclusion Criteria:
History of previous serious adverse events associated with FMT
History of bowel perforation
History of bowel resection
History of intestinal obstruction
History of gastric bypass
History of diverticulitis
History of inflammatory bowel disease (i.e. Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis)
History of celiac disease confirmed by serologic testing or small bowel biopsy
History of severe dietary allergy as designated by World Allergy Organization Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Systemic Reaction Grading System grade 2 or more
Current evidence of mechanical obstruction of the bowel
Subjects who are cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative at the time of enrollment as indicated by clinical testing unless the fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) donor is CMV seronegative with negative plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for CMV.
Known allergies to loperamide, sodium chloride, glycerol, theobroma oil, hide bovine gelatin, sodium lauryl sulfate, colorants FD&C, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol, sodium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, benzalkonium chloride, disodium EDTA or potassium chloride.
Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period. Women of childbearing potential (those who are not post-menopausal or post-hysterectomy) must be negative for pregnancy per urine pregnancy test at enrollment
Individuals with the ability to conceive children who are not willing to abstain from sexual activity or use an effective form of birth control during the duration of the study
Unwilling or unable to participate in study procedures including oral intake of FMT, colonoscopy, fiber supplementation, collection of stool samples and completion study surveys
Cannot reasonably and safely participate in the study in the opinion of the investigators
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
David Fredricks
Phone
206.667.1935
Email
dfredric@fredhutch.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Fredricks
Organizational Affiliation
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Fredricks
Phone
206-667-1935
Email
dfredric@fredhutch.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Fredricks
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Fecal Microbiota Transplant and Dietary Fiber Supplementation for the Treatment of Gut Graft Versus Host Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs