MotIoN aDaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for MSA (MINDS)
Primary Purpose
MSA - Multiple System Atrophy
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Deep brain stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for MSA - Multiple System Atrophy focused on measuring deep brain stimulation, autonomic
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of MSA with disabling autonomic symptoms
- >6/12 in the autonomic subsection (Q9-12) of the UMSAR scale
- Patient willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study.
- Male or female aged 55 years or over
- Able to walk (to perform gait analysis)
- Have an anticipated prognosis > 2 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Female of child-bearing age
- The patient is unwilling to participate or unable to give informed consent.
- The patient has been deemed unfit for stimulator insertion by their healthcare team i.e. surgical contraindications to DBS:
- Bleeding or coagulation disorder
- Not fit for general anaesthetic
- Unable to deal with implanted DBS system (turn on and off and recharging where applicable, although it is acceptable if a carer can do this)
- Untreated anxiety or depression
- Unable to undergo preoperative MRI (e.g. metal implants)
- Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm.
Sites / Locations
- John Radcliffe HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Deep brain stimulation
Arm Description
All patients will undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation with results compared before and after stimulation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in quality of life before and after DBS measured by EuroQol-5 domains
EQ-5D before and after DBS. Each domain score 1-5, higher is worse.
Change in freezing of gait before and after DBS, measured by freezing of gait questionnaire
Measured by Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG) before and after DBS, Score 0-24, higher is worse.
Change in the number of sleep arousals per night
Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS using
Change in the number of sleep arousals per night
Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS
Cardiovascular symptoms before and after DBS (continuous blood pressure)
Measured by 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure before and after DBS
Cardiovascular symptoms before and after DBS (change in postural blood pressure)
Measured by tilt table blood pressure before and after DBS
Change of power in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Measured by change in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Change of power in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Measured by change in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Change of power in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Measured by change in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events
Documentation of adverse events from intervention
Measurement of Falls frequency
Falls diary
Frequency and volume of bladder voiding before and after stimulation
British association of urological surgeons bladder diary
Autonomic function before and after stimulation measured by autonomic symptom profile
Autonomic symptom profile questionnaire. Higher score is worse. Multiple sections, and composite score possible.
Carer Burden before and after stimulation measured by Zarit Burden interview
Zarit Burden interview Carer Burden Questionnaire. Score 0-88, higher is worse.
MSA disease severity score before and after stimulation
Unified MSA Rating Scale before and after stimulation. Scores 0-48 pt1, 0-56 pt2; higher is worse.
Gait Analysis before and after stimulation using gaitrite mat to measure gait and step velocity and symmetry
Gait parameters testing using Gaitrite mat
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05197816
First Posted
November 29, 2021
Last Updated
January 5, 2022
Sponsor
University of Oxford
Collaborators
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05197816
Brief Title
MotIoN aDaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for MSA
Acronym
MINDS
Official Title
MotIoN aDaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for MSA
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 3, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Oxford
Collaborators
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Patients routinely undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment of symptoms related to neurodegenerative conditions, most commonly Parkinson's disease. In the Investigator's experience, and published evidence shows, that stimulation has effects on the autonomic nervous system. In patients undergoing therapeutic DBS for a particular subtype of Parkinsonism (Multiple System Atrophy), the effects on autonomic parameters such as blood pressure and bladder symptoms has been shown to be improved by the investigators (unpublished data). In this current study, the investigators plan to use a novel technique of adaptive DBS in order to provide stimulation dependent on patient physiological or positional factors. This is with the aim of making stimulation more responsive and patient-specific.
Detailed Description
Aim and patient group:
Multiple System Atrophy is a form of Parkinsonism and is a neurodegenerative condition that is characterized by gait and autonomic failure. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of aDBS of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus (PPN) on autonomic and gait symptoms in a group of 5 patients with MSA. Patients will enter our routine selection process but patients in the study will be selected for predominantly autonomic symptoms as per the inclusion criteria below. The aim is to test whether or not PPN aDBS improves quality of life, and has an effect on a variety of measurable autonomic parameters in this subset of patients. Secondary aims are to assess the safety of DBS in MSA, and to look at the structural projections and effects on brain networks associated with stimulation.
Background:
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a routine treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). In Oxford, around 80 DBS operations per year are performed, and approximately two thirds of these are in patients with PD. Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a 'Parkinsonian' condition similar to PD and is a progressive, incurable, neurodegenerative condition characterized by a combination of Parkinsonism, ataxia, and autonomic failure. Any one of these three features may predominate, making diagnosis difficult; however, virtually all patients have autonomic dysfunction. Indeed, autonomic dysfunction is the presenting feature in half of patients that have Parkinsonism or ataxia predominant MSA. The motor manifestations such as gait problems, ataxia, and postural abnormalities are very similar to those encountered by patients with Parkinson's disease, though unfortunately are usually less responsive to dopamine agonists and so can be more disabling. Patients tend to progress more quickly, often confined to a wheelchair within 3-5 years of diagnosis, and death is usually within a decade.
Whilst DBS has sometimes been performed for the treatment of MSA, including in Oxford , the primary outcome measure is usually the motor outcome, despite the fact that the autonomic symptoms are probably the predominant factor in causing a reduced quality of life. This is because DBS is traditionally used to control motor symptoms and the exploration of its effects on autonomic function are relatively new, and pioneered by the investigators.
The most common complaints caused by autonomic dysfunction in MSA are related to orthostatic hypotension and neurogenic bladder. The former causes dizziness, fatigue and, when a severe fall in BP occurs on standing, can lead to collapse. This may be, at least in part, a cause for the numerous falls that these patients suffer. Part of the aim of this study is to look at orthostatic BP changes with and without stimulation and see whether these are improved by DBS. This may correlate with a reduction in falls, although this study is unlikely to be powered to answer this specific question. Other 'autonomic' problems include bladder dysfunction, sleep disorders, exercise intolerance and problems with thermoregulation and sweating. These will be captured using questionnaires.
Regarding the target used for DBS, a well-established target to improve gait and postural abnormalities in PD is the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). It has been demonstrated that the PPN is also a brain area that, when stimulated, improves bladder function in these patients. It has also been shown that PPN stimulation reduces postural fall in BP in a group of PD patients treated primarily for gait and postural problems. Whilst these studies provide a rationale for looking at similar parameters in MSA patients, this study aims to answer the question as to whether it will work for these symptoms in MSA, in addition to the motor symptoms routinely treated.
The investigators have already shown in 5 patients with MSA that these symptoms are improved with PPN DBS. The difference in this trial is the usage of a new DBS device. This is a novel device where stimulation parameters can be changed in response to changes in the patient's position, activity, or physiological parameters.
Usage of adaptive stimulation:
The investigators intend to study the usage of motion-based control of stimulation. In the current trial, the main aim is to assess the effects of DBS on gait, sleep, and blood pressure control.
In previous studies, the investigators have noted that while standing, blood pressure is increased with stimulation, as is lying blood pressure. Supine hypertension may increase the stroke risk for these patients. Furthermore, the best improvement in gait is seen with a slightly different stimulation waveform.
In order to correct for this, the investigators propose to introduce motion-based adaptive stimulation which would involve the use of an accelerometer in changing between different stimulation parameters depending on the patient's position - so delivering a different waveform for lying and standing.
Justification/importance:
A trial of DBS to assess the effect on autonomic symptomatology of MSA has never been performed. We aim to combine a five patient clinical pilot study of DBS for MSA with an investigation of the neural circuitry underpinning autonomic control.
This translational strategy is likely to lead to a larger efficacy study of DBS for MSA as well as revolutionizing neural-based treatments in other autonomic disorders such as orthostatic hypotension and pure autonomic failure.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
MSA - Multiple System Atrophy
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, autonomic
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Evaluation of symptomatology "on" and "off" adaptive deep brain stimulation
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
5 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Deep brain stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All patients will undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation with results compared before and after stimulation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Deep brain stimulation
Intervention Description
Electrical pulses from implanted generator that adapts to patient activity and/or physiology
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in quality of life before and after DBS measured by EuroQol-5 domains
Description
EQ-5D before and after DBS. Each domain score 1-5, higher is worse.
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Change in freezing of gait before and after DBS, measured by freezing of gait questionnaire
Description
Measured by Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG) before and after DBS, Score 0-24, higher is worse.
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Change in the number of sleep arousals per night
Description
Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS using
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Change in the number of sleep arousals per night
Description
Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Cardiovascular symptoms before and after DBS (continuous blood pressure)
Description
Measured by 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure before and after DBS
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Cardiovascular symptoms before and after DBS (change in postural blood pressure)
Description
Measured by tilt table blood pressure before and after DBS
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Change of power in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Description
Measured by change in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Change of power in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Description
Measured by change in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Change of power in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Description
Measured by change in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events
Description
Documentation of adverse events from intervention
Time Frame
Throughout study up to 6 months
Title
Measurement of Falls frequency
Description
Falls diary
Time Frame
Throughout study up to 3 months
Title
Frequency and volume of bladder voiding before and after stimulation
Description
British association of urological surgeons bladder diary
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Autonomic function before and after stimulation measured by autonomic symptom profile
Description
Autonomic symptom profile questionnaire. Higher score is worse. Multiple sections, and composite score possible.
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Carer Burden before and after stimulation measured by Zarit Burden interview
Description
Zarit Burden interview Carer Burden Questionnaire. Score 0-88, higher is worse.
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
MSA disease severity score before and after stimulation
Description
Unified MSA Rating Scale before and after stimulation. Scores 0-48 pt1, 0-56 pt2; higher is worse.
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Title
Gait Analysis before and after stimulation using gaitrite mat to measure gait and step velocity and symmetry
Description
Gait parameters testing using Gaitrite mat
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Neuropsychological Outcome before and after stimulation
Description
Structured interview and standard Neuropsychological Testing (Memory, Attention, Language, Mood, visuospatial function and cognition
Time Frame
Pre-operative and at 6 months after stimulation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of MSA with disabling autonomic symptoms
>6/12 in the autonomic subsection (Q9-12) of the UMSAR scale
Patient willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study.
Male or female aged 55 years or over
Able to walk (to perform gait analysis)
Have an anticipated prognosis > 2 years
Exclusion Criteria:
Female of child-bearing age
The patient is unwilling to participate or unable to give informed consent.
The patient has been deemed unfit for stimulator insertion by their healthcare team i.e. surgical contraindications to DBS:
Bleeding or coagulation disorder
Not fit for general anaesthetic
Unable to deal with implanted DBS system (turn on and off and recharging where applicable, although it is acceptable if a carer can do this)
Untreated anxiety or depression
Unable to undergo preoperative MRI (e.g. metal implants)
Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
John Radcliffe Hospital
City
Oxford
State/Province
Oxfordshire
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 9DU
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexander L Green, FRCS
Phone
01865234762
Email
alex.green@nds.ox.ac.uk
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Undecided We are recruiting only 5 patients, so sharing IPD even anonymised, may be identifiable. Decision will be taken when this can be definitively elucidated.
Learn more about this trial
MotIoN aDaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for MSA
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs