search
Back to results

High-intensity Aquatic Exercise for Adults With Rheumatic Diseases (AquaHigh)

Primary Purpose

Rheumatic Diseases

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Group A: High intensity exercise training
Group B: moderate intensity exercise training
Sponsored by
Oslo Metropolitan University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatic Diseases focused on measuring Rheumatic Diseases, Aquatic exercise, High-intensity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Individuals who

  1. are 18 years or older,
  2. have a diagnosis of any kind of RDs,
  3. can walk with or without a walking aid and
  4. understand Norwegian.

Exclusion Criteria:

1) medical contraindications to high intensity exercise, 2) life expectancy below 1 year and 3) currently participating or have participated in aquatic high intensity exercise programs or trials during the last 3 months.

-

Sites / Locations

  • Oslo Metroplitan University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

A: Exercise

B: Exercise

Arm Description

High intensity interval exercise training (4 x 4 minutes of intensity above 17 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion)

Moderate intensity exercise training

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in peak oxygen consumption
Physical capacity will be assessed with a maximal walking treadmill test for estimation of peak oxygen consumption. A modified Balke protocol on a treadmill will be used.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in 30 STS
The 30 sec sit-to-stand test (30STS) will be used is a measure of lower extremity strength
Change in Patients Global Assessment score
Change in Patients Global Assessment score (PGA) is a self-reported measure in which the patient's overall disease activity is measured. The phrasing of PGA is not standardized, but the PGA of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR is based on the question "In all the ways in which your RDs affect you, how would you rate the way you felt over the past week?" PGA is reported on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Higher scores represent a high level of disease activity. PGA is reliable for the assessment of both joint and skin disease and a PGA score < 20 is defined as low disease activity.
Change in the 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function form (PF-8a).
The 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, (PROMIS) physical function form (PF-8a) is a brief patient-reported measure of physical function, Scale 5 (best) to 1 (worst)
Change in Quality of Life
Euro Quality of life questionnaire (EQ5D-5L), Scale 1 (best) to 5 (worst) and Scale 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Change in patients' level of physical activity
The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale measures the patients' level of physical activity on a 10-point scale based on 10 descriptive activity levels ranging from wholly inactive and dependent to regular participation in impact sports. Scale 1 (worst) to 10 (best)
Change in reported pain
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain will be measured at rest and in activity on a 0-10 NRS. The patients mark a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change in fatigue
The Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) score assesses NRS for fatigue severity, effect, and coping during the past 7 days. All three dimensions are rated from 0-10, and the total score is obtained by dividing the sum of individual scores by 3

Full Information

First Posted
January 13, 2022
Last Updated
March 22, 2023
Sponsor
Oslo Metropolitan University
Collaborators
The Dam Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05209802
Brief Title
High-intensity Aquatic Exercise for Adults With Rheumatic Diseases
Acronym
AquaHigh
Official Title
High-intensity Aquatic Exercise for Adults With Rheumatic Diseases (AquaHigh)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 3, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 22, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 12, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Oslo Metropolitan University
Collaborators
The Dam Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare aquatic high intensity interval training with moderate intensity exercise training on exercise capacity in a population with rheumatic diseases.
Detailed Description
Exercise is important to manage rheumatic diseases (RDs). In 2007, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) launched a global initiative to advocate the use of exercise not only to prevent illness but to serve as a key element in the management and treatment of multiple chronic diseases. Their "Exercise is Medicine" initiative promotes exercise as a highly potent free medicine with few side effects. Despite catchphrases such as "best drug ever," few adhere to the global recommendations for weekly physical activities. Exercise is one of the therapeutic strategies that helps minimise deleterious effects on the musculoskeletal system generated by aging while preserving independence, promoting weight control, and maintaining or improving quality of life, functional capacity, and emotional well-being. However, exercises performed on the ground can aggravate joint pain and increase the risk of falls among those with RDs. Aquatic exercises are a popular adjunct treatment modality for patients with inflammatory RDs. Aquatic exercises are highly preferred by people with RDs, who are more likely to report feeling better than those treated with similar exercises on land. A preference for a water-based rehabilitation or environment may enable greater exercise compliance. A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2011 concluded that the effects of aquatic exercise for adults with arthritis appears comparable to land-based exercise. When people are unable to exercise on land or find it difficult, aquatic programs provide an enabling alternative strategy. Aquatic exercise programmes have been criticised for being non-progressive or low-intensive. One possible advantage of the aquatic environment is that the people with chronic diseases may be able to train at higher intensities than on land. The effectiveness of aquatic exercise needs further comprehensive investigation, particularly related to the link between load, types of exercise, and degree of changes in physical functioning and physical fitness. Method: Design: The study will be a randomized clinical trial. Patients will be recruited from different municipalities in Norway with possibilities of pool training in temperate water (between 30-34°C to be optimal). Intervention group: The intervention group will receive aquatic high intensity interval exercise training twice a week for 12 weeks. Control group: The control group will receive aquatic moderate intensity exercise training twice a week for 12 weeks. Sample Size Estimation: Sample size is calculated on the basis of the primary outcome variable, where a between-group difference in VO2peak of 15% or 3.5 mL∙kg-1∙min-1 is considered to be of clinical relevance. Both groups are receiving an exercise intervention, therefore we estimate a smaller between group difference to be 2.0 mL∙kg-1∙min-1. Using a reported standard deviation of change in VO2peak of 3 and 80% power to detect this difference, approximately 35 participants are required in each group. To allow for a possible 20% drop-out rate, we plan to randomise 84 patients in total (i.e. 42 per group). Statistical analyzes: Descriptive data are reported for variables of interest and will be analysed following the intention-to-treat principle. Prospective differences in primary and secondary outcomes and baseline characteristics between the intervention group and the control group will be assessed by t-tests for continuous and normal distributed variables and non-parametric tests for categorical variables. Multiple linear regression modelling is used to control for confounding differences between study groups. The study will provide evidence-based knowledge for performing high-Intensity water workout in municipalities and investigates the factors that determine successful effects on physical fitness, disease activity and pain and tests the programme's utility for municipal health care services.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatic Diseases
Keywords
Rheumatic Diseases, Aquatic exercise, High-intensity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
84 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
A: Exercise
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
High intensity interval exercise training (4 x 4 minutes of intensity above 17 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion)
Arm Title
B: Exercise
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Moderate intensity exercise training
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Group A: High intensity exercise training
Intervention Description
Both group will receive aquatic exercise training twice a week for 12 weeks at different intensities
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Group B: moderate intensity exercise training
Intervention Description
Both group will receive aquatic exercise training twice a week for 12 weeks at different intensities
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in peak oxygen consumption
Description
Physical capacity will be assessed with a maximal walking treadmill test for estimation of peak oxygen consumption. A modified Balke protocol on a treadmill will be used.
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in 30 STS
Description
The 30 sec sit-to-stand test (30STS) will be used is a measure of lower extremity strength
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Title
Change in Patients Global Assessment score
Description
Change in Patients Global Assessment score (PGA) is a self-reported measure in which the patient's overall disease activity is measured. The phrasing of PGA is not standardized, but the PGA of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR is based on the question "In all the ways in which your RDs affect you, how would you rate the way you felt over the past week?" PGA is reported on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Higher scores represent a high level of disease activity. PGA is reliable for the assessment of both joint and skin disease and a PGA score < 20 is defined as low disease activity.
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Title
Change in the 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function form (PF-8a).
Description
The 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, (PROMIS) physical function form (PF-8a) is a brief patient-reported measure of physical function, Scale 5 (best) to 1 (worst)
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Title
Change in Quality of Life
Description
Euro Quality of life questionnaire (EQ5D-5L), Scale 1 (best) to 5 (worst) and Scale 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Title
Change in patients' level of physical activity
Description
The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale measures the patients' level of physical activity on a 10-point scale based on 10 descriptive activity levels ranging from wholly inactive and dependent to regular participation in impact sports. Scale 1 (worst) to 10 (best)
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Title
Change in reported pain
Description
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain will be measured at rest and in activity on a 0-10 NRS. The patients mark a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months
Title
Change in fatigue
Description
The Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) score assesses NRS for fatigue severity, effect, and coping during the past 7 days. All three dimensions are rated from 0-10, and the total score is obtained by dividing the sum of individual scores by 3
Time Frame
Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Individuals who are 18 years or older, have a diagnosis of any kind of RDs, can walk with or without a walking aid and understand Norwegian. Exclusion Criteria: medical contraindications to high intensity exercise, life expectancy below 1 year and currently participating or have participated in aquatic high intensity exercise programs or trials during the last 3 months.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heidi Bunæs-Næss, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Oslo Metropolitan University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oslo Metroplitan University
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0130
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

High-intensity Aquatic Exercise for Adults With Rheumatic Diseases

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs