search
Back to results

Advanced Planning for Online Accounts and Data

Primary Purpose

Terminal Cancer, Metastatic Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Post-Mortem Plan
Sponsored by
University of Colorado, Denver
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Terminal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Life-limited adults diagnosed with metastatic cancer who have online accounts and data.
  • Adult family/loved ones of the diagnosed adult who are willing to participate in planning activities.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Sites / Locations

  • University of Colorado HealthRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Post-Mortem Plan

Arm Description

Following the death of the terminally ill participant, investigators will work with networks as the wishes of the deceased are executed. Continued engagement at this point will allow us to provide support to the network during a difficult period or time while also identifying shortcomings in our plans and systemic challenges to postmortem planning. Working with those who are grieving is a delicate proposition, but one with which my students and I have extensive experience.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Determine best practices for supporting participants
The investigator will use interviews to develop a broad understanding of the terminal patient, the network, and the relevant accounts and data. During interviews with the terminally ill participant, the study team will seek to develop an understanding of the participant as a person, the network and its key members, and establish a shared set of expectations. The investigator anticipates members of the patient's social network will be involved during this interview. Through personal interviews, the study team will identify end-of-life needs and wishes. The study team will engage in value elicitation activities to identify both what the values are that should inform the work with the participant, as well as the source of values and the agency people have in relationship to them. In many cases, participants will have already engaged in versions of these conversations focused on other domains in their life (e.g., finances, funerary wishes, etc.).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 27, 2021
Last Updated
February 6, 2023
Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
U.S. National Science Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05222308
Brief Title
Advanced Planning for Online Accounts and Data
Official Title
Advanced Planning for Online Accounts and Data of Patients With Metastatic Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 17, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
U.S. National Science Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The proposed research consists of engagements with terminal cancer patients and their friends and family as they engage in end-of-life planning.
Detailed Description
Through personal interviews, the Investigator will identify end-of-life needs/wishes. The Investigator will engage in value elicitation activities to identify both what the values are that should inform the work with the participant, as well as the source of values and the agency people have in relationship to the participant. In many cases, participants will have already engaged in versions of these conversations focused on other domains in their life (e.g., finances, funerary wishes, etc.). As such, the interviews will also identify how wishes related to online accounts and data align with wishes from other domains. Based on needs identified during the previous stage, the investigators will support patients and networks in articulating a set of requests and preferences, and work with participants to develop and implement a plan to fulfill these requests. Throughout this stage the investigator's focus is on how participants' high-level wishes can be translated into specific technical practices and features, a challenge identified in prior work. Focusing on this translation will allow the study team to develop post-mortem plans for the participants while also systematically identifying types of breakdowns that can be addressed in future design research. The study team anticipate many requests will require the study team to investigate technical and policy feasibility. For example, a request that next of kin be able to have full access to an account may not be supported by that platform, requiring the study team to consider workarounds and their viability over time. The study team will ideate on a variety of possible solutions, presenting viable options to participants. For each request, the study team will document the details including challenges to fulfilling the request, possible solutions, and the fragility of those solutions should there be changes over time to technology (e.g., passwords being replaced by 2-factor authentication) or social circumstances (e.g., an individual's willingness to perform a specific action). This documentation will both help aid the participant in making choices, while also allowing the study team to holistically identify common shortcomings in technology design related to post-mortem planning. Based on the articulated requests, the study team will develop and present a set of draft plans to the participant and their network and discuss the merits of each and potential trade-offs. The study team will then support the participant and network as a plan is selected, soliciting feedback from the participants about each option. Next, participants and the participants' networks will need to perform some amount of work to make preparations and support the plan (e.g., collecting usernames and passwords, adding instructions to a will, setting up a Legacy Contact on Facebook or a designated contact on google). The study team will support the participant through this process, taking note of tasks that are confusing, technically difficult or impossible, or especially laborious. Engagement during this process will allow participants to make the best possible preparation, while allowing the study team to note problems that should be addressed in our Stage 1 and 2 processes, the specific participant's plan, or with post-mortem technology more broadly. After having completed post-mortem preparations, the study team will continue to support participants with changes the participant may wish to make to the plan as social and technical circumstances evolve. The study team will check in with participants at regular intervals based on their preferences and guidance from their oncologist. Additionally, participants can contact the study team at any time with questions or to request help.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Terminal Cancer, Metastatic Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
This study aims to identify the challenges that online accounts and data present at the end of life. This study will engage life-limited cancer patients through longitudinal qualitative and technology design methods (action research, contextual inquiry, and participatory design) to: empirically identify challenges that death presents for users; and develop and validate strategies for end-of-life planning related to online accounts and data that honor human dignity while addressing the challenges and constraints of technology design. Investigors will engage patients and their family/loved ones in a consulting and supportive role to: identify their needs and challenges, develop and implement an end-of-life plan, and support family/loved ones with the execution of this plan after the patient dies.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Post-Mortem Plan
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Following the death of the terminally ill participant, investigators will work with networks as the wishes of the deceased are executed. Continued engagement at this point will allow us to provide support to the network during a difficult period or time while also identifying shortcomings in our plans and systemic challenges to postmortem planning. Working with those who are grieving is a delicate proposition, but one with which my students and I have extensive experience.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Post-Mortem Plan
Intervention Description
Following the death of the terminally ill participant, investigators will work with networks as the wishes of the deceased are executed. Continued engagement at this point will allow us to provide support to the network during a difficult period or time while also identifying shortcomings in our plans and systemic challenges to postmortem planning. Working with those who are grieving is a delicate proposition, but one with which my students and I have extensive experience.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Determine best practices for supporting participants
Description
The investigator will use interviews to develop a broad understanding of the terminal patient, the network, and the relevant accounts and data. During interviews with the terminally ill participant, the study team will seek to develop an understanding of the participant as a person, the network and its key members, and establish a shared set of expectations. The investigator anticipates members of the patient's social network will be involved during this interview. Through personal interviews, the study team will identify end-of-life needs and wishes. The study team will engage in value elicitation activities to identify both what the values are that should inform the work with the participant, as well as the source of values and the agency people have in relationship to them. In many cases, participants will have already engaged in versions of these conversations focused on other domains in their life (e.g., finances, funerary wishes, etc.).
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Life-limited adults diagnosed with metastatic cancer who have online accounts and data. Adult family/loved ones of the diagnosed adult who are willing to participate in planning activities. Exclusion Criteria: -
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jed Brubaker
Phone
3037355546
Email
jed.brubaker@colorado.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jed Brubaker
Organizational Affiliation
University of Colorado, Boulder
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Colorado Health
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jed Brubaker
Phone
303-735-5546
Email
jed.brubaker@colorado.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stacy Fischer
Phone
3037246353
Email
stacy.fischer@cuanschutz.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD will not be shared, in accordance with IRB and ethics requirements.

Learn more about this trial

Advanced Planning for Online Accounts and Data

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs