Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP Pathway for Migraine
Primary Purpose
Migraine
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Sham cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Migraine
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- male or female patients, aged between 40 and 70 years, referring to the Headache Center of the University of L'Aquila;
- a diagnosis of migraine with or without aura according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3; https://ichd-3.org/);
- age at onset of migraine <50 years;
- migraine must have been present for at least ≥ 12 months;
- treated with CGRP-MAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab) according to clinical practice criteria for 90-180 days since the first subcutaneous administration (this time range was chosen to ensure a stable CGRP pathway inhibition);
- reporting >4 monthly migraine days in the last 30 days of observation despite treatment with CGRP-MAbs;
- able to discriminate between migraine and tension-type headaches;
- written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- any migraine preventive medication other than CGRP-MAbs;
- secondary migraine;
- epilepsy or any other neurologic condition that may be worsened by transcranial electrical stimulation;
- metallic head implants, cardiac pacemaker or any other device that could malfunction or be displaced by electrical stimulation;
- pregnancy or lactation.
Sites / Locations
- University of L'AquilaRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Decrease in headache days
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Decrease in disabling headache days
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Decrease in mean 10-point Visual Analog Scale
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group in the 10-point Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10 points, where 0 means "no pain at all" and 10 "maximum conceivable pain")
Decrease in doses of acute treatment
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Secondary Outcome Measures
Decrease in mean modified Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (mMIDAS) score
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group in the modified Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (mMIDAS).
mMIDAS is a self-administered questionnaire that contains five questions about the headache a patient had in the previous month, assessing the impact of migraine on three domains of daily activity: two questions for paid work or schoolwork, two questions for household work, and one question for family, social and leisure activities. The two questions for each of the first two groups assess, respectively, the number of days off due to headache, and the number of days in which the productivity was reduced by half or more. mMIDAS index is derived from the sum of the answers on the first five questions. This score defines patients in four categories of headache disability: little/none disability if the score is between 0 and 5; mild disability if between 6 and 10; moderate disability if between 11 and 20; and severe disability if greater than 20.
Decrease in mean Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Decrease in mean Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Decrease in mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Decrease in mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group.
HADS is a scale based upon 14 questions. A score from 0 to 21 is given to both anxiety and depression, where 0-7 scores are normal, 8-10 borderline, and 11-21 abnormal.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05161871
Brief Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP Pathway for Migraine
Official Title
Effectiveness of tDCS and Monoclonals Antibodies Anti-CGRP as a Combined Treatment for Migraine: a Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 16, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 16, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of L'Aquila
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Electrophysiological changes that occur in the brains of migraine patients, lead to the activation of nociceptive centers, including a peripheral neural structure, the trigeminal ganglion (TG), which releases pain-inducing peptides and mostly calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Monoclonal antibodies acting on the CGRP pathway (CGRP-MAbs) are the first drugs specifically designed for migraine, they inhibit CGRP release from the TG without entering the brain. Not all patients experience benefit from CGRP-MAbs treatment. For this reason, associating these drugs with a non-pharmacological treatment that acts centrally, such as transcranial direct current stimulation, could be effective.
The aim of the study is investigating how the migraine preventive treatment with CGRP-MAbs in association with tDCS, is effective to reduce headache days, days of disabling headache, intensity of pain and consumption of acute treatments. Migraine-related disability, quality of life, sleep disturbance and psychological aspects will also be evaluated. Patients will be randomized into two groups, one will receive active tDCS and one sham tDCS. Both patients and investigators will be blind to the treatment administered (double-blind).
Furthermore, will be evalutated the cortical mechanisms involved in migraine by directly modulating brain physiology via repetitive tDCS in patients with migraine on treatment with CGRP-MAbs. To fulfill this aim, we will assess the EEG correlates of the actual effects of the stimulation in a sham-controlled study, providing the EEG indexes linked to the altered and potentially restored cortical dynamics in migraine.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Migraine
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Intervention Description
The cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation protocol will consist in five daily sessions, each lasting 20 min. The montage will provide a bilateral stimulation on occipital areas, with the reference anodal electrodes positioned on the M1 areas. The stimulation will be applied via 4 conductive-rubber square electrodes (5x5 cm) placed in sponges saturated with high conductivity gel and connected to a battery-operated stimulator system. Direct current with maximal intensity of 1.5 mA with be provided for 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Intervention Description
Sham stimulation will be performed by the same protocol as active stimulation; however, the device will be switched off 30 seconds after the beginning of stimulation. This way, the patient will experience the same sensations as with active stimulation without receiving actual stimulation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decrease in headache days
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in disabling headache days
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in mean 10-point Visual Analog Scale
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group in the 10-point Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10 points, where 0 means "no pain at all" and 10 "maximum conceivable pain")
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in doses of acute treatment
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decrease in mean modified Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (mMIDAS) score
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group in the modified Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (mMIDAS).
mMIDAS is a self-administered questionnaire that contains five questions about the headache a patient had in the previous month, assessing the impact of migraine on three domains of daily activity: two questions for paid work or schoolwork, two questions for household work, and one question for family, social and leisure activities. The two questions for each of the first two groups assess, respectively, the number of days off due to headache, and the number of days in which the productivity was reduced by half or more. mMIDAS index is derived from the sum of the answers on the first five questions. This score defines patients in four categories of headache disability: little/none disability if the score is between 0 and 5; mild disability if between 6 and 10; moderate disability if between 11 and 20; and severe disability if greater than 20.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in mean Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in mean Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Decrease in mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group.
HADS is a scale based upon 14 questions. A score from 0 to 21 is given to both anxiety and depression, where 0-7 scores are normal, 8-10 borderline, and 11-21 abnormal.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in occipital electroencephalographic (EEG) signal power at 8-13 Hz frequency after vs before tDCS
Description
Difference between the active tDCS treated group and the sham tDCS treated group
Time Frame
4 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
male or female patients, aged between 40 and 70 years, referring to the Headache Center of the University of L'Aquila;
a diagnosis of migraine with or without aura according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3; https://ichd-3.org/);
age at onset of migraine <50 years;
migraine must have been present for at least ≥ 12 months;
treated with CGRP-MAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab) according to clinical practice criteria for 90-180 days since the first subcutaneous administration (this time range was chosen to ensure a stable CGRP pathway inhibition);
reporting >4 monthly migraine days in the last 30 days of observation despite treatment with CGRP-MAbs;
able to discriminate between migraine and tension-type headaches;
written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
any migraine preventive medication other than CGRP-MAbs;
secondary migraine;
epilepsy or any other neurologic condition that may be worsened by transcranial electrical stimulation;
metallic head implants, cardiac pacemaker or any other device that could malfunction or be displaced by electrical stimulation;
pregnancy or lactation.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of L'Aquila
City
L'Aquila
ZIP/Postal Code
67100
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simona Sacco, MD
Phone
+390862433561
Email
simona.sacco@univaq.it
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35620782
Citation
Ornello R, Rosignoli C, Caponnetto V, Pistoia F, Ferrara M, D'Atri A, Sacco S. Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP as a Combined Treatment for Migraine (TACTIC): Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2022 May 10;13:890364. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.890364. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP Pathway for Migraine
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs