Efficacy of ArchSinus, NasoPore & Propel to Prevent Post-Surgical MT Lateralization and Improve Symptomatic Outcomes
Primary Purpose
Chronic Sinusitis
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ArchSinus stent
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Sinusitis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis defined as symptomatic inflammation of the sinuses of at least 12 consecutive weeks duration despite medical management
- CT scan examination with a minimum Zinreich score of 5 prior to study entry
- Less than 2-point Zinreich score difference between two sides
- Primary FESS including bilateral total ethmoidectomy; symmetrical uncinate process reduction
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inferior turbinectomy, reduction or outfracture
- Polyp grade ˃ 4 bilaterally on Lildholdt's scale (1-3)
- Concha bullosa
- Severe nasal septal deviation at the level of OMC
- Sinonasal tumors
- FESS including asymmetrical resection of the middle turbinate
- Known allergy to nickel
- Known polyurethane induced dermatitis
- Oral steroid-dependent condition
- Momometasone furoate intolerance
- Known hypersensitivity to lactide, glycolide or caprolactone copolymers.
- Glaucoma or cataract
- History of immune deficiency
- Cystic fibrosis
- Pregnant or lactating female
- Acute sinus inflammation
- Coagulation disorders
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
ArchSinus stent
Propel stent
NasoPore packing
Arm Description
Post-FESS implantation of the study device (ArchSinus) into ethmoid sinus cavity
Post-FESS implantation of the comparator device (Propel) into ethmoid sinus cavity.
Post-FESS implantation of the comparator device (NasoPore) into ethmoid sinus cavity.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Middle turbinate lateralization 12 week post FESS (based CT scan)
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to Propel stent (Intersect ENT), to prevent post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization, 12 weeks post-FESS, based on CT scan.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Middle turbinate lateralization 12 week post FESS (based video endoscopy)
The secondary objective (1) is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT), ), to prevent post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization, 12 weeks post-FESS, based on video endoscopy on a 4-point scale.
Symptomatic outcomes within the 3-month post-FESS
The secondary objective (2) is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT) in improving the symptomatic outcomes based on side-specific SNOT-22 questioner, within the 3-month follow-up.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05156801
Brief Title
Efficacy of ArchSinus, NasoPore & Propel to Prevent Post-Surgical MT Lateralization and Improve Symptomatic Outcomes
Official Title
Efficacy of the ArchSinus, NasoPore and the Propel Stent in Preventing Post-Surgical Middle Turbinate Lateralization and Improving the Symptomatic Outcomes; Randomized, Blinded, Comparative Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
March 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
January 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
STS Medical
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a multi-center, randomized, single-blinded comparative 3-arm clinical study. This clinical study is designed to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus stent to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT), and to NasoPore (Stryker) in preventing post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months post FESS.
Detailed Description
50 chronic rhinosinusitis patients, that met the inclusion criteria will undergo bilateral FESS and subsequent bilateral placement of the ArchSinus into the randomized ethmoid sinus cavity and NasoPore / Propel into the other ethmoid sinus cavity. Comparative treatment sides will be randomly assigned; 50 sinuses treated with ArchSinus stent, 25 sinus treated with Propel stent, 25 sinuses treated with Nasopore. Standard Propel implant and 4cm whole NasoPore will be used.
ArchSinus stent will be removed 2 weeks (13-15 days) post FESS. Propel will be removed as necessary 2 weeks (13-15 days) post FESS. NasoPore arm will be debrided as necessary 2 weeks (13-15 days) post-FESS. Prior to removal / debridement procedures, the patients will be blindfolded, to keep them blinded for the treatment type on each side of their nose.
All patients will be followed up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks and 12 months post FESS and examined endoscopically. The endoscopic videos will be analyzed by independent pannel of 3 ENT surgeons, blinded to the treatment type, to assess middle turbinate lateralization on a 4-point scale.
CT scan will be performed pre-FESS and 12 weeks after the operation, to assess middle turbinate lateralization, as demonstrated by percent change in middle meatus (MM) area pre-FESS and 12 weeks after the surgery. Inflammatory mucosal thickening will be quantified using the Zinreich staging system. CT scans will be analyzed blindly by Medical Metrics Inc.
Symptomatic improvement will be analyzed weekly within 3 months follow up, using Side-specific Nasal SNOT-22 questioner.
Patient symptomatic relief during the implantation time will be analyzed 2 weeks post FESS, with Side-specific Nasal SNOT-22 questioner.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Sinusitis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
50 chronic rhinosinusitis patients, that met the inclusion criteria will undergo randomization into ArchSinus / Propel or ArchSinus / NasoPore implantation group. Comparative treatment sides will be randomly assigned; 13 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (right)/ Propel (left); 12 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (left)/ Propel (right); 12 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (right)/ NasoPore (left); 13 subjects will be assigned to ArchSinus (left)/ NasoPore (right) groups.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Primary objective will be analyzed using nasal video endoscopy and a CT scan, by an external experts in a blinded fashion. Secondary objective will be analyzed using side-specific SNOT-22 questioner, subjects will be blinded to the treatment type.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ArchSinus stent
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Post-FESS implantation of the study device (ArchSinus) into ethmoid sinus cavity
Arm Title
Propel stent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Post-FESS implantation of the comparator device (Propel) into ethmoid sinus cavity.
Arm Title
NasoPore packing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Post-FESS implantation of the comparator device (NasoPore) into ethmoid sinus cavity.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ArchSinus stent
Other Intervention Name(s)
Composite Removable Sinus Stent System
Intervention Description
Post FESS unilateral placement of the ArchSinus stent into the randomized ethmoid sinus cavity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Middle turbinate lateralization 12 week post FESS (based CT scan)
Description
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to Propel stent (Intersect ENT), to prevent post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization, 12 weeks post-FESS, based on CT scan.
Time Frame
12 weeks post FESS
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Middle turbinate lateralization 12 week post FESS (based video endoscopy)
Description
The secondary objective (1) is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT), ), to prevent post-FESS middle turbinate lateralization, 12 weeks post-FESS, based on video endoscopy on a 4-point scale.
Time Frame
12 weeks post FESS
Title
Symptomatic outcomes within the 3-month post-FESS
Description
The secondary objective (2) is to compare the efficacy of the ArchSinus to the Propel stent (Intersect ENT) in improving the symptomatic outcomes based on side-specific SNOT-22 questioner, within the 3-month follow-up.
Time Frame
12 weeks post FESS
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Re-stenosis rate 6 weeks post FESS (based video endoscopy)
Description
(1) Compare re-stenosis rate in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses assessed on a 1 to 4 scale based on nasal endoscopy at week 6
Time Frame
6 weeks post FESS
Title
symptomatic relief 2 weeks post FESS
Description
Compare symptomatic relief in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses, based side - specific Nasal SNOT-22 score 2 weeks post-FESS.
Time Frame
2 weeks post FESS
Title
Removal time
Description
Compare ArchSinus and Propel removal time
Time Frame
2 weeks post FESS
Title
Inflammatory mucosal thickening
Description
Compare % change of inflammatory mucosal thickening 12 weeks post FESS in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses
Time Frame
12 weeks post FESS
Title
Re-stenosis rate 12 months post FESS
Description
Compare re-stenosis rate in ArchSinus / Propel / NasoPore implanted sinuses assessed on a 1 to 4 scale based on nasal endoscopy 12 months post FESS.
Time Frame
12 months post FESS
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis defined as symptomatic inflammation of the sinuses of at least 12 consecutive weeks duration despite medical management
CT scan examination with a minimum Zinreich score of 5 prior to study entry
Less than 2-point Zinreich score difference between two sides
Primary FESS including bilateral total ethmoidectomy; symmetrical uncinate process reduction
Exclusion Criteria:
Inferior turbinectomy, reduction or outfracture
Polyp grade ˃ 4 bilaterally on Lildholdt's scale (1-3)
Concha bullosa
Severe nasal septal deviation at the level of OMC
Sinonasal tumors
FESS including asymmetrical resection of the middle turbinate
Known allergy to nickel
Known polyurethane induced dermatitis
Oral steroid-dependent condition
Momometasone furoate intolerance
Known hypersensitivity to lactide, glycolide or caprolactone copolymers.
Glaucoma or cataract
History of immune deficiency
Cystic fibrosis
Pregnant or lactating female
Acute sinus inflammation
Coagulation disorders
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lena Shlossberg, MS
Phone
+972526826962
Email
lena@ststent.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of ArchSinus, NasoPore & Propel to Prevent Post-Surgical MT Lateralization and Improve Symptomatic Outcomes
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs