search
Back to results

Study Comparing the Standard Administration of IO Versus the Same IO Administered Each 3 Months in Patients With Metastatic Cancer in Response After 6 Months of Standard IO (MOIO)

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer Metastatic, Renal Cell Carcinoma, Head and Neck Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Reduced dose intensity of IO
Sponsored by
UNICANCER
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lung Cancer Metastatic focused on measuring Immunotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must have signed a written informed consent form prior to any trial specific procedures.
  2. Patient aged ≥18 years old.
  3. Initial metastatic disease histologically confirmed including: lung cancer, renal cell cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, triple negative breast cancer, Merkel cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and melanoma.
  4. Patients in partial or complete response after 6 months of standard immunotherapy (whatever the line of therapy) according to the RECIST (confirmed by local radiological assessment). For metastatic melanoma only patients in partial response.
  5. Eligible to maintain the same standard IO treatment.
  6. Patient with Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status ≤1.
  7. Patients with brain metastases are allowed, provided they are stable according to the following definitions: treated with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and without evidence of progression prior to randomization and have no evidence of new or enlarging brain metastases.
  8. Patients treated by IO previously combined with chemotherapy are allowed.
  9. Patients with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)-IO or pemetrexed-IO or bevacizumab-IO are allowed.
  10. Evidence of post-menopausal status, or negative urinary or serum pregnancy test for pre-menopausal patients.
  11. Both sexually active women of childbearing potential and males (and their female partners) patients must agree to use adequate contraception method for the duration of the study treatment and after completing treatment according to the most recent version of the IO Summary of product characteristics (SmPC).
  12. Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the trial including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits, and examinations including follow-up.
  13. Patient must be affiliated to a Social Security System.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Metastatic melanoma in complete response.
  2. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma with International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database (IMDC) favourable-risk treated TKI/IO combination.
  3. Hematologic malignancies (leukaemia, myeloma, lymphoma…)
  4. Active infection requiring systemic therapy.
  5. Patients enrolled in another therapeutic study within 30 days before the inclusion in and during MOIO study.
  6. Patient unable to comply with study obligations for geographic, social, or physical reasons, or who is unable to understand the purpose and procedures of the study.
  7. Person deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.

Sites / Locations

  • Institut de cancérologie de l'OuestRecruiting
  • Clinique Sainte CatherineRecruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de la Côte BasqueRecruiting
  • CHU BesançonRecruiting
  • Centre François Baclesse
  • Centre Jean PerrinRecruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier IntercommunalRecruiting
  • CHU Henri MondorRecruiting
  • Centre Georges François LeclercRecruiting
  • Clinique ChenieuxRecruiting
  • Hospices Civils de LyonRecruiting
  • Hôpital La Timone -APHM
  • Centre Antoine LacassagneRecruiting
  • Institut Curie
  • Hôpital Saint LouisRecruiting
  • Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
  • Hôpital Européen Georges PompidouRecruiting
  • CHU Poitiers
  • Insitut GodinotRecruiting
  • Centre Eugene MarquisRecruiting
  • Institut Curie
  • Institut de cancérologie de l'OuestRecruiting
  • ICANSRecruiting
  • Hôpital FochRecruiting
  • IUCTRecruiting
  • CHU Bretonneau

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Experimental arm

Control arm

Arm Description

Reduced dose intensity of IO: IO will be administered every 3 months (at the same dose levels) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice or investigator's decision

Standard IO: Continuation of IO at the same dose levels and rhythmicity until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival (PFS)
The progression-free survival is the length of time during and after the treatment of a disease that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the proposed therapeutic strategy
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 36 months.
Immune progression-free survival (iPFS)
The progression-free survival is the length of time during and after the treatment of a disease that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse (Immune disease progression (iPD)). iPD will be determined locally by the investigator through the use of iRECIST in case of lesions identified at Baseline.
Objective response rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 at 12 and 24 months post-randomization.
Overall survival (OS)
The overall survival is the length of time from randomization that patients enrolled in the study are still alive.
Duration of response (DoR)
Duration of response (DoR) defined as the time from randomization to first documented response until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials. The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
The Developed 5-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Developed by the EuroQol group, the self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials consists of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each dimension has 5 levels. This questionnaire provide a 5-digit score which generate a health state profile. The VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the score range from 100 (Best imaginable health state) to 0 (Worst imaginable health state). The VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
The HADS is a 14 items questionnaire: 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression scored on a scale. Scores for items in each subscale of the HADS are summed to produce an anxiety score (HADS-A) or a depression score (HADS-D), or can be added to produce a total score corresponding to emotional distress (HADS-T). Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), for a total score ranging from 0-21 for each subscale. The entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.
Fear of relapse questionnaire
The Fear of relapse questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire aiming to better understand how these concerns of fear of relapse by patients manifest themselves. The questionnaire contains 32 items rated on a five-point Likert-type scale (0 = "never", 1 = "seldom ", 2 = "sometimes", 3 = "often", and 4 = "always"). For all items, higher scores indicate more severe fear of relapse.
Safety profile
The National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI-CTCAE v5) is widely accepted in the community of oncology research as the leading rating scale for adverse events. This scale, divided into 5 grades (1 = "mild", 2 = "moderate", 3 = "severe", 4 = "life-threatening", and 5 = "death") determined by the investigator, will make it possible to assess the severity of the disorders.

Full Information

First Posted
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Sponsor
UNICANCER
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05078047
Brief Title
Study Comparing the Standard Administration of IO Versus the Same IO Administered Each 3 Months in Patients With Metastatic Cancer in Response After 6 Months of Standard IO
Acronym
MOIO
Official Title
Randomized Phase III Trial of Standard Immunotherapy (IO) by Checkpoint Inhibitors, Versus Reduced Dose Intensity of IO in Patients With Metastatic Cancer in Response After 6 Months of Standard IO
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 8, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 7, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 7, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
UNICANCER

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Immunotherapy (IO), such as treatment with anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 inhibitors, is a rapidly expanding treatment for multiple metastatic cancers with improved survival for certain cancers. However, the optimal duration of immunotherapies is currently unknown. Our hypothesis is that a reduced dose intensity of IO could be as effective as the current standard treatment in term of prevention of the disease progression. If proved right, this study will have a positive medico-economic impact by reduction of the costs associated with the treatment and the toxicity, and an increase of the patients' quality of life.
Detailed Description
Immunotherapy (IO) is a rapidly expanding treatment for multiple metastatic cancers with improved survival for certain cancers. For currently approved immunotherapies such as PD-1 / PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-CTLA-4, the rhythm and duration of treatment are recommended until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. However, the optimal duration of these treatments is currently unknown. No major dose-dependent effect of anti-PD-1 have been observed and whether the frequency of infusion of IO could improve response or maintain efficacy. Moreover, phase I studies have shown that saturation of the target (PD-1 or PD-L1) can persist far beyond the serum half-life of the IO and 3-monthly infusions of an anti-PD-1 antibody could potentially generate the same level of activity as infusions administered every 2 weeks. In silico modeling studies have suggested that alternate scheduling with IO couldn't compromise the efficacy of the treatment. Indeed, prolonged half-lives of IO drugs, time-varying clearance plus plasma concentrations far above the threshold associated with maximal target-engagement, suggest that the rhythm of administration of IO could be slowed down. Without substantial international data for responding patients, apart metastatic melanoma in complete response, patients and physicians are afraid of stopping treatment, by fear of relapse. Over-treatment with IO may be toxic and inefficient. The rising cost of cancer care in the era of immunotherapy is of great concern for public and private payers around the world. Chronic administration has important consequences for patients and health systems, with multiple medical visits and the risk of chronic, progressive and sometimes fatal toxicities induced by immunotherapy. This is a pragmatic and strategic study challenging the routine practice which compares for the first time in a randomized phase III study, the standard administration of IO versus the same agent administered each three months in patients with metastatic cancer in partial or complete response after 6 months of standard IO ( except melanoma in CR). If our hypothesis of non-inferiority of PFS with a reduced dose intensity of IO is verified, this could replace standard treatment and have a positive medico-economic impact, allowing, on the one hand, a reduction of the costs associated with the treatment and the toxicity, and on the other hand, an increase of the patients' quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer Metastatic, Renal Cell Carcinoma, Head and Neck Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Melanoma
Keywords
Immunotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomized 1:1 into two arms: • Experimental arm: Reduced dose intensity of IO IO will be administered every 3 months (at the same dose levels) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice or investigator's decision. • Control arm: Standard IO Continuation of IO at the same dose levels and rhythmicity until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice. Random allocation will be stratified by tumour type, by response status (partial response versus complete response) evaluated 6 months after the initiation of standard IO, by treatment line (first line vs others), and by type of IO
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
646 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Reduced dose intensity of IO: IO will be administered every 3 months (at the same dose levels) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice or investigator's decision
Arm Title
Control arm
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard IO: Continuation of IO at the same dose levels and rhythmicity until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Reduced dose intensity of IO
Intervention Description
After 6 months of treatment with standard IO, IO will be administered every 3 months (at the same dose levels) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or patient's choice or investigator's decision
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Description
The progression-free survival is the length of time during and after the treatment of a disease that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse.
Time Frame
From randomization to disease progression or death, up to 3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the proposed therapeutic strategy
Description
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 36 months.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Immune progression-free survival (iPFS)
Description
The progression-free survival is the length of time during and after the treatment of a disease that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse (Immune disease progression (iPD)). iPD will be determined locally by the investigator through the use of iRECIST in case of lesions identified at Baseline.
Time Frame
From randomization to disease progression or death, up to 3 years
Title
Objective response rate (ORR)
Description
Objective response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 at 12 and 24 months post-randomization.
Time Frame
From randomization to 12 and 24 months post-randomization
Title
Overall survival (OS)
Description
The overall survival is the length of time from randomization that patients enrolled in the study are still alive.
Time Frame
From randomization to death from any cause, up to 3 years
Title
Duration of response (DoR)
Description
Duration of response (DoR) defined as the time from randomization to first documented response until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Time Frame
From randomization to disease progression or death, up to 3 years
Title
Quality of life questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
Description
Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials. The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Time Frame
At inclusion visit (pre-randomization) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 36 months post-randomization
Title
The Developed 5-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Description
Developed by the EuroQol group, the self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials consists of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each dimension has 5 levels. This questionnaire provide a 5-digit score which generate a health state profile. The VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the score range from 100 (Best imaginable health state) to 0 (Worst imaginable health state). The VAS is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Time Frame
At inclusion visit (pre-randomization) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 36 months post-randomization
Title
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
Description
The HADS is a 14 items questionnaire: 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression scored on a scale. Scores for items in each subscale of the HADS are summed to produce an anxiety score (HADS-A) or a depression score (HADS-D), or can be added to produce a total score corresponding to emotional distress (HADS-T). Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), for a total score ranging from 0-21 for each subscale. The entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.
Time Frame
At inclusion visit (pre-randomization) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 36 months post-randomization
Title
Fear of relapse questionnaire
Description
The Fear of relapse questionnaire is a self-reported questionnaire aiming to better understand how these concerns of fear of relapse by patients manifest themselves. The questionnaire contains 32 items rated on a five-point Likert-type scale (0 = "never", 1 = "seldom ", 2 = "sometimes", 3 = "often", and 4 = "always"). For all items, higher scores indicate more severe fear of relapse.
Time Frame
At inclusion visit (pre-randomization) and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 36 months post-randomization
Title
Safety profile
Description
The National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI-CTCAE v5) is widely accepted in the community of oncology research as the leading rating scale for adverse events. This scale, divided into 5 grades (1 = "mild", 2 = "moderate", 3 = "severe", 4 = "life-threatening", and 5 = "death") determined by the investigator, will make it possible to assess the severity of the disorders.
Time Frame
At 12 months and 3 years post-randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients must have signed a written informed consent form prior to any trial specific procedures. Patient aged ≥18 years old. Initial metastatic disease histologically confirmed including: lung cancer, renal cell cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, triple negative breast cancer, Merkel cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and melanoma. Patients in partial or complete response after 6 months of standard immunotherapy (whatever the line of therapy) according to the RECIST (confirmed by local radiological assessment). For metastatic melanoma only patients in partial response. Eligible to maintain the same standard IO treatment. Patient with Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status ≤1. Patients with brain metastases are allowed, provided they are stable according to the following definitions: treated with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and without evidence of progression prior to randomization and have no evidence of new or enlarging brain metastases. Patients treated by IO previously combined with chemotherapy are allowed. Patients with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)-IO or pemetrexed-IO or bevacizumab-IO are allowed. Evidence of post-menopausal status, or negative urinary or serum pregnancy test for pre-menopausal patients. Both sexually active women of childbearing potential and males (and their female partners) patients must agree to use adequate contraception method for the duration of the study treatment and after completing treatment according to the most recent version of the IO Summary of product characteristics (SmPC). Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the trial including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits, and examinations including follow-up. Patient must be affiliated to a Social Security System. Exclusion Criteria: Metastatic melanoma in complete response. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma with International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database (IMDC) favourable-risk treated TKI/IO combination. Hematologic malignancies (leukaemia, myeloma, lymphoma…) Active infection requiring systemic therapy. Patients enrolled in another therapeutic study within 30 days before the inclusion in and during MOIO study. Patient unable to comply with study obligations for geographic, social, or physical reasons, or who is unable to understand the purpose and procedures of the study. Person deprived of their liberty or under protective custody or guardianship.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Clotilde SIMON
Phone
+33 (0) 1 73 79 79 11
Email
c-simon@unicancer.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gwenaëlle GRAVIS-MESCAM, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49055
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elouen BOUGHALEM
Facility Name
Clinique Sainte Catherine
City
Avignon
ZIP/Postal Code
84918
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Werner HILGERS
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque
City
Bayonne
ZIP/Postal Code
64109
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Louis FRANCOIS
Facility Name
CHU Besançon
City
Besançon
ZIP/Postal Code
25030
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hamadi ALMOTLAK
Facility Name
Centre François Baclesse
City
Caen
ZIP/Postal Code
14076
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre-Emmanuel BRACHET
Facility Name
Centre Jean Perrin
City
Clermont-Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maureen BERNADACH
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Isabelle MONNET
Facility Name
CHU Henri Mondor
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carolina SALDANA
Facility Name
Centre Georges François Leclerc
City
Dijon
ZIP/Postal Code
21079
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alice HERVIEU
Facility Name
Clinique Chenieux
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sabrina FALKOWSKI
Facility Name
Hospices Civils de Lyon
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69310
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Denis MAILLET
Facility Name
Hôpital La Timone -APHM
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13385
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Laurent DEVILLE
Facility Name
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06189
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Delphine BORCHIELLINI
Facility Name
Institut Curie
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75005
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe LE TOURNEAU
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint Louis
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hélène GAUTHIER
Facility Name
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luca CAMPEDEL
Facility Name
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yann VANO
Facility Name
CHU Poitiers
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas ISAMBERT
Facility Name
Insitut Godinot
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51726
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amélie LEMOINE
Facility Name
Centre Eugene Marquis
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35042
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurence CROUZET
Facility Name
Institut Curie
City
Saint-Cloud
ZIP/Postal Code
92210
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe LE TOURNEAU
Facility Name
Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest
City
Saint-Herblain
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Judith RAIMBOURG
Facility Name
ICANS
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67200
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philippe BARTHELEMY
Facility Name
Hôpital Foch
City
Suresnes
ZIP/Postal Code
92151
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raffaele RATTA
Facility Name
IUCT
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Iphigénie KORAKIS
Facility Name
CHU Bretonneau
City
Tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mathilde CANCEL

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Unicancer will share de-identified individual data that underlie the results reported. A decision concerning the sharing of other study documents, including protocol and statistical analysis plan will be examined upon request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data shared will be limit to that required for independent mandated verification of the published results, the applicant will need authorization from Unicancer for personal access, and data will only be transferred after signing of a data access agreement.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Unicancer will consider access to study data upon written detailed request sent to Unicancer, from 6 months until 5 years after publication of summary data.

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing the Standard Administration of IO Versus the Same IO Administered Each 3 Months in Patients With Metastatic Cancer in Response After 6 Months of Standard IO

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs