search
Back to results

Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Primary Purpose

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Onset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Sponsored by
Indiana University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis focused on measuring lidocaine, buffered, local anesthetic, irreversible pulpitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria - In order to participate, subjects must:

  • Be between the ages of 18 and 80 years old
  • Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation
  • Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II)
  • Not be pregnant
  • Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported)
  • Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours)
  • Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data
  • Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study

Exclusion Criteria - No subjects will have:

  • A negative response to cold in the proposed treatment tooth
  • A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling

Sites / Locations

  • Indiana University School of Dentistry Graduate Endodontics Dept.Recruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Arm Description

Buffered local anesthetic (addition of sodium bicarbonate to make a 10% buffered solution)

Standard local anesthetic

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Profoundness of pulpal anesthesia
Number of Participants who demonstrate profound pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (maximum stimulation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Onset of pulpal anesthesia
Duration of time required to achieve pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (maximum stimulation)

Full Information

First Posted
January 7, 2022
Last Updated
March 28, 2022
Sponsor
Indiana University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05227300
Brief Title
Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Official Title
Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Controlled, Randomized Double-blind Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 14, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 31, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Indiana University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether one type of anesthetic (numbing medicine) will work better at numbing the nerve in a tooth than using a different type of anesthetic. A second purpose is to see if the time needed to numb the nerve in a tooth is different between the two anesthetics.
Detailed Description
40 subjects with a mandibular molar diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be randomly allocated into 2 groups. One group will receive a total of 3 cartridges of a standard, unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine via inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) followed by supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations, while the other will receive the equivalent yet buffered formulation. An electronic pulp tester (EPT) will be used to objectively determine baseline pulpal status of the affected tooth, followed by 2-minute interval testing following the administration of all local anesthesia. The onset of pulpal anesthesia is defined by the first of 2 consecutive EPT=80 readings, and the endodontic treatment may begin. Profound pulpal anesthesia is ultimately determined if the patients report a comfortable pulpotomy as reflected on the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Keywords
lidocaine, buffered, local anesthetic, irreversible pulpitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This study will be a single-center, controlled, randomized, double-blind (provider and subject), 2 treatment, 1 period, parallel study
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Masking Description
A statistician will provide a two-product randomization scheme which will randomize each of the 40 subjects on the order of their entry into the study. The research assistants will be aware of and document this scheme, but the student researcher/PI will not know what type of anesthetic will be administered.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Buffered local anesthetic (addition of sodium bicarbonate to make a 10% buffered solution)
Arm Title
Unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard local anesthetic
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Onset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution
Intervention Description
Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Intervention Description
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Profoundness of pulpal anesthesia
Description
Number of Participants who demonstrate profound pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (maximum stimulation)
Time Frame
Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Onset of pulpal anesthesia
Description
Duration of time required to achieve pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (maximum stimulation)
Time Frame
Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria - In order to participate, subjects must: Be between the ages of 18 and 80 years old Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II) Not be pregnant Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported) Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours) Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study Exclusion Criteria - No subjects will have: A negative response to cold in the proposed treatment tooth A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kenneth Spolnik, DDS
Phone
317-274-7280
Email
kspolnik@iu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Peter Alena, DMD
Phone
317-274-5311
Email
palena@iu.edu
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Indiana University School of Dentistry Graduate Endodontics Dept.
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Spolnik, DDS
Phone
317-274-7280
Email
kspolnik@iu.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17368327
Citation
Rosenberg PA, Amin KG, Zibari Y, Lin LM. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17062748
Citation
Goodis HE, Poon A, Hargreaves KM. Tissue pH and temperature regulate pulpal nociceptors. J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1046-9. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501114.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2827545
Citation
Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25841959
Citation
Schellenberg J, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M. Effect of Buffered 4% Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27507627
Citation
Saatchi M, Farhad AR, Shenasa N, Haghighi SK. Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buccal Infiltration on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23880260
Citation
Fowler S, Reader A. Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):970-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22414822
Citation
Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs