search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Azithromycin in Idiopathic Purulent Oedematous Sinusitis in Adults (SOPAZITHRO)

Primary Purpose

Sinusitis, Chronic, Sinus Infection Chronic

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Azithromycin Oral Tablet
Placebo
Sponsored by
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sinusitis, Chronic

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient older than 18 years and less than 70 years of age
  • Chronic rhinosinusitis (> 12 weeks of evolution) meeting the definition published in the European Paper Position2012 (1) and corresponding exclusively to the following endoscopic and CT criteria:

    • Nasal endoscopy showing bilateral and diffuse involvement associating edema of the mucosa of the nasal cavities and meatus with the presence of mucopurulent secretions in these areas
    • Nasosinus CT scan showing diffuse and bilateral pansinus opacities involving at least the maxillary sinuses and the anterior and posterior ethmoids
  • Persistent intractable purulent rhinosinusitis despite at least 2 antibiotic therapies
  • Signed informed consent of the patient
  • Membership in a health insurance plan or beneficiary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • PCOS of identified primary cause (identified immune deficiency, cystic fibrosis)
  • Chronic non-purulent rhinosinusitis (nasosinusal polyposis, allergic rhinosinusitis)
  • Localized chronic suppurative rhinosinusitis (single sinus, unilateral, frontal or maxillary or sphenoidal)
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency (factor V level < 50%)
  • Severe renal insufficiency (stage 4 (GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) and/or creatinine < 40 ml/min)
  • Severe heart failure (old age, ischemic heart disease, episode of recurrent cardiac arrest; hypotension, NYHA functional stage III-IV; widened QRS, complex ventricular arrhythmias; hyponatremia (Na <135mmol/l); stage 4 renal failure (GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2); severely depressed LVEF (< 30%)
  • Documented moderate pre-existing hearing loss (>30dB) or single ear (unilateral cophosis)
  • Major cognitive impairment or lack of French language skills preventing completion of SNOT-22 and SF-36 questionnaires
  • Patient with galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption syndrome (rare hereditary diseases)
  • Patient with peanut or soy allergy
  • Patient allergic to macrolides
  • Patients who are intolerant or allergic to any of the excipients of azithromycin or placebo
  • Treatment with azithromycin in the previous 3 months
  • Long QT on ECG ((>440ms for male and >450ms for female) or cardiac arrhythmia or bradycardia (<60btm)
  • Hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia on blood ionogram
  • Confirmed or suspected atypical mycobacteriosis
  • Contraindicated drug combinations with macrolides (K-vitamins or drugs containing cisapride, colchicine, ergotamine or dihydroergotamine)
  • Cautionary drug combinations (non-inclusion criteria)

    • Atorvastatin (Increased risk of concentration-dependent rhabdomyolysis-type adverse events due to decreased hepatic metabolism of the cholesterol-lowering drug.
    • Ciclosporin (risk of increased ciclosporin blood levels and creatinine levels)
    • Digoxin (increase in digoxemia due to increased absorption of digoxin), Drugs likely to cause torsades de pointes, in particular class IA (e.g. quinidine) and class III (e.g. amiodarone, sotalol) antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics (e.g. phenothiazines, pimozide), tricyclic antidepressants (e.g. citalopram), certain fluoroquinolones (e.g. moxifloxacin, levofloxacin) (increased risk of ventricular rhythm disturbances)
    • Simvastatin (increased risk of rhabdomyolysis-type adverse effects (concentration-dependent), due to decreased hepatic metabolism of the cholesterol-lowering agent)
    • Ivabradine (increased risk of ventricular rhythm disorders),
    • Hypokalemic drugs
    • Bradycardia drugs
  • Patients with severe cholestasis
  • Patients under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patients with hematologic malignancies who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • History of facial radiotherapy
  • History of rhinosinus cancer
  • Participation in other category 1 research at the time of inclusion or in the month prior to inclusion

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Hospitalier IntercommunalRecruiting
  • Hôpital Henri Mondor
  • CHU Bicêtre, AP-HP
  • CHU LilleRecruiting
  • CHU de la Croix Rousse
  • Hospices de Lyon
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille Conception
  • CHRU de NancyRecruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De NantesRecruiting
  • Hôpital LariboisiereRecruiting
  • CHU ToulouseRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Azithromycin oral tablet

Placebo

Arm Description

Azithromycin 250 mg once daily morning or evening (with or without meals)

Placebo once daily morning or evening (with or without meals)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) 22
Comparison of the means of the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22) specific quality of life scores after 3 months of treatment. (min = 0, max = 110)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of infectious rhinosinus exacerbations
The number of infectious rhinosinus exacerbations during the 3-month period,
Number of courses of antibiotics used
Number of courses of antibiotics used during the 3-month period other than azithromycin or placebo
Visual analog scales of symptoms
Visual analog scales (VAS) of symptoms (self-assessment) (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, facial pain, smell disorder, nasal hyperactivity, epistaxis). The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10.
Semi-quantitative symptom scale
Semi-quantitative 4-point symptom scale assessed by the practitioner (min = 0, max = 3)
Semi-quantitative nasal endoscopy score
Semi-quantitative nasal endoscopy score (0: absent/1: present) for each of the following items: presence of pus, edema, erythema, crusts, polyps, scored out of 5 per nasal cavity (maximum score of 10) (Lund Kennedy score),
Quantitative Lund MacKay CT score
Quantitative Lund MacKay CT score (0: no sinus opacity, 1: moderate opacity, 2: total opacity) measured on 12 for each side (score of 24 maximum),
Nasal inflammation flow
Nasal inflammation (nasal nitric oxide (NO) flow, neutrophil polynuclear cell (NPC) and lymphocyte infiltrate on nasal cytology and assays of interleukin 6, 8 and elastase produced by NPCs in nasal secretions)
General quality of life
General quality of life Short form 36 (SF-36) (min=1, max=100)
Days off work
Number of days off work in the 3 months prior to treatment and the number of days off work during the 3 months of treatment
Olfactory score
Olfactory score (sniffing's stick test),
Bacteria present on the protected nasal swab
Identification and quantification of bacteria observed on the protected nasal swab (semi-quantitative score
Number of participants with clinical adverse events as assessed by compliance
Clinical tolerance evaluated by the effective intake of tablets
Number of participants with biological adverse events as assessed by compliance
Biological tolerance evaluated by the effective intake of tablets
Residual effect of the treatment using the SNOT 22 quality of life questionnaires
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the SNOT 22 quality of life questionnaires
Residual effect of the treatment using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaires
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaires
Residual effect of the treatment using the VAS score
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the VAS score. The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10.
Residual effect of the treatment using the semi-quantitative symptom scale
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the semi-quantitative symptom scale
Residual effect of the treatment using the nasal endoscopy
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the nasal endoscopy
Residual effect of the treatment using the bacteriological samples.
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the bacteriological samples.
Quantitative aspect of the ciliary beat
Quantitative aspect of the ciliary beat (frequency of the beat in Hertz) on a small number of centers having the equipment
Qualitative aspect of the ciliary beat
Qualitative aspect of the ciliary beat (coordination (normal or dyskinetic), index of efficiency)) on a small number of centers having the equipment

Full Information

First Posted
October 28, 2021
Last Updated
November 28, 2022
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05157685
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Azithromycin in Idiopathic Purulent Oedematous Sinusitis in Adults
Acronym
SOPAZITHRO
Official Title
Evaluation of the Efficacy of 3-month Continuous Extended Treatment With Azithromycin in Idiopathic Purulent Oedematous Sinusitis in Adults: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 28, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Purulent Oedematous Sinusitis (POS) is a particular form of chronic rhinosinusitis observed in 2% of the general population. In spite of its heavy impact on the quality of life, There is no established recommendation for the treatment of primary POS. Long-term low-dose macrolides are currently proposed for these forms of chronic rhinosinusitis when conventional treatments (local corticosteroids, saline rinsing, iterative short courses of antibiotics targeted on pathogens, and surgical opening and drainage) have failed. This treatment with macrolides is currently applied off-label. This study aims to assess the efficacy of macrolides in POS. An extensive workup is fulfilled to exclude other forms of chronic rhinosinusitis (Th2 biased inflammatory diseases, allergic diseases) (allergy, nasosinusal polyposis) or those due to cystic fibrosis or immune deficiency.
Detailed Description
POS is a particular form of chronic rhinosinusitis described in 2% of the general population. They lead to an alteration in the quality of daily life with a significant impact on the professional life of 70% of patients. They can be of idiopathic or of secondary origin. The most frequent secondary forms are those observed in cystic fibrosis and immune deficiencies. The pathophysiology of primary POS remains poorly understood, involving Th1-type inflammation and various bacteria (with Staphylococcus Aureus in the forefront). Bacteria could impair the ciliary beat, perpetuating infection and mucosal inflammation. There is no established recommendation for the treatment of primary POS Long-term low-dose macrolides are currently proposed for these forms of chronic rhinosinusitis when conventional treatments (local corticosteroids, saline rinsing, iterative short courses of antibiotics adapted to the germs found, and surgical drainage) have failed. This treatment with macrolides is currently used off label. Macrolides are effective on most gram-positive and gram-positive bacteria. Macrolides also have immunomodulatory properties on the Th1 immune response. This effect is maintained even in the presence of macrolide-resistant bacteria. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, daily administration of half-dose macrolides over the long term (HDLT) has been shown to be effective in reducing the frequency of infectious exacerbations. Uncontrolled trials have described an improvement in symptom scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyps. The results observed in randomized trials versus placebo are contradictory. A meta-analysis published in 2013 based on these 2 randomized studies was inconclusive regarding the efficacy of HDLT macrolides. The heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria with rhinosinusitis of a different proTh-2 inflammatory profile corresponding to that usually observed in nasal polyposis could explain this lack of result. A review of the literature published in 2017 on HDLT macrolides based on 52 publications observed a very wide diversity of antibiotic protocols in terms of the molecule chosen, the administration scheme and the duration of treatment (8 to 24 weeks). The number of patients studied was often small, which affected the statistical power of the results obtained. The authors of this review conclude by stressing the need to conduct placebo-controlled studies on large populations of patients selected on the phenotypic level. This study propose to evaluate the value of HDLT macrolides in this specific etiological setting. This project plans to exclude all chronic rhinosinusitis of Th2 inflammatory origin (allergy, nasosinusal polyposis) or those due to cystic fibrosis or immune deficiency. In addition, the inclusion centers selected in Ile de France have the necessary expertise to evaluate the impact of azithromycin on mucociliary clearance, notably with the development of innovative tools to measure the efficiency of the ciliary beat (high-speed video microscopy and particle tracking).At the same time, the tolerance of HDLT macrolides measured in patients with cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is excellent, provided that the well-documented contraindications are respected. No serious adverse effects have been reported, apart from cases of transient or permanent moderate hearing loss requiring audiometric monitoring. No specific study regarding the treatment of primary POS is available to date, even tough POS is very prevalent and its management is still associated with poor patient-reported outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sinusitis, Chronic, Sinus Infection Chronic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
230 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Azithromycin oral tablet
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Azithromycin 250 mg once daily morning or evening (with or without meals)
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo once daily morning or evening (with or without meals)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Azithromycin Oral Tablet
Other Intervention Name(s)
active arm
Intervention Description
Treatment assigned by randomization will be prescribed immediately. The active or placebo will be dispensed by the centre's pharmacy. Treatment will be taken in the morning or evening for 3 months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
comparator arm
Intervention Description
Treatment assigned by randomization will be prescribed immediately. The active or placebo will be dispensed by the centre's pharmacy. Treatment will be taken in the morning or evening for 3 months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of sinonasal outcome test (SNOT) 22
Description
Comparison of the means of the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22) specific quality of life scores after 3 months of treatment. (min = 0, max = 110)
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of infectious rhinosinus exacerbations
Description
The number of infectious rhinosinus exacerbations during the 3-month period,
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Number of courses of antibiotics used
Description
Number of courses of antibiotics used during the 3-month period other than azithromycin or placebo
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Visual analog scales of symptoms
Description
Visual analog scales (VAS) of symptoms (self-assessment) (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, facial pain, smell disorder, nasal hyperactivity, epistaxis). The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Semi-quantitative symptom scale
Description
Semi-quantitative 4-point symptom scale assessed by the practitioner (min = 0, max = 3)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Semi-quantitative nasal endoscopy score
Description
Semi-quantitative nasal endoscopy score (0: absent/1: present) for each of the following items: presence of pus, edema, erythema, crusts, polyps, scored out of 5 per nasal cavity (maximum score of 10) (Lund Kennedy score),
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Quantitative Lund MacKay CT score
Description
Quantitative Lund MacKay CT score (0: no sinus opacity, 1: moderate opacity, 2: total opacity) measured on 12 for each side (score of 24 maximum),
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Nasal inflammation flow
Description
Nasal inflammation (nasal nitric oxide (NO) flow, neutrophil polynuclear cell (NPC) and lymphocyte infiltrate on nasal cytology and assays of interleukin 6, 8 and elastase produced by NPCs in nasal secretions)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
General quality of life
Description
General quality of life Short form 36 (SF-36) (min=1, max=100)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Days off work
Description
Number of days off work in the 3 months prior to treatment and the number of days off work during the 3 months of treatment
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Olfactory score
Description
Olfactory score (sniffing's stick test),
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Bacteria present on the protected nasal swab
Description
Identification and quantification of bacteria observed on the protected nasal swab (semi-quantitative score
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants with clinical adverse events as assessed by compliance
Description
Clinical tolerance evaluated by the effective intake of tablets
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Number of participants with biological adverse events as assessed by compliance
Description
Biological tolerance evaluated by the effective intake of tablets
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Residual effect of the treatment using the SNOT 22 quality of life questionnaires
Description
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the SNOT 22 quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Residual effect of the treatment using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaires
Description
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Residual effect of the treatment using the VAS score
Description
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the VAS score. The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Residual effect of the treatment using the semi-quantitative symptom scale
Description
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the semi-quantitative symptom scale
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Residual effect of the treatment using the nasal endoscopy
Description
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the nasal endoscopy
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Residual effect of the treatment using the bacteriological samples.
Description
At 6 months (i.e., 3 months after cessation of treatment), the residual effect of treatment will be measured using the bacteriological samples.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Quantitative aspect of the ciliary beat
Description
Quantitative aspect of the ciliary beat (frequency of the beat in Hertz) on a small number of centers having the equipment
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Qualitative aspect of the ciliary beat
Description
Qualitative aspect of the ciliary beat (coordination (normal or dyskinetic), index of efficiency)) on a small number of centers having the equipment
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient older than 18 years and less than 70 years of age Chronic rhinosinusitis (> 12 weeks of evolution) meeting the definition published in the European Paper Position2012 (1) and corresponding exclusively to the following endoscopic and CT criteria: Nasal endoscopy showing bilateral and diffuse involvement associating edema of the mucosa of the nasal cavities and meatus with the presence of mucopurulent secretions in these areas Nasosinus CT scan showing diffuse and bilateral pansinus opacities involving at least the maxillary sinuses and the anterior and posterior ethmoids Persistent intractable purulent rhinosinusitis despite at least 2 antibiotic therapies Signed informed consent of the patient Membership in a health insurance plan or beneficiary Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy or breastfeeding PCOS of identified primary cause (identified immune deficiency, cystic fibrosis) Chronic non-purulent rhinosinusitis (nasosinusal polyposis, allergic rhinosinusitis) Localized chronic suppurative rhinosinusitis (single sinus, unilateral, frontal or maxillary or sphenoidal) Severe hepatic insufficiency (factor V level < 50%) Severe renal insufficiency (stage 4 (GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) and/or creatinine < 40 ml/min) Severe heart failure (old age, ischemic heart disease, episode of recurrent cardiac arrest; hypotension, NYHA functional stage III-IV; widened QRS, complex ventricular arrhythmias; hyponatremia (Na <135mmol/l); stage 4 renal failure (GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2); severely depressed LVEF (< 30%) Documented moderate pre-existing hearing loss (>30dB) or single ear (unilateral cophosis) Major cognitive impairment or lack of French language skills preventing completion of SNOT-22 and SF-36 questionnaires Patient with galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption syndrome (rare hereditary diseases) Patient with peanut or soy allergy Patient allergic to macrolides Patients who are intolerant or allergic to any of the excipients of azithromycin or placebo Treatment with azithromycin in the previous 3 months Long QT on ECG ((>440ms for male and >450ms for female) or cardiac arrhythmia or bradycardia (<60btm) Hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia on blood ionogram Confirmed or suspected atypical mycobacteriosis Contraindicated drug combinations with macrolides (K-vitamins or drugs containing cisapride, colchicine, ergotamine or dihydroergotamine) Cautionary drug combinations (non-inclusion criteria) Atorvastatin (Increased risk of concentration-dependent rhabdomyolysis-type adverse events due to decreased hepatic metabolism of the cholesterol-lowering drug. Ciclosporin (risk of increased ciclosporin blood levels and creatinine levels) Digoxin (increase in digoxemia due to increased absorption of digoxin), Drugs likely to cause torsades de pointes, in particular class IA (e.g. quinidine) and class III (e.g. amiodarone, sotalol) antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics (e.g. phenothiazines, pimozide), tricyclic antidepressants (e.g. citalopram), certain fluoroquinolones (e.g. moxifloxacin, levofloxacin) (increased risk of ventricular rhythm disturbances) Simvastatin (increased risk of rhabdomyolysis-type adverse effects (concentration-dependent), due to decreased hepatic metabolism of the cholesterol-lowering agent) Ivabradine (increased risk of ventricular rhythm disorders), Hypokalemic drugs Bradycardia drugs Patients with severe cholestasis Patients under guardianship or curatorship Patients with hematologic malignancies who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation History of facial radiotherapy History of rhinosinus cancer Participation in other category 1 research at the time of inclusion or in the month prior to inclusion
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Emilie BEQUIGNON
Phone
0145175000
Ext
+33
Email
emilie.bequignon@chicreteil.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Camille JUNG
Phone
0145175000
Ext
+33
Email
camille.jung@chicreteil.fr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal
City
Créteil
State/Province
Ile De France
ZIP/Postal Code
94000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
André COSTE
Facility Name
Hôpital Henri Mondor
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sophie BARTIER
Facility Name
CHU Bicêtre, AP-HP
City
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-François PAPON
Facility Name
CHU Lille
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Geoffrey MORTUAIRE
Email
Geoffrey.MORTUAIRE@CHRU-LILLE.FR
Facility Name
CHU de la Croix Rousse
City
Lyon
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clémentine Daveau
Facility Name
Hospices de Lyon
City
Lyon
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maxime Fieux
Facility Name
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille Conception
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13005
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Justin MICHEL
Facility Name
CHRU de Nancy
City
Nancy
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cécile Rumeau
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nantes
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Malard, MD PhD
Email
olivier.malard@chu-nantes.fr
Facility Name
Hôpital Lariboisiere
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin Verillaud
Facility Name
CHU Toulouse
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillaume De Bonnecaze, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Azithromycin in Idiopathic Purulent Oedematous Sinusitis in Adults

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs