search
Back to results

Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer (OMAMA)

Primary Purpose

Constipation, Opioid-Induced

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Macrogol Only Product in Oral Dose Form
Magnesium hydroxide 724mg
Sponsored by
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Constipation, Opioid-Induced focused on measuring Cancer, Palliative care, Cancer pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation, macrogol/electrolytes, magnesium hydroxide

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Patients with metastatic cancer (≥18 years);
  • Starting with slow release or transdermal opioids for pain;
  • Able to complete a Dutch questionnaire. Previous treatment with opioids is allowed, if discontinued more than 4 weeks ago.

Exclusion Criteria:

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Patients with contra-indications for laxatives
  • Use of laxatives during the last four weeks
  • Severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine >180 umol/l)
  • Estimated life expectancy <3 months

Sites / Locations

  • FlevoziekenhuisRecruiting
  • Rijnstate ZiekenhuisRecruiting
  • Radboud university Medical center NijmegenRecruiting
  • Jeroen Bosch ZiekenhuisRecruiting
  • Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRecruiting
  • Spaarne GasthuisRecruiting
  • Groene Hart Hospital
  • Haaglanden Medical Centre
  • Leiden University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Erasmus Medical CenterRecruiting
  • University Medical Center GroningenRecruiting
  • Martini Hospital GroningenRecruiting
  • University Medical Center Utrecht

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Macrogol/electrolytes

Magnesium hydroxide

Arm Description

Macrogol/electrolytes is started at a dose of 1 sachet once a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of macrogol/electrolytes may be increased to 2 sachets a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.

Magnesium hydroxide is started at a dose of 724 mg three times a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of magnesium hydroxide may be increased to 1448 mg three times a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The percentage of patients with a score of <30 of the Bowel Function Index
A clinician-administered patient-reported questionnaire to assess clinically significant constipation, validated in patients receiving opioids for chronic non-malignant pain and for malignant pain (Abramovitz 2013, Rentz 2009 and 2011). It consists of three questions, assessing ease of defecation, feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation and personal judgement of the patient regarding constipation, each during the last 7 days and each rated on a scale of 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome). A total score ≥30 (mean of the three separate scores) indicates clinically significant constipation. A change of the total score of >12 is regarded as clinically meaningful. It has been used in a large observational study in cancer patients receiving opioids (Davies 2021) and in randomised trials of opioid antagonists for OIC (Ahmedzai 2012, Dupoiron 2017, Leng 2020, Poelaert 2015). It has been recommended as the assessment tool of choice for OIC (Argoff 2015, Farmer 2019).

Secondary Outcome Measures

The EQ5D
A self-administered, generic assessment tool developed by the EuroQol Group, a network of international research teams, and consists of questions on five dimensions of health (i.e., mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) (Pickard 2007). It has been used in cost-effectiveness studies on OIC (Dunlop 2012, Hjalte 2016, Lawson 2016).
Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation
Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation as judged by professional care givers (Davies 2021, Drossman 2016), including: straining during >25% of defecations lumpy or hard stools in >25% of defecations sensation of incomplete evacuation in >25% of defecations sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage in >25% of defecations manual manoeuvres to facilitate >25% of defecations <3 spontaneous defecations per week At least two of these criteria have to be fulfilled in order to diagnose constipation, to be judged by the treating physician or clinical nurse specialists/nurse practitioners
Cancer pain score
Numeric Rating SDcale, ranging from 0 to 10
Patient satisfaction with laxative
A single four-item question, ranging from unsatisfied to very satisfied.
Side effects of laxatives
All side-effects are scored on a four-point Likert scale (not at all, a bit, rather, very much): Bad taste Problems with swallowing Abdominal cramps Nausea Flatulence Diarrhea Other (to be specified by the patient)
Cost-effectiveness of macrogol/electrolytes compared to magnesium hydroxide
We aim to perform a comparative cost-effectiveness of the laxatives. This requires data collection on healthcare procedures and QOL in responders, non-responders and patients with side-effects of laxatives for the follow-up period of the study. These healthcare procedures will be extracted from hospital databases and healthcare use outside the hospital will be collected with the iMCQ at 4 weeks. All individual health care procedures will be linked to their unit costs. Reimbursement prices issued by the Dutch Healthcare Authority and national reference prices will be used for this assessment as outlined in current Dutch pharmaco-economic guidance. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using a decision tree including different branches for initial therapy and responders and non-responders. The costs and QOL of the patients in the trial will be used as input for this decision tree. Total costs and effects will be calculated by summing the costs and effects of each branch.

Full Information

First Posted
January 19, 2022
Last Updated
June 29, 2023
Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
UMC Utrecht, Leiden University Medical Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Spaarne Gasthuis, Rijnstate Hospital, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Flevoziekenhuis, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Haaglanden Medical Centre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05216328
Brief Title
Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Acronym
OMAMA
Official Title
OMAMA-study - Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 2, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
UMC Utrecht, Leiden University Medical Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Spaarne Gasthuis, Rijnstate Hospital, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Flevoziekenhuis, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Haaglanden Medical Centre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
More than 70% of patients with cancer in the palliative phase have pain that often requires treatment with opioids (morphine-like agents). Constipation occurs in 59% of patients treated with opioids. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) has consequences that range from daily discomfort with social insecurity and disability to intestinal obstruction. It leads to limitations in self-management, a reduced quality of life and a risk of the need for more care. In the guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer" it is recommended to start preventively with an osmotic laxative such as macrogol/electrolytes or magnesium hydroxide when starting opioids. Macrogol/electrolytes has been proven to be effective for OIC, but is sometimes perceived by patients as unpleasant due to its taste. Magnesium hydroxide, which is less commonly prescribed for OIC, has a neutral taste. Although it is mentioned in the guideline, it is not studied for the treatment of OIC and also not officially registered for this. To support the advice of the guideline and to prove that a choice is possible, it is important to investigate whether there are differences in effectiveness and/or side effects between macrogol/electrolytes and magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of OIC. The aim of this study is to compare macrogol/electrolytes with magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer in the palliative (incurable) phase, who start opioids because of pain. The choice of laxative is determined by drawing lots (randomisation). After two weeks, its effect will be assessed and will be presented as the percentage of patients who have not developed constipation after starting opioids. If the laxative, as assigned by lot, is described as satisfactory by the patient, the patient can continue with the drug that the patient used, after the study through regular prescription. The investigators will ask the patients in the study about their satisfaction with the laxative used, any side effects and the degree of pain. Furthermore, the appeal to care for possible constipation will be examined. Because the best attainable quality of life in the palliative phase is the objective of all care, the investigators will also measure this perceived quality with a questionnaire in this study. The results of this study will lead to the best achievable prevention of opioid constipation in patients with cancer in the palliative phase.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Constipation, Opioid-Induced
Keywords
Cancer, Palliative care, Cancer pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation, macrogol/electrolytes, magnesium hydroxide

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
330 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Macrogol/electrolytes
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Macrogol/electrolytes is started at a dose of 1 sachet once a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of macrogol/electrolytes may be increased to 2 sachets a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.
Arm Title
Magnesium hydroxide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Magnesium hydroxide is started at a dose of 724 mg three times a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of magnesium hydroxide may be increased to 1448 mg three times a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Macrogol Only Product in Oral Dose Form
Other Intervention Name(s)
Macrogol/electrolytes
Intervention Description
Information already included in arm/group description.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Magnesium hydroxide 724mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Magnesiumoxide
Intervention Description
Information already included in arm/group description.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The percentage of patients with a score of <30 of the Bowel Function Index
Description
A clinician-administered patient-reported questionnaire to assess clinically significant constipation, validated in patients receiving opioids for chronic non-malignant pain and for malignant pain (Abramovitz 2013, Rentz 2009 and 2011). It consists of three questions, assessing ease of defecation, feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation and personal judgement of the patient regarding constipation, each during the last 7 days and each rated on a scale of 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome). A total score ≥30 (mean of the three separate scores) indicates clinically significant constipation. A change of the total score of >12 is regarded as clinically meaningful. It has been used in a large observational study in cancer patients receiving opioids (Davies 2021) and in randomised trials of opioid antagonists for OIC (Ahmedzai 2012, Dupoiron 2017, Leng 2020, Poelaert 2015). It has been recommended as the assessment tool of choice for OIC (Argoff 2015, Farmer 2019).
Time Frame
On day 14
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The EQ5D
Description
A self-administered, generic assessment tool developed by the EuroQol Group, a network of international research teams, and consists of questions on five dimensions of health (i.e., mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) (Pickard 2007). It has been used in cost-effectiveness studies on OIC (Dunlop 2012, Hjalte 2016, Lawson 2016).
Time Frame
On day 0 and day 14
Title
Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation
Description
Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation as judged by professional care givers (Davies 2021, Drossman 2016), including: straining during >25% of defecations lumpy or hard stools in >25% of defecations sensation of incomplete evacuation in >25% of defecations sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage in >25% of defecations manual manoeuvres to facilitate >25% of defecations <3 spontaneous defecations per week At least two of these criteria have to be fulfilled in order to diagnose constipation, to be judged by the treating physician or clinical nurse specialists/nurse practitioners
Time Frame
On day 0 and day 14
Title
Cancer pain score
Description
Numeric Rating SDcale, ranging from 0 to 10
Time Frame
On day 0 and day 14
Title
Patient satisfaction with laxative
Description
A single four-item question, ranging from unsatisfied to very satisfied.
Time Frame
On day 14
Title
Side effects of laxatives
Description
All side-effects are scored on a four-point Likert scale (not at all, a bit, rather, very much): Bad taste Problems with swallowing Abdominal cramps Nausea Flatulence Diarrhea Other (to be specified by the patient)
Time Frame
On day 14
Title
Cost-effectiveness of macrogol/electrolytes compared to magnesium hydroxide
Description
We aim to perform a comparative cost-effectiveness of the laxatives. This requires data collection on healthcare procedures and QOL in responders, non-responders and patients with side-effects of laxatives for the follow-up period of the study. These healthcare procedures will be extracted from hospital databases and healthcare use outside the hospital will be collected with the iMCQ at 4 weeks. All individual health care procedures will be linked to their unit costs. Reimbursement prices issued by the Dutch Healthcare Authority and national reference prices will be used for this assessment as outlined in current Dutch pharmaco-economic guidance. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using a decision tree including different branches for initial therapy and responders and non-responders. The costs and QOL of the patients in the trial will be used as input for this decision tree. Total costs and effects will be calculated by summing the costs and effects of each branch.
Time Frame
On day 14

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: Patients with metastatic cancer (≥18 years); Starting with slow release or transdermal opioids for pain; Able to complete a Dutch questionnaire. Previous treatment with opioids is allowed, if discontinued more than 4 weeks ago. Exclusion Criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: Patients with contra-indications for laxatives Use of laxatives during the last four weeks Severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine >180 umol/l) Estimated life expectancy <3 months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kay Kistemaker, MSc/MD
Phone
+31 6 50087799
Email
k.kistemaker@amsterdamumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lia van Zuylen, Prof. dr.
Phone
+3120 4445571
Email
c.vanzuylen@amsterdamumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lia van Zuylen, Prof.dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Flevoziekenhuis
City
Almere
State/Province
Flevoland
ZIP/Postal Code
1315 RA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dirkje Sommeijer, Dr.
Email
dsommeijer@flevoziekenhuis.nl
Facility Name
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
City
Arnhem
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6815 AD
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maurice van der Vorst, Drs.
Email
mvandervorst@rijnstate.nl
Facility Name
Radboud university Medical center Nijmegen
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kris Vissers, Prof. dr
Phone
+31-24-3666353
Email
Kris.Vissers@radboudumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Evelien Kuip, Dr.
Phone
+31-24-36592857
Email
Evelien.Kuip@radboudumc.nl
Facility Name
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
City
's Hertogenbosch
State/Province
Noord-Brabant
ZIP/Postal Code
5223 GZ
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tineke Smilde, Dr.
Email
t.smilde@jbz.nl
Facility Name
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Monique Steegers, Prof. dr.
Phone
+31 (0)20 444 4444
Email
m.steegers@amsterdamumc.nl
Facility Name
Spaarne Gasthuis
City
Hoofddorp
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
2134 TM
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerty de Klerk, Drs.
Email
g.deklerk@spaarnegasthuis.nl
Facility Name
Groene Hart Hospital
City
Gouda
State/Province
South Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
2803 HH
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marissa Cloos-van Balen, MD
Email
Marissa.Cloos@ghz.nl
Facility Name
Haaglanden Medical Centre
City
The Hague
State/Province
South Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
2512 VA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anouk Jochems, MD
Email
a.jochems@haaglandenmc.nl
Facility Name
Leiden University Medical Center
City
Leiden
State/Province
Zuid-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
2333 ZA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marije Slingerland, Dr.
Email
m.slingerland@lumc.nl
Facility Name
Erasmus Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
State/Province
Zuid-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 GD
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karin van der Rijt, Prof. dr.
Email
c.vanderrijt@erasmusmc.nl
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713 GZ
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
AN Reyners, Prof. dr.
Phone
+31 50 361 28 21
Email
a.k.l.reyners@umcg.nl
Facility Name
Martini Hospital Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9728 NT
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annette van der Velden, Dr.
Email
a.vandervelden@mzh.nl
Facility Name
University Medical Center Utrecht
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Els Witteveen, Prof. dr.
Phone
+31-88-7556265
Email
P.O.Witteveen@umcutrecht.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexander de Graeff, Dr.
Phone
+31-88-7556308
Email
A.deGraeff-2@umcutrecht.nl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24102611
Citation
Abramowitz L, Beziaud N, Causse C, Chuberre B, Allaert FA, Perrot S. Further validation of the psychometric properties of the Bowel Function Index for evaluating opioid-induced constipation (OIC). J Med Econ. 2013 Dec;16(12):1434-41. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.851083. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21937568
Citation
Ahmedzai SH, Nauck F, Bar-Sela G, Bosse B, Leyendecker P, Hopp M. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, parallel-group study to determine the safety and efficacy of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release tablets in patients with moderate/severe, chronic cancer pain. Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;26(1):50-60. doi: 10.1177/0269216311418869. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26582720
Citation
Argoff CE, Brennan MJ, Camilleri M, Davies A, Fudin J, Galluzzi KE, Gudin J, Lembo A, Stanos SP, Webster LR. Consensus Recommendations on Initiating Prescription Therapies for Opioid-Induced Constipation. Pain Med. 2015 Dec;16(12):2324-37. doi: 10.1111/pme.12937. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19662923
Citation
Bell T, Annunziata K, Leslie JB. Opioid-induced constipation negatively impacts pain management, productivity, and health-related quality of life: findings from the National Health and Wellness Survey. J Opioid Manag. 2009 May-Jun;5(3):137-44. doi: 10.5055/jom.2009.0014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28850447
Citation
Christensen HN, Olsson U, From J, Breivik H. Opioid-induced constipation, use of laxatives, and health-related quality of life. Scand J Pain. 2016 Apr;11:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32701649
Citation
Davies A, Leach C, Butler C, Gregory A, Henshaw S, Minton O, Shorthose K, Batsari KM. Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer: a "real-world," multicentre, observational study of diagnostic criteria and clinical features. Pain. 2021 Jan;162(1):309-318. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002024.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22707180
Citation
Dhingra L, Shuk E, Grossman B, Strada A, Wald E, Portenoy A, Knotkova H, Portenoy R. A qualitative study to explore psychological distress and illness burden associated with opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients with advanced disease. Palliat Med. 2013 May;27(5):447-56. doi: 10.1177/0269216312450358. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27144617
Citation
Drossman DA. Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Rome IV. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 19:S0016-5085(16)00223-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22313329
Citation
Dunlop W, Uhl R, Khan I, Taylor A, Barton G. Quality of life benefits and cost impact of prolonged release oxycodone/naloxone versus prolonged release oxycodone in patients with moderate-to-severe non-malignant pain and opioid-induced constipation: a UK cost-utility analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):564-75. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.665279. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28641363
Citation
Dupoiron D, Stachowiak A, Loewenstein O, Ellery A, Kremers W, Bosse B, Hopp M. A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone-naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR. Eur J Pain. 2017 Oct;21(9):1528-1537. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1054. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30788113
Citation
Farmer AD, Drewes AM, Chiarioni G, De Giorgio R, O'Brien T, Morlion B, Tack J. Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced constipation: European expert consensus statement. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):7-20. doi: 10.1177/2050640618818305. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Erratum In: United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):178.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9505981
Citation
Freedman MD, Schwartz HJ, Roby R, Fleisher S. Tolerance and efficacy of polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution versus lactulose in relieving opiate induced constipation: a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;37(10):904-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04264.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33063777
Citation
Ginex PK, Hanson BJ, LeFebvre KB, Lin Y, Moriarty KA, Maloney C, Vrabel M, Morgan RL. Management of Opioid-Induced and Non-Opioid-Related Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Nov 1;47(6):E211-E224. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.E211-E224.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31321524
Citation
Hawley P, MacKenzie H, Gobbo M. PEG vs. sennosides for opioid-induced constipation in cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1775-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04944-5. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22564354
Citation
Head SJ, Kaul S, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP. Non-inferiority study design: lessons to be learned from cardiovascular trials. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs099. Epub 2012 May 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27830531
Citation
Hjalte F, Ragnarson Tennvall G, Welin KO, Westerling D. Treatment of Severe Pain and Opioid-induced Constipation: An Observational Study of Quality of Life, Resource Use, and Costs in Sweden. Pain Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):227-236. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0059-9. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22156893
Citation
Ishihara M, Ikesue H, Matsunaga H, Suemaru K, Kitaichi K, Suetsugu K, Oishi R, Sendo T, Araki H, Itoh Y; Japanese Study Group for the Relief of Opioid-induced Gastrointestinal Dysfunction. A multi-institutional study analyzing effect of prophylactic medication for prevention of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):373-81. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318237d626.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31186614
Citation
Lyseng-Williamson KA. Correction to: Macrogol (polyethylene glycol) 4000 without electrolytes in the symptomatic treatment of chronic constipation: a profile of its use. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2019;35(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s40267-018-0588-x. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20128662
Citation
Penning-van Beest FJ, van den Haak P, Klok RM, Prevoo YF, van der Peet DL, Herings RM. Quality of life in relation to constipation among opioid users. J Med Econ. 2010 Mar;13(1):129-35. doi: 10.3111/13696990903584436.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17488136
Citation
Pickard AS, Wilke CT, Lin HW, Lloyd A. Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):365-84. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725050-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25757607
Citation
Poelaert J, Koopmans-Klein G, Dioh A, Louis F, Gorissen M, Loge D, Van Op den Bosch J, van Megen YJ. Treatment with prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone improves pain relief and opioid-induced constipation compared with prolonged-release oxycodone in patients with chronic severe pain and laxative-refractory constipation. Clin Ther. 2015 Apr 1;37(4):784-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19912069
Citation
Rentz AM, Yu R, Muller-Lissner S, Leyendecker P. Validation of the Bowel Function Index to detect clinically meaningful changes in opioid-induced constipation. J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):371-83. doi: 10.3111/13696990903430481.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21083515
Citation
Rentz AM, van Hanswijck de Jonge P, Leyendecker P, Hopp M. Observational, nonintervention, multicenter study for validation of the Bowel Function Index for constipation in European countries. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):35-44. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.535270. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19886948
Citation
Taylor RR, Guest JF. The cost-effectiveness of macrogol 3350 compared to lactulose in the treatment of adults suffering from chronic constipation in the UK. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15;31(2):302-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04191.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17509812
Citation
Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31231974
Citation
Tokoro A, Imai H, Fumita S, Harada T, Noriyuki T, Gamoh M, Akashi Y, Sato H, Kizawa Y. Incidence of opioid-induced constipation in Japanese patients with cancer pain: A prospective observational cohort study. Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(10):4883-4891. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2341. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16225360
Citation
Wirz S, Klaschik E. Management of constipation in palliative care patients undergoing opioid therapy: is polyethylene glycol an option? Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005 Sep-Oct;22(5):375-81. doi: 10.1177/104990910502200511.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.pallialine.nl
Description
guidelines palliative care
URL
http://www.palliaweb.nl
Description
The Dutch digital palliative care platform

Learn more about this trial

Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs