Alcohol PBS and Thinking About the Past
Alcohol Drinking in College
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Alcohol Drinking in College
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- minimum age of 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- no exclusions at baseline
- participants who do not follow the instructions for the specific writing task will be unable to sign-up for the remaining follow up sessions (Parts 2-6) and will be excluded the final data analyses
Sites / Locations
- Texas A&M University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Placebo Comparator
Active Comparator
Experimental
Experimental
Negative Event Only
Negative Event + Factual Thinking Task
Negative Event + Counterfactual Task
Personalized Normative Feedback
Participants will be asked to think of a specific example of the most (or one of the most) negative, unpleasant event with alcohol they have experienced; the event they choose must have occurred at least a year ago. Or they will be asked to think of the most significant event that has occurred in the past year. After thinking of a specific event, they will be given three minutes to write about their experience. The writing prompt will ask that they express the event information in a few sentences. This writing prompt will help participants place themselves back into that moment and access salient emotions and cognition about it. Similar negative event prompts have been used in counterfactual thinking studies (McFarland & Alvaro, 2000; White & Lehman, 2005).
Participants in this group, the event plus the factual thinking task condition, will be told the following after completing the negative event writing task, "After disappointing and/or negative experiences like the one you described on the previous page, people often think about the details of the situation. For example, when it happened, who was involved, and what happened right before or after the incident occurred. In the space below please provide examples of some of these details.." There will be 10 blank boxes below the instructions and participants will be asked to provide some examples of details from their traumatic event. They will be asked to only list as many as they can naturally recall without repeating any. This procedure is derived from Kray and colleague's (2010) study on counterfactual thinking and meaning in life.
Participants will be told after completing the negative event writing task, "After disappointing and/or negative experiences like the one you described, people sometimes cannot help thinking "what if…" or "if only…" and imagining how things might have gone differently. That is, if only I had done something differently, the negative drinking situation could have been avoided or turned out better. In the box below please identify things that, had they been different, would have improved the outcome of the negative drinking situation you described earlier and briefly describe how the outcome would have been better." Participants will be asked to list three counterfactuals about the event. Participants will also be asked to think of situations where these strategies could be used, to list out any obstacles that might prevent them from implementing these strategies and to indicate their intention to use each strategy over the next week.
Participants in this group, the personalized normative feedback, will be asked to rate the frequency and quantity of TAMU students that use PBS when drinking.