search
Back to results

Efficacy of Orosol® in the Treatment of Chemo- and Radiation-induced Mucositis. (OROSOL)

Primary Purpose

Oral Mucositis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Topical application of Orosol®
Topical application of Placebo comparator
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Oral Mucositis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient, male or female, either

    • treated with chemotherapy for hematological cancer (leukemia, lymphoma) and suffering from grade 2 to 4 mucositis (according to WHO / NCI-CTCAE), or
    • treated with radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy (cisplatin or cetuximab) for head and neck cancer and suffering from grade 2 to 4 mucositis (according to WHO / NCI-CTCAE),
  • Agreeing not to take any treatment for mucositis other than the treatment proposed in this study, apart from the classic symptomatic treatment for mucositis recommended by WHO.
  • Able to give informed consent to participate in research.
  • Beneficiary of a Social Security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A woman who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or may be.
  • Major subject under guardianship, curators, deprived of liberty, or under the safeguard of justice.
  • Medical and / or surgical history deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the study because it would invalidate any reliable assessment.
  • General state of health considered pejorative (Karnofsky index <60).
  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetic subject (presence of honey in Orosol®).
  • Subject on an anticoagulant (AVK or AOD) (interaction of the cranberry contained in Orosol® with anticoagulants (in particular warfarin) with instability of the International Normalized Ratio; the AODs can potentially present the same type of interaction).
  • History of administration of the treatment (or equivalent) in the study.
  • Anticipated difficulties in reading / understanding the protocol and its questionnaires.
  • Subjects in the exclusion period from another clinical trial
  • Refusal of participation.

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Jean-Perrin
  • CHU clermont-ferrandRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Radio-induced oral mucositis / Medical Device

Radio-induced oral mucositis / Placebo comparator

Chemo-induced oral mucositis / Medical Device

Chemo-induced oral mucositis / placebo comparator

Arm Description

Patient with radio-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with experimental medical device

Patient with radio-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with placebo

Patient with chemo-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with experimental medical device

Patient with chemo-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on mucositis score (WHO)
Evolution the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis by collecting the mucositis score according to the World Health Organization scale (from 0 (absence of mucositis) to 4 (Oral feeding not possible, enteral (tube) or parenteral feeding indicated))
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on mucositis score (NCI-CTCAE v3.0)
Evolution the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis by collecting the mucositis score according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (clinical scale) (v 3.0) (from 0 (absence of mucositis) to 4 (Necrosis, spontaneous hemorrhage))
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on oral feeding (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Evolution the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis by collecting the difficulty in feeding orally with the functional signs scale from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (functional scale) (v 4.0) (from 0 (absence of mucositis) to 4 (Necrosis, Vital prognosis engaged))

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item voice"
The OAG "item voice" scale is a scale from 1 (Normal) to 3 (highly impacted) assessing the difficulty of speaking
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item swallowing"
The OAG "item swallowing" scale is a scale from 1 (Normal) to 3 (highly impacted) assessing the difficulty of swallowing
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item tongue aspect"
The OAG "item tongue aspect" scale is a scale from 1 (pink, wet and presence of taste buds) to 3 (cracked, blistered) assessing the aspect of the tongue
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item salivation"
The OAG "item salivation" scale is a scale from 1 (normal) to 3 (absence of salivation) assessing the hyposialia
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item mucous membrane and gums"
The OAG "item mucous membrane and gums" scale is a scale from 1 (pink and wet) to 3 (ulcerations and / or bleeding) assessing the state of aggression of the mucous membranes
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "teeth"
The OAG "item teeth" scale is a scale from 1 (clean and free of debris) to 3 (widespread plaques and debris on all damaged gums and teeth) assessing the state of aggression of the teeth
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "lips"
The OAG "item lips" scale is a scale from 1 (smooth, dewy and damp) to 3 (ulcerations or bleeding) assessing the state of aggression of the lips
Burning sensation
Assessment of burning symptom with visual analogical scale (from 0 (absence of burning sensation to 10 (strongest burning sensation imaginable)
Pain intensity
Assessment of pain with visual analogical scale (from 0 (absence of pain sensation to 10 (strongest pain sensation imaginable)

Full Information

First Posted
November 22, 2021
Last Updated
November 23, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05161091
Brief Title
Efficacy of Orosol® in the Treatment of Chemo- and Radiation-induced Mucositis.
Acronym
OROSOL
Official Title
Efficacy of Orosol® in the Treatment of Chemo- and Radiation-induced Mucositis. Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 22, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Oral mucositis is one of the most debilitating side effects of radiation therapy and various forms of chemotherapy, especially for head and neck cancers and hematopoietic stem cell transplants. It is a consequence of the cytostatic effects of anticancer treatments on rapidly renewing cells of the oral mucosa; An ulcer appears which will increase in size due to subsequent bacterial, fungal and / or viral growth, while the leakage of toxins through damaged capillaries causes irritation and a burning sensation. Proteolytic enzymes, known to destroy the extracellular matrix, inhibit cell regeneration and healing. Depending on the severity of the ulceration, infection and feeding possibilities, mucositis is scored between grade 0 (absent) and grade 4 (maximum) (according to the WHO (World Health Organization) classification or the NCI-CTCAE (National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), the latter degree most often requiring a modification of the anticancer treatment which may have an impact on the prognosis of the disease. Although, theoretically, mucositis is easy to treat because it only requires simple cleaning of the ulcers and stimulation of the growth of the underlying healthy cells to make up for the loss of substance, there are currently only limited symptomatic treatments available.
Detailed Description
Oral mucositis is one of the frequent and disabling effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, with an impact on the quality of life of patients and induced or prolonged hospital stays. It is a consequence of the cytostatic effects of anticancer treatments on rapidly renewing cells of the oral mucosa. Proteolytic enzymes, known to destroy the extracellular matrix, inhibit cell regeneration and healing. Treatment is currently symptomatic, with little effectiveness. Orosol® is a medical device, osmotically active viscous solution. Applied to the surface of an ulcer, it forms a film and mechanically attracts the hypotonic fluid present under the injured surface, thus cleaning the ulcer of all contaminants present on the surface (dead cells, cell debris, bacterial toxins and chemical agents. toxic) and reducing pain and burning sensation. This mechanical action also cleanses the ulcer of toxic substances that inhibit cell growth and paves the way for healing. This device (class 1) is a medical device that complies with the requirements set by European regulations for the treatment of oral mucositis and has shown improvement in a preliminary study in patients with chemo-induced mucositis. However, its effectiveness has not yet been tested in the case of radiation-induced mucositis. The main objective of the research is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis in patients treated for cancer by the evaluation at 28 days of the evolution of the mucositis via mucositis (WHO and NCI-CTCAE v3.0 scales) and food (WHO scales and functional signs of NCI-CTCAE v4.0) scores. The secondary objectives consist in evaluating during the treatment the mucositis score, the general state of health of the mouth, the burning sensation, the intensity of the pain on D1, D3, D5, D7, D14, D21 and D28 as well as analgesic consumption, the incidence of new ulcers, changes in anti-cancer treatment linked to mucositis and the tolerance of the treatment. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, bicenter study to establish CE compliance in a new indication. 54 adult patients, treated by chemotherapy for haematological cancer or radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy for head and neck cancer, with CTCAE grade ≥ 2 mucositis and agreeing not to take any treatment other than that studied (except the treatment symptomatic of mucositis recommended by the WHO), will be recruited during their treatment in the specialized services of the Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital or the Jean Perrin Center over a period estimated at 24 months. After information, collection of consent and verification of the selection criteria, patients will receive according to randomization (1: 1 stratified according to radio / chemotherapy) either the active treatment or a placebo. During the first visit, a clinical examination with evaluation of the grade of mucositis (WHO scale and clinical signs NCI-CTCAE v3.0), photographs of ulcers (retrospective control), evaluation of the state of the mouth (OAG (Oral Assessment Guide) grid), difficulty in feeding by the oral route (functional signs NCI- CTCAE v4.0) will be performed as well as assessments (VAS (Visual Analogic Scales) of pain and burning sensations before and 30 minutes after treatment. Visits are scheduled on D3, D5, D7, D14, D21 and D28 with clinical examination, photographs, evaluations of the condition of the mouth, difficulty in feeding, pain and burning sensation, collection of any adverse effects and changes in the anti-cancer treatment if necessary.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Oral Mucositis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
54 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Radio-induced oral mucositis / Medical Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient with radio-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with experimental medical device
Arm Title
Radio-induced oral mucositis / Placebo comparator
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patient with radio-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with placebo
Arm Title
Chemo-induced oral mucositis / Medical Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient with chemo-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with experimental medical device
Arm Title
Chemo-induced oral mucositis / placebo comparator
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patient with chemo-induced oral mucositis at least grade 2 treated with placebo
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Topical application of Orosol®
Intervention Description
Orosol® is a 20 ml aluminum bottle equipped with a spray without propellant gas for local application. Simply shake the bottle gently, apply the product to the injured surface by pressing your finger on the spray to deliver the product (4 to 5 times so as to form a thin film on the surface of the mouth) . It is recommended to use Orosol® every 2 hours at the start of treatment and then 3 to 4 times a day. The maximum duration of treatment will be 28 days. Eating or drinking should be avoided for the first 15 to 30 minutes after applying the product.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Topical application of Placebo comparator
Intervention Description
Placebo comparator is a 20 ml aluminum bottle equipped with a spray without propellant gas for local application. Simply shake the bottle gently, apply the product to the injured surface by pressing your finger on the spray to deliver the product (4 to 5 times so as to form a thin film on the surface of the mouth) . It is recommended to use Placebo comparator every 2 hours at the start of treatment and then 3 to 4 times a day. The maximum duration of treatment will be 28 days. Eating or drinking should be avoided for the first 15 to 30 minutes after applying the product.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on mucositis score (WHO)
Description
Evolution the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis by collecting the mucositis score according to the World Health Organization scale (from 0 (absence of mucositis) to 4 (Oral feeding not possible, enteral (tube) or parenteral feeding indicated))
Time Frame
At day 28
Title
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on mucositis score (NCI-CTCAE v3.0)
Description
Evolution the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis by collecting the mucositis score according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (clinical scale) (v 3.0) (from 0 (absence of mucositis) to 4 (Necrosis, spontaneous hemorrhage))
Time Frame
At day 28
Title
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the curative treatment with Orosol® on oral feeding (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Description
Evolution the symptoms of chemo-induced or radiation-induced mucositis by collecting the difficulty in feeding orally with the functional signs scale from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (functional scale) (v 4.0) (from 0 (absence of mucositis) to 4 (Necrosis, Vital prognosis engaged))
Time Frame
At day 28
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item voice"
Description
The OAG "item voice" scale is a scale from 1 (Normal) to 3 (highly impacted) assessing the difficulty of speaking
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item swallowing"
Description
The OAG "item swallowing" scale is a scale from 1 (Normal) to 3 (highly impacted) assessing the difficulty of swallowing
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item tongue aspect"
Description
The OAG "item tongue aspect" scale is a scale from 1 (pink, wet and presence of taste buds) to 3 (cracked, blistered) assessing the aspect of the tongue
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item salivation"
Description
The OAG "item salivation" scale is a scale from 1 (normal) to 3 (absence of salivation) assessing the hyposialia
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "item mucous membrane and gums"
Description
The OAG "item mucous membrane and gums" scale is a scale from 1 (pink and wet) to 3 (ulcerations and / or bleeding) assessing the state of aggression of the mucous membranes
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "teeth"
Description
The OAG "item teeth" scale is a scale from 1 (clean and free of debris) to 3 (widespread plaques and debris on all damaged gums and teeth) assessing the state of aggression of the teeth
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Assessment of general state of health of the mouth with Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scale "lips"
Description
The OAG "item lips" scale is a scale from 1 (smooth, dewy and damp) to 3 (ulcerations or bleeding) assessing the state of aggression of the lips
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Burning sensation
Description
Assessment of burning symptom with visual analogical scale (from 0 (absence of burning sensation to 10 (strongest burning sensation imaginable)
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28
Title
Pain intensity
Description
Assessment of pain with visual analogical scale (from 0 (absence of pain sensation to 10 (strongest pain sensation imaginable)
Time Frame
At day 1, 3 , 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patient, male or female, either treated with chemotherapy for hematological cancer (leukemia, lymphoma) and suffering from grade 2 to 4 mucositis (according to WHO / NCI-CTCAE), or treated with radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy (cisplatin or cetuximab) for head and neck cancer and suffering from grade 2 to 4 mucositis (according to WHO / NCI-CTCAE), Agreeing not to take any treatment for mucositis other than the treatment proposed in this study, apart from the classic symptomatic treatment for mucositis recommended by WHO. Able to give informed consent to participate in research. Beneficiary of a Social Security scheme. Exclusion Criteria: A woman who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or may be. Major subject under guardianship, curators, deprived of liberty, or under the safeguard of justice. Medical and / or surgical history deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the study because it would invalidate any reliable assessment. General state of health considered pejorative (Karnofsky index <60). Type 1 or type 2 diabetic subject (presence of honey in Orosol®). Subject on an anticoagulant (AVK or AOD) (interaction of the cranberry contained in Orosol® with anticoagulants (in particular warfarin) with instability of the International Normalized Ratio; the AODs can potentially present the same type of interaction). History of administration of the treatment (or equivalent) in the study. Anticipated difficulties in reading / understanding the protocol and its questionnaires. Subjects in the exclusion period from another clinical trial Refusal of participation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lise Laclautre
Phone
334.73.754.963
Email
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent Devoize
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Jean-Perrin
City
Clermont-Ferrand
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
lise Laclautre
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michel Lapeyre
Facility Name
CHU clermont-ferrand
City
Clermont-Ferrand
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lise Laclautre
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent Devoize

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21133051
Citation
Feller L, Essop R, Wood NH, Khammissa RA, Chikte UM, Meyerov R, Lemmer J. Chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: pathobiology, epidemiology and management. SADJ. 2010 Sep;65(8):372-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15000636
Citation
Velez I, Tamara LA, Mintz S. Management of oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy: an update. Quintessence Int. 2004 Feb;35(2):129-36.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16499139
Citation
Peterson DE. New strategies for management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. J Support Oncol. 2006 Feb;4(2 Suppl 1):9-13.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Orosol® in the Treatment of Chemo- and Radiation-induced Mucositis.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs