search
Back to results

Radioembolization in Elderly/ Fragile Patients With mCRC (CAIRO7)

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
radioembolization
Standard of care first-line systemic therapy
Sponsored by
UMC Utrecht
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer Metastatic

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must have given written informed consent.
  2. Female or male patients aged ≥18 years.
  3. Metastatic colorectal cancer, with metastases confined to the liver, previously not systemically treated.
  4. Previous local treatment of liver metastases by resection of a maximum of two liver segments and/or local ablation is allowed.
  5. Elderly/frail patients, according to the local investigator not eligible for local treatments or intensive systemic regimens with combination chemotherapy.
  6. ECOG Performance status 0-2 (Table 1).
  7. Eligible for systemic treatment with capecitabine + anti-VEGF antibody.
  8. Adequate bone marrow (Hb ≥ 6 mmol/L, WBC ≥ 3x109/L, platelets ≥ 100x109/L), liver (serum bilirubin ≤ 1x upper limit of normal (ULN), ASAT/ALAT ≤ 5x ULN), and renal (GFR ≥ 40 ml/min) functions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease.
  2. Previous adjuvant treatment completed within 6 months prior to randomization.
  3. Symptoms of primary tumour, if in situ, that require intervention; prior treatment with (chemo)radiotherapy and/or resection of primary tumor is allowed.
  4. Resection of more than 2 liver segments, 2-stage procedures and/or radiotherapy of liver metastases.
  5. Eligible for more intensive systemic regimens (i.e. doublet or triplet chemotherapy).
  6. Eligible for local treatment of liver metastases (e.g. surgical resection, ablation).
  7. Presence of extrahepatic metastases; the presence of small (≤ 1 cm) lesions outside the liver on CT scan that are not clearly suspicious for metastases and/or the presence of enlarged hilar lymph nodes in the liver up to a maximal diameter of 2 cm is allowed.
  8. Non-correctable INR >2.0.
  9. Any serious comorbidity preventing the safe administration of anti-VEGF antibody treatment. This includes uncontrolled hypertension or treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive drugs, arterial (cerebro)vascular event within the past 12 months, history of bleeding, history of GI perforation, or presence of fistulae.
  10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  11. Mental disorders that may compromise patient compliance.
  12. Active second malignancy within the previous 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of skin and in situ carcinoma of cervix.
  13. Body weight over 150 kg (because of maximum table load).
  14. Known severe allergy for intravenous contrast fluids.
  15. Participation to another investigational study.

Sites / Locations

  • UMC UtrechtRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard of care first-line systemic therapy

Radioembolization

Arm Description

capecitabine plus anti-VEGF antibody

radioembolization of liver with holmium-166 microspheres

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

progression-free survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Adverse event frequency and grade according to CTCAE version 5.0
Quality of life (EORTC quality of life questionnaire number C30)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Quality of life (EORTC quality of life questionnaire number CR29)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Quality of life (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory: MFI-20)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Overall survival
Cost-effectiveness: Medical Consumption Questionnaire (MCQ)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Cost-effectiveness: Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.

Full Information

First Posted
July 30, 2021
Last Updated
November 7, 2022
Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05092880
Brief Title
Radioembolization in Elderly/ Fragile Patients With mCRC
Acronym
CAIRO7
Official Title
Radioembolization in Elderly/Fragile Patients With Unresectable Livermetastases of Colorectal Cancer, CAIRO7 Study of the DCCG
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Radioembolization (RE) is a minimally invasive treatment with administration of radioactive microspheres into the hepatic artery via a microcatheter. Since tumors are preferentially supplied by the hepatic artery, most microspheres get trapped in the tumor. RE has been shown a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of unresectable CRC liver metastases. These data compare favourably with the toxicity data of capecitabine plus bevacizumab, but this should be validated in a prospective study. The proposed study investigates the efficacy of RE as an alternative, better tolerated and more cost-effective treatment option in elderly or frail patients compared to chronic systemic treatment with comparable progression-free survival.
Detailed Description
Rationale In The Netherlands, ±14.000 people/year are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), and 50% of patients already have/will develop distant metastases, most commonly to the liver. Standard treatment is palliative systemic treatment, which prolongs overall survival (OS). In only a small subset of patients with liver-only metastases, local treatment (i.e. surgery) of metastases is possible with curative intent, either initially or after downsizing by intensive systemic treatment. The average age at CRC diagnosis is 69 yrs, and 30% of CRC patients are ≥75 yrs. Thus, many patients are too old and/or fragile to allow intensive systemic regimens or major surgery. In frail/elderly patients the standard treatment is capecitabine plus an antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, i.e. bevacizumab or biosimilar), given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, resulting in a median progression free survival (PFS) of 8.5-9.2 months. Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea are the most commonly occurring toxicities. Prolonged exposure to CTCAE grade 2 toxicity in frail or elderly patients may already significantly impact quality of life and daily functioning. Therefore, treatments with less toxicity would be of great value for these patients. Radioembolization (RE) is a minimally invasive treatment with administration of radioactive microspheres into the hepatic artery via a microcatheter. Since tumors are preferentially supplied by the hepatic artery, most microspheres get trapped in the tumor. RE has been shown a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of unresectable CRC liver metastases. These data compare favourably with the toxicity data of capecitabine plus bevacizumab, but this should be validated in a prospective study. The proposed study investigates the efficacy of RE as an alternative, better tolerated and more cost-effective treatment option in elderly or frail patients compared to chronic systemic treatment with comparable progression-free survival. Objectives: Primary objective: The objective of this randomized phase 2 study is to demonstrate efficacy of a single RE in terms of PFS in CRC patients with liver-only metastases who are candidates for palliative systemic treatment with capecitabine plus anti-VEGF antibody (bevacizumab or biosimilar). Secondary objectives: To evaluate safety/toxicity. To evaluate cost-effectiveness. To evaluate quality of life (QoL). To evaluate overall survival. Study design: Multi-center, interventional, treatment, randomized phase 2, open label, comparative study. The study will be conducted within the network of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). Patients will be randomized 1:1 between RE and systemic treatment with capecitabine + anti-VEGF antibody. Study population: 220 elderly and/or fragile patients with liver-limited, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, previously not systemically treated, who are candidates for systemic treatment with capecitabine plus an anti-VEGF antibody, will be enrolled in this study. Given the lack of validated selection criteria for elderly and/or frail this judgement will be left to the discretion of the local investigator. Intervention: Individualized holmium-166 radioembolization (166Ho-RE) will be performed via a catheter during angiography. Dosimetry-based treatment planning will be individualized using Q-Suite™ software. The comparator, standard systemic treatment, will be given by the local investigator and will consist of capecitabine orally 1000 mg/m2 bid day 1-14 + anti-VEGF antibody i.v. 7.5 mg/kg day 1 at 3-weekly cycles, continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint: Progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints: Safety/toxicity. Cost-effectiveness. QoL. Overall survival.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer Metastatic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
randomized phase 2
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard of care first-line systemic therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
capecitabine plus anti-VEGF antibody
Arm Title
Radioembolization
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
radioembolization of liver with holmium-166 microspheres
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
radioembolization
Intervention Description
holmium-166 microspheres
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of care first-line systemic therapy
Intervention Description
Capecitabine plus anti-VEGF antibody
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
progression-free survival
Time Frame
4 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse event frequency and grade according to CTCAE version 5.0
Time Frame
3.5 years
Title
Quality of life (EORTC quality of life questionnaire number C30)
Description
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time Frame
3.5 years
Title
Quality of life (EORTC quality of life questionnaire number CR29)
Description
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time Frame
3.5 years
Title
Quality of life (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory: MFI-20)
Description
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time Frame
3.5 years
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Cost-effectiveness: Medical Consumption Questionnaire (MCQ)
Description
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Cost-effectiveness: Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ)
Description
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time Frame
4 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients must have given written informed consent. Female or male patients aged ≥18 years. Metastatic colorectal cancer, with metastases confined to the liver, previously not systemically treated. Previous local treatment of liver metastases by resection of a maximum of two liver segments and/or local ablation is allowed. Elderly/frail patients, according to the local investigator not eligible for local treatments or intensive systemic regimens with combination chemotherapy. ECOG Performance status 0-2 (Table 1). Eligible for systemic treatment with capecitabine + anti-VEGF antibody. Adequate bone marrow (Hb ≥ 6 mmol/L, WBC ≥ 3x109/L, platelets ≥ 100x109/L), liver (serum bilirubin ≤ 1x upper limit of normal (ULN), ASAT/ALAT ≤ 5x ULN), and renal (GFR ≥ 40 ml/min) functions. Exclusion Criteria: Previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Previous adjuvant treatment completed within 6 months prior to randomization. Symptoms of primary tumour, if in situ, that require intervention; prior treatment with (chemo)radiotherapy and/or resection of primary tumor is allowed. Resection of more than 2 liver segments, 2-stage procedures and/or radiotherapy of liver metastases. Eligible for more intensive systemic regimens (i.e. doublet or triplet chemotherapy). Eligible for local treatment of liver metastases (e.g. surgical resection, ablation). Presence of extrahepatic metastases; the presence of small (≤ 1 cm) lesions outside the liver on CT scan that are not clearly suspicious for metastases and/or the presence of enlarged hilar lymph nodes in the liver up to a maximal diameter of 2 cm is allowed. Non-correctable INR >2.0. Any serious comorbidity preventing the safe administration of anti-VEGF antibody treatment. This includes uncontrolled hypertension or treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive drugs, arterial (cerebro)vascular event within the past 12 months, history of bleeding, history of GI perforation, or presence of fistulae. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Mental disorders that may compromise patient compliance. Active second malignancy within the previous 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of skin and in situ carcinoma of cervix. Body weight over 150 kg (because of maximum table load). Known severe allergy for intravenous contrast fluids. Participation to another investigational study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UMC Utrecht
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tjitske Kent - Bosma
Phone
+31887551321
Email
tbosma@umcutrecht.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kees Punt, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marnix Lam, MD, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Radioembolization in Elderly/ Fragile Patients With mCRC

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs