search
Back to results

Efficacy of the Combination of Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Acute Non-specific Low Back Pain

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tachifene
Brufen
Sponsored by
Aziende Chimiche Riunite Angelini Francesco S.p.A
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring low back pain, ibuprofen, Paracetamol, Tachifene®

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 64 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients of any ethnic origin between 18 and 64 years of age (limits included).
  • Patients with uncomplicated and localized acute low back pain or acute exacerbation of chronic low back pain (not radiating below the gluteal fold), with moderate/severe pain at baseline. Minimum VAS score ≥ 40 mm at screening visit.
  • Women of childbearing potential and women with no menses for a period < 12 months must have a negative pregnancy test at Visit 0 and have to agree not to start a pregnancy from the signature of the informed consent up to the Final Visit/Visit 2, using an appropriate birth control method such as combined oestrogen-progestin containing hormonal contraceptives (e.g., oral, injectable, transdermal), progestin-only hormonal contraceptives (e.g., oral, injectable, implantable), intrauterine device (IUD) or Intrauterine hormone-releasing System (IUS) in combination with male condom, bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomised partner, sexual abstinence. The following definitions will be considered:

    • Woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP): i.e., fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal, unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy.
    • A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause.
  • Patients legally capable of giving their consent to participate in the study and available to sign and date the written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to the active ingredients and/or to any component of the study medications.
  • Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Lactating and pregnant women.
  • Clinically significant abnormalities on physical examination, vital signs or laboratory tests at Visit 0 which in the opinion of the Investigator could interfere with the study procedures or endpoints evaluation.
  • Suspicious or confirmed COVID-19 infection at time of screening visit.
  • History of cervical, thoracic, or lumbosacral pain for ≥75% of the time in the last year, or of any other Low Back Pain episode in the last 3 months that required pharmacological treatment with an opioid analgesic.
  • Patients with:

    • serious spinal pathology; spinal surgery in the year prior to screening or history of more than one spinal surgery; history of severe lumbar spinal stenosis; ankylosing spondylitis; lumbosciatalgia; herniated disc or radiculopathy; severe arthritis and osteoporosis; muscular diseases, such as myositis, poliomyelitis, muscular dystrophy and myotonia; fibromyalgia; myasthenia grave; fracture or recent history of violent trauma of the back; structural deformity of the back;
    • history of hypersensitivity to aspirin or any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; suspicion of inflammatory, infective or neoplastic cause of pain; non- specific back symptoms related to abdominal, pelvic or thoracic pathology sensory and/or motor deficits in lower extremities;
    • history of gastroduodenal ulcer or bleeding;
    • history of severe cardiac, hepatic or renal insufficiency;
    • current anticoagulant therapy;
    • previous treatment with anticoagulants in the seven days before the screening visit;
    • concomitant use of physical or alternative therapies to treat current episode of pain;
    • local steroid injection for any reasons within previous 30 days;
    • alcohol or drug-addition or abuse;
    • cancer, not in remission or in remission less than 1 year;
    • active influenza or other viral syndrome; immunosuppression; systematically unwell; unexplained significant weight loss;
    • widespread neurological symptoms (including cauda equina syndrome) or any brain disease; ever suffered from any brain damage or have been in a coma; epilepsy or seizure;
    • active or suspected oesophageal, gastric, pyloric channel, or duodenal ulceration, or bleeding in the last 30 days;
    • blood-formation disturbance;
    • renal and/or hepatic failure;
    • acute hepatitis;
    • acetylsalicylic acid-triggered asthma;
    • history of asthma;
    • glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient patients; glutathione deficiency, dehydration, chronic malnutrition; anaemia.

Sites / Locations

  • Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G.Rodolico
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona
  • In-Vivo sp z o. o.
  • Przychodnia "Przy Szapitalu"
  • Zespół Porani Specjalistycznych Reumed Filia nr 1 Wallenroda
  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Poznan
  • Nasz Lekarz Przychodnie Medyczne
  • Centrum Medyczne AstiMed
  • Centrum Medyczne PRATIA
  • Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tachifene

Brufen

Arm Description

paracetamol 500 mg/ibuprofen 150 mg FDC, film-coated tablets. Two tablets 3 times daily for 3 days (i.e., every 8 hours ± 1 hour).

ibuprofen 600 mg, film coated tablets. One tablet 3 times daily for 3 days (i.e., every 8 hours ± 1 hour).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary endpoint will be the area under the pain intensity difference-versus-time curve of Low Back Pain scores up to 3 days of treatment
The pain intensity difference will be considered to be the difference in VAS pain intensity between one time-point and the baseline. The sum of the pain intensity differences (SPID) will be the sum of the average of two consecutive pain intensity differences multiplied by the time-interval between two time points.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Visual Analogue Scale 0-10 cm (100 mm)
Change in Visual Analogue Scale score at baseline (Visit 0) and at the end of study (Visit 2).The Visual Analogue Scale consists of a continuous horizontal line of 10 cm (100 mm) in length, on a piece of paper, with ends labelled as the extremes of pain, from 0 (left side): "no pain", to 10 (right side): "pain as bad as it could be". Patients will be asked to place a line with a pen perpendicular to the VAS line and intersecting the VAS line at the point that represents their current pain intensity.
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in Visual Analogue Scale 0-10 cm (100 mm) score.
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in VAS score, assessed at baseline (Visit 0) and Visit 2, and daily recorded in the patient diary during the whole home-stay period
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the hand-to-floor distance
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the hand-to-floor distance assessed at Visits 0, 1 and 2, measured by a cm graduated bar. The Hand-to-floor-distance, also called fingertip-to-floor test or mobility assessment, is a test to evaluate the mobility of both the whole spine and the pelvis in the overall motion of bending forward. The Investigator will ask the patient to stay erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together. The patient will be asked to bend forward as far as possible and try to touch the floor with his/her fingers, while maintaining the knees, arms, and fingers fully extended. The vertical distance between the tip of the middle finger and the platform will be measured through a simple cm graduated bar (0 value at floor). The vertical distance between the platform and tip of the middle finger is positive when the subject does not reach the platform and negative when he/she can go further.
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the in the degree of improvement in the functional disability
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the in the degree of improvement in the functional disability, assessed at Visits 0, 1 and 2, measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The Oswestry Disability Indexcontains 10 sections: (1) pain intensity, (2) personal care (washing/dressing), (3) lifting, (4) walking, (5) sitting, (6) standing, (7) sleeping, (8) sex life (if applicable), (9) social life, (10) travelling. Each section contains six statements that are scored from 0 (minimum degree of difficulty in that activity) to 5 (maximum degree of difficulty): if the first statement is marked, the section score is=0; if the last statement is marked, it is=5. The total score is the Oswestry Disability Index score and is obtained by summing up the scores of all sections, giving a maximum of 50 points. The final score is expressed as a percentage with the following formula: (total score/ (5 × number of questions answered) × 100%.
Change in the patients' global impression
Change in the patients' global impression at Visits 1 and 2, measured by the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale.The patient will give the evaluation about his/her rating of overall improvement (if any) relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the treatment, according to the PGIC 7-point scale (Hurst and Bolton, 2004): No change (or condition has got worse) Almost the same, hardly any change at all A little better, but no noticeable change Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference Moderately better and a slight but noticeable change Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference
Change in the clinical global impression
Change in the clinical global impression at Visits 1 and 2, measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale provides an overall clinician-determined summary evaluation of the treatment. the results in the appropriate source documents and on eCRF. The Investigator will assign a score based on how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the treatment, according to the following 7-point scale (Guy, 1976): Very much improved since the initiation of treatment Much improved Minimally improved No change from the initiation of treatment Minimally worse Much worse Very much worse since the initiation of treatment
Monitoring the frequency of adverse events
Safety will be assessed by monitoring the frequency of adverse events in each treatment group. AEs will be summarized using the total number of AEs, the total number and percentage of patients who experienced an AE, and the number and percentage of patients who experienced an AE within each System Organ Class (SOC) and by preferred term.

Full Information

First Posted
January 24, 2022
Last Updated
January 30, 2023
Sponsor
Aziende Chimiche Riunite Angelini Francesco S.p.A
Collaborators
TFS Trial Form Support
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05222724
Brief Title
Efficacy of the Combination of Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Acute Non-specific Low Back Pain
Official Title
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Ibuprofen and Paracetamol Versus Ibuprofen in Monotherapy in Acute Low Back Pain (LBP)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 5, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 5, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Aziende Chimiche Riunite Angelini Francesco S.p.A
Collaborators
TFS Trial Form Support

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of paracetamol/ibuprofen Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) compared to ibuprofen in patients with uncomplicated non-specific acute low back pain after a 3-day treatment period.
Detailed Description
This is a Phase IV, multicenter, international, open-label, parallel-group study. The study will be conducted at sites located in Italy, Poland and Hungary. The sites will be outpatient facilities and hospitals. A total of 176 patients are planned to be included in the study This trial will be conducted in accordance with the study protocol, GCPs, Declaration of Helsinki (including up-to-date versions) and applicable regulatory requirements. The present clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of 2 tablets of paracetamol 500 mg/ibuprofen 150 mg administered 3 times daily, in the management of patients with acute non-specific Low Back Pain (LBP) condition.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain
Keywords
low back pain, ibuprofen, Paracetamol, Tachifene®

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
176 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tachifene
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
paracetamol 500 mg/ibuprofen 150 mg FDC, film-coated tablets. Two tablets 3 times daily for 3 days (i.e., every 8 hours ± 1 hour).
Arm Title
Brufen
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ibuprofen 600 mg, film coated tablets. One tablet 3 times daily for 3 days (i.e., every 8 hours ± 1 hour).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tachifene
Other Intervention Name(s)
paracetamol 500 mg/ibuprofen 150 mg
Intervention Description
paracetamol 500 mg/ibuprofen 150 mg FDC, film-coated tablets. Two tablets 3 times daily for 3 days (i.e., every 8 hours ± 1 hour).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Brufen
Other Intervention Name(s)
ibuprofen 600 mg
Intervention Description
ibuprofen 600 mg, film coated tablets. One tablet 3 times daily for 3 days (i.e., every 8 hours ± 1 hour).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary endpoint will be the area under the pain intensity difference-versus-time curve of Low Back Pain scores up to 3 days of treatment
Description
The pain intensity difference will be considered to be the difference in VAS pain intensity between one time-point and the baseline. The sum of the pain intensity differences (SPID) will be the sum of the average of two consecutive pain intensity differences multiplied by the time-interval between two time points.
Time Frame
From Day 1 up to Day 3 (±1)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Visual Analogue Scale 0-10 cm (100 mm)
Description
Change in Visual Analogue Scale score at baseline (Visit 0) and at the end of study (Visit 2).The Visual Analogue Scale consists of a continuous horizontal line of 10 cm (100 mm) in length, on a piece of paper, with ends labelled as the extremes of pain, from 0 (left side): "no pain", to 10 (right side): "pain as bad as it could be". Patients will be asked to place a line with a pen perpendicular to the VAS line and intersecting the VAS line at the point that represents their current pain intensity.
Time Frame
Day 0 and Day 8 (±1)
Title
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in Visual Analogue Scale 0-10 cm (100 mm) score.
Description
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in VAS score, assessed at baseline (Visit 0) and Visit 2, and daily recorded in the patient diary during the whole home-stay period
Time Frame
From Day 0 to Day 8 (±1)
Title
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the hand-to-floor distance
Description
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the hand-to-floor distance assessed at Visits 0, 1 and 2, measured by a cm graduated bar. The Hand-to-floor-distance, also called fingertip-to-floor test or mobility assessment, is a test to evaluate the mobility of both the whole spine and the pelvis in the overall motion of bending forward. The Investigator will ask the patient to stay erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together. The patient will be asked to bend forward as far as possible and try to touch the floor with his/her fingers, while maintaining the knees, arms, and fingers fully extended. The vertical distance between the tip of the middle finger and the platform will be measured through a simple cm graduated bar (0 value at floor). The vertical distance between the platform and tip of the middle finger is positive when the subject does not reach the platform and negative when he/she can go further.
Time Frame
Day 0, Day 4 and Day 8 (±1)
Title
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the in the degree of improvement in the functional disability
Description
Change from baseline up to the end of the study in the in the degree of improvement in the functional disability, assessed at Visits 0, 1 and 2, measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The Oswestry Disability Indexcontains 10 sections: (1) pain intensity, (2) personal care (washing/dressing), (3) lifting, (4) walking, (5) sitting, (6) standing, (7) sleeping, (8) sex life (if applicable), (9) social life, (10) travelling. Each section contains six statements that are scored from 0 (minimum degree of difficulty in that activity) to 5 (maximum degree of difficulty): if the first statement is marked, the section score is=0; if the last statement is marked, it is=5. The total score is the Oswestry Disability Index score and is obtained by summing up the scores of all sections, giving a maximum of 50 points. The final score is expressed as a percentage with the following formula: (total score/ (5 × number of questions answered) × 100%.
Time Frame
Day 0, Day 4 and Day 8 (±1)
Title
Change in the patients' global impression
Description
Change in the patients' global impression at Visits 1 and 2, measured by the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale.The patient will give the evaluation about his/her rating of overall improvement (if any) relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the treatment, according to the PGIC 7-point scale (Hurst and Bolton, 2004): No change (or condition has got worse) Almost the same, hardly any change at all A little better, but no noticeable change Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference Moderately better and a slight but noticeable change Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference
Time Frame
Day 4 and Day 8 (±1)
Title
Change in the clinical global impression
Description
Change in the clinical global impression at Visits 1 and 2, measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale provides an overall clinician-determined summary evaluation of the treatment. the results in the appropriate source documents and on eCRF. The Investigator will assign a score based on how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the treatment, according to the following 7-point scale (Guy, 1976): Very much improved since the initiation of treatment Much improved Minimally improved No change from the initiation of treatment Minimally worse Much worse Very much worse since the initiation of treatment
Time Frame
Day 4 and Day 8 (±1)
Title
Monitoring the frequency of adverse events
Description
Safety will be assessed by monitoring the frequency of adverse events in each treatment group. AEs will be summarized using the total number of AEs, the total number and percentage of patients who experienced an AE, and the number and percentage of patients who experienced an AE within each System Organ Class (SOC) and by preferred term.
Time Frame
8 (±1) days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male and female patients of any ethnic origin between 18 and 64 years of age (limits included). Patients with uncomplicated and localized acute low back pain or acute exacerbation of chronic low back pain (not radiating below the gluteal fold), with moderate/severe pain at baseline. Minimum VAS score ≥ 40 mm at screening visit. Women of childbearing potential and women with no menses for a period < 12 months must have a negative pregnancy test at Visit 0 and have to agree not to start a pregnancy from the signature of the informed consent up to the Final Visit/Visit 2, using an appropriate birth control method such as combined oestrogen-progestin containing hormonal contraceptives (e.g., oral, injectable, transdermal), progestin-only hormonal contraceptives (e.g., oral, injectable, implantable), intrauterine device (IUD) or Intrauterine hormone-releasing System (IUS) in combination with male condom, bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomised partner, sexual abstinence. The following definitions will be considered: Woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP): i.e., fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal, unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. Patients legally capable of giving their consent to participate in the study and available to sign and date the written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Known hypersensitivity or allergy to the active ingredients and/or to any component of the study medications. Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption Lactating and pregnant women. Clinically significant abnormalities on physical examination, vital signs or laboratory tests at Visit 0 which in the opinion of the Investigator could interfere with the study procedures or endpoints evaluation. Suspicious or confirmed COVID-19 infection at time of screening visit. History of cervical, thoracic, or lumbosacral pain for ≥75% of the time in the last year, or of any other Low Back Pain episode in the last 3 months that required pharmacological treatment with an opioid analgesic. Patients with: serious spinal pathology; spinal surgery in the year prior to screening or history of more than one spinal surgery; history of severe lumbar spinal stenosis; ankylosing spondylitis; lumbosciatalgia; herniated disc or radiculopathy; severe arthritis and osteoporosis; muscular diseases, such as myositis, poliomyelitis, muscular dystrophy and myotonia; fibromyalgia; myasthenia grave; fracture or recent history of violent trauma of the back; structural deformity of the back; history of hypersensitivity to aspirin or any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; suspicion of inflammatory, infective or neoplastic cause of pain; non- specific back symptoms related to abdominal, pelvic or thoracic pathology sensory and/or motor deficits in lower extremities; history of gastroduodenal ulcer or bleeding; history of severe cardiac, hepatic or renal insufficiency; current anticoagulant therapy; previous treatment with anticoagulants in the seven days before the screening visit; concomitant use of physical or alternative therapies to treat current episode of pain; local steroid injection for any reasons within previous 30 days; alcohol or drug-addition or abuse; cancer, not in remission or in remission less than 1 year; active influenza or other viral syndrome; immunosuppression; systematically unwell; unexplained significant weight loss; widespread neurological symptoms (including cauda equina syndrome) or any brain disease; ever suffered from any brain damage or have been in a coma; epilepsy or seizure; active or suspected oesophageal, gastric, pyloric channel, or duodenal ulceration, or bleeding in the last 30 days; blood-formation disturbance; renal and/or hepatic failure; acute hepatitis; acetylsalicylic acid-triggered asthma; history of asthma; glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient patients; glutathione deficiency, dehydration, chronic malnutrition; anaemia.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
City
Caserta
State/Province
CE
ZIP/Postal Code
81100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G.Rodolico
City
Catania
ZIP/Postal Code
95123
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
In-Vivo sp z o. o.
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-048
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Przychodnia "Przy Szapitalu"
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-094
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Zespół Porani Specjalistycznych Reumed Filia nr 1 Wallenroda
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-607
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Poznan
City
Skorzewo
ZIP/Postal Code
60-185
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Nasz Lekarz Przychodnie Medyczne
City
Toruń
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne AstiMed
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
01-864
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne PRATIA
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
01-868
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
02-691
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of the Combination of Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Acute Non-specific Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs