search
Back to results

Proactive and Integrated Management and Empowerment in Parkinson's Disease (PRIME-UK): A New Model of Care (PRIME-RCT) (PRIME-RCT)

Primary Purpose

Parkinsonism

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PRIME Parkinson Care
Usual Care
Sponsored by
University of Bristol
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Parkinsonism focused on measuring Lewy body dementia, Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal degeneration, Vascular dementia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a diagnosis of parkinsonism made by a movement disorder specialist
  2. Be willing to participate
  3. Have the ability to provide informed consent to participant, or where unable to do so due to cognitive impairment, availability of a close friend or relative to act as a personal consultee
  4. Age 18 years and above.
  5. Resident within the geographical catchment area of Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Foundation Trust, UK

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with drug, infection or toxin induced parkinsonism
  2. Patients who lack capacity to participate but do not have anyone who can be a consultee to provide advice regarding the patient's wishes and views
  3. Patients with a current medical, cognitive or psychosocial issue or co-enrolment in other study that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.

Sites / Locations

  • Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

PRIME Parkinson Care

Usual care

Arm Description

PRIME Parkinson Care is a multi-component model of care comprising individual components: a) Case management b) Empowerment of patients and care givers c) Empowerment of healthcare professionals d) IT infrastructure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Goal attainment
Measured using the Bangor Goal-Setting Interview (BGSI) - score 1-10, higher score = better outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Parkinson's disease assessment
Measured using MDS-Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Score range 0-199, higher score = worse outcome
Non-motor symptom burden
Measured using MDS-Non-motor rating scale (MDS-NMS); Score range 0-334, higher score = worse outcome
Parkinson's-related quality of life
Measured using The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39); Score range 0-100, higher score = worse outcome
Fear of falling
Measured using the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (ICON-FES); Score range 10-40, higher score = worse outcome
Global Impression of change
Measured using the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC);Score range 0-7, higher score = worse outcome
Frailty
Measured using The Frailty Instrument of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE-FI75+); Score range 0-1, higher score = worse outcome
Frailty
Measured using Pictorial fit frail scale; Score range 0-43, higher score = worse outcome
Frailty
Measured using clinical frailty scale; Score range 0-9, higher score = worse outcome
Sarcopenia
Measured using the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climb stairs, falls questionnaire (SARC-F); Score range 0-10, higher score = worse outcome
Sarcopenia
Measured using the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climb stairs, falls, calf circumference questionnaire (SARC-CalF); Score range 0-20, higher score = worse outcome
Malnutrition risk
Measured using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST); Score range 0-6, higher score = worse outcome
Malnutrition risk
Measured using the Seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition (SCREEN-II-14); Score range 0-64, higher score = better outcome
Physical performance
Measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); Score range 0-12, higher score = better outcome
Physical performance
Measured using the Timed up and Go (TUG); score is not a scale (timing)
Physical activity
Measured using the Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire - WA Version (IPEQ-WA); Score range 0-182, higher score = better outcome
Gait
Measured using single and dual task gait assessments
Grip strength
Measured using hand-held dynamometer; scoring is in kg not a scale
Advance Care Plan data
Measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System - Revised: Parkinson's disease (ESAS-R-PD); Score range 0-100, higher score = worse outcome
Palliative symptom burden
Measured using the Palliative Case Outcome Scale - symptom list: Parkinson's disease (POS-S-PD); Score range 0-40, higher score = worse outcome
Hospice utilisation outside place of death
Captured from hospital and GP records
Use of anticipatory medication
Captured from hospital and GP records
Healthcare contacts with hospice and/or palliative care services
Captured from hospital and GP records
Loneliness/social isolation
Measured using UCLA-Loneliness Scale (3-item); Score range 3-9, higher score = worse outcome
Social participation
Measured using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing questionnaire (ELSA) - scoring not a scale
Perceived social support
Measured using Multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS); Score range 12-84, higher score = better outcome
Coping strategy
Measured using the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (BRIEFCope); Score range 28-112, higher score = better outcome
Acceptance of illness
Measured using Acceptance of Illness Scale; Score range 8-40, higher score = better outcome
Capability
Measured using the ICEpop Capability measure for older people (ICECAP-O); Score range 5-20, higher score = better outcome
Patient Activation
Measured using Patient Activation Measure (PAM); Score range 0-100, higher score = better outcome
Health related quality of life
Measured using EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L); Score range 5-25, higher score = worse outcome
Mortality
Captured from hospital and GP records
Healthcare events
Captured from hospital and GP records
Frequency of Parkinson's follow-up
Captured from hospital and GP records
Frequency and type of engagement with PRIME Parkinson care
Captured from study information
Experience of holistic patient-centred care
Measured using Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-26); Score range 26-130, higher score = better outcome
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Bone health
Measured using a combination of QFracture and FRAX questionnaires
Life space assessment
Measured using LSA questionnaire collecting participant's movements over the last month

Full Information

First Posted
October 19, 2021
Last Updated
August 24, 2023
Sponsor
University of Bristol
Collaborators
Radboud University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05127057
Brief Title
Proactive and Integrated Management and Empowerment in Parkinson's Disease (PRIME-UK): A New Model of Care (PRIME-RCT)
Acronym
PRIME-RCT
Official Title
Proactive and Integrated Management and Empowerment in Parkinson's Disease (PRIME-UK): A New Model of Care
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
October 28, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Bristol
Collaborators
Radboud University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
People living with Parkinson's disease experience progressive motor and non-motor symptoms, which negatively impact on health-related quality of life. Symptoms emerge and evolve as the disease progresses. Current care models are often inadequate to meet their needs. This study aims to evaluate whether a complex and innovative model of integrated care will increase an individual's ability to achieve their personal goals, have a positive impact on health and symptom burden, and be more cost-effective when compared with usual care.
Detailed Description
Background: People living with Parkinson's disease experience progressive motor and non-motor symptoms, which negatively impact on health-related quality of life and can lead to an increased risk of hospitalisation. It is increasingly recognised that the current care models are not suitable for the needs of people with parkinsonism whose care needs evolve and change as the disease progresses. This study aims to evaluate whether a complex and innovative model of integrated care will increase an individual's ability to achieve their personal goals, have a positive impact on health and symptom burden, and be more cost-effective when compared with usual care. Methods: This is a single centre, randomised controlled trial where people with parkinsonism and their informal caregivers are randomised into one of two groups: either PRIME Parkinson multi-component model of care; or usual care. Adults ≥18 years with a diagnosis of parkinsonism, able to provide informed consent or the availability of a close friend or relative to act as a personal consultee if capacity to do so is absent, and living in the trial geographical area are eligible. Up to three caregivers per patient can also take part, must be ≥18 years, provide informal, unpaid care and able to give informed consent. The primary outcome measure is goal attainment, as measured using the Bangor Goal Setting Interview. The duration of enrolment is 24 months. The total recruitment target is n=214 and the main analyses will be intention to treat. Discussion: This trial tests whether a novel model of care improves health and disease-related metrics including goal attainment, and decreases hospitalisations whilst being more cost-effective than the current usual care. Subject to successful implementation of this intervention within one centre, the PRIME Parkinson model of care could then be evaluated within a cluster-randomised trial at multiple centres.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinsonism
Keywords
Lewy body dementia, Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal degeneration, Vascular dementia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
214 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PRIME Parkinson Care
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PRIME Parkinson Care is a multi-component model of care comprising individual components: a) Case management b) Empowerment of patients and care givers c) Empowerment of healthcare professionals d) IT infrastructure.
Arm Title
Usual care
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
PRIME Parkinson Care
Intervention Description
A novel model of care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Care
Intervention Description
Usual NHS Care
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Goal attainment
Description
Measured using the Bangor Goal-Setting Interview (BGSI) - score 1-10, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Parkinson's disease assessment
Description
Measured using MDS-Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Score range 0-199, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Non-motor symptom burden
Description
Measured using MDS-Non-motor rating scale (MDS-NMS); Score range 0-334, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Parkinson's-related quality of life
Description
Measured using The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39); Score range 0-100, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Fear of falling
Description
Measured using the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (ICON-FES); Score range 10-40, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Global Impression of change
Description
Measured using the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC);Score range 0-7, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Frailty
Description
Measured using The Frailty Instrument of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE-FI75+); Score range 0-1, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Frailty
Description
Measured using Pictorial fit frail scale; Score range 0-43, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Frailty
Description
Measured using clinical frailty scale; Score range 0-9, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Sarcopenia
Description
Measured using the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climb stairs, falls questionnaire (SARC-F); Score range 0-10, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Sarcopenia
Description
Measured using the Sluggishness, Assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climb stairs, falls, calf circumference questionnaire (SARC-CalF); Score range 0-20, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Malnutrition risk
Description
Measured using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST); Score range 0-6, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Malnutrition risk
Description
Measured using the Seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition (SCREEN-II-14); Score range 0-64, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Physical performance
Description
Measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); Score range 0-12, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Physical performance
Description
Measured using the Timed up and Go (TUG); score is not a scale (timing)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Physical activity
Description
Measured using the Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire - WA Version (IPEQ-WA); Score range 0-182, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Gait
Description
Measured using single and dual task gait assessments
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Grip strength
Description
Measured using hand-held dynamometer; scoring is in kg not a scale
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Advance Care Plan data
Description
Measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System - Revised: Parkinson's disease (ESAS-R-PD); Score range 0-100, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Palliative symptom burden
Description
Measured using the Palliative Case Outcome Scale - symptom list: Parkinson's disease (POS-S-PD); Score range 0-40, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Hospice utilisation outside place of death
Description
Captured from hospital and GP records
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Use of anticipatory medication
Description
Captured from hospital and GP records
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Healthcare contacts with hospice and/or palliative care services
Description
Captured from hospital and GP records
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Loneliness/social isolation
Description
Measured using UCLA-Loneliness Scale (3-item); Score range 3-9, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Social participation
Description
Measured using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing questionnaire (ELSA) - scoring not a scale
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Perceived social support
Description
Measured using Multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS); Score range 12-84, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Coping strategy
Description
Measured using the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (BRIEFCope); Score range 28-112, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Acceptance of illness
Description
Measured using Acceptance of Illness Scale; Score range 8-40, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Capability
Description
Measured using the ICEpop Capability measure for older people (ICECAP-O); Score range 5-20, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Patient Activation
Description
Measured using Patient Activation Measure (PAM); Score range 0-100, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Health related quality of life
Description
Measured using EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L); Score range 5-25, higher score = worse outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Mortality
Description
Captured from hospital and GP records
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Healthcare events
Description
Captured from hospital and GP records
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Frequency of Parkinson's follow-up
Description
Captured from hospital and GP records
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Frequency and type of engagement with PRIME Parkinson care
Description
Captured from study information
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Experience of holistic patient-centred care
Description
Measured using Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-26); Score range 26-130, higher score = better outcome
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Description
Measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Bone health
Description
Measured using a combination of QFracture and FRAX questionnaires
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Life space assessment
Description
Measured using LSA questionnaire collecting participant's movements over the last month
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Have a diagnosis of parkinsonism made by a movement disorder specialist Be willing to participate Have the ability to provide informed consent to participant, or where unable to do so due to cognitive impairment, availability of a close friend or relative to act as a personal consultee Age 18 years and above. Resident within the geographical catchment area of Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Foundation Trust, UK Exclusion Criteria: Patients with drug, infection or toxin induced parkinsonism Patients who lack capacity to participate but do not have anyone who can be a consultee to provide advice regarding the patient's wishes and views Patients with a current medical, cognitive or psychosocial issue or co-enrolment in other study that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emily J Henderson, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Bristol
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS8 1NU
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Proactive and Integrated Management and Empowerment in Parkinson's Disease (PRIME-UK): A New Model of Care (PRIME-RCT)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs